« First « Previous Comments 2540 - 2579 of 2,641 Next » Last »
Anyway, my principle is that nonviolent ideas do not deserve censorship.
What do you mean? Trump has not tried to censor anything.
Second, who is this guy? "Nick Hanauer is a Seattle-based entrepreneur."
Enough with this bs comparison. You can't go work for Monsanto and run a blog against Round-Up
Do you really think people have total "free speech" when on the company timeclock. Can you go around at work spewing any type of political or personal beliefs, even if they go against the company wishes, and not get some sort of backlash?
Only a leftist could describe a tax CUT as a financial giveaway.Def of Cut - reduce the amount or quantity of.
ESPN: "Requiring players to stand is like slavery".
Wow. That was almost beautiful. I can see you and Iwog have a very deep relationship.
Where? All I'm saying that apparently the reduction of corporate tax and number of brackets has some value to other than "trumpkins and eeeevil republicans" and not as useless and meaningless like that "multizillionaire guy" seems to suggest.
What you do on your own time should not be used against you at work. But when you are at work, you should just work like you are being paid to.But none of that has anything to do with the censorship of minority views which corporations are imposing lately.
Pssst.... Free Speech means you can mock other's opinions/speech, yes? Where did I mention ESPN ought to be gagged by law?It's just a failing network that continues to fail.
Who are you talking to?The entire NFL situation is silly. Associating playing football w patriotism is a marketing tactic. Its silly. This marketing tactic is at odds w the social justice marketing tactic.The NFL is a cold, corporate beast that is blatantly virtue signalling to make money. It'd be refreshing to separate a game from any of that nonsense.Unfortunately they've painted themselves into a corner. This is gonna get interesting
Right. But for some reason it's just rejected outright. I wonder what that reason is...
But yeah, I'm a brain damaged liar who denies the reality that Democrats don't want to ban guns.
What exactly is a "assault rifle"? Can you explain what it is for me?
I know. All I'm saying that when your side rejects some tax moves absolutely w/o condition it makes you look not serious.
Because the difference is that Google employee was discussing with other employees company policies internally. While NFL ball chasing idiots were getting involved into national politics outside their organization.
His second tweet in a day on the subject; Doubling Down. Messaging Control Attempt confirmed.
He was writing about his own working conditions, not some irrelevant agenda from outside. Nor was he showing any disrespect to the country or abusing his employer's resources
A democrat strategy that never worked. Borrow, and give it away to the able bodied welfare queens.
NFL = National Felons League
No Joey, if that was the case we would not have deficits when democrat Presidents are in power.By the way, are you OK with our money being given away to able bodied bums who refuse to work?
joeyjojojunior saysI love the way people on here must twist and squirm to try to pretend to be consistent.Not everyone here gets paid to troll like you do.
I love the way people on here must twist and squirm to try to pretend to be consistent.
but you're ignoring the fact that his memo was about his own working conditions, not an attempt to abuse his position to publicly promote a certain unrelated agenda.
Is Kaepernick forced to sit in the back of the bus?
At work, yes, unless he has some compliant about his job.
Although those two situations are quite different as explained by Patrick I would be ok with it if the protection would apply to both. It would be huge if we would have a law to protect against political correctness and SJWs at the workplace (or ideally no HR/discrimination laws in the first place).
Someone needs to try and educate you, but it's really a lost cause.
Whatever credit he gets for a budget surplus, is erased and puts him deep in the negative for signing and championing Gramm–Leach–Bliley. He basically setup the country for 2008.
I'm glad you've finally admitted why you TROLL all the time.
Didn't it ever occur to you that maybe we need to have a fascist dictatorship until Trump solves all of our problems, and only after that can we go back to being a republic.
Economy, inflation, interest rates, unemployment, etc
The coverage of Trump was unbelievably negative, even more negative than Obama's first 60 days was one big Media panegyric.