"It appears the recent declines in housing wealth may be reducing consumer spending between $200 billion and $375 billion per year," he said. "That reduction corresponds to lower living standards for many Americans."
http://money.cnn.com/2012/02/10/news/economy/bernanke_housing/index.htm?iid=HP_River
Watch
Follow
Befriend
2 threads
43 comments
Berkeley, CA
2005 called , it wants it's economic policy back .
Follow
Befriend (5)
10 threads
2,329 comments
What he failed to explain is,why the out of whack situation from 2002-2007 was necessary? huh?
Follow
Befriend (54)
5,239 threads
6,173 comments
46 male
Menlo Park, CA
Premium
The situation in 2002-2007 was necessary to mask the vast transfer of income upward from the middle class to the 1%.
The middle class didn't care so much about that transfer as long as it could borrow to maintain its standard of living.
Follow
Befriend (5)
10 threads
2,329 comments
Patrick says
Oh, I see. Once the banks and some wall street firms started failing burden goes on taxpayers - top 1% escaped. :)
Follow
Befriend (1)
22 threads
478 comments
San Jose, CA
1% sucked money from middle class to the max through extended hours of labor, outsourcings, debts and bail-outs. Now they don’t have to care what will happen here anymore, because they have enough money to invest in other developing countries and suck them too. Yet, pay only 15% tax here.
Follow
Befriend (5)
10 threads
2,329 comments
Classic American success story. LOL.
Follow
Befriend
10 threads
419 comments
He estimates the decline in home prices has resulted in more than $7 trillion in lost household wealth.
It is a wealth was NOT there to start with.
It is just like the 1.5+ trillion dollars he printed last year.
Now he is printing and giving to Europe.
This is sick.