bob2356's comments

« First    « Previous    Comments 11059 - 11098 of 11,098    Last »

  bob2356   ignore (3)   2018 Oct 15, 12:43am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag        

TwoScoopsOfSpaceForce says

I see this a little differently, @Patrick.. Our CIA loved working with Islamist Radicals, has done so many times; Brennan is knee deep in that shit. A liberalizing Saudi Arabia is actually not good in their minds, and one that is working with Trump is definitely bad in their eyes.

So now it's a deep state false flag operation by the CIA to shut down liberalization in KSA? How did they manage to run the operation inside the KSA embassy? Oh wait, he actually came out with his elbow crooked and the cia set up mirrors so that the cameras didn't record him leaving. Then the CIA grabbed him. Of course, it's all so Damn these guys are good. Must be the same crew that took down the twin towers and faked the moon landings. .
  bob2356   ignore (3)   2018 Oct 15, 1:15am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Patrick says

Yes, the Koch brothers agree with the liberal "open border" policy to make poor American citizens even poorer by driving down their wages. So that does put the Koch brothers on the liberal side of this issue.

What liberal open border policy is that? You seem confused by the difference between wanting to have people coming here vs wanting to treat them humanly once they are here. Want to show where "liberals" are advocating open borders? I'll be waiting, and waiting, and waiting.

“That’s a Koch brothers proposal, right-wing people in this country would love … an open-border policy. Bring in all kinds of people, work for $2 or $3 an hour, that would be great for them. I don’t believe in that. I think we have to raise wages in this country.” Bernie Sanders when asked about open borders.
  bob2356   ignore (3)   2018 Oct 15, 1:22am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

TwoScoopsOfSpaceForce says
Here's another program:

All that's missing from your endless rant is what percentage of immigrants are eligible. Want to get into that? I didn't think so.

So trump has had almost 2 years to eliminate these benefits. Not to mention go after employers to eliminate jobs for illegals. What happened? NADA, nothing, zippo. Trump must be an open border fanatic also.or he would have done something. Actions count.

I say lets stop chain immigration. Start by booting out Melana Trumps parents to show trump is serous about the issue. What's good for the goose is good for the gander.
  bob2356   ignore (3)   2018 Oct 15, 1:21pm   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag        

curious2 says
Deficits are the one thing both major parties appear to agree on. Two Presidents in a row, of ostensibly opposite parties, have each doubled the national debt. We have seen every possible combination of government (Republican Congress and White House, Democratic Congress and White House, and divisions), and the result is always more deficits.

There is just a teeny tiny little bit of difference between doubling the debt with tax cuts and war spending vs inheriting the second largest economic disaster in the history of the country.
  bob2356   ignore (3)   2018 Oct 18, 5:26am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Pretty funny he boffed someone he calls "horseface".
  bob2356   ignore (3)   2018 Oct 18, 5:46am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

TwoScoopsOfSpaceForce says

1. This kind of shit has been going on forever in the House of Saud, it's just the first time the US Establishment is reporting it, with belated, coincidental timing.

Really? Want to post all the times saudi's killed someone in their embassy in another country? Oh wait. allegedly killed. Actually he was abducted by aliens using special alien cloaking devices to take him out without cameras recording it. ROFLOL.

TwoScoopsOfSpaceForce says
2c. And Alaweed bin Talal

You never said how many community organizers Talal sent to harvard law for islamic studies other than obama.. ROFLOLx2

TwoScoopsOfSpaceForce says

If you shot John Pilger or Ken Livingstone or Michael Moore, you're not killing a Journalist, you're killing a Shill

You forgot Hannity, Beck, and O'Reilly. on your shill list. RFLOLx3

Pretty impressive that Trump sent the sec of state to KSA to help them get their stories straight or at least come up with a story that the Trump could claim was plausible to try to preserve the fiction of the new and improved KSA. The entire world will be laughing their asses off of course, but at least it will be a cover story. .
  bob2356   ignore (3)   2018 Oct 18, 5:47am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

WookieMan says

Lol, just thought of this. I'm going to create a religion where it's required for only attractive women to give me a blowjob upon meeting me.

Trump beat you to it.
  bob2356   ignore (3)   2018 Oct 18, 5:57am   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

WookieMan says

Before it comes up and you guys wake up, I know you can search past comments and posts even if a user changes their name. I get that. There are users that have started an entirely different account though.

The hand full of true trolls will find ways to keep posting nonsense garbage no matter what is done. You can spot them in about 2 sentences. so what is the difference?
  bob2356   ignore (3)   2018 Oct 18, 6:43am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Patrick says
Supreme Court Takes Case That Could End Internet Censorship

Very very unlikely the Roberts court is gong to issue a broad ruling . Have you ever listened to Roberts speak on his philosophy as chief justice? CSPAN has some of his forums in venues like law schools. He is very committed to narrow rulings and court consensus. Check some of them out some time. I recently listened to him speak at U Minn law school.

In the 1 in a million chance they do issue a broad ruling it will not be expanding the first amendment to force private social media companies to essentially adhere to a non existent fairness doctrine. The case already has 2 districts (6th and Columbia) that have ruled in favor the supreme court's existing state actors test. while the 2nd has ruled to ignore existing law and precedent. Nader completely fucked up the first amendment with his VA pharmacy ruling by a very liberal and activist supreme court. Which bit nader and the court activists in the ass for the next 30 years finally leading to citizens united. Be careful what you wish for you may get it.

But Roberts court is conservative, strict constitutionalist, and pro business. The supreme court has to take the case because there is a conflicting ruling between districts, but I think they will simply affirm the 6th and Columbia rulings leaving the 2nd overruled.

Of course I thought Kelso was a slam dunk protection for private property case. So you never know what any supreme court will do.
  bob2356   ignore (3)   2018 Oct 18, 6:47am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

marcus says
the kind the future Donald Trumps will want.

Tenpoundbass says
Trump is irrelevant now. Who we elect next to preserve his sensible cour

Can you guys at least once and a while try to get into a conversation more substantial than NAA NAA trump NAA NAA trump. You know the acting like an adult thing.

Never mind, forget I had such stupid idea. What was I thinking?
  bob2356   ignore (3)   2018 Oct 18, 3:15pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

marcus says

Fuck you bob. Just becasue you can't relate to my fear of a future fascist America, that's no reason to be even more of a prick than usual.

I guess you don't read my posts. I'm anti trump and have been posting about the coming fascist america since patnet started and far before that. I personally have gotten multiple citizenship's and establishing a life overseas because of my concern of coming fascist america going back to the start of the selling out of the republican party by rove and gingrich. I think that level of concern goes far beyond relating wouldn't you say?

That doesn't mean the only thing I can post is trump sucks nyaa nyaa. on every thread. I somehow missed your substantive discussion of Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. Halleck, before the supreme court. .
  bob2356   ignore (3)   2018 Oct 18, 3:16pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Goran_K says
That’s different from the leftist democrats?

Partisanship can be ugly but let’s not pretend it’s only one side who engages in it. I remember Obama’s “Republicans sit in the back of the bus” comments.

Are you saying marcus is a rightist trump supporter some how? I called out both sides, when will you start doing that?
  bob2356   ignore (3)   2018 Oct 18, 3:32pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

socal2 says
bob2356 says
Really? Want to post all the times saudi's killed someone in their embassy in another country?

How about the 3,000 they killed in downtown New York Bob? Besides, I'd argue the Saudis killed this guy more carefully than Putin spreading radioactive poison all over Europe or even the US droning suspects from 20,000 feet.

You've been rightfully critical about the Saudi Wahabbi Islamist for years on this site. Why are you bent that Saudi Arabia took out a Wahabbi?

Where am I bent the saudi's took at a wahabbi? I'm bent the saudi apologists starting with two scoops up to and including trump are still trying to sell the new improved KSA bullshit when they just proved they are worse than ever. I don't think any country ever had the balls to brazenly kill someone inside one of their embassies before.

I notice the kinder gentler KSA hasn't stopped funding radical imans or madras schools (aka terrorist recruitment and training centers) all around the world. All the radical islamic terrorist attacks around the world lead right back to the KSA. So hey, let's goad our way into war with Iran because they are bad people. WTF?
  bob2356   ignore (3)   2018 Oct 18, 3:39pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

TwoScoopsOfSpaceForce says

Saudi Arabia never assassinated anybody until now? ROTFL

Like who did they assassinate in their embassy over seas? Names are lacking. You don't think the first time any country has done something so bold and stupid is news worthy?

TwoScoopsOfSpaceForce says
bob2356 says
You never said how many community organizers Talal sent to harvard law for islamic studies other than obama.. ROFLOLx2


Like who? The names are lacking. You seem to be having trouble with this.
  bob2356   ignore (3)   2018 Oct 18, 3:47pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

WookieMan says
. But if you're petty enough to create a whole new account or even change your name, doesn't that signal some insecurity? Do people change their legal name when they get called out at work? Get their ass kicked? Lose an argument?

They would if it was as easy as it is to do here. There are many petty insecure people in the world. Why does it surprise you to find some on patnet?
  bob2356   ignore (3)   2018 Oct 19, 4:30am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (2)   quote   flag        

TwoScoopsOfSpaceForce says
I'm thinking what you said about when Islam begins to grow.

ROFLOL. The whole 1.3% muslim population in Ireland is going to institute sharia law?
  bob2356   ignore (3)   2018 Oct 19, 4:45am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (2)   quote   flag        

Blue says
If we shutdown immigration today, even at current 4 mil population (I just got it from Wikipedia) in 55 yr at 5% conservative growth, they can get to double digit.
100*(4*1.05**55)/(330*1.01**55) = 10.26%.

That assumes no group but musliims will have a positive birth the next 55 years. I find that to be pretty improbable. Where is the research on this amazing phenomena? Other than it's true because I believe it should be true.

If we don't shut down immigration muslims will lose ground. Only 6% of immigrants historically came from the middle east or north africa and trump shut most of them down. Close to 40% come from latin america and another 40% are asian. OMG all the mexican and chinese muslims pouring into the country. The horror, the horror.

  bob2356   ignore (3)   2018 Oct 19, 5:22am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

curious2 says
. Looking at history, the Vikings traveled the world and prospered mightily with Odin and Thor. Even

The Vikings prospered with revolutionary advances ships, tactics, espionage, and weapons. Especially the virtually unbreakable Ulfberht swords which used advanced metallurgy not discovered again for 800 more years. Most of the great dominant conquering societies did so by new advances warfare in some way from Alexander the great perfecting Phillips phalanx to mongols horse skills to the blitzkrieg. Either the people being attacked develop effective counter measures or the strong leader dies and no one can carry on or the conquest wealth corrupts the conquerors then the dominance disappears and the conquering society falls. . Religion rarely influences the fall. GIbbon's babbling excepted Christianity had very little to do with the fall of rome.
  bob2356   ignore (3)   2018 Oct 19, 5:50am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

doik says
The only difference is that religion, race, gender, and sexual orientation are protected classes because of the historic oppression of these classes whereas political orientation is not currently a protected class. Personally, I think political orientation needs to be a protected class given how divisive it has become.

Are you saying that social media is somehow forbidden to refuse offensive content involving religion, race, gender, and sexual orientation? When did that happen? Want to get into the details of how that works? Who is protecting them and how?

mell says
remove all discrimination laws. We'd be better off. Just protect free speech.

What discrimination laws do you think are forcing facebook to drop infowars?

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech. That is the only constitutional protection of free speech that exists. It says nothing about corporations.

There have been 240 years (with the exception of a couple very brief periods of liberal courts) starting with Dartmouth College v. Woodward of supreme court rulings expanding the rights of corporations. What exactly do you think will inspire one of the most conservative strict constitutionalist courts in history to force an entirely new set of requirements on corporations granting new and unprecedented free speech rights that have never existed before that are not mentioned in the constitution?

There is a great book out there called we the corporations detailing the history of the supreme court and corporations. Well worth a read if you actually want to know the history and facts.
  bob2356   ignore (3)   2018 Oct 19, 5:53am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

marcus says

Again. Fuck you bob.

Thank you. I really have appreciated your insightful thoughtful input into Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. Halleck, going before the supreme court.
  bob2356   ignore (3)   2018 Oct 19, 6:01am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Tenpoundbass says

Pelosi ran out of town on a Pole. By Cubans that hate Commie Bastards as much as I do.

Amazing all the outrage here about some one being chased out of a restaurant for their political views. There were something like 10 threads of endless total outrage about cruz being chased out. Only one tthread about the same thing happening to pelosi and it says good that it happened.

Why are the far right wingers such fucking hypocrites. Is it lsome kind of requirement to get your super secret far right wingnut decoder ring?

Disclaimer, I despise pelosi and cruz.
  bob2356   ignore (3)   2018 Oct 19, 6:15am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

TwoScoopsOfSpaceForce says

Before I answer, can you explain why Iran was rewarded for executing gays and protesters with the Iran Deal?

Because you and tatupu seem to not want to explain this.

Why we need to have MbS - the only Saudi Ruler who has actually passed concrete liberal reforms - removed over a potential assassination, but we need to keep the Iran Deal with the Murderous Mullahs who imprison, torture, and execute countless people every year?

ROFLOL. Now that's really funny shit. Rewarded for killing gays and protesters? Like decapitation and subsequent public crucifixion of Ahmed bin ‘Adhaib bin ‘Askar al-Shamlani al-‘Anzi, for homosexuality? Oh shit that was in Riyadh, never mind. What a fucking joke. KSA gets rewarded every day by the USofA for executing gays and protesters using your "logic" .

I still waiting for the list of names. But I'm sure you will get it to me before the sun goes supernova. Maybe.
  bob2356   ignore (3)   2018 Oct 19, 6:24am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

socal2 says
‘We Misled You’: How the Saudis Are Coming Clean on Funding Terrorism"

I missed the part of the article that says what KSA DID about their sponsorship of terrorism around the world. Both officially as a government and private money. It's noticeably absent. So the saudi's now openly admit to fostering terrorism against the US and the rest of the west for decades. Nice. With friends like these who needs enemies? But hey they are now the new kindlier gentler KSA. They feel bad about it and some day they will consider doing something about it. Maybe.
  bob2356   ignore (3)   2018 Oct 19, 2:08pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

TwoScoopsOfSpaceForce says
When I get an answer, I'll provide links to scholar funding provided by bin Talal. They're sitting in my Bookmarks.

Sure right, I'm sure someone somewhere actually believes that. Would that be Including the receipts from where he paid for Obama's tuition for islamic studies at Harvard law? Too goddam funny.

I didn't get a list of all the saudi executions in their embassies prior to this one either. The ones the press ignored because those executions in their embassies wouldn't derail saudi liberalization. ROFLOL. You really can't make this shit up.
  bob2356   ignore (3)   2018 Oct 19, 2:14pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

TwoScoopsOfSpaceForce says
bob2356 says
ROFLOL. The whole 1.3% muslim population in Ireland is going to institute sharia law?

Ah, that's really stretching a point to dismiss it.

Stretching a point? You mean like this

TwoScoopsOfSpaceForce says
Shar'ia in Ireland
  bob2356   ignore (3)   2018 Oct 19, 2:38pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Strategist says
Think about it. If Muslims have the highest birth rates, and all other religions face declining birth rates, it's just a matter of time before Muslims are the only group with a positive birth rate. It's not just probable, but very likely.

If? Probable? Likely?

Blue says

Not true, you missed that I did add one percent rate to the rest, currently its less than 1.7 though as per us censers and falling.

Nothing like well researched and documented information. What exactly is the muslim birth rate in the US? How about compared to other groups? The other groups that you generously took 40% off of their birth rates. Don't let facts screw you up but birth rates of all groups including muslims drops through the floor when they move from a poor country to a first world country.

Even majority muslim countries have falling birth rates. The fertility rate across all 49 Muslim-majority countries fell from 4.3 children per woman in 1990-95 to about 2.9 in 2010-15. This was still higher than the global fertility rate in 2015, but it’s a strikingly fast drop given the fact that it took some Western European countries nearly a century to transition from six children per woman to three.

But hey it's true because I believe it should be true is still the gold standard of proof on patnet.
  bob2356   ignore (3)   2018 Oct 19, 2:52pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Quigley says

So... it seems like the government pulled a fast one with social security savings.

No, a whole bunch of people didn't bother to hold their political leaders accountable. The information has been out there all along.
  bob2356   ignore (3)   2018 Oct 19, 3:02pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

TwoScoopsOfSpaceForce says
Multiple people in the thread had to repeat that fact, then he complained that the numbers disproving his conception of reality were being posted by multiple users.

TwoScoopsOfSpaceForce says

Hey Bob, did you read the instructions?

Did you figure out the numbers for the non presidential races yet? But hey, multiple people posted the same numbers totally irrelevant to the point. I guess they are still working on figuring out 2018 isn't a presidential election year.
  bob2356   ignore (3)   2018 Oct 19, 3:20pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

dr6B says
bob2356 says
The question still stands. Are the people who spent the last 50 years building the current libertarian republican party dominance going to let D's control the house without spending very dime they can throw at the races?

First, most R's (with exception of Paul who was redistricted out by his colleagues) are not libertarian. Second, I do not believe that "big money" cares which party is in power, so they will support "useful idiots" from either party.

Most R's have made a deal with the devil and if they don't dance to the libertarian tune they will see their funding disappear and face a strong heavily funded primary challenge from some one who will. Big money? Who's big money? Big money on both sides very much cares which party is in power. Only big money on the R side has a long term coordinated plan they have been executing for 40 years.

So the question still stands, after reaching pretty much the pinnacle of their long term goals are the big boys on the right going to roll over and let the D's take back the house? Hint, the koch bro's libertarian network is planning to spend 60% more on republican congressional races in 2018 than 2016 at 400 million. Which is 150 million more than the RNC can come up with. I would say that is a pretty impressive concentration of money and power in one single group that all R politicians have to respect.
  bob2356   ignore (3)   2018 Oct 19, 3:22pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch says
Actually, it would not be surprising if one of MSBs buddies held out the phone for Trump to run over his speakerphone for Ivanka and the kids to listen to the libby hack being sawed to death.

When are the turks going to post on youtube?
  bob2356   ignore (3)   2018 Oct 21, 5:53am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Goran_K says

Guantanamo Bay and water boarding experts disagree.

People who have actually served and have been there and done that like our sec of defense disagree with you and people who are 5 time draft dodgers. What in your long and distinguished military experience leads you to believe torture works? Especially since the wmd intelligence that convinced congress authorize war in Iraq was false information by Ibn al-Shaykh al-Libi provided under torture. That worked out well.
  bob2356   ignore (3)   2018 Oct 21, 5:59am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

tatupu70 says

None of those things show he supported terrorism.

It's true because I say it's true. That's the way it works.

Hey two scooops. Still working on the list of people saiddi's killed in their embassies and taleil sent to harvard law for islmic studies. ROFLOL. Your arguments have long since become a joke. MBS stepped on his dick big time and showed the whole world who he really was doing it. Give it up.
  bob2356   ignore (3)   2018 Oct 21, 6:24am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

clambo says

Saudi Arabia is no threat in any way to the USA;

9/11 would seem to disagree with you. The threat is there every single day of the next one. I haven't heard of the new kinder gentler KSA taking any steps (as in actually doing anything not talking about doing something. Form a committee is the oldest do nothing dodge in history) to rein in support of terrorism around the world coming from KSA. The new kinder gentler KSA is actively funding and using Al-Qaida in Yemen as we speak. Which makes the US and Al-Qaida very ironic and unwilling allies in Yemen. I wonder what projects this branch of Al-Qaida will be working on after the Yemen war?

clambo says
Mexico on the other hand is.

Are the mexicans planning to take back texas? I'm pretty sure they don't want it back if it includes ted cruz.
  bob2356   ignore (3)   2018 Oct 21, 6:32am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

TwoScoopsOfSpaceForce says
Awww, poor 3H Club.

(Houthi, Hamas, and Hezbollah are all Iranian backed terrorist groups).

Terrorist group. Any militia that doesn't do what the US wants done.

Freedom fighters. Any militia that does do what the US wants done.

See how simple it is.
  bob2356   ignore (3)   2018 Oct 21, 6:33am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Strategist says
When I'm with a woman, I tell her what I want to do with her body, and do it. I always get thanked spanked.

You made a typo. I fixed if for you.
  bob2356   ignore (3)   2018 Oct 21, 6:38am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

curious2 says

Your link says, "The study confirms the perception that Muslim women have more children than non-Muslims in Western Europe, but shows that the gap is not as large as many believe." The study compares populations within the Netherlands.

The article talks about a number of countries and factors. Read the words instead of looking at the pictures.
  bob2356   ignore (3)   2018 Oct 21, 7:57am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

curious2 says

In the UK:

How do you always manage to find such nonsense. If, possibly, could, assumes, might, suggests, estimated, concluded, likely, according to, etc. etc. Hint, when you see something the contains those words in every paragraph it's either a bunch of meaningless speculation, sell newspapers sensationalism, or ideological nonsense.

The paper suggests that if migration continues at the same rate but refugee movement stops, the UK will have the highest overall population of Muslims in the EU, at 13m, making up 16.7 per cent of the population.

The report "supposes" migrants from the middle east will continue at a record influx of asylum seekers fleeing conflicts in Syria and other predominantly Muslim countries levels for the next 32 years? . Totally contradictory but interesting.thought. I can see why you like it since you frequently argue contradictory positions. On the same subject. "Overall, an estimated 43 per cent of all migrants to the UK between mid-2010 and mid-2016 were Muslims,". . Pretty odd how they picked those dates. Just happened to be the peak of the syrian war crises. What a totally unexpected coincidence. Sort of like the sun rising in the east.
Top ten countries of origin by country of birth and nationality, UK 2017
1 Poland 922,000 9.8
2 India 829,000 8.8
3 Pakistan 522,000 5.6
4 Ireland 390,000 4.1
5 Romania 390,000 4.1
6 Germany 318,000 3.4
7 Bangladesh 263,000 2.8
8 Italy 232,000 2.5
9 South Africa 228,000 2.4
10 China 216,000 2.3

Very strange how mulsim countries are only 7% of immigrants while 43% of the immigration. Do you suppose researchers at oxford doesn't know how to do math?

The whole thing is just silly. nonsense of patching unrelated bits and cherry picked facts together but it sells newspapers.
  bob2356   ignore (3)   2018 Oct 21, 2:28pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Strategist says

No country is a serious threat to us. Islam is a very serious threat to us, and a very serious threat to the rest of the world. Islam must and will be brought to it's knees.

Still waiting to hear your plan to bring 25% of the world to it's knees.
  bob2356   ignore (3)   2018 Oct 21, 2:32pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Goran_K says
Democrat Senator Sherrod Brown facing allegations of sexual assault in the 1980s

What fucking pussies these democrats are. A real republican man would molest young boys.
  bob2356   ignore (3)   2018 Oct 21, 5:35pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Strategist says
The plan is simple:
Install USA friendly dictators and Kings in power.
Give them arms to go after Islamic countries not friendly to us.
Install friendly dictators in weakened Islamic countries.
Execute radicals, control their education, clamp down on sharia laws.
Fully expose the Muslim world to democracy and western values.
Eliminate madrassas completely.
Islam will be brought to its knees.

How's it working out so far for you so far? Got a list of all those US friendly dictators and kings for us? Maybe you can add it to two scoops lists.

The Housing Trap
You're being set up to spend your life paying off a debt you don't need to take on, for a house that costs far more than it should. The conspirators are all around you, smiling to lure you in, carefully choosing their words and watching your reactions as they push your buttons, anxiously waiting for the moment when you sign the papers that will trap you and guarantee their payoff. Don't be just another victim of the housing market. Use this book to defend your freedom and defeat their schemes. You can win the game, but first you have to learn how to play it.
115 pages, $12.50

Kindle version available

about   best comments   contact   one year ago   suggestions