WatchOr (I hope) 6-12 months too early. Last falls sales comps got us ready to buy, but the low inventory, multiple bids, and all-cash buyers came on with such a fury that we are stepping back and wondering WTF.
Put an offer on a house on Monday, 20K over asking. 25 offers by Tuesday. Went to all-cash, no-contingency buyer. Last fall we probably could have gotten it for list or under. Now, no way.
How many more years of high rent will I be paying??
Follow
Befriend (1)
22 threads
469 comments
San Jose, CA
Rental Watch says
In my observation, on South Bay, new development never stopped completely. It wasn’t robust like before 2006, but new houses are offered all the time. That means developers still able to make profit with current prices what is not possible with far away areas.
Follow
Befriend (2)
7 threads
530 comments
Belmont, CA
iwog says
You've given up on getting even more than a fair share? The beast is sated? Now use government to protect your landed gentry status.
Follow
Befriend (2)
7 threads
530 comments
Belmont, CA
iwog says
So a market needs new buyers, right? And this window, what, this was a window where someone with 20% down and a reasonable but not lavish existence could somehow scrape enough together to maybe afford something in a area with good schools. And now this "window" is closed, how can there be a market if nothing turns over and nobody can afford to get in? Sounds to me like if the zoning scam were fixed and the government actually allowed development this farcical shortage created by the landed gentry in control of all government regardless of party this whole shortage and ridiculous pricing would go away.
Yet the scammers need to "make money" sitting on assets that cost huge in taxes, upkeep and carrying costs and the NAR drones continue to parrot what a great deal HouseBorrowerShip is.
Follow
Befriend (2)
7 threads
530 comments
Belmont, CA
rowemoore says
The landed gentry scum in the fortress areas with good schools will never allow a new crop of middle class to put these types of homes anywhere near their NIMBY castles, their I GOT MINE castles, where they and they alone get to live on the hill watching over the rest of us commute and struggle like mad.
Follow
Befriend (8)
38 threads
2,001 comments
Pleasanton, CA
Premium
High rent? Where do you live? If the BA then your rent should be much less than the cost to own. Not the same elsewhere though.
Follow
Befriend
34 threads
2,098 comments
BoomAndBustCycle says
Here's the thing though: We have been looking for about 6 weeks and believe it or not, you'd be amazed at just how many foreclosures there are that seemingly came from those making high incomes. We're talking about nice houses in places like Piedmont Oakland, Rockridge, and other somewhat semi-affluent upper middle income type areas. Its not just poor and middle class people who are losing their homes. Its also those who "could" afford a home but probably only with two incomes at all times. All it would take is a job loss and they lose the home, and that's probably what's happened in a lot of these cases.
The deal with the BA is that a lot of buyers get a home and pay for it by the skin of their teeth. This is regardless of income. There's very little room for error and thus why a surprisingly large amount of upper income earners sit tediously on the edge of getting foreclosed come any sort of shift in their financial fortunes.
Its not just the bottom feeder investor fodder that's getting foreclosed. Its also the nice Craftsman houses with the 2 bimmers parked out front as well.
Follow
Befriend (1)
11 threads
224 comments
San Francisco, CA
RentingForHalfTheCost says
San Francisco proper. My once working-class neighborhood has turned shi-shi (I've been in the same nabe for 15 years, same SFH rental for 12).
Single family homes in SF are not rent controlled.
As someone posted previously, if you need anything bigger than 2 bedrooms (we have kids) and want a garage and a yard (kids=car) and pets, then apartments can be hard to find.
Our landlord raising the rent by $200 month is what made us start thinking that now is the time to buy.
Apparently everyone else, including the infestors, decided the same thing.
Follow
Befriend
34 threads
2,098 comments
1sfrenter,
We too are looking for houses. I am going to gently suggest that you need to maybe take a look at the situation differently. It sounds like you've been saving for years and have your ducks in a row. If that be the case, then don't worry about it. We too have been renting and saving for a long time. If you waited 15 years, then you can wait a bit longer. We fully expect it to take us a good year to find something. We're not going to get into any bidding wars and we will find the house for us, in our price range.
What I think is going on now is probably temporary. But even if it isn't, there will always be the "right" house out there, even if it takes awhile longer. So don't worry if people are freaking out and buying houses at random. Just take it easy and take your time.
Follow
Befriend (3)
12 threads
600 comments
Worst time to buy is spring/summer. Very best time to buy is to put your offer in between December 23 to January 5. Much less competition and better acceptance of your offer. People are too broke and recovering to get out there. Their moods are all off.
Follow
Befriend (4)
52 threads
4,416 comments
Corning, NY
Premium
rowemoore says
I hope so!
Follow
Befriend (4)
52 threads
4,416 comments
Corning, NY
Premium
1sfrenter says
I like your term for "investors." Classic!
Follow
Befriend (1)
11 threads
224 comments
San Francisco, CA
KILLERJANE says
If inventory is low right now (height of selling season), it might be nonexistent by fall/winter.
Unless all the underwater owners see the multiple bids and higher prices and start flooding the market.
One can only hope.
Follow
Befriend
41 threads
905 comments
Ross, CA
Mick Russom says
No, but they may allow these pre-fabs:
Follow
Befriend (1)
11 threads
224 comments
San Francisco, CA
edvard2 says
Thanks for the reassurance. This is about where we are, too. Resigned to be patient and kissing a$$ to our landlord so we don't find ourselves in a desperate situation.
It's also given us some time to re-evaluate our priorities. Although we know we want to buy, we have decided to get something a lot smaller and cheaper than originally planned.
It's easy to get caught up in the realtor's and mortgage broker's way of doing things (borrow and buy as much as you can).
It may be a blessing in disguise that we have not gotten any of our offers accepted. A smaller, cheaper house means the difference between possibly paying off the mortgage in 15 years vs. debt slavery until the day I day.
Follow
Befriend (28)
170 threads
4,175 comments
Premium
rowemoore says
A friend who did two of these in different states said the catalogs these days for factory built homes are incredible. I saw the first that went up in the mid-1980s and it was a sleek country home with wraparound porch/deck. The other one I never visited, built in the mid-1990s, years after his wife died, and he said the variety of homes on the catalogs in that time had tripled and then some.
Follow
Befriend (8)
38 threads
2,001 comments
Pleasanton, CA
Premium
1sfrenter says
Run the full numbers and expenses and compare you rent verses a comparable house to buy in you hood. I think you will be surprised how much better of you are right now to rent.
Follow
Befriend (4)
52 threads
4,416 comments
Corning, NY
Premium
APOCALYPSEFUCK is Tony Manero says
But do they come with pre-fab arsenals and gun-ports?
Follow
Befriend (28)
170 threads
4,175 comments
Premium
wthrfrk80 says
Given the advancement in the art, sure, very likely.
Follow
Befriend (1)
11 threads
224 comments
San Francisco, CA
edvard2 says
Been renting for 30 years. Don't want to anymore. Too old (and have kids and pets) to have to move whenever house gets sold (owner-occupied eviction has happened to us twice!) and single family homes are not rent controlled here.
I've said it before: when you are young it's no big deal to chase cheaper rentals and get boxes off craigslist and borrow a truck and get your pals to help you move with a case of beer and some pizza. Throw in some kids, a few pets, a piano, a bad back, etc., not so much.
And JOBS. We have stable jobs with seniority. Moving to work in another school district given the cuts in education just doesn't make sense.
And this is our home. Yes there has been a mass exodus of middle class folks out of San Francisco, but the idea that hundreds of thousands of people (ie., anyone who makes less than 250K a year) should leave their home and the place they love is ridiculous. That's what happens during a war.
I guess this is a war. Class War. And we are losing.
Follow
Befriend
41 threads
905 comments
Ross, CA
APOCALYPSEFUCK is Tony Manero says
Get off the grid and the only weapons you'll need are fishing poles and a knife
Follow
Befriend (4)
52 threads
4,416 comments
Corning, NY
Premium
1sfrenter says
I think Buffett would agree.
Follow
Befriend
34 threads
2,098 comments
I hear what you're saying. Moving sucks... for everyone. Young, old, and those inbetween. Trust me. We have a TON of crap, and yes- we too are attached to where we live. But where we live is semi-desirable and thus we've made some exceptions to where we will buy simply because to us the additional costs of living where we live aren't really worth it.
True, we don't have kids and that alone makes a huge difference. But I still think you have options. Plenty of people buy or rent homes in the East Bay and commute to SF. I did it for 2 years and it wasn't that big a deal. Its easy to forget that SF is about 15-20 minutes from the east bay. So its not like we're talking some huge chasm.
But everyone has their own idea of what they place value on and how much they're willing to pay for the privilege.
Follow
Befriend (5)
10 threads
2,329 comments
wthrfrk80 says
LOL. Then why are we arguing about home prices here?
Follow
Befriend (1)
11 threads
224 comments
San Francisco, CA
edvard2 says
You are so very right. As a gay surfer, I am willing to pay to live in a place where people don't throw eggs and empty beer cans at me out their car windows (been there, done that) and will pay extra to be able to catch a few waves before I have to be at work.
AND, I can still complain about class warfare.
I don't think decimating the middle class and passively watching as we all become beholden to the landlord class is a good idea.
That's why I appreciate these online forums and the Occupy movement and anything else that brings these issues to light.
I also believe that the suburbs will be the new ghettos. I prefer the city.
Follow
Befriend
2 threads
5 comments
Fremont, CA
BoomAndBustCycle says
I know many dual income (Tech Industry) couples with kids who bought in 2005-08 with 20-30% down payment. Even though their houses have dropped 10-30% They can still afford the mortgage and recent price bump is helping with lower rate refinancing. Some have even paid more money to makeup for the gap in appraised value and remaining loan amount to get lower rate financing. Many of them are in decent to excellent (as measured by API) school districts i.e. Cupertino, Fremont(Mission/WarmSprings/Ardenwood), Palo Alto, San Ramon, Dublin and Pleasanton. Million dollar home buyers refinanced to 2.5% 5/1 ARM. They are betting on low interest rate for a while (10+ years). Some of them are counting on stock grants to pay off the mortgage after 5 years if interest rates rise.
Follow
Befriend
34 threads
2,098 comments
1sfrenter says
Guess we all have our own preferences. I personally don't find the Bay Area suburbs- at least the immediate bay area burbs like Oakland, Berkely and so on as being that different in regards to attitudes and open-mindedness. I'm also not sure how the suburbs could become ghettos if they're getting filled up by priced-out city dwellers. But then again, the cities have undergone a transformation from being mostly ghettos to newly-minted gentrified playgrounds.
Its also sad that no matter where you live, there are ugly people everywhere. I grew up in the very rural, very conservative South. There were good aspects and bad. Open minded people and those who weren't so much. I've now lived on both coasts and many different places. People are people just about everywhere.
That said, I fully admit that I too am paying a rather huge premium to buy a house here. I suppose I could make an effort to relocate to somewhere else that has the jobs I am in- like Austin or something. But I've been here long enough and getting the an age where change is increasingly difficult. I complain about the BA but in the end its been good to me so far. Its also been good to a lot of other people and they too are willing to shell out the dough to stay.
Follow
Befriend
34 threads
2,098 comments
sera says
Oh no doubt, The bulk of these such couples are probably fine. But as mentioned above, some of them would be in pretty deep doo-doo if one or both of them lost a job because they bought at the absolute peak at the absolute top of their price levels counting on those 2 jobs to pay for the mortgage.
We too are one of those fairly high, dual wage earning couples. Even so, there is no way I would pay anything close to the 650-900k some of these folks are paying even though we would qualify. 450-500k is more like it and that's sadly still more or less a starter home here. Insane given what we make and what it costs to buy here.
Follow
Befriend (7)
37 threads
1,526 comments
Mountain View, CA
bmwman91's website
Premium
1sfrenter says
Absolutely. It is shrinking across the US as a whole. CA is seeing it even more, and to top it off, lots of middle class people are leaving. Since my job isn't tied to any particular locality, I am working out the logistics of a move to Seattle. This area is an odd mix: many aspects of it feel like a sinking ship for middle class folks, while at the same time there is this boom in web services companies and a lot of people thinking that the sky is the limit here.
Follow
Befriend (4)
52 threads
4,416 comments
Corning, NY
Premium
bmwman91 says
Stock up on anti-depressants. It's even cloudier there than where I live.
Follow
Befriend (3)
124 comments
Rental Watch says
The most logical reason for low inventory.
Follow
Befriend
485 comments
Los Angeles, CA
hanera says
Really? Sounds like tautological used house salesman mumbo jumbo to me.
Follow
Befriend (7)
37 threads
1,526 comments
Mountain View, CA
bmwman91's website
Premium
wthrfrk80 says
I am up there for work weekly. I have been going there for work for the last 4 years. It really isn't as bad as people say. You just gotta sack-up & get out and live regardless of rain, shine or otherwise.
Follow
Befriend (4)
52 threads
4,416 comments
Corning, NY
Premium
bmwman91 says
lol. Good point.
Follow
Befriend
13 comments
Philistine says
It's more like economics and capitalism. Think of housing like a manufacturing process:
There are inputs to the process, raw materials, land, a regulatory environment to work within (permits, building standards, cost of improvements to hook into local sewer/water/electricity/drainage, etc.), and a process used to convert the raw materials to the product (energy and labor).
If the cost of the inputs, regulatory environment, and process exceeds the market price for the product, no one will produce the product.
Some people believe that in fact, if there was demand at current prices, builders could and would build at a cost that allows them to make a profit. In some parts of the country, this may be the case. I do not believe this is true in many parts of California based on my experience (land is too expensive, regulatory environment too expensive--build it green initiatives, permit costs, etc.). If it were true, you would see more grading of new lots...what we see instead is predominantly building on existing inventory of finished lots.
So, if you are in an environment where cost>price, there will be no new supply. If there is no new supply, but a growing demand for the product (in a location with a growing population, there is a growing demand for shelter), simple laws of supply and demand dictate that eventually prices will rise.
Land is the plug number...it's value is the residual of what's left after you back out all the other costs and a profit margin. If after you back out all the costs, the number is negative...no new development. If after you back out all the costs plus a profit margin, you get $X, then a builder will generally pay $X for the land.
Today, near the coasts, this calculation yields a number >$0, if a builder can find a willing land seller at a price of $X, and a municipality willing to grant entitlements, then they can buy the land, build the home, and turn a profit. If there is no land available at a price that makes sense in the calculation, they won't buy, and they won't develop/build.
Farther inland, the calculation in many places yields a number of less than $0, so the only way builders generally have been able to make sense of the math in those markets is either a) they have existing partially/completely developed land in their inventory that they can justify building on because they already have sunk costs in land and infrastructure, or b) they are buying finished lots at less than the cost of the infrastructure from distressed land sellers or financial institutions.
There is a finite amount of lots that fall into categories "a" and "b". Once they are gone, there will not be additional development in the negative residual land value locations until the math makes sense again to develop more lots. The cost of the inputs needs to fall, or the value of homes needs to go up. With the Fed printing money, thereby weakening the dollar, and interest rates low (and affordability high), the likely outcome is prices rising, not cost of the inputs falling.
Perversely, exacerbating the situation is that many builders (public and private) sold finished land inventory for big losses to investors when times were the worst (2009/2010) because in addition to raising some cash in the sale, they could claim huge losses on the land sale, and get tax refunds from Uncle Sam for income taxes paid in prior years. This reduced the number of lots they can build on now--some of those investors are selling the lots back to the builders today at less than replacement cost, but above what they paid.
Other investors are just sitting tight on the finished lots, under the theory that eventually the math will need to make sense for homebuilding to occur on raw land again, meaning the lots will eventually be worth much more than they are today in that particular market.
Follow
Befriend (2)
7 threads
530 comments
Belmont, CA
1sfrenter says
No, despite stagflation one income and huge inflation in gas , food, rent and tuition, people are still trying the real estate ponzi scheme because helicopter ben is shoveling free money at the problem interest rates are basically zero in real terms.
Despite this the middle class is crushed, pay is stagnant and ever departing from the cost of living increases, and the scam and ponzi artists pretend that they will retire rich in real estate instead of like, you know, actually being an honest and productive worker, entrepreneur or business owner - not that that's rewarded anymore.
The world is for those who take massive risks, and the 1-2% of those who take said risks they get to be elevated and walk on the middle class. And those 98% who fail, well, we the hard working middle class with kids get to carry them around on social programs until they go off and bet the farm again.
What a joke. The bay area, for all its prosperity, is a stinking, moldy outdated trafficy pile of crap. And now the NY-style gordon geckos are coming and running the place, long gone are the guys with sandals running cool new businesses in a relaxed way and in come the rats from afar here to try and milk the last vestiges of the systems for whatever.
Joke. Innovation is basically dead.
Follow
Befriend (2)
7 threads
530 comments
Belmont, CA
bmwman91 says
The only limit in the sky is the pie. Its bull. The failure rate is astonishing, and if you see, in just about every case, the success is ordained, as in, Instagram guy and Zuck had met before... And google bough ad words from Oingo/Applied Semantics, they bought Andriod and youtube.
Innovation is dead. Rainmakers rule, and the rest is robotic global 500 type companies kicking the employee in the nuts.
If you arent executive management or high end sales, you are getting screwed to the wall in the bay area.
Follow
Befriend (2)
7 threads
530 comments
Belmont, CA
sera says
No public school in the entire state of CA is excellent. Public schools are worthless today. Totally. its the biggest scam I've ever seen. I have an API-950 school,for the kids, garbage. And of course private is 20-30k/yr.
Bay Area sucks. Its time to pack it in. 2 more years or so.
Follow
Befriend (2)
7 threads
530 comments
Belmont, CA
rowemoore says
Tough with kids.
Follow
Befriend (8)
38 threads
2,001 comments
Pleasanton, CA
Premium
Mick Russom says
Easy, each kids gets his/her own pod.
Follow
Befriend (16)
761 threads
7,688 comments
Boca Raton, FL
Premium
Only Ikea could design a $86,500 house that looks like a $17,500 house.
Worst part, I assembled the damn thing and I've got 100 left over pieces.