WatchThis might have been posted before but what the heck. Its worth revisiting. How many of you think the bubble will return? Of those of you out there looking- and not just those looking in the fortress areas- what are you seeing? Much of the same or have things changed?
Secondly, if another bubble rears its ugly head, what would you do?
A: panic and buy a house ( or get priced out foreva'!)
B: Say: "Screw it, I'm moving
C: Stay and continue to rent
D: ( for those that already own) brag about how much your house is worth.
E: None of the above.
Follow
Befriend (4)
52 threads
4,416 comments
Corning, NY
Premium
I will:
F: start shorting the banks that hold the mortgages
Follow
Befriend (4)
25 threads
1,520 comments
Laguna Beach, CA
Premium
I will do what wthrfrk80 is doing. Fundamentals will assure that another "bubble" can only be temporary.
Follow
Befriend (8)
1 threads
792 comments
Danville, CA
Premium
A lot of people will simply move.
Follow
Befriend (13)
102 threads
3,764 comments
wthrfrk80 says
Same here, of course I don't live in the BA. But the way this state is ran I wouldn't be surprised if many will want to abandon it simply.
Follow
Befriend (8)
1 threads
792 comments
Danville, CA
Premium
IBM has job openings in San Jose and San Francisco on a regular basis that can't be filled. Most of their people can't afford to live in the area.
Things aren't gonna change. There's no reason. The trust fund babies are still here. The wealthy Baby Boomers are still here. The Berkeley profs who live in Orinda and Lafayette are still here.
If anything, the property situation and income disparity are likely to get worse.
There's too much money here...but that's how it is. Been that way for years.
Follow
Befriend (2)
14 threads
648 comments
wouldn't do anything different.
1. keep renting
2. keep investing the extra money i save by renting, in stocks and bonds
i make good money. rent is cheap. no reason to change my strategy.
Follow
Befriend (1)
11 threads
224 comments
San Francisco, CA
I think this is just a spring bump up that will not last. Yahoo laying off thousands of workers will balance out the facebook IPO.
We are looking, but will keep renting til we find exactly what we want. We are looking in the 400-600K range in the city and I have been following very closely.
There is a shadow inventory out there and banks are sitting on vacant homes, even in desirable places within San Francisco.
Everyone who bought between 2004 and 2008 is underwater, to the tune of 100K or more.
The only reason we are seeing bidding wars is because realtors are listing places for under what they know they will go for. There are plenty of places that are sitting fort 30, 60, 90+ days.
Follow
Befriend
34 threads
2,109 comments
1sfrenter says
Well the thing is that even though the realtor was trying to insinuate that things were heating up, there are a lot of houses that have been sitting, sometimes for a marked period of time. Now- granted most have now sold and some seemingly more recently. But some had been sitting for 6-9 months.
At least in the area we live in it seems that there are homes that will sell, but only at a certain price. Anything that's north of 500k seems to sit. Anything over 600k sits for quite a long time. Perhaps I find this a bit comforting. My wife and I make a dual 6 figure income and there's no way I would touch anything over 500k. Otherwise our mortgage- even with a big down payment- would be a lot more than we're paying in rent. Perhaps others are feeling the same and thus the reason why only houses that aren't crazy expensive are selling.
Follow
Befriend
28 threads
351 comments
Hysteresis says
Rent is FAR from cheap... Last I checked rents were at a historic all-time high and increasing.
Follow
Befriend
34 threads
2,109 comments
Rent isn't cheap as it was. Our situation is unique in that we've lived in the same house 9 years with no rent increases. But even if we rented now it wouldn't take much of a house in the BA to suddenly pay a lot more than renting the same house, and that's also after adding in a down payment.
Follow
Befriend (2)
14 threads
648 comments
BoomAndBustCycle says
i wasn't speaking for you. i was speaking for me.
rent -for me- is cheap.
rent is cheap relative to my income, and relative to the cost of housing in my neighborhood (median around $800k).
i suspect, although i haven't looked too deeply, my rent is cheap relative to a lot of the rent prices in the bay area even though i'm in a nice neighborhood. i've had one rent increase in the 6 or 7 years i've been living here.
Follow
Befriend
660 comments
Mountain View, CA
Anyone got an opinion on Mountain View?
Follow
Befriend (1)
12 threads
51 comments
La Mesa, CA
Personally, I think this generation is a little tired of housing as a bubble so I expect the next bubble to be elsewhere. BUT if I did suspect a bubble situation then:
A.5 Buy a house on cheap & easy credit, flip it, make 25%. Rinse and Repeat.
Duh. Absolutely nothing but fantastic things have happened to the people who did this last time EVEN if they acted a fool at the end.
Follow
Befriend (8)
38 threads
2,007 comments
Pleasanton, CA
Premium
Goran_K says
I'll not only short, I'll do shorting on margin. Bring it on!
Follow
Befriend (8)
38 threads
2,007 comments
Pleasanton, CA
Premium
BoomAndBustCycle says
In the BA rents are way under the ownership costs. By a lot! That makes them cheap when comparing against the alternative of buying.
Follow
Befriend (8)
38 threads
2,007 comments
Pleasanton, CA
Premium
Hysteresis says
Ditto. I'd probably pick up a few home depot shares cause if people are going to start living in the empty foreclosures they will need to fix them up first. ;)
Follow
Befriend
28 threads
351 comments
Hysteresis says
Your situation is the exception to the rule. You must have a very generous landlord.
Follow
Befriend
34 threads
2,109 comments
jessica says
Yes, I too think this generation is tired of housing as a bubble. That said, there are a lot in my generation who graduated college when the dot-com busted and thus we missed that one and then by the time we got decent jobs the housing boom had priced us out. So people like me got double-screwed by bubbles.
Secondly, what I and others have seen and knew is that bubbles inflate and pop. But these cycles take time and don't necessarily result in the desired outcome. I remember all of us bubble watchers assumed the pop would happen- which it did. But what we didn't expect was that prices wouldn't fall to levels that were even close to being that great. The aftermath 6 years into the bust cycle is that places like the BA are still damned-expensive and due to investors buying up all the cheaper stuff it meant the lower priced houses were off-limits and the remnants are basically just so-so houses that are still in the half-million dollar range.
I was in my early 20's when the housing bubble hit. I'm now in my mid-30's. Its taken half a generation for a full cycle of boom and bust to occur. While I am wary of bubbles I can also say that I'm not going to get screwed again and come another bubble, I'll either leave this area or I'll buy something because booms and busts take years and I'm not necessarily willing to wait it out another 10+ years again.
I suppose the good thing about the boom was that it forced us to rent and save for 10 years. We now have a lot of cash and savings. We could very easily go out and buy something now. Had there not been a bubble I might have blown a lot of cash on a house instead.
Follow
Befriend (5)
10 threads
2,329 comments
BoomAndBustCycle says
1 more. My rent has not increased in 4 years - not the only exception.
Follow
Befriend
6 threads
130 comments
BoomAndBustCycle says
I don't think it's all that uncommon for landlords to hold the rents steady for good, long term tenants. I have several paid for single family rental homes in coastal CA and I haven't raised the rents on long term tenants in four years and have no inclination to do it in the near future even though they are rented for under fair market. My lowest priced rental is $2100 a month and the others are are several hundred a month more. The one that rents for $2100 and another one has long term tenants. For whatever reason (renters become buyers in some cases, job changes, etc.) the other homes seem to turn over every few years. I have several friends that are landlords as well and they also have long term tenants that they don't raise the rates every year even though they could.
My properties are paid for and I don't need to squeeze every dollar out of them because I have been very fortunate to have done well over the years. I would rather keep the rent steady for several years for a good, long term tenant that pays on time and doesn't cause me or the management companies any trouble. It cost money to turn over rental homes; advertising, management fees for new tenant, etc.
Follow
Befriend
110 comments
bubblesitter says
Another. My rent was $1395/month in 1997 and is $1495/month now (month to month, midsize apt. complex in MtV). Spiked up about 15% higher during the .com bubble but came back down afterwards when I complained and has been at this level since 2006.
The downside is that I'd really like to live somewhere with a more intelligent and responsive manager, and less noisy neighbors, but moving to even the same class of apt. around here would cost quite a bit more at this point :-( On the bright side I have her boss' email and can go through him instead for most things.
Follow
Befriend (8)
38 threads
2,007 comments
Pleasanton, CA
Premium
bubblesitter says
and another. I've had one rent increase in 14 years and when that one happened I just moved. The place sat idle for about 4 months after I moved. That'll teach em.
Follow
Befriend
28 threads
351 comments
oddhack says
And you say homeowners are immobile... All the "exceptions" here appear to be less mobile than they appear, if moving ultimately means a significant rent hike.
RentingForHalfTheCost, if you had bought 14 years ago.. there is no way you'd be underwater.. You'd be halfway done paying off your mortgage.. or 1 year from paying off your mortgage with a 15 year loan.
So RentingForHalfTheCost appears to be bragging that he's paying a "low rent" when if he'd bought 14 years ago with 15 year fixed mortgage.. he'd be a year away from only paying property taxes and maintenance.
Follow
Befriend
110 comments
BoomAndBustCycle says
Shrug. I don't know what the "rule" is and neither do you, but I expect in general good tenants who've been there for a while will do better rentwise than the Google employee who just has to live 5 minutes from work.
I don't know about his situation, but if I'd bought 15 years ago when I moved out here... I wouldn't have bought, because I was flat broke having just left grad school. If I bought a few years later when I had enough cash for the then-standard hefty downpayment... prices had already escalated beyond a sane level in MtV at that time. And that was *before* the real lender shenanigans began.
Follow
Befriend (2)
14 threads
648 comments
BoomAndBustCycle says
i'm hardly immobile.
it just means i'd be paying a higher rent than i do now (which i could afford). i just checked craigslist and apartments in my city are $500 to $900 more than my current rent. i guess i'm getting a good deal.
funny, at the time i signed a lease they were having problems finding tenants and giving a month free. i guess now there's a strong demand.
Follow
Befriend
28 threads
1,489 comments
San Jose, CA
Premium
edvard2 says
What do you mean "returns"? It never left.
Follow
Befriend (3)
9 threads
704 comments
Los Angeles, CA
you guys are funny - one day its the apocalypse, next day its the bubble may return....
those that can afford to buy - buy. Those that can't - don't. It's been that way forever.
Someone once told me - the trick with real estate is...you never sell. If you time it right, Iwog style, then by the time you retire you have a bunch of places that you are renting out which is your retirement. Papervalue of the house is not that important. Rent value = important.
At this point there are killer deals out there, I wish I had more money because I see the 1% buying everything up. I think instead of y'all's fantasy of prices going down to 1975 in a few years, its gonna be the 1% owning most of it and renting to you at horrendous prices. A 30 year fixed mortgage as laughable as it may seem to you now, is going to be as cheap as it gets.
:)
Follow
Befriend (8)
1 threads
792 comments
Danville, CA
Premium
BoomAndBustCycle says
NOTHING here is cheap...food, rent, or anything else. Flight instruction is needlessly expensive. Renting the aircraft itself is ridiculous. Getting a car worked on is higher than it should be.
There's too much money here!
Follow
Befriend (1)
11 threads
224 comments
San Francisco, CA
Hysteresis says
Try renting once you have kids and a couple of pets. There's immobility for you.
Follow
Befriend (8)
38 threads
2,007 comments
Pleasanton, CA
Premium
BoomAndBustCycle says
Not true at all. My life would be different for sure. However, I would have not been able to live in Switzerland, U.K. , Canada, spent 2 months in Brasil, 1 month in Hawaii, and take almost 2 years off from work to do all the above. A house would have kept me from traveling, and from doing what I love. I would have been indebted to the 30 year note.
Now, 14 years later, I am not behind. Back 14 years ago I would have just barely had the 3.5% down for a BA home. Now, I really don't need a note to get a home. 14 years of savings and investment without the debt of a note has given me that privilege. Obviously, we are all different, but betting on the appreciation of a pile of lumber and nails is not my idea of investing. Did the BA do well in appreciating the wood and nails assets. Sure, but I did better in my investing and these last few years I just lapped every home owner on the track. :)
Follow
Befriend (8)
38 threads
2,007 comments
Pleasanton, CA
Premium
SubOink says
Fear fear fear. How do you know that the 30 year note couldn't drop another 50% in rate? You don't. Today's 4% could turn into 2% before this free money train turns around. Then home prices could go up for a change. ;)
Follow
Befriend (8)
38 threads
2,007 comments
Pleasanton, CA
Premium
BoomAndBustCycle says
Just for the record, I did buy a house in that 14 year period, just not in the BA. In central valley and for a weekend home. I sold in 2009 and glad I did, cause I can buy it back now for about 25% less than I sold. I paid about what I thought was a reasonable value considering the rent and housing construction costs at the time, and I sold as soon as someone was willing to pay me an unreasonable amount for it. Pretty simple formula.
Follow
Befriend
7 threads
677 comments
SubOink says
Ha! (HA!!!) The choice whether to buy anything today has more to do with available credit than it does with individual solvency.
Follow
Befriend (31)
34 threads
2,545 comments
San Jose, CA
Premium
RentingForHalfTheCost says
This says it all for me. Anyone with a double digit IQ would know what happened to you. Now I know what kind of financial shape you're in, and why you despite high home prices in the Bay Area. ;)
Follow
Befriend (8)
38 threads
2,007 comments
Pleasanton, CA
Premium
E-man says
We all should despise high home prices that are only justified by funny named loans like Jumbo, non conventional, arm, FHA ( f&*ing half assed), etc. Remove this bull and then we might just have a reasonable market where wealth is not about how much debt you can step into during your life. :)
Follow
Befriend (3)
9 threads
704 comments
Los Angeles, CA
RentingForHalfTheCost says
So what. Then you re-fi at 2% and it gets even cheaper.
Austinhousingbubble says
And in order to get credit you have to qualify. Some do, some don't.
Follow
Befriend (3)
9 threads
704 comments
Los Angeles, CA
it's happening...
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/investors-looking-buy-homes-thousands-134405371.html
Follow
Befriend
34 threads
2,109 comments
SubOink says
Nothing is new. That's been happening for years. All its done is that it has kept the overall median prices low.
But moving on, I think one of the reasons I still have a problem with the math in buying- at least for us- is that as of now our part of the rent is around $1,300 for a large 2 story 4 bedroom house we share with one other person. It has a large back yard and a 2 car garage as well. We've lived there for nine years.
As mentioned, we have saved up a lot of cash. We earn an income that probably puts us within the upper percentile of the area median income. We are frugal as you could probably get. We have nearly perfect credit and would thus qualify for the lowest interest rate. Thus logically you'd think we were perfect for buying a house.
But when I do the math its still almost nonsense. If we say- bought a $500k house and put down $100,000 with an interest rate of around 4.00-4.50%, the payments would still be over $2,000 a month. That's just for the mortgage and nothing else. On top of that, the 500k home in question would likely be a lot smaller than what we rent, probably need at least a few major repairs or need a total overhaul of the interior, and so on. So for almost double the cost we would basically be downgrading to a smaller home that would probably not be as nice . That makes zero sense to me.
Then again I suppose if we were paying current market rate rent, which for our house is around $2,500, then I suppose it would make more sense. The comparisons would be about the same if not slightly less to rent, but not dramatically less.
Follow
Befriend
2 threads
47 comments
Fremont, CA
Rule of bubbles:
1. Bubbles can't be reflated.
2. You don't see another bubble in same asset class during the same generation.
Follow
Befriend
2 threads
47 comments
Fremont, CA
SubOink says
Investors buy properties to resell at a profit or rent it out. That means these properties are likely to come back to market. Imagine if market does not improve and investors start dumping these houses!