« First « Previous Comments 3516 - 3555 of 4,026 Next » Last »
Huh? How is this a response to What i said?You’re not doing a good job of unbiased moderation. You should mark his uncivil comment as such, just as you did mineAnd answer the question
They are being restricted from growing Agricultural Hemp and Medicinal Cannabis, and processing it into products that are in high demand in this country. They’re being restricted from consuming Hemp micro greens for nutrition and wellness, and having their assets vandalized and seized, not to mention their community UNDER CONSTANT ATTACK FROM THEIR OWN FEDERAL GOVERNMENT?Why do you feel the need to be disingenuous here, are you ignorant of these realities and facts?
I don't have a dog in the fight @Patrick but @errc is right on these comments if we're going to take the rules as stated. I actually found Strat's post pretty funny on this thread, so I don't personally mind them, but we're on a slippery slop here. Can there be a humor element to it? Probably not. I don't interpret this as Strat "attacking" Dan or Jazz, and I think they would admit that. But when taking the comments at their face value, it could be considered an attack by an outsider that hasn't read this forum. We're fully engulfed in the dark underbelly of moderation. I'm not sure what the other side looks like, but these comments are a perfect example of a gray area.
What are you so afraid of?
Are you drunk already , or just higher than usual? Are you sniffing glue?Obviously I’m being treated unfairly. You marked those posts as uncivil, and Patnet has a long history of allowing racist comments.When Sniper posted “Bye Bye nigger boy!” As Obama left office, the post got more likes than dislikes
Wouldn’t the definition of being treated unfairly, include marking my posts as uncivil and removing them, while allowing others to comment at and around me in an uncivil fashion?
For what reason should nature’s flowers be regulated?Thought you said you were a Libertarian? How can one claim to be a Libertarian while demanding that the State be so intrusive as to regulate which flowers people grow and consume in the privacy of their own homes? Are you drunk already?How do you pay for the enforcement of a regulation on flower consumption and agricultural plant production?
So if that’s your position, how do you intend to fund the enforcement of the regulations on plants and flowers.You have to answer this
All that exists is arbitrary censorship by an omnipotent moderator and a gang of like-minded helper thugs that are more than willing to mark criticism of the moderator and his actions as "uncivil".
Everyone should go back and read iwog's post.
Since when does Patrick.net have any need for being SFW?
If it’s a good question, why not simply answer it?AFAIK, you were the one who decided the need for SFW after Iwog posted granny in her bra.Maybe you should be focusing your energy on working while on company time, rather than attempting to censor opposing points of view
He didn't abuse his moderating ability (sic). He posted a comment in the wrong category, so that he could avoid you as a moderator
No it is not. I admitted that he was trying to circumvent the site's moderation - namely your moderation. In fact, if you go back to the original thread, you will see that I was the first person to call him out on it. I stated that he was not abusing his moderator power, which I think is what you meant when you wrote 'moderation ability'. Now, you are mis-characterizing what I wrote. Do you even see the difference?
I’m of the opinion that it’s unreasonable to ask for the victims of his harassment to participate in a civil forum, so long as he’s subverting your ban.
A better question is how do you not know that Sniper is the user Ironman who was banned by Patrick for constantly attacking posters here?
So you don’t find it offensive when Sniper/Ironman posted “Bye Bye Nigger boy!!!” At The President, because racism doesn’t exist?
Your credibility is deteriorating.Patrick definitely didn’t delete it. Hell, he may have been one of the Likes. Patrick also denies that racism exists lol
Find it yourself. It’s in the Trump inauguration thread
So even though you want a restoration of personal liberties and freedoms, you’re okay with the old Statist method of confiscating large amounts of your income to fund The State Union Members who wage war on the citizenry, over the use of flowers and agricultural crops like Hemp.That seems rather inconsistent with your claims
Patrick definitely didn’t delete it. Hell, he may have been one of the Likes. Patrick also denies that racism exists lol
Huh? Bernie campaigned on limiting government waste.Why would I ever regret voting for Government efficiency? I’m a Real American
Goran_K sayserrc saysHuh? Bernie campaigned on limiting government waste.Why would I ever regret voting for Government efficiency? I’m a Real AmericanSo you eliminate government waste by creating... more government?Huh?
errc saysHuh? Bernie campaigned on limiting government waste.Why would I ever regret voting for Government efficiency? I’m a Real AmericanSo you eliminate government waste by creating... more government?
The government has a LARGE role in the runaway costs in healthcare and university education. Bernie wanted to tackle all that waste
Goran_K sayserrc saysThe government has a LARGE role in the runaway costs in healthcare and university education. Bernie wanted to tackle all that wasteBy creating a larger role for government within those sectors? How would that have reduced government waste?By being honest about it and addressing it head on. Then replacing it with something betterWhy are you going so far off topic in this thread?
errc saysThe government has a LARGE role in the runaway costs in healthcare and university education. Bernie wanted to tackle all that wasteBy creating a larger role for government within those sectors? How would that have reduced government waste?
Strategist saysBernie is an idiot. According to him, if everyone makes Zero, you are better off because you are equal.Is it ok to call this for what it is -- a LIE?
Bernie is an idiot. According to him, if everyone makes Zero, you are better off because you are equal.
The daily posters both L/R are so focused on who next they can attack the tree is invisible. To bad you all don't take a month off and then come back with new perspective and perhaps new ppl to attack. This site is conditioned as is and there is no fix..... This is as good as it gets boys and girls....
The normal way of having a discussion is that the person that makes a claim has to back it up. It is not my job to prove that Bernie dd not make that statement. It is the job of Stragist to provide a solid reference to Bernie making such a statement.
Whoa Goran will have to ban you for doing that he said it’s bigly against the rules
Goran_K lol.... Patrick wants Volume you may not care about it however the conditioning I mention will make sure "you" get your wish low volume. Patnet had its day and now just critical mass keyboard verbal war mongers and he can continue down this dead end road as long as he wishes and the only change that will take place is more people not giving 2cents to be a part of this endless mess....
Thought you said dragging comments from uncivil jail and reposting them to threads was against your rules?
Yea except you’re lying I didn’t take a post from uncivil jail and repost it to the mains. You were calling me a liar and asked for the proof!We’re you just baiting me to break your rules?Why do you feel the need to keep being so dishonest?
Again with the lying.Patrick never censored the post where Sniper/Ironman called Obama a nigger. All of his posts were scrubbed wheN Patrick banned him for trolling his site with personal attacks 24/7.This is provable. Simply ask @Patrick to confirm that he removed the post in question for being uncivil, and I’ll retract the accusations that you are lying.Simple enough
And by the way, your statement about wanting to "generate debate" is diametrically opposed to what you said in MY thread, where you stated that
If you’re open to the possibility that you are wrong, why did you default by calling me a liar? I’m confident you won’t find an honest person to agree with you that you can both act that way and except nor request, civility.If you want civility, you’re going to have to lead by example
I disagree. It sure as heck is not just volume. Pointing out the shortcomings and self-contradictions of an omnipotent moderator is QUALITY, and to borrow a phrase, quality of the BELTFED variety. Nothing is more important than taking the moderators to task when they do wrong, as you have (IMO) done. Moderation by an omnipotent moderator has been an unmitigated disaster. That is my opinion.
But the fact remains that omnipotent moderation and mob-based prosecution must be stopped.