WatchHere are some things I think seem true to me, but could be refuted by you geniuses.
If we have hit any bottom, we need a counterargument to the below. Please add to these negative pressure arguments as you think of more. I'd suggest we make an alternate list of bull arguments and see what we think looks most accurate as to where we are in this bubble:
Bear argument--
During the bubble:
There were 100s of thousands of consumers added to the pool of purchasers, due to easy credit and low underwriting standards.
There were more houses being built, adding to inventory now
There was lower unemployment, and now it’s very high
There were people who could have afforded houses that can no longer purchase any (due to foreclosure, credit damage, job loss or eviscerated savings)
There was irrational exuberance
There was a healthy (feeling) business environment, in Europe and in Asia too, adding to consumer strength and purchases of CDOs and MBS by sovereign wealth funds
People are trapped in houses due to underwater conditions; unable to relocate or move up
People are gun-shy, scared to take the plunge
Society is more mobile now; people may feel they need to move to get better jobs and feel that mortgages constrain them
The elderly will have houses to put on the market when they downsize, and there are millions of boomers that will
Retirement accounts have been neglected or drained, keeping people in the workforce longer (but concerned about savings, not home buying)
Deficit issues have made the idea of killing the MID or Fannie/Freddie a possibility
Wages haven’t kept up with much of anything, including inflation, driving down purchasing power
Deficit reduction obsessions dampen consumerism
Why would these conditions have changed in the last year or two, to the point where home prices would be turning around?
Follow
Befriend
249 threads
2,913 comments
1sfrenter says
I don't think we've seen the true bottom. I believe what's going on is a quick Spring bounce that happens every year. When Summer gets here, prices will continue their downward trend.
Why??? until the job situation gets better and unemployment "truly" drops (not the fake numbers put out by the BLS), it takes a solid job to buy a house. Don't think the ones on unemployment will be eligible for a mortgage.
Plus, you have the boat loads of houses underwater, these people are truly "stuck"... until their houses rise in value or they pay off a big chunk of principal, they ain't going anywhere or moving up to their next larger home.
If the financial situation melts down in this country, then all bets are off....
Sit tight, you'll be able to get a deal shortly......
Follow
Befriend (28)
181 threads
4,590 comments
Premium
But isn't US RE grossly underpriced compared to the rest of the world? A 3/2 in a free fire zone in Stockton should be at least as expensive as a 3/2 in downtown Sydney, right?
Follow
Befriend (1)
11 threads
224 comments
San Francisco, CA
bmwman91 says
Well actually I've been renting for almost 30 years, but wasn't in a position family-wise or career-wise to buy until about 2003, and by then it was so obviously crazy that even though I could have bought I chose not too.
Not sure when I found patrick.net and The Housing Bubble Blog, but I was one of those people everyone thought was crazy because I kept saying that real estate doesn't always go up.
Luckily I found company online.
Although now no one seems to know what's going to happen in "special" places like SF.
I know it will always cost more to live here, and I can deal with that, but sheesh, the all cash folks and the investors are bumming me out.
I'm not a facebook stockholder, a would-be-landlord, or a flipper. Just need a decent place to live and tired of landlords.
Follow
Befriend (2)
3 threads
563 comments
Madison, WI
Why would these conditions have changed in the last year or two, to the point where home prices would be turning around?
Piles of money, just waiting to be inflated away, with no where else to go with it. Investor demand.
Heck, we are even selling banks to China now.
Follow
Befriend
249 threads
2,913 comments
everything says
They haven't.... just some people want to jump on a small upward blip to say the housing recession is over!!!
Until the fundamental conditions needed to own a house change, the overall direction of house prices is DOWN!!
Follow
Befriend
249 threads
2,913 comments
Realtors Are Clowns says
Ha Ha, Why does that comment flash a picture of some big fat chick standing in line in front of me. :)
Follow
Befriend (31)
34 threads
2,608 comments
San Jose, CA
Premium
CL,
What BMW man said. The 99% think they're in control, but the 1% is holding the remote control. :)
Follow
Befriend (31)
34 threads
2,608 comments
San Jose, CA
Premium
Call it Crazy says
If this is your believe, are you currently shorting the homebuilder and the bank stocks? What stocks are you shorting? I'd love to know. Thanks in advance.
Follow
Befriend (12)
141 threads
1,367 comments
Emeryville, CA
E-man says
There is symbiosis here though. They can't fuck us too bad, since they need us to make and buy their garbage. (You'd be lucky if you worked at the pitchfork and torch factory!).
Keep in mind that for most Americans, they have no retirement plans per se. They spend and live like they have pensions, but they only had their houses. If the solution proffered by the .01% is that granny and Grandpa can work until they die, they might just get the revolution they've been successfully avoiding thus far.
Housing has not yet returned to pre-bubble pricing, right? We are to believe that the Government et al have finally figured out a way to defy gravity? Or is that only in SF and Manhattan? Or will we get our comeuppance soon?
Follow
Befriend (8)
38 threads
1,606 comments
Mountain View, CA
bmwman91's website
Premium
CL says
This is a very interesting line of discussion and one that always fascinated me in social science / history classes.
Looking through history, we see time and time again that the elite 0.01% ALWAYS ends up fucking the producer classes harder and harder until a revolution comes, or the society is weakened to the point that it is overrun by another one. While it may seem hard to believe that those with that sort of power could be so short sighted and stupid, it is the case every single time in history. They have an incredible gig going, but there is no such thing as "enough" and they will continually seek ways to extract wealth from the masses. Eventually, they there comes an event in history that wakes everyone up into come sort of semi-cohesive rage, and the 0.01% gets hung & dismembered. It is never a pleasant thing for anyone as the entire society generally turns inside out and a lot of innocent blood is spilled in the process.
As far as I can tell, America is still pretty far from that. We still have our bread & circuses (the dollar menu & reality TV) to keep everyone complacent, with bellies full of [something]. Our freedoms are slowly being eroded and we are in a position where the only way to get the nation's finances in order is through massive austerity & tax increases. If I had to guess, the spark that will set it all off someday will be when the government attempts to repeal the second amendment. If they did it now, it wouldn't cause a revolution. Give it 30-40 years of further government corruption & incompetence, and when it is clear that they mean to disarm us in a final move to make us slaves to the ruling class, I think that it will get ugly.
What does this tangent have to do with housing? Well, as far as I can tell, housing is increasingly becoming a vehicle for wealth extraction from the people. Home ownership has been a pillar of American culture, and having your own slice of property embodies what a lot of people see freedom as. As that is taken away from us, it will be a sore point that isn't easily forgotten, and probably drawn upon someday if things get to the point where the ruling class is hunted by the angry masses.
(and of course, it may be that not a single bit of this ever happens and we all live happily ever after...you just never know)
Follow
Befriend
3 threads
73 comments
bmwman91 says
Really?? That's odd because I find people in SF to be much better traveled than in Texas or North Carolina because they are LIVING it. These are people that realize that they don't need a quarter acre with a 1000 SF garage but can live in a smaller place and still enjoy the outdoors around here. I've met more folks in SF that have taken one year sabbaticals that in DC, Austin, Raleigh, Irvine in twice the time.
And using SF as a barometer for the US is disingenuous (you might as well use Manhatten as well). Plenty of folks can find cheap housing to buy in Houston, San Antonio, Dallas, Detroit.
Follow
Befriend (12)
141 threads
1,367 comments
Emeryville, CA
bmwman91 says
It's kind of also that old adage about boiling frogs. Already, we frogs are boiling in no or lost housing, low wages, bad food, unemployment, and shrinking benefits, austerity, etc.
The problem with Americans is faux outrage has displaced real outrage. We used to care about social justice and economic fairness, and now most are corporate sycophants.
Follow
Befriend (8)
38 threads
1,606 comments
Mountain View, CA
bmwman91's website
Premium
CL says
I agree completely. The internet & mass media have given people the false impression that their voice counts because it can be "seen" on a computer screen. Take almost everyone in here. It is much easier to post in a forum about why housing should be cheaper and how rigged the game is than to go and DO anything about it (defecating on a realtor's face, herding people that HELOCed their house to the max & then squatted onto some sort of prison-island, feeding investment bankers & the heads of the TBTF banks to needy children in African cannibal tribes, etc).
Follow
Befriend (12)
141 threads
1,367 comments
Emeryville, CA
It seems to me that the reason rates are low, and that the Fed et al are deploying herculean efforts, is to make the payment affordable. They want suckers to jump in and take some property off their hands at a HIGHER price, right?
The only problem this time is a shortage of suckers that either qualify or want to be the last man/woman in on the ponzi, n'est-ce pas?
And wouldn't that mean that prices have nowhere, longer term, to go but down? How long can they maintain ZIRP? How many QEs can they undertake? How many immigrants will buy with cash?
Can rents bubble? Because that would be the next step for "them". Raise the rents to make that crappy, overpriced house look more appealing, if you can get financed at 3%.
Follow
Befriend (1)
11 threads
224 comments
San Francisco, CA
CL says
You can't borrow money to pay for rent - so at a certain point rents must be in line with incomes.
But the landlord class will squeeze their renters for every dime...
...until they can't.
Follow
Befriend (31)
34 threads
2,608 comments
San Jose, CA
Premium
bmwman91 says
CL,
BMW man is correct again. Americans are so spoiled. You guys don't know what it is like to be poor. Life in the ghetto part of Oakland is still pretty good compared to other countries. We have it very very good here.
If you think the Bay Area housing is expensive compared to our salary, you haven't travelled much. To me and many foreigners, RE in the Bay Area is cheap cheap cheap.
Follow
Befriend (48)
274 threads
12,646 comments
47 male
Lafayette, CA
Premium
E-man says
Unfortunately most Americans don't own a passport and are very spoiled.
I'm spoiled rotten but at least I try to cross the border once in awhile.
Follow
Befriend (8)
38 threads
1,606 comments
Mountain View, CA
bmwman91's website
Premium
E-man says
Yup. After a few trips to industrial China (I have in-laws there, and have to go to Flex/Foxconn for work stuff), I no longer complain about the quality of life in America. There is stuff that concerns me since I think that we are in a downward trajectory, but I would still prefer to be poor here than middle-class there. It was quite a shock to a white guy the first time I went there!
Follow
Befriend (12)
141 threads
1,367 comments
Emeryville, CA
E-man says
I don't think this is true. I think it ignores the fact that many don't make a living wage in the Bay Area, and points to a disconnect that Patnet readers have from the wage reality that most live under.
Sure, WE have decent wages, and WE can afford to live here. But many struggle under the onerous burden that rents and mortgages place on them.
I've lived in 3 countries. A lot of the homes were owned outright in multigenerational settings. Carpoolers I pick up from Africa are shocked at how nice and affordable their homes were in their birthplace compared to here.
Rich people don't have a problem here. That's true.
Follow
Befriend (2)
3 threads
283 comments
E-man says
I'd rather say that salaries in the Bay Area are ridiculously high.
In mainland China, RE is ordinary by US standards but is expensive to them, because they're grossly underpaid (i. e., the yuan is undervalued).
Follow
Befriend (6)
5 threads
2,368 comments
E-man says
eman,
shorting is speculating, "gambling", not investing. To be "investing" for when prices going down, whether its houses or some other asset, is being totally liquid in money or cash equivalent. you are welcome.
Follow
Befriend
249 threads
2,913 comments
E-man says
Huh... how did you get "stocks" out of my comment?? I was referencing the basics of owning: a good stable job with decent income and property values that aren't dropping...
Investing in bank and homebuilder stocks... I'd rather go out in my back yard and set my money on fire... would have the same ending...
I'm also not planning on buying in the near future either... see my fire statement above...
Follow
Befriend (31)
34 threads
2,608 comments
San Jose, CA
Premium
Call it,
It's easy to criticize others when you have no skin in the game. If you believe the housing market will keep on tanking and the banks are insolvent, don't you think that shorting the homebuilder and bank stocks is the way to go? Basically, your action and your comments are not going hand in hand.
Iwog and I believe the housing market hit bottom so we put our money where our mouths are. We don't mouth off like others, who talk the talk, but don't walk the walk. That's all I'm saying.
For those that like to take on the challenge. Show us your bet on here so everyone knows your cards. You will have the bragging right if you make the right call. If you don't dare to show your bet/cards and put the money where your mouth is, you may want to reserve the comments to yourself.
Cheers.
Follow
Befriend (28)
181 threads
4,590 comments
Premium
Smart investors are planting potatoes and teaching their families how to fight with ballistic weapons and bayonets.
Follow
Befriend
7 threads
36 comments
bmwman91 says
this is what i've done myself. i've spent way too much time analyzing and following the bay area market and finally came to the conclusion that it's just not rational.
now if i can only convince myself to stop looking entirely, it's almost like a bad accident, you don't want to look but can't help yourself.
Follow
Befriend
19 threads
1,536 comments
Los Angeles, CA
THere is a new show called 'doomsday preppers' and I watched a few - some people are preparing for TEOTWAKI due to currency collapse and/or hyperinflation. Its a great show!
http://channel.nationalgeographic.com/channel/doomsday-preppers/
If you arent planning for cannibal anarchy you will have two choices: become a scavenging cannibal or get eaten by one.
Fun stuff!
Follow
Befriend (8)
38 threads
1,606 comments
Mountain View, CA
bmwman91's website
Premium
ih8alameda says
I hear you. Keeping tabs is hard to stop doing...for one it is like watching a train wreck happen. Second, there's this nagging glimmer of hope that maybe it WILL be rational someday...hope is a bitch lol. The rational part of my brain already knows that it will likely always be irrational here! But yeah, looking at it objectively & seeing that there is no reason to give credence to the FEAR associated with not buying, and that that fear is a deliberate sales tactic, makes life ever so much more pleasant. It hit me a while ago that I don't want a house: I want a large garage/workshop and a big listening room with no attached walls for my speakers.
The easiest way to deal with the unhappiness that comes from wanting something...is to STOP WANTING IT! Sure, it sounds contrived and silly, but it really is the secret to keeping sane & happy in our consumerist society.
Follow
Befriend
249 threads
2,913 comments
E-man says
I had plenty of skin in the game, for 30 years I drank the kool-aid until I finally "woke up" and put down the glass.
E-man says
You two don't mouth off??? hmmm.... anyway, I DON'T think we have hit the bottom, that's why I cashed in and took my chips off of the table. I'm sitting on the side lines until the crash is done, then I will re-visit the housing market...
BTW, while I'm sitting on the sidelines, I'm saving a BOAT LOAD of money being a RENTER vs. an OWNER, so all is good!!
E-man says
I've "placed my bets" by selling out and pulling out my equity and not worrying about my house losing value year by year. We will see if my bet ends up being the right one... check back in a year. Since the date of the signed contract on my sold house last year, it's value has dropped another $30K. (and still going) (But, that $30K is currently in my pocket, so at this point, I'm ahead on the "bet"..
Follow
Befriend (23)
56 threads
4,081 comments
Scottsdale, AZ
robertoaribas's website
Call it Crazy says
good call from May 2012!!! really good advice!!!!
Follow
Befriend
249 threads
2,913 comments
robertoaribas says
I'm glad you have soooo much time on your hands from not having a life to go back and search posts from a year ago. So let's recap what I posted above....
Call it Crazy says
So let's take a look at a quick graph of the last year...
*
*
Looks like many of the east coast states prices turned down just like I predicted May 2012. Also, the median price is quite a bit more than your $40K crap shacks in Phoenix....
I wonder if the fundamentals of what's needed to buy a house have changed over the last year...... hmmmmm, don't think so...
So, what did change over the year to help the overall US prices climb.... let me think..... maybe it was this...
Fed Undertakes QE3 With $40 Billion Monthly MBS Purchases
By Joshua Zumbrun - Sep 13, 2012 6:46 PM ET
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-09-13/fed-plans-to-buy-40-billion-in-mortgage-securities-each-month.html
......"The Federal Reserve said it will expand its holdings of long-term securities with open-ended purchases of $40 billion of mortgage debt a month in a third round of quantitative easing as it seeks to boost growth and reduce unemployment."
Oh, I see now.... The Fed jumps in and pumps the market which in turn helps investors to buy all the low hanging fruit.
So, my question is, was the rise in house prices in certain areas caused by the normal flow of Joe Six Pack home buyers or was caused by the abnormal intervention of the FED????
Follow
Befriend (23)
56 threads
4,081 comments
Scottsdale, AZ
robertoaribas's website
Call it Crazy says
the Fed started jumping in a hell of a lot before may of 2012, and house prices, in Phoenix and plenty of other places, had started up long before that.
So, you were 100% wrong, arrogant in your wrongness, and now you will make up excuses on this thread, and LIE about your investments on the other one.
You are a joke on here!
Follow
Befriend
249 threads
2,913 comments
robertoaribas says
Let's see... I'm wrong about the bloomberg article written in Sept. 2012 about the increase to 40 Billion of Fed purchases....
I must have Photoshopped the Zillow graph, right????
..and I lied about non-existent investments that I've never had....
Does that sound about right in your Fucked Up mind???
Follow
Befriend (23)
56 threads
4,081 comments
Scottsdale, AZ
robertoaribas's website
Call it Crazy says
you really are pathetic! the fed purchases Maybe knocked 0.25% of rates ,big freaking deal
so yeah, you were wrong, And by the way, picking three new england states that have judicial foreclosures, and nothing to do with the rest of the US proves nothing.
you are a dipshit.
Arizona Zillow Home Value Index
Arizona real estate info
there's Arizona, which you predicted to drop 11% in may 2012... good call dipstick!
Follow
Befriend (13)
104 threads
471 comments
Premium
CL says
Homeownership is at multi-year lows. Thus, once can deduce that many of these low tier purchasers have already been weeded out. Going forward the impact of high risk / low credit borrowers should be minimal.
Follow
Befriend
19 threads
644 comments
Los Angeles, CA
What does it mean when the following conditions occur:
-Rents are falling.
-Purchase prices are rising. Drastically. Pretty sure I don't need to justify this one. Should be accepted fact at the moment.
-New build is going up in significant amounts, but won't be complete for 1-2 more years. Will be a mix of rentals and sales.
This is currently happening in DTLA...funny how there were news articles left and right in the short time frame(1 to 1 1/2 years) that featured rising rents, but now that rents are falling(by as much as 10-20% based on recent list prices), mums the word.
However, you don't need news articles and you don't need to take my word for it. Thanks to craigslists map feature, you can search to your hearts content.
And in fact, I almost missed a unit at $1250/mo...a price level I've never seen outside one poorly located, poorly maintained building. I had set the minimum rent at $1400 and was finding so many units at that level that I figured I better lower it to $1200!
Follow
Befriend
1 threads
210 comments
dodgerfanjohn says
DTLA is the poster boy for a speculative investment. Investors bought RE there hoping the revitalization trend continues. I'm skeptical that it'll turn out the way some people are anticipating, especially with the Farmer's Field hiccup, but I can see the potential.
IF (and that's a big IF) it realizes that potential, rents and prices will skyrocket. Until then, people will be able to rent out for much less than the cost of buying. Kudos for those taking advantage of it. It's a great place to live if you're young and single.
Follow
Befriend
66 threads
535 comments
Simi Valley, CA
dodgerfanjohn says
http://patrick.net/forum/?p=1219721
Follow
Befriend
19 threads
644 comments
Los Angeles, CA
Mark D says
LOL that was awesome!
Follow
Befriend
19 threads
644 comments
Los Angeles, CA
zesta says
Whats funny is Roberto Aribas claimed in a past post that no investor ever bought a property soley because they thought it would appreciate.
I had posted that I was confused because I knew investors were buying units in DTLA that either they were renting at a loss or NOT RENTING AT ALL!!!!!!
Yet, confusingly...thats exactly what is happening. I wonder how many of these mom and pop investors factored in declining rents?
Follow
Befriend
1 threads
210 comments
dodgerfanjohn says
Well, I can't speak for Roberto Aribas, but obviously anybody speaking in absolute terms will be wrong sometime.
Some people invest in stocks for slow and steady returns, others try to hit for the cycle. In my opinion, investing in DTLA condos is like trying to buy a lottery ticket, a loser more often than not. On the other hand I know of an investment group that purchased a couple lots a decade ago that is very unprofitable as a parking lot, but is going to end up being a 'winning lotto ticket' whenever they sell.