When the idea to borrow against ourselves first got tabled, someone should have been shot IMHO. Dead on the spot. As an example for the next stupid idea in the room of our best and brightest. If capitalism fails, we have no one to blame but ourselves.
"But the difference has been made up for with interest paid by the Treasury on the $2.6 trillion that the federal government owes the program."
http://money.cnn.com/2012/04/20/news/economy/social_security_medicare/index.htm?iid=Lead

Watch
Follow
Befriend (5)
10 threads
2,329 comments
RentingForHalfTheCost says
No,we went one step further.
Borrowing from future generations to make us appear richer.
Follow
Befriend (4)
52 threads
4,416 comments
Corning, NY
Premium
RentingForHalfTheCost says
Seems like capitalism has a history of self-distruction. Capitalism is a lot like nuclear fission. It's great if it's got some regulation and direction. If not...meltdown!
For example, Glass-Stegall was put in place to prevent a meltdown. But we thought it was too old-fashioned and got rid of it.
Follow
Befriend (48)
274 threads
12,575 comments
47 male
Lafayette, CA
Premium
Capitalism works if it is tempered with a system to prevent the unreasonable accumulation of wealth. Allowing Bill Gates or Warren Buffett access to tax rules that allow them to accumulate more wealth than the GDP of entire states is insane.
A lifetime achievement of $100 million (approximately $1 million per year over a lifetime plus investment returns) is more than enough to motivate anyone on earth to succeed. Yet when Obama wants to raise taxes on people making over $1 million, armies of blue collar workers earning $25,000 per year accuse the government of communism.
I highly recommend the movie Idiocracy to anyone who hasn't seen it. As far as borrowing from ourselves to keep the economy going, we have no choice. We're near the end of the Monopoly game and all the cash is being held by the 1%. You either tax it, borrow it, or steal it.
A responsible government taxes it before things get too far out of hand. If that fails, a system of borrowing it is established. If the aristocracy gets so strong that borrowing is terminated, there's a socialist revolt and the money is simply stolen.
Follow
Befriend (13)
103 threads
3,764 comments
bubblesitter says
Follow
Befriend (8)
204 threads
4,415 comments
Davis, CA
This is needlessly vague thread.
Did we "borrow against ourselves" to fight WWII?
BIG TIME, with a debt-to-GDP of 120%.
Do you "borrow against yourself" when you take out a loan?
Yes you do.
If you want a pre-banking environment, you can find it.
If you want to envision a totally debt-free government, they wrote a paper about that once. It involved some worries over what happens when we have no Treasuries to market to the world and the consequences of that.
Follow
Befriend (5)
1,070 comments
Santa Cruz, CA
At least in WWII they sold War Bonds and they were clearly identified as paying for the war effort.
Follow
Befriend (2)
11 threads
218 comments
San Jose, CA
clambo says
Furthermore, all that debt was invested productively. This time around, we've been borrowing and throwing good money after bad.
Follow
Befriend (5)
1,070 comments
Santa Cruz, CA
Do you mean sec. 8 , WIC and food stamps for my friend Maricela paid for by debt might not be productive?
Follow
Befriend (2)
11 threads
218 comments
San Jose, CA
clambo says
I mean bank bailouts and the like.
Follow
Befriend (6)
5 threads
2,359 comments
iwog says
It is because he is black, even though he is as white as he is black.