CBS Money Watch Features FREE LEADS and MARKETING TOOLS FOR REAL ESTATE AGENTS (Advertisement)

If the bubble returns to the BA, what will you do?


By edvard2   Follow   Mon, 2 Apr 2012, 8:35am   20,604 views   263 comments
Watch (1)   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

This might have been posted before but what the heck. Its worth revisiting. How many of you think the bubble will return? Of those of you out there looking- and not just those looking in the fortress areas- what are you seeing? Much of the same or have things changed?

Secondly, if another bubble rears its ugly head, what would you do?

A: panic and buy a house ( or get priced out foreva'!)
B: Say: "Screw it, I'm moving
C: Stay and continue to rent
D: ( for those that already own) brag about how much your house is worth.
E: None of the above.

« First     « Previous     Viewing Comments 184-223 of 263     Next »     Last »     See most liked comments

  1. freak80


    Follow
    Befriend (4)
    52 threads
    4,416 comments
    Corning, NY
    Premium

    184   3:45pm Thu 5 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   Protected  

    SubOink says

    Makes no sense. Why would showing off "the worst investment possible" be even considered showing off then?

    Because they don't think of it an an investment. They think of it as a luxury good. Like a Ferrari. Or a yacht. Or a glass of fine wine. Or a jet. They don't expect a return on those purchases. They buy them because they're nice to have and they can afford it. They're investments are in stocks and bonds. And maybe real estate if they're collecting rents.

  2. edvard2


    Follow
    Befriend
    34 threads
    2,109 comments

    185   3:57pm Thu 5 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike  

    wthrfrk80 says

    Because they don't think of it an an investment. They think of it as a luxury good. Like a Ferrari. Or a yacht. Or a glass of fine wine. Or a jet.

    I'll use myself as a real-life example to further this notion. In my "other life" prior to getting my current career going I worked at retail stores making $8-$10 an hour. I did this from the time I was around 16, all the way through college, and the first 2-3 years after graduating college. I can recall taking out a loan for a computer. It took me over 2 years to pay it off. It cost $1,500 which at the time to me with my financial situation was a HUGE amount of money. In fact, most anything like a TV, CDs, cell phones, and a nice dinner all seemed impossibly expensive. I was just barely scraping by.

    Fast-forward to now after 10+ years in my career and I make a lot more. I'm not rich, but I can go out and buy a computer, a flatscreen TV, or even a econo-car no problem. Not to say I do this all that often as I'm a cheap-ass who still drives the car I had in high school. But when I go out to a nice dinner I no longer worry about how much it is or what it'll do to my monthly expenditure or what sort of dent it will make in my savings account. Not that I take this for granted, but these are all things that at one time were very big deals to me since they were outside the realm of what I could really afford. Now I can and that notion has more or less evaporated.

    What if I made millions and millions of dollars? A nice house would be the same thing. Not neccesarily an investment per-say, but given that its value in the end would probably be a non-issue since I wouldn't be counting on it for my finanancial well-being unlike most people who do simply because their purchasing power is limited and a house to them is this extremely expensive thing that could very easily ruin them financially if things don't go well.

  3. Nomograph


    Follow
    Befriend (1)
    104 threads
    2,851 comments

    186   4:46pm Thu 5 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike (2)  

    edvard2 says

    If the bubble returns to the BA, what will you do?

    I have a better question:

    When you figure out that there are a lot of wealthy, successful people in the nice areas and you'll never be able to afford a house on the peninsula, what will you do?

  4. FunTime


    Follow
    Befriend (3)
    38 threads
    801 comments
    San Francisco, CA

    187   5:11pm Thu 5 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike  

    SubOink says

    We just did our taxes this year. Massive refund. First time. Amazing. Prop tax was paid by tax refund and there is money left over.

    The government and the people with money in this country thank you. Actually, I thank you too, because your willingness to loan the government money all year takes a little sting out of how much I disagree with where my taxes get spent.

  5. FunTime


    Follow
    Befriend (3)
    38 threads
    801 comments
    San Francisco, CA

    188   5:12pm Thu 5 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike  

    SubOink says

    All rich people could just rent, multiple homes. After all, they are rich. They can afford it. No need to buy.

    Some do.

  6. FunTime


    Follow
    Befriend (3)
    38 threads
    801 comments
    San Francisco, CA

    189   5:13pm Thu 5 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike  

    SubOink says

    Why would showing off "the worst investment possible" be even considered showing off then?

    Sociology.

  7. rootvg


    Follow
    Befriend (8)
    1 threads
    792 comments
    Danville, CA
    Premium

    190   6:23pm Thu 5 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike   Protected  

    Nomograph says

    edvard2 says

    If the bubble returns to the BA, what will you do?

    I have a better question:

    When you figure out that there are a lot of wealthy, successful people in the nice areas and you'll never be able to afford a house on the peninsula, what will you do?

    There ARE a lot of wealthy, successful people in the nice areas and for that reason those areas will never be affordable. My understanding is Danville and Alamo were high in the early seventies and they're high now.

    It's EXPENSIVE to live here. Some will not be able to afford it. Some who are here, should not be.

    What else is there to know?

  8. bighorse


    Follow
    Befriend
    3 threads
    104 comments
    San Jose, CA

    191   7:19pm Thu 5 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (2)   Dislike (1)  

    F. Continue posting about how smart you are about not buying.

  9. dunnross


    Follow
    Befriend
    28 threads
    1,489 comments
    San Jose, CA
    Premium

    192   8:01pm Thu 5 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (3)   Dislike   Protected  

    rootvg says

    There ARE a lot of wealthy, successful people in the nice areas and for that reason those areas will never be affordable.

    Are you saying that wealthy people like to overpay? How did they become wealthy, then?

  10. Austinhousingbubble


    Follow
    Befriend
    7 threads
    677 comments

    193   8:06pm Thu 5 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike  

    rootvg says

    There ARE a lot of wealthy, successful people in the nice areas and for that reason those areas will never be affordable. My understanding is Danville and Alamo were high in the early seventies and they're high now.

    It's EXPENSIVE to live here. Some will not be able to afford it. Some who are here, should not be.

    What else is there to know?

    There are a lot of wealthy successful people in Des Moines, Iowa, too. Mountain Brook, Alabama is one of the ten wealthiest communities in the entire country. Bloomfield Hills, Michigan has the second highest median income in the country, just ahead of Beautiful Belle Meade, Tennessee, and just behind Palm Beach, Floriders. It would be interesting to do a comparison of the cost of living in these places and a place like Danville.

  11. rootvg


    Follow
    Befriend (8)
    1 threads
    792 comments
    Danville, CA
    Premium

    194   8:41pm Thu 5 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike   Protected  

    Austinhousingbubble says

    rootvg says

    There ARE a lot of wealthy, successful people in the nice areas and for that reason those areas will never be affordable. My understanding is Danville and Alamo were high in the early seventies and they're high now.

    It's EXPENSIVE to live here. Some will not be able to afford it. Some who are here, should not be.

    What else is there to know?

    There are a lot of wealthy successful people in Des Moines, Iowa, too. Mountain Brook, Alabama is one of the ten wealthiest communities in the entire country. Bloomfield Hills, Michigan has the second highest median income in the country, just ahead of Beautiful Belle Meade, Tennessee, and just behind Palm Beach, Floriders. It would be interesting to do a comparison of the cost of living in these places and a place like Danville.

    Fair enough, but there isn't the demand for those places that we have here. There also isn't so much old money and then you have the California emotional, follow-the-leader high school culture thing to worry about.

    When we say the Bay Area is a bubble, we mean it. This is Disneyland. When we try to explain this place to my parents, they look at us like we're nuts.

    There's too much money here, too many over credentialed arrogant assholes who can't think straight and too many interlopers from all over the world looking to seek their fortunes at someone else's expense by redefining reality. If you come here not knowing that, you will eventually get hurt. The laws of physics, economics and common sense have not been repealed. Two and two will NEVER equal five no matter how many people say so and no matter how many times they say it.

    Bloomfield Hills is a nice place. It snows there, but it's nice. Moreland Hills, Ohio is also nice with similar demographics. Around Columbus, Upper Arlington is nice. I think Jack Nicklaus still lives there. In the Cincinnati area, I like Blue Ash. I'd live there in a second.

    Down your way, I like Round Rock. Georgetown is also a good bet although it's further away. Go south and there's San Marcos. I got my hair cut there once, during a day trip to the outlet mall.

  12. rootvg


    Follow
    Befriend (8)
    1 threads
    792 comments
    Danville, CA
    Premium

    195   8:48pm Thu 5 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   Protected  

    wthrfrk80 says

    SubOink says

    Makes no sense. Why would showing off "the worst investment possible" be even considered showing off then?

    Because they don't think of it an an investment. They think of it as a luxury good. Like a Ferrari. Or a yacht. Or a glass of fine wine. Or a jet. They don't expect a return on those purchases. They buy them because they're nice to have and they can afford it. They're investments are in stocks and bonds. And maybe real estate if they're collecting rents.

    Ross Perot has invested primarily in Treasuries for years and years. He says it's not about return on his money but return OF his money.

  13. rootvg


    Follow
    Befriend (8)
    1 threads
    792 comments
    Danville, CA
    Premium

    196   8:51pm Thu 5 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   Protected  

    wthrfrk80 says

    SubOink says

    Makes no sense. Why would showing off "the worst investment possible" be even considered showing off then?

    Because they don't think of it an an investment. They think of it as a luxury good. Like a Ferrari. Or a yacht. Or a glass of fine wine. Or a jet. They don't expect a return on those purchases. They buy them because they're nice to have and they can afford it. They're investments are in stocks and bonds. And maybe real estate if they're collecting rents.

    Even in general aviation, most of the big airplanes are owned by paper corporations for tax and liability reasons. I can name several flight schools right off the top of my head where the school doesn't own the planes. One of them is a fairly prestigious operation over at Livermore Muni.

  14. rootvg


    Follow
    Befriend (8)
    1 threads
    792 comments
    Danville, CA
    Premium

    197   8:52pm Thu 5 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   Protected  

    RentingForHalfTheCost says

    BoomAndBustCycle says

    The inevitable depression and morale crushing layoffs that would commence... It would be a hard, chaotic reset button on our financial system.

    Bring it ON! Time for us sinners to pay and pay dearly. We can take it. Who is not up for a good round of suffering. I'd vote for this if there was a vote. And I own multiple houses (just not any in the BA). I'd rather get us back on track to eventually be prosperous again, regardless of how long it took. Even if it took longer than I live. At least we would be passing down something worth inheriting. Right now, we are passing on an economy build on junk bonds in all honesty. 61% of the bonds are being bought by the fed. What a joke.

    Won't happen. It should but it won't.

  15. rootvg


    Follow
    Befriend (8)
    1 threads
    792 comments
    Danville, CA
    Premium

    198   8:53pm Thu 5 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   Protected  

    dunnross says

    rootvg says

    There ARE a lot of wealthy, successful people in the nice areas and for that reason those areas will never be affordable.

    Are you saying that wealthy people like to overpay? How did they become wealthy, then?

    Who cares? It's not my business either way.

  16. Nomograph


    Follow
    Befriend (1)
    104 threads
    2,851 comments

    199   9:49pm Thu 5 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    dunnross says

    Are you saying that wealthy people like to overpay?

    Do wealthy people overpay for a Maserati when they could have purchased a Honda Civic?

  17. dunnross


    Follow
    Befriend
    28 threads
    1,489 comments
    San Jose, CA
    Premium

    200   10:01pm Thu 5 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (5)   Dislike   Protected  

    Nomograph says

    dunnross says

    Are you saying that wealthy people like to overpay?

    Do wealthy people overpay for a Maserati when they could have purchased a Honda Civic?

    No, but buying a crappy old house in a place like Palo Alto, is like buying a Honda Civic for the price of Maserati, just because it has Michelin Tires.

  18. B.A.C.A.H.


    Follow
    Befriend (6)
    5 threads
    2,359 comments

    201   10:24pm Thu 5 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike (1)  

    rootvg says

    cares? It's not my business

    Then why do you judge your gay neighbors?

  19. SubOink


    Follow
    Befriend (3)
    9 threads
    704 comments
    Los Angeles, CA

    202   10:39pm Thu 5 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Rich people don't buy a 500k house.

    Somebody that makes 1Mill a year, buys a house with a mortgage of 20k/month.

    The ratio is very similar then the guy that makes 150k having a mortgage of 3000/month.

    Complete nonsense. You guys have no clue what rich people do and why they do it. They do things very similar than everybody else - just add a 0 or 00 or 000 to it.

    You think the guy that makes 20 million a year buys a house for 3 million in cash? No, he buys a house for 45Million...and that's the second house or the third house. It still takes 4-5 years of his income to pay for those houses.

  20. RentingForHalfTheCost


    Follow
    Befriend (8)
    38 threads
    2,006 comments
    Pleasanton, CA
    Premium

    203   8:26am Fri 6 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike   Protected  

    Nomograph says

    dunnross says

    Are you saying that wealthy people like to overpay?

    Do wealthy people overpay for a Maserati when they could have purchased a Honda Civic?

    I know many wealthy people that do cause price inflation. They pay retail for vehicles, houses, etc. without even trying to haggle. It is not worth their time. I once went tire kicking with a manager, who, spent about 2 hours to decide to buy a BMW convertible. No where in the discussion was anything about price even discussed. I asked him as we were driving back to the office about this, and he said he was fine paying what they were asking for it. He would rather give them the sticker price and make everyone happy and get great service in the process.

    Most of us don't work like that. We know that the above person overpaid because anyone that haggles will do better. I don't want just the middle of the price profile, I want to be the person who pays the least out of all the buyers. That will still stay with me, even if I was rich. I'm sure it has to do with living my first 25 years of life so broke it was even hard to "pay" attention. ;)

  21. RentingForHalfTheCost


    Follow
    Befriend (8)
    38 threads
    2,006 comments
    Pleasanton, CA
    Premium

    204   8:31am Fri 6 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   Protected  

    SubOink says

    Rich people don't buy a 500k house.

    Somebody that makes 1Mill a year, buys a house with a mortgage of 20k/month.

    The ratio is very similar then the guy that makes 150k having a mortgage of 3000/month.

    Complete nonsense. You guys have no clue what rich people do and why they do it. They do things very similar than everybody else - just add a 0 or 00 or 000 to it.

    You think the guy that makes 20 million a year buys a house for 3 million in cash? No, he buys a house for 45Million...and that's the second house or the third house. It still takes 4-5 years of his income to pay for those houses.

    I completely agree with your argument here. However, I read all the previous posts and I can't figure out what you are arguing about. I didn't see any comment saying anything opposite of what you are saying here. Rich people do buy houses, and they do buy at their comfort level. That level is way above what is comfortable to most of us overpaid pheasants.

  22. rootvg


    Follow
    Befriend (8)
    1 threads
    792 comments
    Danville, CA
    Premium

    205   8:47am Fri 6 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   Protected  

    dunnross says

    Nomograph says

    dunnross says

    Are you saying that wealthy people like to overpay?

    Do wealthy people overpay for a Maserati when they could have purchased a Honda Civic?

    No, but buying a crappy old house in a place like Palo Alto, is like buying a Honda Civic for the price of Maserati, just because it has Michelin Tires.

    You don't have to buy in Palo Alto. You don't even have to live in Palo Alto.

  23. Goran_K


    Follow
    Befriend (4)
    25 threads
    1,520 comments
    Laguna Beach, CA
    Premium

    206   9:05am Fri 6 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   Protected  

    SubOink says

    Rich people don't buy a 500k house.

    Somebody that makes 1Mill a year, buys a house with a mortgage of 20k/month.

    The ratio is very similar then the guy that makes 150k having a mortgage of 3000/month.

    You think the guy that makes 20 million a year buys a house for 3 million in cash? No, he buys a house for 45Million...and that's the second house or the third house. It still takes 4-5 years of his income to pay for those houses.

    Actually no. Thomas Stanley's book titled "The Millionaire Next Door" interviewed about a thousand people with a net worth of over $1,000,000(U.S) on exactly what you're talking about:

    Who are the rich in this country?

    What do they do?

    Where do they shop?

    What do they drive?

    How do they invest?

    Many rich people tend to be fairly conservative and practical in their purchasing decisions. The most popular car for a millionaire? Toyota Camry. Less than 10% actually drove a "Luxury" brand car (Porsche, Ferrari, etc). One person he interviewed had a $10,000,000 net worth but lived in a sub-$800,000 home.

    The book was published in 1996, before the dot.com bust, and Real estate bubble, so the millionaires Stanley interviewed were "real" wealthy people, not on-paper millionaires because they held inflated assets like unproven tech stock, or real estate.

  24. SparrowBell


    Follow
    Befriend
    45 comments
    San Jose, CA

    207   9:21am Fri 6 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Maybe, if the commute time could be make less by more efficient public transportation, location could be less of an issue. For e.g, there's VTA right in front our place that would go to mountain view Caltrain except it takes twice as long as driving, almost twice as much as the monthly caltrain parking permit. Before the gas price skyrockets, think Caltrain pass costs would exceed fuel cost. As much as California is trying to be green, they haven't been that successful in public transportation. How about public transportation connecting east bay with the Caltrain crossing the bridge? Of course, I don't know the difficulty in construction, but there is eurostar crossing English channel, it shouldn't be mission impossible.

  25. freak80


    Follow
    Befriend (4)
    52 threads
    4,416 comments
    Corning, NY
    Premium

    208   9:28am Fri 6 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike   Protected  

    rootvg says

    There's too much money here, too many over credentialed arrogant assholes who can't think straight and too many interlopers from all over the world looking to seek their fortunes at someone else's expense by redefining reality. If you come here not knowing that, you will eventually get hurt. The laws of physics, economics and common sense have not been repealed. Two and two will NEVER equal five no matter how many people say so and no matter how many times they say it.

    That's probably the best description of the Bay Area I've ever seen. Well said.

  26. RentingForHalfTheCost


    Follow
    Befriend (8)
    38 threads
    2,006 comments
    Pleasanton, CA
    Premium

    209   9:30am Fri 6 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   Protected  

    SparrowBell says

    Maybe, if the commute time could be make less by more efficient public transportation, location could be less of an issue. For e.g, there's VTA right in front our place that would go to mountain view Caltrain except it takes twice as long as driving, almost twice as much as the monthly caltrain parking permit. Before the gas price skyrockets, think Caltrain pass costs would exceed fuel cost. As much as California is trying to be green, they haven't been that successful in public transportation. How about public transportation connecting east bay with the Caltrain crossing the bridge? Of course, I don't know the difficulty in construction, but there is eurostar crossing English channel, it shouldn't be mission impossible.

    I can easily beat the lightrail from Milpitas to Mountain View by biking. Have been doing it for years. The caltrain catches back up to me around Redwood city area. So sad.

  27. freak80


    Follow
    Befriend (4)
    52 threads
    4,416 comments
    Corning, NY
    Premium

    210   9:34am Fri 6 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   Protected  

    RentingForHalfTheCost says

    That level is way above what is comfortable to most of us overpaid pheasants.

    You mean like this guy? ;)

  28. SubOink


    Follow
    Befriend (3)
    9 threads
    704 comments
    Los Angeles, CA

    211   9:39am Fri 6 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Goran_K says

    Many rich people tend to be fairly conservative and practical in their purchasing decisions. The most popular car for a millionaire? Toyota Camry

    I work with many very wealthy people. They all have more cars than I can keep track of and there is no toyota camry in sight. Actually, the camry is what the cleaning lady drives.
    What nonsense is that. Look around the rich neighborhoods. Here in LA, you can look at miles and miles of neighbordhoods where each house costs 1.5mill and up...who do you think buys those if not the rich??

    Look at ferrari and luxury car sales...who do you think buys those?

    And look at Richard Branson type characters. You think he drives a Toyota Camry? LOL.

    RentingForHalfTheCost says

    However, I read all the previous posts and I can't figure out what you are arguing about.

    You are right. I can't figure it out either. :) ...ah, wait...I guess we got on a tangent about houses being a terrible investment and then blabla and then bla and then more blabla...and now we are talking abut ferrari's and organic beans. LOL.

    Happy Easter!!

  29. Hysteresis


    Follow
    Befriend (2)
    14 threads
    648 comments

    212   9:53am Fri 6 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Goran_K says

    Actually no. Thomas Stanley's book titled "The Millionaire Next Door" interviewed about a thousand people with a net worth of over $1,000,000(U.S) on exactly what you're talking about:

    Many rich people tend to be fairly conservative and practical in their purchasing decisions. The most popular car for a millionaire? Toyota Camry. Less than 10% actually drove a "Luxury" brand car (Porsche, Ferrari, etc). One person he interviewed had a $10,000,000 net worth but lived in a sub-$800,000 home.

    this is correct

    the data is fairly recent - it's from 2009.

    also, stanley has a phd, was a professor for 20 years and his current job is studying and researching wealthy people. he studies the wealthy for a living. he has multiple best selling and widely acclaimed books (with actual data) on his findings on who the wealthy are and profiles them accurate.

    these credentials trump anyone's lame "observations" pulled from their ass.

    From the book "Millionaire Teacher: The Nine Rules of Wealth You Should Have Learned in School", Thomas Stanley, wealth researcher and author of "The Millionaire Mind" and "The Millionaire Next Door" conducted a survey and found:

    """Most US homes valued at a million dollars or more (as of 2009) were not owned by millionaires.
    Instead, the majority of million-dollar homes were owned by non-millionaires with large mortgages and very expensive tastes.

    In sharp contrast, 90 percent of those who met the defined criterion to be a millionaire -- having a net worth of more than $1 million -- lived in homes valued at less than a million dollars."""

  30. E-man


    Follow
    Befriend (31)
    34 threads
    2,545 comments
    San Jose, CA
    Premium

    213   9:54am Fri 6 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   Protected  

    Many people on this board wants to buy/own a house in Palo Alto or the Peninsula, and they don't deny it. The only problem is that they want to pay Concord or the Central Valley home prices.

    It all comes down to supply and demand. The NIMBY in the Peninsula are so anti-development, which limits the supply, while the immigration into the Bay Area keeps on going up. Why do you think rent dropped during the last couple of recessions, and it went up the moment the economy is just barely getting better?

    How many people you know that used to do that commute from the Central Valley, Los Banos, Salinas, etc. to the Bay Area for work, are still doing it. The majority of them gave the house back to the bank and moved back to the Bay Area. This is another dynamic that drives rent to stupidly high prices today. Guess who suffer the most? Of course, it's the renters.

    As a landlord, I haven't realized this rent increase. I feel for the renters and haven't increased the rent in the past 3 years. However, I'm so tempted to raise rent on all of my rentals because it seems like the renters on this board don't appreciate that their landlord is giving them a deal. :)

  31. E-man


    Follow
    Befriend (31)
    34 threads
    2,545 comments
    San Jose, CA
    Premium

    214   10:05am Fri 6 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   Protected  

    Goran_K says

    The book was published in 1996, before the dot.com bust, and Real estate bubble, so the millionaires Stanley interviewed were "real" wealthy people, not on-paper millionaires because they held inflated assets like unproven tech stock, or real estate.

    It looks like we read the same book. :)

    In 1996, home prices were generally about 1/2 of what they are now and interest rate was around 7-8%. Gas prices were about 1/3 of what they are now. Food prices were about 1/2 of what they are now. Rents were about 60% of what they are now. Wouldn't you say a millionaire in 1996 is equivalent to a $2 millionaire now? :)

  32. SubOink


    Follow
    Befriend (3)
    9 threads
    704 comments
    Los Angeles, CA

    215   11:21am Fri 6 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Hysteresis says

    this is correct

    I guess its really all the poor people living in the 30mill+ houses down at the beach...NOT

  33. CrazyMan


    Follow
    Befriend
    449 comments
    Boulder Creek, CA

    216   11:23am Fri 6 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    E-man says

    Many people on this board wants to buy/own a house in Palo Alto or the Peninsula, and they don't deny it. The only problem is that they want to pay Concord or the Central Valley home prices.

    This is one of the dumber things you've ever posted, which is saying a lot.

    Not everybody wants to live in PA or MV, most people just want to live in the BA without spending 80% of their income to do so. I don't think anyone expects a PA home to 300K =/

    Also, some of us get reasonable deals because we pay rent on time and take care of the properties we live in. Trust me, you aren't doing anyone any favors. My landlord raises my rent, and they'll be over here changing light bulbs. They know this and I treat their place well, so they don't raise my rent.

  34. clambo


    Follow
    Befriend (5)
    1,070 comments
    Santa Cruz, CA

    217   11:44am Fri 6 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (2)   Dislike  

  35. Hysteresis


    Follow
    Befriend (2)
    14 threads
    648 comments

    218   12:10pm Fri 6 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    SubOink says

    Hysteresis says

    this is correct

    I guess its really all the poor people living in the 30mill+ houses down at the beach...NOT

    this is retarded. no one said such a stupid thing. were did you learn to read?

  36. tiny tina


    Follow
    Befriend
    2 threads
    175 comments

    219   12:23pm Fri 6 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Hysteresis says

    were did you learn to read?

    Oh, the irony.

  37. Hysteresis


    Follow
    Befriend (2)
    14 threads
    648 comments

    220   12:28pm Fri 6 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    tiny tina says

    Hysteresis says

    were did you learn to read?

    Oh, the irony.

    likewise

  38. RentingForHalfTheCost


    Follow
    Befriend (8)
    38 threads
    2,006 comments
    Pleasanton, CA
    Premium

    221   12:41pm Fri 6 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike   Protected  

    E-man says

    As a landlord, I haven't realized this rent increase. I feel for the renters and haven't increased the rent in the past 3 years. However, I'm so tempted to raise rent on all of my rentals because it seems like the renters on this board don't appreciate that their landlord is giving them a deal. :)

    Stick it to them. 25% increase retro back 3 months! Wait, are you my landlord? Crap, ignore what I just said. Nothing to see here, keep moving...

  39. RentingForHalfTheCost


    Follow
    Befriend (8)
    38 threads
    2,006 comments
    Pleasanton, CA
    Premium

    222   12:45pm Fri 6 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   Protected  

    SubOink says

    Hysteresis says

    this is correct

    I guess its really all the poor people living in the 30mill+ houses down at the beach...NOT

    I'm actually reading this book now and it is very enlightening. Sure, there are rich that show things off and use their wealth to buy what others can't. But we are talking averages here. There is a vast majority of millionaires that live in middle of the line homes. They live a life you wouldn't suspect considering they are worth 4-5million. It is a good read. "The Millionaire Next Door: The Surprising Secrets of America's Wealthy". The moral of the book. Don't believe everything you see.

  40. thomas.wong1986


    Follow
    Befriend
    16 threads
    4,426 comments

    223   7:08pm Fri 6 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    E-man says

    Many people on this board wants to buy/own a house in Palo Alto or the Peninsula, and they don't deny it. The only problem is that they want to pay Concord or the Central Valley home prices.

    But when you compare a $1M 1100 sq ft home in Palo Alto to a home 3x bigger and much modern located 15min drive in Silver Creek ... you ask what am i paying $1M in PA for ?

    LOL! for many of use who have lived here all of lives.. it really doesnt make sense. So why get so little for so much ?

    No PA prices dont make sense compared to the nearby areas.

« First     « Previous comments     Next comments »     Last »

edvard2 is moderator of this thread.

Email

Username

Watch comments by email
Home   Tips and Tricks   Questions or suggestions? Mail p@patrick.net  

Page took 214 milliseconds to create.