Compare Realtors' Commissions and Rankings at LessThan6Percent.com (Advertisement)

Racism and race riots


By iwog   Follow   Sat, 7 Apr 2012, 4:33pm   7,758 views   67 comments
In Lafayette CA 94549   Watch (1)   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

I've stayed mostly quiet on this issue because I'm not a big believer in racism. Human beings are genetically predisposed to avoid strangers, and one of the criteria is race and species. Both blacks and whites and others have numerous reasons to be pissed off at each other, and it's best not to fan the flames by pretending it's anything more than it is. Both blacks and whites on the left are often too hysterical about racial issues, and most people on the right can't get through the day without bleating "RACE CARD!".

However this publication by the well known neoconservative slime machine National Review editor John Derbyshire is about to change my mind. John Derbyshire isn't some KKK jerk in the shadows and the National Review isn't some rogue fringe website. In fact National Review articles are directly wired into Newscrap and frequently quoted without editing.

I just have one editorial comment myself: Republicans, get your fucking people in line before you incite a genuine race war! You mouth-breathing zombie pricks have no excuses this time. The next Republican jackoff that defends the right against charges of racism should go soak his head in the toilet.

Here's the link. You may have trouble pulling it up because "firestorm" doesn't quite cover it and the servers are crashing:

http://takimag.com/article/the_talk_nonblack_version_john_derbyshire

Short version:

(10a) Avoid concentrations of blacks not all known to you personally.
(10b) Stay out of heavily black neighborhoods.

(10c) If planning a trip to a beach or amusement park at some date, find out whether it is likely to be swamped with blacks on that date (neglect of that one got me the closest I have ever gotten to death by gunshot).

(10d) Do not attend events likely to draw a lot of blacks.

(10e) If you are at some public event at which the number of blacks suddenly swells, leave as quickly as possible.

(10f) Do not settle in a district or municipality run by black politicians.

(10g) Before voting for a black politician, scrutinize his/her character much more carefully than you would a white.

(10h) Do not act the Good Samaritan to blacks in apparent distress, e.g., on the highway.

(10i) If accosted by a strange black in the street, smile and say something polite but keep moving.

Most Liked Comments

  Sort by time instead  
  1. iwog


    Follow
    Befriend (48)
    274 threads
    12,546 comments
    47 male
    Lafayette, CA
    Premium

    1   11:34am Sun 8 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (2)   Dislike  

    Honest Abe says

    Are you kidding? 10b, 10c and 10e are probably statements given out by most large city police departments across America.

    Police departments are local law enforcement agencies of the government, are they not?

    Choose one: Political correctness or personal safety. Duh.

    I'm glad you're admitting to be shamelessly racist. Honesty is the best policy.

  2. iwog


    Follow
    Befriend (48)
    274 threads
    12,546 comments
    47 male
    Lafayette, CA
    Premium

    2   4:33pm Sun 8 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (2)   Dislike  

    Honest Abe says

    The best thing you could do to help the 1%'s...if you REALLY care, would be to reestablish limited, constitutional government.

    I've refuted this 100 times and I'll refute it 100 more because people like you don't listen. Ever.

    When you remove government, you don't replace it with freedom. You replace it with aristocracy and the tyranny of wealth. Government stands between you and people who would make you a slave. That is its primary purpose. You spit in the faces of the founding fathers who knew who the enemy was. You're a disgrace to your country and your heritage.

  3. iwog


    Follow
    Befriend (48)
    274 threads
    12,546 comments
    47 male
    Lafayette, CA
    Premium

    3   8:53pm Sun 8 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (2)   Dislike  

    Honest Abe says

    Iwog, you STILL haven't learned, Government isn't the solution to America's problems. And who EVER said to REMOVE government????? I said LIMITED, CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT...which is what our founding fathers wanted.

    If government isn't the solution to America's problems, how did slavery end? How did women get the right to own property? How did we pull children out of coal mines? Why are there seat belts in cars? Why do children no longer die from expired milk? How come we haven't destroyed all our forests like Great Britain did?

    Corporations are almost always on the wrong side of history. Government for all its flaws is almost always on the right side of history. You don't have the fucking option to replace government with NOTHING. Someone is going to fill the vacuum, and that someone is going to want you starving so you'll work for almost nothing.

  4. Huntington Moneyworth III, Esq


    Follow
    Befriend
    53 threads
    658 comments

    4   4:55pm Wed 11 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (2)   Dislike  

    marcus says

    iwog says

    Magna Carta, end of slavery, practically everything done under FDR, Teddy Roosevelt's crusade against trusts, progressive taxation.

    CBOE must have been referring to dictatorships, kings etc over most of history.

    A lot of people can't see the obvious strong trend back in that direction. The aristocracy plutocrats and corporations) want us to have a virtual dictatorship that they own. That's why corporations are now people.

    Watch what you say about Corporations like me. My hired staff of ex-Blackwater rapists are prone to being trigger happy. I don't want to be forced to have my men Stand Their Ground.

  5. iwog


    Follow
    Befriend (48)
    274 threads
    12,546 comments
    47 male
    Lafayette, CA
    Premium

    5   4:45pm Mon 9 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike  

    msilenus says

    If one thinks that it is at all salient that NBC fired the editor who edited the Zimmerman call, then these facts should impress.

    You're going to compare the Zimmerman edit, which may have been a mistake for time or may not have been, with Derbyshire condemning the entire black race?

    Really????

    Neoconservatives will try to make Derbyshire look like a rogue element in an otherwise pure movement. It will be complete bullshit but they will try.

  6. iwog


    Follow
    Befriend (48)
    274 threads
    12,546 comments
    47 male
    Lafayette, CA
    Premium

    6   10:29pm Mon 9 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike  

    msilenus says

    You asked me if I'm "Really???" going to compare two things. I said yes, and then asked why not. As in: why is it not appropriate to compare those two cases?

    The question stands.

    Figures. You'd ask me a question you refused to answer yourself namely why it's appropriate to compare those two cases.

    I already answered you in part. One was probably a mistake OR an attempt to over-sensationalize the story for media consumption. The other is a hate filled rant condemning an entire race.

    They are different at every level. One is a personal drama involving two men. The other has broad implications for millions of people belonging to the African race. One may or may not attempt to label a single individual as a racist, the other is without any doubt an attempt to condemn all blacks in every situation.

    So what's your side? You didn't present a side so we don't know, you just said they were the same. Furthermore you made this insane childish assertion:

    msilenus says

    (You won't answer, because you can't.)

    I am not a member of the American fascist movement. I am not a brainwashed robot programmed by Newscorp. I HAVE the ability to think for myself, answer questions, and make intelligent arguments. Marcus and Thunder have done the same.

    There is no parity between the right and the left. I often say right-wingers can't answer my questions, which is probably why you decided to mock me, however when I say it I'm telling the truth. You're not. I suggest you absorb this lesson and ask yourself why that's the case.

  7. iwog


    Follow
    Befriend (48)
    274 threads
    12,546 comments
    47 male
    Lafayette, CA
    Premium

    7   10:37pm Mon 9 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike  

    mdovell says

    Seat belts in car exist because companies invented them and Chevy screwed up with the Corvair. If you eliminate that car chances are it would have taken another decade or so to put them in. Children can still die from expired milk if they don't know how to read!

    Seatbelts exist in cars because they were mandated by the government. In this case, automobile producers fought the regulations because they didn't want their cars to be considered unsafe. In all my other examples, it was government forcing corporations to do the right thing, in many cases with violent opposition.

    Government is the only tool people have against wealth. Destroying it is destroying the ability of people to reign in power. Republicans have no intention of removing government and leaving a vacuum. They have people waiting in the wings that are all too ready to restrict freedom in lots of creative ways.

    Company housing, company stores, 80 hour work weeks, pollution, toxic working conditions, unsafe products, and forced mediation with a 99% success rate for the corporation in any dispute. That's what you're voting for when you vote Republican.

  8. bob2356


    Follow
    Befriend
    2 threads
    2,497 comments

    8   2:19am Tue 10 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike  

    marcus says

    mdovell says

    Seat belts in car exist because companies invented them and Chevy screwed up with the Corvair.

    Seat belts and the Corvair were two independent auto safety issues championed by Ralph Nader. The Corvair was said to be crash prone. We had one back in the late 60s.

    The only thing championed by Ralph Nader was Ralph Nader. He was a self promoting egotist who hated all corporations and wanted to exert control any way he could.

    Case in point, "Unsafe at any Speed" vilifying the corvair. His contention was that swing arm rear suspension was a dangerous design, which was not true anyway. Yet Nader never mentioned VW, porsche, and mercedes cars which had exactly the same design as the corvair and sold a lot more cars worldwide. The only point of the book was to discredit GM, not anything to do with safety. I remember in the early 70's NHTSA did extensive track testing on corvairs comparing them to other cars of the early 60's and found no problems at all.

    FYI ford and I think hudson and saab offered seat belts in the 50's.

    A man named Dr. Sheldon was also very important in the history of seat belts while ralph nader was still in grade school. He did serious research on seat belts and auto safety that was very influential. He pretty much invented the retractable seat belt.

  9. msilenus


    Follow
    Befriend (3)
    8 threads
    335 comments

    9   3:11pm Tue 10 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike  

    I'll add that NBC is more credible than NR. And Fox News. And many other right-wing peddlers of sophistic narrative. That credibility gap stems from the sophistic narrative peddling.

    NBC handled their little scandal correctly, and so did NR. They both made it perfectly clear that they do not tolerate the bullshit at hand. As it should be. And that should be the end of that.

  10. iwog


    Follow
    Befriend (48)
    274 threads
    12,546 comments
    47 male
    Lafayette, CA
    Premium

    10   8:46am Wed 11 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike  

    CBOEtrader says

    Historically, government was the way the wealth controlled the people, not the other way around. Do you have historical examples to support your statement "government is the only tool people have against wealth."

    Magna Carta, end of slavery, practically everything done under FDR, Teddy Roosevelt's crusade against trusts, progressive taxation.

    Are you kidding me?

  11. marcus


    Follow
    Befriend (5)
    168 threads
    5,082 comments

    11   4:55pm Sat 7 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    I'm speechless and really wish I hadn't read that. What an ignorant fucking asshole.

    It's ironic how talking about "the talk" and the very real racism that exists could trigger this kind of thing.

    Sad to say but I think it could be politics. Obama's advantage is that to many of us his race is incidental, and not something we think about often. The right would love it if he was in a position where he had to get into the middle of racial ugliness, asserting himself in ways that allows them to pander to peoples fears and prejudices.

    Note the comments from Newt and others (on this site) about how terrible it was that Obama said "if I had a son he would look like Trayvon"

    Wtf ? Overreaction to anyone asserting the fact that how he looked may well have been a factor in his being killed. What's that about anyway ?

  12. marcus


    Follow
    Befriend (5)
    168 threads
    5,082 comments

    12   5:03pm Sat 7 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    What, he was offended when he learned about "the talk ?"

    At least they fired him quickly.

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/07/national-review-fires-john-derbyshire_n_1410273.html?1333840125&ref=media

  13. iwog


    Follow
    Befriend (48)
    274 threads
    12,546 comments
    47 male
    Lafayette, CA
    Premium

    13   5:12pm Sat 7 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    marcus says

    At least they fired him quickly.

    Yes they had no choice, but it still leaves a genuine hardcore racist publishing tainted material for the National Review for years.

    Millions of earnest denials from the right all gone in a puff of smoke. It's impossible for a Republican to ever claim "We're not racist" again. John Derbyshire was a heavy advocate for the Tea Party too.

  14. marcus


    Follow
    Befriend (5)
    168 threads
    5,082 comments

    14   9:24pm Sat 7 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  
  15. Kevin


    Follow
    Befriend
    40 threads
    2,652 comments

    15   2:20am Sun 8 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Not all conservatives are racist, but if you're racist you're probably a conservative.

    (yes, there are racist liberals, too, but they're the exception that proves the rule).

  16. iwog


    Follow
    Befriend (48)
    274 threads
    12,546 comments
    47 male
    Lafayette, CA
    Premium

    16   1:03pm Sun 8 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Honest Abe says

    I also noticed you chickened out of answering the simple question: If you had to choose one, which would it be, Political correctness or personal safety?

    You didn't ask a question. You said a rhetorical "choose one". How can I chicken out of answering something you didn't even ask? Is your life so devoid of success that you've got to invent one?

    I would choose personal safety over political correctness. So would pretty much everyone. The problem is we're not talking about that are we.

    Honest Abe says

    My guess is that you will duck and dodge and refuse to answer, again. Prove me wrong.

    I always prove you wrong other than when you prove yourself wrong.

  17. iwog


    Follow
    Befriend (48)
    274 threads
    12,546 comments
    47 male
    Lafayette, CA
    Premium

    17   1:14pm Sun 8 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Honest Abe says

    Agreed. Many would choose personal safety than "political correctness". It just seemed like you disparaged John Derbyshire over political correctness, thats all.

    I disparaged John Derbyshire for being a racist prick, inspiring fear and hatred of blacks, and publishing something that will make everything he's afraid of far worse. If he doesn't want to walk around in poor black neighborhoods, then maybe he'd be more comfortable in poor Hispanic neighborhoods or poor white neighborhoods. No? Then why would he incite a race war by signaling out blacks?

    Besides none of that was my main point. My main point is that you and your friends who post on this board defended the Republican party and the Republican media against charges of being racist.

    Boy I bet you feel stupid now!

  18. marcus


    Follow
    Befriend (5)
    168 threads
    5,082 comments

    18   1:35pm Sun 8 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    iwog says

    Boy I bet you feel stupid now!

    No he doesn't. But his comments say everything that needs to be said.

  19. marcus


    Follow
    Befriend (5)
    168 threads
    5,082 comments

    19   8:22pm Sun 8 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    I understand Abe's need to defend his team, even if all he has is emotion and bluster. Our founding fathers were in a different time but Iwog's right and at least he makes a very clear argument.

    iwog says

    When you remove government, you don't replace it with freedom. You replace it with aristocracy and the tyranny of wealth. Government stands between you and people who would make you a slave.

    It's about balance and no matter how imbalanced it get's Abe's type will always argue for it to be more so.

    Privatized prisons. Fully privatized health care, except medicare - but they want to privatize that. Privatized miltary. Privatized schools.

    We have a system where privately owned prisons lobby against relaxation of drug laws. That's just one glaring example of how messed up our system is.

    http://www.fareedzakaria.com/home/Articles/Entries/2012/3/25_Incarceration_Nation.html

  20. clambo


    Follow
    Befriend (5)
    1,070 comments
    Santa Cruz, CA

    20   9:07pm Sun 8 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    There won't be any race riots, you already know that. After President Johnson saw them that hot summer he cranked up the "war on poverty" and everything else to keep people quiet.
    No thinking person will want to sacrifice their being caught in the streets and failing a drug test thereby risk losing some benefits.
    If you dislike something some nobody wrote somewhere, write an editorial back.

Premium member iwog is moderator of this thread.

Email

Username

Watch comments by email
Home   Tips and Tricks   Questions or suggestions? Mail p@patrick.net  

Page took 145 milliseconds to create.