"Only a complete moron like me would post personally identifying information such as my real name, Roberto Ribas, to the point where it caused me problems at my work place.
Fixed your post Professor Ribas."
Here's one of the posts in question.
And I'd never purposely expose someone's personal info, even if I disliked the poster. But since Ribas personally outed himself it's fair game. Add in that not only is his current username an insult, but nearly every post he makes is an insult, he is deserving of the response.
In short, someone who did the most outrageously stupid thing one can do on the Internet, has no business calling others stupid. What Ribas did and continues to do is sort of Internet Darwinism.
What is it with Hillary Clinton? What is it about this brilliant and accomplished woman–described by Barack Obama as possibly “more qualified” to be president than anyone in history–that makes so many people certain she is an incurable liar?
I could be wrong, but I think it's the lying.
Some recent examples... (serious paraphrasing)
"I never sent classified information."
"I only used one device."
"I always supported gay marriage."
It's like her gut reaction to any question is to lie. She'd be much better off if she just stuck to the truth.
I saw an interview of her where the reporter was playing the tape of her (Clinton) saying that she thinks that a marriage is between a man and a woman. Despite the words on the tape, Clinton kept saying she never said that and accused the reporter of twisting her words.
This is beyond lying. And it's stupid! I think she'd be surprised how many people would understand the concept that her opinions on gay marriage evolved over the years and she grew a better understanding of things. It's okay to admit that as a heterosexual, it took some time to understand or appreciate the feelings of homosexuals. Even if you're not trying to be mean or dismissive... Many, if not most, Americans went through a similar evolution of thought. It doesn't make you a bad person. It's makes you real. I think people would have identified with that. But, no. She chose to lie, instead.
Sorry, but having lived through the 1990s, I gave up on the "where there's smoke, there's fire" rule: Sometimes it's just smoke.
She's so far beyond "smoke" it isn't even funny. One, maybe two scandals might be smoke. Her continuous proximity to very serious transgressions is much more than smoke.
Does any of this bother you, at all? I can admit there are things that bother me about Trump. You don't appear to have much objectivity when it comes to evaluating her character. Your best answer is, "but Trump did this" or "you're a paranoid conspiracy theorist." It's okay to support a candidate overall (mostly because we have to work with what we have) but also recognize that there are some serious concerns. I guess I'd respect your answer more if it were more objective.... If you'd quit making excuses or calling everyone paranoid for suggesting that Hillary's continual connection to serious scandals puts her somewhere between having pathologic poor judgment and being downright criminal... and admit that it isn't unreasonable for people to be suspicious...
These aren't small transgressions and they aren't excused by anyone else's behavior. You decide what you're willing to overlook, but don't act like it isn't there because you choose to overlook it.
Obviously, you prefer her brand of "shady" over Trump's. But pretending that she's lily white because charges don't meet the beyond-a-reasonable-doubt standard required in criminal court is absurd. Kind of like OJ. We all know he did it. His acquittal resulting from the reasonable doubt standard changed nothing. As soon as he was faced with the preponderance of evidence standard in civil court, the overall picture looked quite different.
How bad does your life have to be to think that's funny?
Whoa, sister, slow down. Who pissed in YOUR milk?
It's 2016, people post their personal information all over the net and don't give it a second thought. And these who want to post anonymous post anonymous. It's when someone reveals his personal information, boasts about his reaches and smarts and then suddenly his balls starts shrinking and he starts squealing for his name to be removed it becomes funny. Fucking hilarious, actually.
CLINTON CAMPAIGN FREAKING OUT AS DONALD TRUMP LEADS IN THE POLLS
In a recent poll done by OANN/Gravis where they asked 40% Dems, 33% Republicans and 27% Independents who they would vote for, Donald Trump won with flying colors. Keep in mind these poll numbers came out before the DNC email leaks, where they were exposed for collusion with the media, lies and deception. Once new polls come out, there will be an even more drastic difference in people not wanting to vote for Hillary Clinton and i’m sure a lot jumping on to the Trump train.
The truth is that is socially unacceptable to say you are a Trump supporter with fear of losing jobs, friends and family many people say they will vote Democrat. Although, it’s possible that on election day, Trump could end up with upwards of 57% of the popular vote.
Donald Trump is known for saying “I haven’t even started on her yet” and this is very true. Once Donald Trump faces Hillary Clinton in a one on one debate in September.. things will change drastically. Now that the DNC email leak is making the rounds of the main stream circuit, it’s obvious that there will be another major drop in Clinton’s numbers in the polls.
Clinton campaign is most definitely freaking out at this point, in an attempt to overshadow Clinton’s misuse of emails they choose Tim Kaine as VP who is supposedly strong on foreign affairs. Sanders supporters who Hillary needs to win this election are very skeptical of Kaine and his support for NAFTA, Trans-Pacific Partnership and his recent move for regulations on small sized banks.
Maybe we have come full cycle-the repubs foughtand died to free slaves and the dems were the racists before!
The democrats are still the racists, still muddying the waters of every unfortunate incident with insinuations of racism, still stirring up tensions between the races, still organizing matches and protests and riots that promote the idea that races can't get along. They are the architects of the current atmosphere of inter-racial mistrust and hostility. Their media does their bidding by telling minorities they are victims of racism in every aspect, by telling people they are racist for their political views (or if they don't support other political views.).
People are sick of the Demoncrats and their shit.
They are energized and motivated to vote for change. They are angry and scared and ready to elect people who will be for the AMERICAN people and not for foreigners who hate us.
No more dog whistling Demoncrats.
My prediction: If the WaPo, WSJ, or NYT editorial board is ever hacked, and it comes out they are discussing how to spin the news for a policy or candidate, they'll scream "Freedom of the Press Endangered by Horrible Hackers. Russia/China/KKK/ISIS possibly involved"