Patrick.net

Romney vows to dramatically increase military spending

By iwog   Follow   Fri, 27 Apr 2012, 2:53pm   9,684 views   128 comments
In Lafayette CA 94549   Watch (1)   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

100,000 new troops apparently. http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/promises-promises-questions-about-romney-vows-to-cut-taxes-expand-military-balance-budget/2012/04/27/gIQA58SclT_story.html

Republican platform to balance budget: (you can't make this shit up)

1. Dramatically increase military spending and hire 100,000 additional troops for the war Republicans will start shortly after taking office.
2. Give the richest Americans massive tax cuts by eliminating all forms of taxation that don't actually involve work. (dividends, interest, capital gains)
3. Eliminate all estate taxes so billionaires never need to relinquish their possessions. (that farm you have your eye on will be locked into a single family for 1000 years)
4. Eliminate most Medicare benefits (opposed 2 to 1 by Ammericans)
5. "Reform" social security. (average 25% cuts across the board)
6. Cut waste (HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA......right)

Quiz: What do most Republican voters say the number one issue is?
Answer: BALANCING THE FEDERAL BUDGET!!!!!

How is this not brain damage?

Viewing Comments 1-40 of 128     Next »     Last »     See most liked comments

1. freak80 Follow Befriend (4) 52 threads 4,416 comments Corning, NY Premium

   1   9:40pm Fri 27 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike   It seems to me that both parties are incapable of running the country. But over the last 12 years the Republicans have just gone completely insane. The Democrats are far more reasonable these days.

2. iwog Follow Befriend (48) 274 threads 12,546 comments 47 male Lafayette, CA Premium

   2   9:43pm Fri 27 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike   MarsAttacks! says You can balance the budget by eliminating the DOE, HHS, EPA, DOC, food stamps, medicaid and do those cuts you mentioned. Easy. Bullshit. With the Ryan plan tax cuts, there's no way to balance the budget ever. They are draconian cuts costing hundreds of billions of dollars every year. You always see one side of things.

3. Kevin Follow Befriend 40 threads 2,652 comments

   3   11:41am Sat 28 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike   MarsAttacks! says You can balance the budget by eliminating the DOE, HHS, EPA, DOC, food stamps, medicaid and do those cuts you mentioned. Easy. If you eliminate all of those things, you will only save about 10% of the current deficit. I've said this before, everyone with a brain has said this before, dumb fucks just don't understand: There are only three things that make up 90% of the budget. The military, social security, and medicare. Only *ONE* of those three things is paid for out of the general fund. If you eliminate social security and medicare, the budget would be balanced, but you'd then get to reconcile payroll taxes with income taxes. 2/3rds of americans support both social security and medicare, and everyone seems to support the ridiculous unnecessary military spending. If you're not willing to touch these three things (and by "touch" I mean, "eliminate or radically reduce"), and you're not willing to raise revenue, YOU WILL NEVER BALANCE THE BUDGET. Counting on a 5% growth rate or other bullshit is never going to happen in a mature, fully industrialized economy.

4. curious2 Follow Befriend (5) 31 threads 2,246 comments Premium

   4   12:49pm Sat 28 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (4)   Dislike   Some of the founders of the republic foresaw two basic risks, both of which have now become manifest. First, the emergence of two strong factions. Second, the people might start voting themselves money from the public treasury, leading to bankruptcy. Democrats and Republicans have become rival patronage networks, ideologically incoherent and untethered from reality. The Republicans throw reality to the wind, saying they can cut taxes and increase spending and balance the budget at the same time. Democrats are slightly less unrealistic, saying they can pay for everything by borrowing $1 trillion/year for at least a decade, even though no civilization has ever tried to borrow that much for that long. Republicans work for the military-industrial complex (war all over the world), Democrats work for the medical-industrial complex (ObamaCare) so we can poison and butcher each other at home. Both factions work for the prison industry (drug war), so for-profit prisons can rent cheap prisoner labor to corporations (this already happens with office furniture etc.). Part of the problem is, neither faction holds its own leaders to account, both just follow the leader. Nixon was forced to resign because leaders within his own party looked at the evidence, saw he had broken the law, and held him to account. Does anybody think that would happen today? Look at Bush's war in Iraq, and Obama's endless lies about ObamaCare. Tribalism trumps reality, so reality suffers. People end up in debt peonage, toiling in cubicles with furniture built by prisoners, each day another day older and deeper in debt, but always blaming the other tribe, just like the Orwellian 1984 characters who blame Oceania or Eurasia or whatever the enemy is today. After Nixon, who started the drug war, Republicans made a pact with religious fundamentalists, who didn't bother with reality and were therefore more reliable partisans.

5. freak80 Follow Befriend (4) 52 threads 4,416 comments Corning, NY Premium

   5   2:34pm Sat 28 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   curious2 says Tribalism trumps reality, so reality suffers. People end up in debt peonage, toiling in cubicles with furniture built by prisoners, each day another day older and deeper in debt, but always blaming the other tribe Correct. I think you've nailed it.

6. CBOEtrader Follow Befriend (2) 26 threads 502 comments Chicago, IL

   6   2:53pm Sat 28 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   "Other Romney proposals would make states responsible for programs such as Medicaid, and reduce the federal workforce by 10 percent “through attrition.” " The federal workforce is 2 million people. All he has to do is close down the Department of homeland security and voila a 200k employee layoff. No more spying on Americans = instant 10% cut in our federal workforce.

7. iwog Follow Befriend (48) 274 threads 12,546 comments 47 male Lafayette, CA Premium

   7   3:23pm Sat 28 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike   CBOEtrader says The federal workforce is 2 million people. All he has to do is close down the Department of homeland security and voila a 200k employee layoff. No more spying on Americans = instant 10% cut in our federal workforce. Have no doubt, Romney is going to do exactly the opposite if he wins.

8. rdm Follow Befriend 4 threads 239 comments

   8   4:24pm Sat 28 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike   curious2 says Look at Bush's war in Iraq, and Obama's endless lies about ObamaCare. Yep, those two "accomplishments" are certainly of equal importance, better get the articles of impeachment drawn up quick.

9. jvolstad Follow Befriend (4) 992 threads 1,125 comments San Antonio, TX jvolstad's website

   9   4:35pm Sat 28 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike   Mitt is going to increase the military by 100,000 troops? I can think of five prospects for the troop increase. His five panty waste sons. Sign em up Mitt. The military now takes gays

10. freak80 Follow Befriend (4) 52 threads 4,416 comments Corning, NY Premium

    10   5:25pm Sat 28 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (2)   Dislike   Hey, I think those guys came knocking on my door one Saturday morning.

11. Kevin Follow Befriend 40 threads 2,652 comments

    11   11:50pm Sat 28 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike (1)   curious2 says The Republicans throw reality to the wind, saying they can cut taxes and increase spending and balance the budget at the same time. Democrats are slightly less unrealistic, saying they can pay for everything by borrowing $1 trillion/year for at least a decade Bzzt, wrong. Democrats want to raise taxes. They support the current levels of federal spending, and simply want to pay for it. Republicans also support current levels of federal spending, but do not want to pay for it. They believe the lie that cutting taxes will cause us to have 5%+ GDP growth. Never going to happen. curious2 says even though no civilization has ever tried to borrow that much for that long I can think of many things that the U.S. civilization has done and is doing that have never happened before in history. Arbitrary amounts of paper debt is pretty minor. The U.S. debts (and deficits) are not abnormally high in terms of GDP. Nobody has ever had a $15 trillion economy. curious2 says Nixon was forced to resign because leaders within his own party looked at the evidence, saw he had broken the law, and held him to account. Does anybody think that would happen today? Look at Bush's war in Iraq, and Obama's endless lies about ObamaCare. It's fun to equivocate, but this is just bullshit. Nixon resigned because HE ACTUALLY BROKE THE FUCKING LAW.

12. curious2 Follow Befriend (5) 31 threads 2,246 comments Premium

    12   3:12pm Sun 29 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike (1)   Kevin says Democrats want to raise taxes. They support the current levels of federal spending... Actually, if you check what happened in 2009-2011 when they controlled both houses of Congress and the White House, you might see the opposite: they increased spending while also extending the Bush tax shift. Obama supporters boast that he cut taxes on 95% of Americans, so if you want to stay on their team, you'll need to learn the script. Kevin says The U.S. debts (and deficits) are not abnormally high in terms of GDP. That's absurd. The U.S. debt is the largest of any country in history, and even as a function of GDP it is approaching WWII levels, when the country was facing bankruptcy. Look at Zimbabwe or Weimar Germany for examples of what can happen in these situations. Bernanke and the current crop of elected politicians may think they are the first to discover the printing press, or at least the financial printing press, but they aren't. Others have tried this route, and it has a high risk of ending very badly. Kevin says It's fun to equivocate... Please look up "equivocate." I can't even guess what you're talking about there. Lastly Kevin, your game show buzzer sound effects seem to distract you from math. If you persist with the profanity I'll simply ignore you.

13. Kevin Follow Befriend 40 threads 2,652 comments

    13   3:55pm Sun 29 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike   curious2 says Actually, if you check what happened in 2009-2011 when they controlled both houses of Congress and the White House, you might see the opposite: they increased spending while also extending the Bush tax shift. Obama supporters boast that he cut taxes on 95% of Americans, so if you want to stay on their team, you'll need to learn the script. Yep, nobody wanted to raise taxes during the recession. Now that the recession is over they're openly calling for raising taxes. curious2 says The U.S. debt is the largest of any country in history, and even as a function of GDP it is approaching WWII levels Two very unrelated things. The debt is the largest AND SO IS THE GDP. As a function of GDP, it's high, but it's not anything outrageous. We've been here before, and MANY MANY other countries are in much deeper debt. Lets say that I make $500k a year and have a million dollars in debt. You make $50k a year and have $500,000 in debt. Who's in better financial shape? Talking about debts in terms of absolute value when they're entirely in the form of fiat money is ridiculous. Do you think we'd be better off if we had half the debt and half the GDP? Comparing the US to weimar germany or zimbabwe is the kind of thing that ignorant people do. If you really don't understand the difference, you have no business talking about them. curious2 says Please look up "equivocate." I can't even guess what you're talking about there. "endless lies about Obamacare". curious2 says If you persist with the profanity I'll simply ignore you. Oh no, how will I survive?

14. iwog Follow Befriend (48) 274 threads 12,546 comments 47 male Lafayette, CA Premium

    14   10:05pm Sun 29 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike   curious2 says Look at Zimbabwe or Weimar Germany for examples of what can happen in these situations. How long have you been predicting devaluation? (also known as interest rates at record highs) How long have interest rates been declining to record lows? Reality doesn't support your narrative.

15. FortWayne Follow Befriend (13) 102 threads 3,764 comments

    15   10:09pm Sun 29 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   I don't think Mitt would increase military. Both parties have been nicklediming soldiers left and right for a while now.

16. iwog Follow Befriend (48) 274 threads 12,546 comments 47 male Lafayette, CA Premium

    16   10:22pm Sun 29 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike   FortWayne says I don't think Mitt would increase military. Both parties have been nicklediming soldiers left and right for a while now. I think Republicans are devoid of popular issues and they know it. I mean seriously, what's left? More deregulation after the banking crisis? The Ryan bill cuts taxes for rich people (literally) down to 0%, so nothing left there. Drill baby drill is a pipe dream since excess oil will simply be sold at a profit overseas, and that should be obvious in the first year or two if Romney gets elected. The only thing left is to invent a threat and turn it into eternal war. George Orwell 101.

17. freak80 Follow Befriend (4) 52 threads 4,416 comments Corning, NY Premium

    17   11:45pm Sun 29 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike   Other than "Gays, Guns, n' God" the Republicans have nothing. But of course the populist "Gays, Guns, n' God" candidate (Rick "Frothy" Santorum) lost. It was the Big Business candidate (Mitt "Corporations are People" Romney) that won. It's all about the money.

18. Kevin Follow Befriend 40 threads 2,652 comments

    18   12:19am Mon 30 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (2)   Dislike   You have to be more specific. It's not just about "money", it's about money in the average person's pocket. The economy sucks, so dumb people assume that a rich guy must know something about how to make money for them. In truth, Romney knows nothing about creating jobs and building businesses -- only about extracting money from existing ones.

19. FortWayne Follow Befriend (13) 102 threads 3,764 comments

    19   7:54am Mon 30 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   iwog says I think Republicans are devoid of popular issues and they know it. I mean seriously, what's left? I don't think they'll do well this year. Romney isn't salty, no conviction. The message of "economy would be better with us" isn't really believable. But if Obama restarts the hand outs he might lose. Tea party formed out of frustration with Obamas Carter like unaccounted spending spree which resulted in local corruption.

20. freak80 Follow Befriend (4) 52 threads 4,416 comments Corning, NY Premium

    20   8:43am Mon 30 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike   Kevin says In truth, Romney knows nothing about creating jobs and building businesses -- only about extracting money from existing ones. True that. He's a typical Wall Streeter that knows how to buy and sell paper for a short term profit. But that's it.

21. dublin hillz Follow Befriend 10 threads 768 comments Dublin, CA

    21   9:04am Mon 30 Apr 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike   The best way to deal with military budget is to work backwards. We must ask ourselves as a nation exactly what role the military must serve. I think the reasonable position would be to agree that the military capability should serve as a deterrent from enemy attacks. In other words, the potential advesaries must know that if they attack us, the retribution can be swift, decisive and crushing. However, this does not mean at all that we should waste money on military adeventures that involve invading other nations for strategic resources or other "strategic reasons." Nor does it mean that we should interfere in disputes of other nations. What we must do is gather intelligence so that we know what we must do to retain technological superiority over other nation states in regards to military capabilities. That in turn should drive our budget.

22. Bigsby Follow Befriend 2,826 comments Monterey, CA

    22   5:24am Wed 30 May 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   Cloud says "George Orwell 101, Iwog?" Every read the book 1984? Here is a quick summary: Big Government baaaad. I take it you've never read 1984 then. Paint me surprised.

23. Honest Abe Follow Befriend (41) 91 threads 1,806 comments

    23   6:14am Wed 30 May 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike (1)   I just started reading The Communist Manifesto. By page nine I recognized the arguments used by the libs here on Patrick.net (Marcus, Vincente, Quack-Man, Kevin, wtfkr80, Ellie, et al) are basically communistic ideas. They'll probably accuse me of Thought Crime's, or "unconventional emotions". Why am I not surprised?

24. Bigsby Follow Befriend 2,826 comments Monterey, CA

    24   6:30am Wed 30 May 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   Honest Abe says I just started reading The Communist Manifesto. By page nine I recognized the arguments used by the libs here on Patrick.net (Marcus, Vincente, Quack-Man, Kevin, wtfkr80, Ellie, et al) are basically communistic ideas. They'll probably accuse me of Thought Crime's, or "unconventional emotions". Why am I not surprised? Yes, yes, what they post is exactly what is written in the Communist Manifesto. You must have read those 9 pages really carefully.

25. Honest Abe Follow Befriend (41) 91 threads 1,806 comments

    25   6:50am Wed 30 May 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike (1)   Bigss, have YOU read the Communist Manifesto? Seriously, have you?

26. Bigsby Follow Befriend 2,826 comments Monterey, CA

    26   6:51am Wed 30 May 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   Honest Abe says Bigss, have YOU read the Communist Manifesto? Seriously, have you? Yes, actually I have. You, though, just lie about it.

27. marcus Follow Befriend (5) 168 threads 5,082 comments

    27   6:57am Wed 30 May 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (2)   Dislike   I have Abe on ignore, but from this quote above, I have to wonder... Is it my observation that things have swung so far to the right that many of Nixon or Reagan's policies are to the left of our supposedly socialist President ? Is it my belief that paying our bills rather than irrationally being willing to default on our debts in a continuing "starve the beast strategy" that will never work, is the better fiscal policy ? I guess it's ultimately the belief that taking our taxes a very small fraction of the way back toward where they were under Eisenhower that makes me seem like my beliefs come out of the communist manifesto. Is there anyone more clueless than Abe on this forum ? Who knows what causes his rigid one dimensional authoritarian views on everything.

28. Bigsby Follow Befriend 2,826 comments Monterey, CA

    28   7:09am Wed 30 May 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   marcus says I have Abe on ignore, but from this quote above, I have to wonder... Is it my observation that things have swung so far to the right that many of Nixon or Reagan's policies are to the left of our supposedly socialist President ? Is it my belief that paying our bills rather than irrationally being willing to default on our debts in a continuing "starve the beast strategy" that will never work, is the better fiscal policy ? I guess it's ultimately the belief that taking our taxes a very small fraction of the way back toward where they were under Eisenhower that makes me seem like my beliefs come out of the communist manifesto. Is there anyone more clueless than Abe on this forum ? Who knows what causes his rigid one dimensional authoritarian views on everything. Apparently, the likes of iwog talking about the need for the very richest in society to carry their load and not be given massive tax breaks (or any other comment that Abe/Cloud... don't agree with) makes you a communist or socialist or whatever the hell they think those words mean. You know - all the stuff people say that is outlined in the first 9 pages of the Communist manifesto. At least the version Abe read.

29. Bigsby Follow Befriend 2,826 comments Monterey, CA

    29   7:42am Wed 30 May 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   Cloud says Abe, don't you love it when the libs declare "they have you on ignore." Points for you. I prefer to be able to read your posts. They're invariably good for a laugh.

30. freak80 Follow Befriend (4) 52 threads 4,416 comments Corning, NY Premium

    30   7:46am Wed 30 May 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   The Rushbots are always entertaining, yes.

31. Vicente Follow Befriend (8) 204 threads 4,411 comments Davis, CA

    31   7:54am Wed 30 May 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (2)   Dislike   jvolstad says Mitt is going to increase the military by 100,000 troops? I can think of five prospects for the troop increase. His five panty waste sons. Sign em up Mitt. The military now takes gays Whoa whoa there pal. We run a volunteer army now. Which means mental defectives, juvenile delinquents, and brown kids with no path to anything better. Do not think for a moment about trying to dragoon Pretty White Trust Fund Babies into your hobby. I'm sure they'd be well liked in the communal showers, but Mormons do not do the gay thing.

32. Patrick Follow Befriend (54) 5,188 threads 6,158 comments 46 male Menlo Park, CA

    32   12:03pm Wed 30 May 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (2)   Dislike (1)   Cloud, you have some serious hate issues. Every time you think you're describing "liberals" you're actually just talking about your own frustration and hate. It's not about them. It's about you.

33. Honest Abe Follow Befriend (41) 91 threads 1,806 comments

    33   12:34pm Wed 30 May 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike (1)   Patrick, with all due respect I have to agree with Cloud. Jovlstad had some hate filled comments as did wtfkr80. Clouds comments, I'm sure, were simply a reaction to the hate speech spewed by those two individuals. BTW, I seriously doubt that jovlstad would call Romneys sons pantie wastes to their faces. It looks like any one of them could defend themselves, and their honor.

34. bob2356 Follow Befriend 2 threads 2,497 comments

    34   12:38pm Wed 30 May 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   Patrick says Cloud, you have some serious hate issues. Every time you think you're describing "liberals" you're actually just talking about your own frustration and hate. It's not about them. It's about you. Cloud just has nothing better to do, leave him alone. If he wasn't hating liberals on pnet 24/7 he might be going out in to society and interacting with real people which would be dangerous. Pnet is providing a much needed a public service in cloud's case.

35. CaptainShuddup Follow Befriend (1) 248 threads 4,716 comments

    35   12:55pm Wed 30 May 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike (1)   It's not about electing Romney, it's about getting him in office, so the sooner we can contemplate his replacement.

36. CaptainShuddup Follow Befriend (1) 248 threads 4,716 comments

    36   12:57pm Wed 30 May 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike (1)   Cloud says Liberals HATE nice families that go to church together and actually love their parents, don't they. Patrick says Cloud, you have some serious hate issues. Liberals do have a serious disrespect for the sovereignty of the Family unit.

37. bob2356 Follow Befriend 2 threads 2,497 comments

    37   1:00pm Wed 30 May 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (2)   Dislike   Cloud says "George Orwell 101, Iwog?" Every read the book 1984? Here is a quick summary: Big Government baaaad. Obviously you failed to read the book very carefully. Actually you managed to miss the entire point of the book all together. Oppressive police state big government is bad. Big government in and of itself isn't the problem. Pretty piss poor analysis even by cloud standards. Or would you consider places like Sweden living embodiments of 1984? Of course as someone who's only thought is to hate liberals cloud somehow totally missed the complete and total stripping of civil rights, well as huge growth of the police state, and the complete destruction of the bill of rights under Reagan and Bush II. As a middle of the road moderate (which would be known as a flaming liberal commie fag in clouds distorted world) I will never ever understand hard right conservative view that a police state is a very good thing, but any kind of government aid to it's citizens is communism and perhaps even anti christ devil worship. Big government of jack booted thugs good, big government of social welfare bad. Check. Cloud could you explain this to me. Just use short words, it's ok.

38. Vicente Follow Befriend (8) 204 threads 4,411 comments Davis, CA

    38   2:12pm Wed 30 May 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike   Cloud says Liberals HATE nice families that go to church together and actually love their parents, don't they. So what you're saying is, that parent-dependent Mormon layabouts should not be welcome in the military. Why do you consider Mormons to be suspect? Is it their propensity for terrorism?

39. leo707 Follow Befriend (12) 10 threads 3,516 comments Oakland, CA leo707's website Premium

    39   3:02pm Wed 30 May 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   Cloud says Liberals HATE nice families that go to church together and actually love their parents, don't they. No, Jesus does: Luke 14:25 And there went great multitudes with him: and he turned, and said unto them, 14:26 If any man come to me, and hate not his father, and mother, and wife, and children, and brethren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot be my disciple. 14:27 And whosoever doth not bear his cross, and come after me, cannot be my disciple.

40. leo707 Follow Befriend (12) 10 threads 3,516 comments Oakland, CA leo707's website Premium

    40   3:10pm Wed 30 May 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike   Cloud says All I see in the Romney kids and their family is goodness. Yes and Romney follows the path a true prophet that taught your religion is wrong, corrupt and an abomination. "My object in going to inquire of the Lord was to know which of all the sects was right, that I might know which to join. No sooner, therefore, did I get possession of myself, so as to be able to speak, than I asked the personages who stood above me in the light, which of all the sects was right — and which I should join. I was answered that I must join none of them, for they were all wrong, and the personage who addressed me said that all their creeds were an abomination in His sight: that those professors were all corrupt . . ." –Joseph Smith, "History of the Church", Vol. 1, p. 5-6 Romney would be overjoyed if your admiration for his family is what brings you to the one true faith. I do not doubt that he approve if you would welcome two of his "bothers" into your home to learn more about how you can fill that emptiness inside of you and fill it with that goodness you admire.

Next comments »     Last »