White murder of blacks vs vice versa


By Patrick   Follow   Fri, 30 Mar 2012, 2:43am PDT   56,103 views   273 comments   Watch (3)   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (5)   Dislike (2)  

It is very politically incorrect but nonethess a fact that white people are much more likely to be murdered by black people in the US than vice versa.

Most murders are within the same race, but even then blacks have a much higher rate of murdering each other than whites do.

From http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2010/crime-in-the-u.s.-2010/tables/10shrtbl06.xls we see that in 2010, 447 whites were murdered by blacks, while 218 blacks were mudered by whites, for a total of 665 inter-racial murders.

Given that blacks are 12.6% of US population, and whites are 72.4% of US population, the population ratio is .174 to 1 black to white.

If the interracial murder rates were the same for both, we would expect 115 out of the 665 murders to be murders of whites by blacks. But the number was 447, which is 388% of the expected rate by populations.

OTOH, the total number was only 447 murders of whites by blacks, which is a small number relative to the total population of the US. There were over 40,000 deaths because of car accidents in the same year.

So a rational white person should be about 100 times more afraid of being killed by a car than being killed by a black person.

#crime

« First     « Previous     Comments 234-273 of 273     Last »

Moderate Infidel   befriend (0)   ignore (1)   Wed, 17 Jul 2013, 1:43pm PDT   Share   Quote   Like (1)   Dislike     Comment 234

Everyone profiles, just like everyone is racist to some degree.

thomaswong.1986   befriend (0)   ignore (5)   Wed, 17 Jul 2013, 5:48pm PDT   Share   Quote   Like   Dislike     Comment 235

Straw Man says

Are you saying that inner city thugs who commit the lion share of killing in Chicago profile each other racially?

This is true with Latino vs Afro-American gangs.. yes.. its true!

throw in lots of name calling and racism.. turf fight !

out comes the guns ... and you get a brutal shot out..

out

Moderate Infidel   befriend (0)   ignore (1)   Wed, 17 Jul 2013, 6:04pm PDT   Share   Quote   Like (1)   Dislike     Comment 236

I learnt about the blacks by watching The Wire.

Vicente   befriend (7)   ignore (0)   Thu, 18 Jul 2013, 4:21am PDT   Share   Quote   Like (1)   Dislike (3)     Comment 237

Patrick says

So a rational white person should be about 100 times more afraid of being killed by a car than being killed by a black person.

Most crimes are intraracial.

foxmannumber1   befriend (0)   ignore (3)   Thu, 18 Jul 2013, 4:36am PDT   Share   Quote   Like (2)   Dislike     Comment 238

The graphic is intentionally misleading. It leaves out Hispanic/latino/mestizo americans, the 2nd most criminal race in the USA behind blacks.

As an example, Take a look at all the "white" males on the texas 10 most wanted fugitives list.

http://www.txdps.state.tx.us/Texas10MostWanted/fugitives.aspx

All except 1 are listed as white males when in reality they are Hispanic.

The FBI does the same biased reporting.

http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2011/crime-in-the-u.s.-2011/tables/table-43

No category for Hispanics/latinos/mestizos. They are lumped in with the whites.

They do this intentionally because if the majority population of the USA, non Hispanic whites, were to realize how much of the crime in his country is committed by blacks and Hispanics something would have to be done about it. The powers that be don't want anything to be done to stop minority crime.

Upon visiting colorlines.com, they have a whole section on articles about Paula Dean calling a black thief who put a loaded gun to her head a 'nigger' 25 years ago. I would not except an honest discussion of race from them.

foxmannumber1   befriend (0)   ignore (3)   Thu, 18 Jul 2013, 4:40am PDT   Share   Quote   Like (2)   Dislike     Comment 239

Each year, in the National Crime Victimization Survey(NCVS), the Bureau of Justice Statistics asks as many as 134,000 Americans what crimes they were victims of, and who the perpetrator was.

In 2008, for single-offender crimes, compared to whites, blacks were much more likely to commit every violent crime: 2.1 times as likely to commit simple assault, 3.1 times as likely to commit aggravated assault, 4.0 times as likely to commit rape/sexual assault, and 7.6 times as likely to commit robbery (mugging).

For multiple-offender (gang) crimes, blacks were even more dangerous compared to whites: 2.9 times as likely to commit simple assault (in a gang), 6.4 times as likely to commit aggravated assault, 7.3 times as likely to commit rape/sexual assault, and 36 times as likely to commit robbery.

These multiples are actually too low because the NCVS counts most Hispanics as white, which increases the "white" crime rate.

"But black crime is caused by poverty"

Actually, race differences in crime rates persist after controlling for socioeconomic status(Lauritsen & Sampson, "Minorities, Crime, and Criminal Justice," 2000). That's why the single best indicator of violent crime levels in an area is the percentage of the population that is black and Hispanic, with a startling 81% correlation (The Color of Crime, 2005). The next best indicators are lack of education (with only a 37% correlation), poverty (with a 36% correlation), and unemployment (with a 35% correlation).

Control for all three, and the race-crime correlation only drops to 78%! In the simplest terms: if blacks had the same jobs, incomes, and educations as whites, they would commit violent crime at almost exactly the same rate they do now. It's easy to blame society for black crime, but it doesn't fit the facts.

Think about it: how can poverty cause rape?

What about unemployment causing arson?

And why concoct implausible excuses for violent criminals, anyway? Who are we protecting?

foxmannumber1   befriend (0)   ignore (3)   Thu, 18 Jul 2013, 4:46am PDT   Share   Quote   Like (2)   Dislike     Comment 240

foxmannumber1   befriend (0)   ignore (3)   Thu, 18 Jul 2013, 5:14am PDT   Share   Quote   Like (6)   Dislike     Comment 241

To address these myths:

1. 14% of whites aren't killed by whites. 6% of blacks aren't killed by blacks. Why are blacks killing whites at over twice the rate?

2. I think violent crime stats are down because we have a lot of blacks in jail already.
I also think that crimes are being wrongly classified or not reported in official numbers at all to make the crime stats appear better.
If someone of rank does not play ball with this policy, they are simply replaced by someone who will.
It's no different than the Atlanta public school cheating scandal.

3. Blacks are more flagrant in their drug use. Whites keep it private.
Blacks are also more likely to be dealers, who also have a host of other charges against them during a drug bust. Guns/theft/assault/parole/etc.
They plead guilty on the drugs and the other charges simply go away, leaving only a drug crime on record. This helps the stats as presented in myth #2.

4. Public schools are run by liberals who bend over backwards not to report blacks for behavioral issues.
Only the worst offending blacks are sent for discipline after numerous violations.
Even with the liberals and other blacks running the show, blacks are still expelled/suspended more frequently simply because they commit more violations.
Blacks commit a disproportionate amount of crime. It starts in their early years and continues on to their adult life.

5. Black neighborhoods are far more crime ridden than any other place in the USA.
Crime is an inverse of general IQ test results.
Blacks have the lowest IQ of any major race in the USA. Blacks commit the most crime of any major race in the USA.

Goran_K   befriend (4)   ignore (2)   Thu, 18 Jul 2013, 10:07am PDT   Share   Quote   Like (2)   Dislike (1)     Comment 242

Good post. To address #4, Trayvon's theft of thousands of dollars of jewelry was ignored by the schools officer. They reported it as "found property", found in his bag with a burglary tool.

indigenous   befriend (0)   ignore (9)   Thu, 18 Jul 2013, 10:33am PDT   Share   Quote   Like (2)   Dislike     Comment 243

Moderate Infidel   befriend (0)   ignore (1)   Thu, 18 Jul 2013, 12:08pm PDT   Share   Quote   Like   Dislike     Comment 244

indigenous says

Typical Jew!

mell   befriend (8)   ignore (4)   Thu, 18 Jul 2013, 12:12pm PDT   Share   Quote   Like (1)   Dislike (1)     Comment 245

Great idea, let's just not use colors anymore to describe anything color ;)

Moderate Infidel   befriend (0)   ignore (1)   Thu, 18 Jul 2013, 12:14pm PDT   Share   Quote   Like   Dislike (2)     Comment 246

Sorry Morgan, but they were actually calling you something else.

Reality   befriend (0)   ignore (7)   Fri, 19 Jul 2013, 5:45am PDT   Share   Quote   Like (1)   Dislike     Comment 247

foxmannumber1 says

Neanderthal DNA is found in every sub species of human except sub Saharan Africans.

http://news.discovery.com/human/genetics-neanderthal-110718.htm

This is pretty convincing evidence that I believe proves the racial egalitarians wrong. We are all *not* the same if everyone but one race has DNA from mating with another species.

Neanderthals were not another species, but a subspecies of homo sapien, just like us modern humans. Neanderthal DNA only constitute a tiny percentage of overall human DNA, obviously result of interbreeding. The absence of Neanderthal DNA in sub-sahara african population is fairly strong proof that modern human (home sapien sapien) came out of sub-Sahara Africa, some of them interbred with Neanderthals after moving out of Africa.

dublin hillz   befriend (0)   ignore (0)   Fri, 19 Jul 2013, 5:47am PDT   Share   Quote   Like   Dislike     Comment 248

Moderate Infidel says

indigenous says




Typical Jew!

Please elaborate....

Moderate Infidel   befriend (0)   ignore (1)   Fri, 19 Jul 2013, 6:37am PDT   Share   Quote   Like   Dislike     Comment 249

dublin hillz says

Please elaborate....

It's a clever joke.

FortWayne   befriend (12)   ignore (7)   Fri, 19 Jul 2013, 7:04am PDT   Share   Quote   Like (1)   Dislike     Comment 250

indigenous says

Tell that to the Treyvon supporters who are out protesting...

foxmannumber1   befriend (0)   ignore (3)   Fri, 19 Jul 2013, 8:09am PDT   Share   Quote   Like (1)   Dislike (1)     Comment 251

Reality says

Neanderthals were not another species, but a subspecies of homo sapien

This is false. For many years it was undisputed that Neanderthals were a different species closely related to modern humans.

Since the realization that everyone but sub Saharan Africans have Neanderthal DNA some liberal quasi scientists with a social agenda try to say that they were no different from modern humans and in the same species and the differences are worthless, which is obviously false.

Subspecies is another word for 'breed' or 'race'.

Reality   befriend (0)   ignore (7)   Fri, 19 Jul 2013, 12:30pm PDT   Share   Quote   Like (1)   Dislike (1)     Comment 252

foxmannumber1 says

Reality says

Neanderthals were not another species, but a subspecies of homo sapien

This is false. For many years it was undisputed that Neanderthals were a different species closely related to modern humans.

Since the realization that everyone but sub Saharan Africans have Neanderthal DNA some liberal quasi scientists with a social agenda try to say that they were no different from modern humans and in the same species and the differences are worthless, which is obviously false.

Subspecies is another word for 'breed' or 'race'.

Neanderthal DNA account for 1-4% of the genome among Europeans and Asians. That is comparable to the rate of redheads! Obviously, if two members from two groups can interbreed, they are of the same species. Hence Neanderthals and Homo Sapien Sapien are of the same species as indicated by DNA evidence.

This view is hardly "liberal." In fact, it contradicts the "100% recent African Origin" theory that is popular among "liberals."

foxmannumber1   befriend (0)   ignore (3)   Fri, 19 Jul 2013, 12:37pm PDT   Share   Quote   Like   Dislike (1)     Comment 253

Reality says

Obviously, if two members from two groups can interbreed, they are of the same species.

This is not true. 2 different closely related species can breed and produce viable offspring. There is nothing preventing humans or their ancestors from doing it as well.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hybrid_%28biology%29

Our fossil record is woefully incomplete to come to real conclusions about where humans, or many current animals, truly came from.

The fact that one group of humans do not contain any DNA from an extinct species while everyone else does makes it a fact that humans are not genetically equal.

Reality   befriend (0)   ignore (7)   Fri, 19 Jul 2013, 12:46pm PDT   Share   Quote   Like (1)   Dislike (1)     Comment 254

foxmannumber1 says

Obviously, if two members from two groups can interbreed, they are of the same species.

This is not true. 2 different closely related species can breed and produce viable offspring. There is nothing preventing humans or their ancestors from doing it as well.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hybrid_%28biology%29

Producing viable off-springs for thousands of generations makes the inter-breeding between Neanderthal and homo sapien sapien not hybrid at all, but the same species.

Our fossil record is woefully incomplete to come to real conclusions about where humans, or many current animals, truly came from.

Ware not talking about fossile records here, but DNA samples.

The fact that one group of humans do not contain any DNA from an extinct species while everyone else does makes it a fact that humans are not genetically equal.

What the heck does "genetically equal" mean anyway?
The partial neanderthal ancestry (1-4%, just like red heads ratio. Incidentally Neanderthals were probably red heads with fair skin, with brain capacity larger than modern human, contrary to the early assumption about them being brutes) disproves the "100% recent African origin" theory about human ancestry.

DukeLaw   befriend (0)   ignore (0)   Fri, 19 Jul 2013, 2:06pm PDT   Share   Quote   Like   Dislike     Comment 255

Wow, "genetically equal"?? Based on that terminology, I'm guessing you didn't get your fair share.

Mark D   befriend (0)   ignore (1)   Fri, 19 Jul 2013, 2:09pm PDT   Share   Quote   Like   Dislike     Comment 256

Reality says

Neanderthal DNA

they say Neanderthal has been extinct? that is such BS. i see these people at the bus stops every morning.

if Neanderthal DNA is found in human then by definition they are of the same species.

we shouldn't be looking at races as a cause for crimes. check out Russia.

CMY   befriend (0)   ignore (0)   Fri, 19 Jul 2013, 6:44pm PDT   Share   Quote   Like (5)   Dislike (1)     Comment 257

As a white dude who grew up around every conceivable race I'm just REALLY tired of being the bad guy. My culture just doesn't encourage being a victim.

Bap33   befriend (3)   ignore (6)   Sat, 20 Jul 2013, 1:16am PDT   Share   Quote   Like (4)   Dislike (2)     Comment 258

how in the freak can the liberal lefties be serious?? Lord Barry suggests he has a connection to TM based on one, maybe two things ... skin color and sex. The freaking very judgment he makes is based on the exact things the GZ used to make his connections. TM looked like Lord Barry as a kid ... and TM looked like the asshole punks that do the crime in GZ neighborhood .... when Lord Barry the Arab does it, for no other reason than to draw attention away from the real troubles of the day, it's all good. When GZ, or any other non-victim, does it in order to survive, the racebaitor left crys foul. Liberalism is a mental disorder. Freaks.

P N Dr Lo R   befriend (0)   ignore (3)   Sat, 20 Jul 2013, 4:52am PDT   Share   Quote   Like (2)   Dislike     Comment 259

In 1960, out-of-wedlock births to black mothers was low double digit, slightly higher than that of whites, and had been stable since 1900, the most racist era outside of the 19th century. After 53 years of civil rights agitation and legislation, it's 70%, with blacks killing other blacks in Chicago with a fury never seen before, probably since the Watts riots of 1965 that coincided with the introduction of the Great Society. The social engineering schemes of the Great Society probably did more to destroy the black family than all the racism of the 19th and 20th centuries combined. No telling how many black children never made their 20th birthdays because they were raised as feral hyenas because they didn't have a strong male presence in the home.

I wonder how often this scene from Jim Crow 1956 is repeated today in the black community (or in the white community for that matter):

http://www.shorpy.com/node/13115?size=_original#caption

I'll bet that's a father (there's that terrible patriarchal term that so many feminists hate) showing those young men in the background the proper way to present themselves. I doubt they showed their underwear in public at school, either:

http://www.shorpy.com/node/13072?size=_original#caption

StillLooking   befriend (0)   ignore (0)   Sat, 20 Jul 2013, 6:00am PDT   Share   Quote   Like   Dislike     Comment 260

Your data shows that whites are really into murdering women.

Bap33   befriend (3)   ignore (6)   Sun, 21 Jul 2013, 12:15pm PDT   Share   Quote   Like (2)   Dislike (1)     Comment 261

Michael Madison ---- game, set, match. Liberalism is a mental disorder, and the Madison case only exists due to liberal politics.

Bap33   befriend (3)   ignore (6)   Sun, 21 Jul 2013, 12:49pm PDT   Share   Quote   Like (1)   Dislike     Comment 262

personal attack chose above reasoning ... how odd, since those on the left view themselves as the mental giants.

CMY   befriend (0)   ignore (0)   Sun, 21 Jul 2013, 3:03pm PDT   Share   Quote   Like (1)   Dislike     Comment 263