http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2012/01/17/MNU91MP58K.DTL
End California Redevelopment Agencies == End Corporate welfare for developers
By justme Follow Tue, 17 Jan 2012, 3:32pm 564 views 2 comments
Watch (1) Share
Quote
Permalink Like Dislike Viewing Comments 1-2 of 2 Last » See most liked comments
|
justme is moderator of this thread. |
Follow
Befriend (2)
33 threads
3,456 comments
The redevelopment racket that has been going on across the country since the 1970s has finally run into some real resistance.
What is redevelopment? I quote from Wikipedia:
"The fundamental tools of a redevelopment agency include the authority to acquire real property, the power of eminent domain, to develop and sell property without bidding and the authority and obligation to relocate persons who have interests in the property acquired by the agency. The financing of such operations might come from borrowing from federal or state governments and selling bonds and from Tax Increment Financing."
As one can see from the description, redevelopment permits an agency to take (read: steal) property from private owners, use taxpayer funds to bankroll the speculation, and then give it away to developers for cheap in no-bid sweetheart deals.
Good riddance to redevelopment, if you ask me.
Follow
Befriend (14)
742 threads
2,563 comments
63 male
Las Vegas, NV
bgamall4's website
Premium
Without redevelopment, San Francisco would be a blighted city. And BTW, eminent domain is not stealing. It is law.
The only thing I wish they would do would give an additional payment beyond market value if the new property prospers.