WatchI have a rental property where the tenants are paying around $3k per month in rent. Which was a bit high when they signed a year ago but now based on my research of going market rents it's actually a bit low! I'm fairly confident that I could increase the rent 10% and have it rented in a month.
They are good tenants
I'm not trying to be greedy just need to stabilize my cashflow.
It's a good area generally so finding good tenants is not a problem.
Follow
Befriend (7)
37 threads
1,539 comments
Mountain View, CA
bmwman91's website
Premium
dodgerfanjohn says
lol
Is toothfairy a known / admitted realtor?
Follow
Befriend (2)
15 threads
429 comments
Reston, VA
Maybe raise the rent 5% if you want to keep them but keep up with market rates.
Follow
Befriend
40 threads
856 comments
Oakland, CA
Thats true not sure why the post says Oakland but this rental is not in Oakland its in the heart of silicon valley and I havent had a problem finding good tenants.
Follow
Befriend (12)
10 threads
3,516 comments
Oakland, CA
leo707's website
Premium
toothfairy says
That is the location indicated by the zip code in your profile.
Follow
Befriend
40 threads
856 comments
Oakland, CA
ah I see. and for the record I'm not a realtor. If it were up to meeven more people would be renting so I guess you could say I'm the anti-realtor :)
Follow
Befriend
6 threads
17 comments
Seattle, WA
Why dont you post the general location of said property, we can all then comment of what we think you can expect to rent it for. Just give a brief description of property i.e 3 bedrooms, lot size, sq footage of residence etc, and the location. And I can promise you that within a week we could all find similar properties that rent for the same price or less.
Follow
Befriend
40 threads
856 comments
Oakland, CA
Ok 3br 1ba house within 2 blocks of downtown mnt. View. For $3000 or less.
Follow
Befriend
7 comments
iwog
You're so right. San Francisco and New York are falling apart because of rent control. If they were more like Detroit, Cleveland, Indianapolis and Cincinnati, which have high rates of homeownership and no rent control, they'd be thriving metropolises -- the most beautiful in the land.
It's sort of like Europe, where Greece, Spain and Italy, with high rates of homeownership, are just blowing the doors off Germany, which has 41 percent homeownership, the lowest in Europe, and strong renter protections. God forbid we should be like Germany instead of Greece.
Or we could just expand rent stabilization, so renters had some protection against the government's despicable bailouts of property owners -- virtually none of whom came to own real estate privately.
Government has nanny-stated the putative owners of this so-called "private'' property. Only renters aren't too big to fail, or to resist the rape of their only real property -- their paychecks -- to subsidize and subsidize and subsidize property owners/debtors.
Follow
Befriend
7 threads
677 comments
Folks -- if this thread isn't the most compelling argument against the better-off-renting mindset, then truly nothing is.
Personally, I'm nearing the point I would rather reach up my asshole and pay for a place with part of my spleen than enrich my miserably cheap, soul-starved, balding, flab-gutted, penny-loafer-wearing, khaki short-sporting, bottom shelf cereal-eating, LIVE STRONG bracelet-wearing, Zig Ziglar/Warren Buffet-worshipping, penny chiseller of a landlord with any more of my precious lucre.
That, and engaging with any human being so stinking drunk with the fear of poverty every month is just...depressing.
Follow
Befriend (9)
414 threads
4,133 comments
Baltimore, MD
I also think 10% all at once might be too much. Try something lower, like 5%, then reevaluate again next year.
Follow
Befriend (31)
34 threads
2,545 comments
San Jose, CA
Premium
Toothfairy,
Losing a good tenant over a couple hundred bucks is not worth it in my book. Instead of raising the rent $300, why don't you raise it $100 and call it a day?
Follow
Befriend (3)
29 threads
490 comments
Denver, CO
Austinhousingbubble says
I moved to Denver 2.5 years ago and rented a SFH for $1500/month -- we figured it was $200-$300 under market when we rented. We got a year lease and once that expired the landlord only wanted to do month to month, so we knew the situation was tenuous (we also knew that the neighbor with the same landlord had been month to month for 10 years)
A few months back he emailed us to let us know that the rent was going to increase from 1500 to 1750, then to 2000, and then to 2250....all with improvements, and all within a 9 month time window.
In the end he gave us notice that he needed the place for himself, so we had to move. We had a few months, but given the rental market in the area, we jumped on the first thing we found (4 days later). The move totally sucked.
Was it stressful? Yes! The uncertainty, the move, the suddenness of it all...all stressors. Would I do it differently? Probably not. In the 30 months we lived there we probably saved on the order of $7500 in rent, which is about 1/2 year of 401K savings. Our savings over buying a comparable house is harder to estimate (and we wouldn't buy a comparable house anyway), but we came out way ahead financially. At the end of the day I feel like we did the right thing given our situation. We can't afford a house in this school district, my employment situation is tenuous (so buying a house didn't make sense), and pre-emptively moving to a more expensive place just to avoid some uncertainty didn't make sense to us.
So, no, this is not a convincing argument against renting for my situation and tolerance for uncertainty, etc. A convincing argument would be if rents went up, or if prices went down, making it a clear financial benefit to own.
Follow
Befriend (3)
29 threads
490 comments
Denver, CO
Austinhousingbubble says
Wow. Deep breath.
Follow
Befriend
6 threads
17 comments
Seattle, WA
Does not seem to be a shortage of homes for rent in that area. There is a whole list of different properties for rent that were listed today.
http://sfbay.craigslist.org/pen/apa/3015976089.html
http://sfbay.craigslist.org/pen/apa/2991660230.html
http://sfbay.craigslist.org/pen/apa/3016039504.html
http://sfbay.craigslist.org/pen/apa/3015268102.html
http://sfbay.craigslist.org/pen/apa/3004160812.html
Follow
Befriend
40 threads
856 comments
Oakland, CA
Andy S says
Those aren't even in Mnt. View. East Palo Alto is low income + high crime...the other listings here are 2br condos?
If you do the search for 3br in Mnt. View there are 15 total for rent and Most are apartments.
http://sfbay.craigslist.org/search/apa/pen?query=&srchType=A&minAsk=&maxAsk=&bedrooms=3&nh=81
Follow
Befriend
40 threads
856 comments
Oakland, CA
E-man says
actually they're not perfect tenants. If I only raise the rent $100 these are the type of people who would just find $100 more dollars worth of things to fix each month.
Follow
Befriend
10 threads
768 comments
Dublin, CA
Raising someone's rent from $3,000 to $3,300 is not something to be taken lightly. Personally, I always felt that paying over $1,600 a month in rent is ridiculous regardless of how it compares to if one "owned" the same dwelling. Obviously, many people do not share the same point of view. I know someone who paid close to $4,500 a month to live in mission san jose district in fremont. I believe at the time the market value of the place was $1.2 million. So yeah, while it may have been better to rent than own same pad, I still would never pay that much in rent. I guess you need to find out if you are likely to replace the renters within 30 days. If so, you will come out ahead.
Follow
Befriend
5 threads
94 comments
toothfairy says
"the type of people" that would demand premium service for premium rates. Danm them!
Follow
Befriend (9)
414 threads
4,133 comments
Baltimore, MD
dublin hillz says
Except since I don't live in CA my acceptable rent number would be much lower then 1600/month
Follow
Befriend
7 threads
677 comments
swebb says
I both understand and sympathise, Swebb. In fact, I would add that I think rents are presently enjoying an anomalous and ultimately temporary boost from a confluence of unique factors in the marketplace. My point was, the overall tenor of this thread and others like it has induced some serious misgivings (gag reflex) in me as a renter/host. I am convinced there are at least as many vested interests lobbying for the rent-vs-own argument as there are behind the buy-now/be-priced-out-forever crowd. Increasingly, it seems like little more than a choice between two different taxonomies of parasite.
Yes, I have saved a prodigious amount of money renting my little granny shack, and in a way, I feel I've become addicted to watching my decimal stuff grow. However, as you well know, renting does suck, and moving really sucks. I guess as prices slowly drift downward and my savings/compensation gradually increases, the greedy machinations of all these genius infesters have left me feeling at least a little more philosophical about the premiums of buying.
BTW - Denver's corrected quite a bit since you moved there, no? Prices do seem to be going down, and rents do seem to be going up there. Nice part of the country -- congratulations.
Follow
Befriend
19 threads
590 comments
Los Angeles, CA
Austinhousingbubble says
Where does this notion come from that renters are constantly moving?
Growing up, I had two friends whose parents rented. One lived in the same apartment for 10 years. The others lived in a SFR in Monterey Park that they rented for over 20 year.
Everyone making an argument against renting keeps citing the "fact" that renters have to move all the time. Do renters really move more often than home debtors(who move every 7 years, yes yes?)
Follow
Befriend
7 threads
677 comments
dodgerfanjohn says
In my instance, it's an empirical observation.
dodgerfanjohn says
They do if they want to enjoy the leverage that renting allows vs owning where housing costs are concerned. When rent rises, most probably pay it to avoid the stress of moving -- even despite the likelihood that a comparable rental for less is available nearby.
Follow
Befriend (8)
38 threads
2,008 comments
Pleasanton, CA
Premium
dublin hillz says
You are paying that much and more to rent money. Either from yourself if you paid all cash or from the bank if you didn't. I don't see any difference except renting for 4500/mth saves you more money. Now, if you are gambling on the house appreciating then all bets are off. Be honest.
Follow
Befriend
40 threads
856 comments
Oakland, CA
ok rents are just going batshit insane now. Look at this!
it seems that landlords are just setting the price ridiculously high and seeing if anyone bites.
http://sfbay.craigslist.org/pen/apa/3017822124.html
or you can rent this townhouse for $5300 per month
http://sfbay.craigslist.org/pen/apa/3017734266.html
Follow
Befriend (8)
38 threads
2,008 comments
Pleasanton, CA
Premium
toothfairy says
They can do what they want. It has no effect on my rent. None. Wishful thinking in a down market. These people are probably so far underwater and they are going to lose the house unless they get this rent. $6k/mth sounds like about the cost of ownership, so they are trying to break even. Good luck with that.
Follow
Befriend (7)
37 threads
1,539 comments
Mountain View, CA
bmwman91's website
Premium
toothfairy says
Sheesh, that is pretty wild. Talk about rent-seeking!
Mountain View has gotten really nutty in the last 18 months. I was negotiating rent DECREASES in summer 2010. Last year, I think that Google's 5000 person hiring spree really threw a wrench into the gears, along with generally increased demand for rentals since RE in this area is priced above many people's comfort zones, but they still want a short commute (me me me). I expect this year to be another one where rents go up in the area, overall. However, I am seeing a lot of very large complexes go up all around here, and investors are turning RE into rentals left & right. Combine those hitting the market and rents possibly violating enough people's comfort zones, and I think that next summer will see rents flatten out or decrease. This is all with respect to MV, Sunnyvale and adjacent parts of SC & SJ.
Follow
Befriend (8)
38 threads
2,008 comments
Pleasanton, CA
Premium
bmwman91 says
Imagine what happens the day Google does its first layoff. Kaboom!
Follow
Befriend
28 threads
351 comments
dodgerfanjohn says
Well if odds are you are staying put for 10-20 years you might as well buy.. The downside risk is minimal. Even people who bought 10 years ago in LA are about even with most renters in most scenarios. And if they took out equity on their home during the bubble days and invested it all into Apple stock then they made a killing. I doubt any renters were able to qualify for a $100K in equity loan in 2005-2006 to invest in Apple.
I keep hearing stories about "opportunity cost" hurting homeowners... But "opportunity cost" can turn into "opportunity loss" just as easily for a homeowners as a renter...
Follow
Befriend
28 threads
351 comments
bmwman91 says
Lower rents in summer of 2010 were due to the residual effects of the "fear of end of the world" that was still very real since March 2009 lows. Once the "world isn't going to end" fear subsided.. rents went back up.
Follow
Befriend (7)
37 threads
1,539 comments
Mountain View, CA
bmwman91's website
Premium
BoomAndBustCycle says
Yeah that makes sense. I assume that the various tax credits for house buyers also suppressed rental demand. Aaah, those were the good days lol.
Follow
Befriend (1)
248 threads
4,716 comments
Meanwhile on the tennants of scumbag landlord forum so and so is posting.
Is it unreasonable for me to rip out the copper wire and pour concrete in the toilets, when a landlord wants to raise my rent, because he's playing the numbers?
Follow
Befriend
28 threads
351 comments
Jerry says
Ok, scenario for you...
Buy in 2012...
2017.. home prices hit bottom. (Officially in every big metro)
2023 home prices recover back to 2012 prices...
2030 new housing bubble starts a brewing and prices start rising toward 2006 bubble levels...(If you believe our BOOM AND BUST society will not be fixed) Then our Millennial generation has their student loans paid off and are ready to buy a house before they are too old...
Sure i missed out on the 2017 absolute bottom.. But you have something to sell in 2030.. vs. nothing to sell as a renter.
Follow
Befriend
10 threads
768 comments
Dublin, CA
RentingForHalfTheCost says
I would not rent for $4,500 or buy for $1.2 million. Either option is completely insane.
Follow
Befriend (3)
29 threads
490 comments
Denver, CO
dodgerfanjohn says
Good question. I only have my own experience go draw on, but having owned two houses and rented countless other dwellings, I would say that my average duration was about the same (both houses were
And for the record, renting doesn't suck. Are there downsides? Absolutely! But on balance I find it to be a pretty good deal. When I do need/want to move, it's a whole lot easier being a renter. I think a big part of it is that it is a choice. I may be in a small group, but I could easily afford to buy/qualify for/pay the monthly payments on a nicer house than I am currently living in. I don't do this for a variety of reasons, but it's my decision...And it being my decision makes it easier than if I just had no choice but to rent. I guess.
EDIT: Why do my comments keep getting clipped? (fixed)
Follow
Befriend
2 threads
27 comments
Pleasanton, CA
dublin hillz says
Agreed on the insanity of either option.
What was the old rule of thumb, maximum of 33% of gross income for a mortgage or 25% of gross income for rent?
$4500 a month rent should then be $216K gross, its not one-percenter income, but its in the top 5%.
Does 1 in 20 (5%) of households pay $4500 a month or more? I would think not.
Follow
Befriend
19 threads
590 comments
Los Angeles, CA
^^^^^
This is interesting.
I pay just over 25% gross in rent.
I do not believe I could find a place I want to live in at the moment for 33% gross....
Theres areas I like that are or we're pushing that point, but now there's zip as far as inventory.
Follow
Befriend
7 threads
677 comments
swebb says
Ha! I'm wondering when it will become the thing to start spamming such comments with Landlords are Liars.
For me, renting is a means of wealth preservation. As a control freak who's sensitive to his surroundings, that's the best argument I can make for renting over owning.
Follow
Befriend
487 comments
Los Angeles, CA
BoomAndBustCycle says
LOL, they didn't buy AAPL with it, they squandered it on Pergo floors, stainless steel appliances, granite countertops, and a tropical vacation.
Follow
Befriend (8)
38 threads
2,008 comments
Pleasanton, CA
Premium
BoomAndBustCycle says
Except all the stocks and bonds you accumulated over the years. Enough to buy two or three houses with cash.
Follow
Befriend (8)
38 threads
2,008 comments
Pleasanton, CA
Premium
Philistine says
Not to mention paying of the ballooning credit cards and getting that new motorcycle and ski boat. Oh, and that overpriced 1 month vacation in Europe. All while their salaries just barely beat inflation. Can you see the bubble? Nah, forget it.