http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/housing/story/2012-06-21/mortgage-rates/55732928/1
Rate on 30-year mortgage falls to record low
By tovarichpeter Follow Thu, 21 Jun 2012, 2:21pm 4,557 views 54 comments
In South San Francisco CA 94080
Watch (0) Share
Quote
Permalink Like Dislike « First « Previous Viewing Comments 15-54 of 54 Last » See most liked comments
|
Premium member tovarichpeter is moderator of this thread. |
Follow
Befriend
229 threads
2,790 comments
tatupu70 says
Wrong again.... Firstly, incomes and interest rates have NO connection.. Secondly, interest rates have been high in the past when we were in recessions, not strong economies....
When we had a strong economy in the middle of the last decade, rates were affordable, in the 5-6% range... yet back in the 1980's we had rates up in the mid teens (13 - 15%) during a recession...
The only main reason for house prices to rise is either loosening of qualifying requirements (free money) or lower interest rates (more house for the payment).
Follow
Befriend (5)
10 threads
2,329 comments
Never buy when there is no YOY apprecation. Declining value RE? absolutely not.
Follow
Befriend (3)
15 threads
5,653 comments
CL says
Sorry, I posted a chart and a link but I guess it got too many dislikes and is gone.
Patrick--you need to reconsider the like/dislike functions. They are being abused now.
Follow
Befriend
4 threads
266 comments
Fremont, CA
We have record low interest rates and yet all that has been accomplished is to delay the final decline of the home prices.
Follow
Befriend (7)
30 threads
1,222 comments
31 male
Premium
tatupu70 says
Yea I've noticed that some posters seem to get blanketed with dislikes on all of their posts,,,,and it would seem that the feature is being abused
Although I think I saw the graph you posted, which I think showed incomes rising steadily over the last 30 years, which I don't think is factual, so maybe the dislike function can come in handy
Interest rates have been trending downward for 30 years, which allows for underlying asset prices that come from leverage, to rise while maintaining similar service payments.
Follow
Befriend
4 threads
266 comments
Fremont, CA
Wages have declined and interest rates have declined to allow individuals to leverage themselves so they can make up the difference.
Follow
Befriend
10 comments
tatupu70 says
And you and your realtor friends continue to spam pat.net with your constant stream of misinformation.
Follow
Befriend
4 threads
266 comments
Fremont, CA
I think its important to have different views. At least it gives something to laugh at.
Follow
Befriend
229 threads
2,790 comments
errc says
I found a chart that he might have been referencing. Although it shows a "rise" in real median income of about $9k over more than 40 years, that ain't much. Then factor in inflation, and you're in the negatives...
Now, make sure you look at the trend at the end of the line, it's heading back down.... not good for housing market going forward...
Follow
Befriend
229 threads
2,790 comments
inflection point says
Based on the direction of the housing market, we need something else to laugh at...
Follow
Befriend (3)
15 threads
5,653 comments
Call it Crazy says
No I posted the nominal wage gain over time. You posted the real income gain. As I told you on another thread, real means inflation adjusted. So incomes have gain $9K over inflation. Which makes sense because productivity has increased over that time period.
Call it Crazy says
Incomes always decrease during a recession.
Follow
Befriend (3)
15 threads
5,653 comments
errc says
It's definitely accurate. Nominal income has certainly risen steadily over the last 30 years.
Please, at least take the time to research a question before deciding to dislike someone's post because you "think" it's wrong.
Follow
Befriend (12)
140 threads
1,355 comments
Emeryville, CA
tatupu70 says
Thanks for trying. We'll get to the bottom of this.
Follow
Befriend (23)
55 threads
3,836 comments
Scottsdale, AZ
robertoaribas's website
Call it Crazy says
lets see: interest rates drop from 5% to 4%... prices up 7.9%, probably is cheaper to buy today...
Follow
Befriend (3)
15 threads
5,653 comments
Call it Crazy says
Those statements are not contradictory. They are both correct.
Follow
Befriend (31)
34 threads
2,554 comments
San Jose, CA
Premium
Musica2 says
This is amazing. The fallacy is alive and well on Patnet....
Yep. The best time to buy is when interest rate at 10%; 15% is even better; 20% is fantastic; 25% is golden. The higher interest rate, the better time to buy. Interest rate will sky rocket in the near future. Time is on your side. ;)
Follow
Befriend (31)
34 threads
2,554 comments
San Jose, CA
Premium
KILLERJANE says
I guess you're right. I should use the word "own" rather than "buy" on properties that are free and clear. On properties that is financed, I should use words like leverage, or borrow OPM to make money. Even better how about have OPM works for you. Isn't that what it is? :)
On the contrary, the word "renting" sounds so temporary. Well, at least I don't have to live under other people's house rules.
God bless America. The land of opportunity for immigrants. :o)
Follow
Befriend (31)
34 threads
2,554 comments
San Jose, CA
Premium
Call it Crazy says
Since I didn't create the land, I'm more than have to pay property tax. In CA, homeowners are being protected by Prop. 13 while renters are exposed to the ravage of rent inflation year after year, decade after decade. At least I don't have to live by someone else's house rules. :o)
Follow
Befriend (3)
15 threads
5,653 comments
Musica2 says
Actually, that's not what happened in the past...
Follow
Befriend (3)
15 threads
5,653 comments
CL says
I'm on the road, but I will post a graph of prices vs interest rates when I am back
Follow
Befriend (3)
15 threads
5,653 comments
Call it Crazy says
Yes, but you also need to remember that interest rates don't go up for no reason. In the past, rates went up when the economy was very strong and incomes were rising. Which caused house prices to rise as well, even with intrest rates increasing.
Note: Incomes just have to match inflation--there don't have to be any real gains. Houses will still rise in nominal terms...
Follow
Befriend (3)
15 threads
5,653 comments
Call it Crazy says
You are completely clueless. The Fed uses its power to influence interest rates to try to encourage investment. It raises them to reduce investment and lowers them to increase investment.
Call it Crazy says
Yes, that's because inflation was high in the late seventies and the Fed drove up rates to cool the economy. It worked and led to the recession in the 80s. You have the cause and effect backwards.
Call it Crazy says
Home prices are most closely correlated with incomes. Although you are correct that the loosening of loan standards can have a big effect. That's a one-off occurance though.
Follow
Befriend (3)
15 threads
5,653 comments
Here's a chart and an article:
http://www.businessweek.com/lifestyle/content/dec2009/bw20091229_199828.htm
I think the author sums it up better than I could. When looking at housing price charts vs. interest rates, you have to be careful to know whether you are looking at inflation adjusted charts or nominal charts...
Follow
Befriend (48)
274 threads
12,577 comments
47 male
Lafayette, CA
Premium
I didn't realize there were posts being deleted due to 3 dislikes. This is a horrible idea, especially where real estate and politics are involved.
The most effective and well informed arguments are often the same ones that make the opposing side the most angry and frustrated.
The most unreasonable and abusive trolls on the board are the same people who will simply flag anything they disagree with.
This will trash the quality of the board in a big hurry if it continues. This thread is a perfect example. Tatupu is almost completely censored while the twit who was taunting him remains.
Follow
Befriend (5)
10 threads
2,329 comments
iwog says
I am sorry but I have to say,this is what happens when you are too bold to call the bottom too early!
Follow
Befriend (7)
30 threads
1,222 comments
31 male
Premium
What will be the catalyst that breaks this 30+ year trend of falling interest rates? Up until 2007, rates moved lower while prices moved higher. Then the bubble peaked, and prices began moving lower while rates continued to decline. So how in bizzaro world do you see a change in the winds that will bring both rising rates AND rising house prices?
I predict that rates will continue lower in order to satisfy those who buy a house on monthly payment metrics, while prices continue to be 'flat' which in reality will be slightly lower when factoring in 'inflation' or currency devaluation, whatever you want to call it.
Thanks for fixing that patrick, I enjoy the sharing of information and differing view points. Always figured that was the point of the discussion on the forum. Not to sit around in a giant circle jerk patting one another on the back for being agreeable, reinforcing beliefs that one already holds. There's always at least two sides to every trade, best to know all the angles well to fully understand the trade offs
Follow
Befriend (48)
274 threads
12,577 comments
47 male
Lafayette, CA
Premium
bubblesitter says
I called the bottom for 2009. (in 2008) 2009 wasn't technically the bottom, but it is still holding up to be a few percentage points from the bottom and prices are headed up again in 2012.
No one can tell the future, we just take our best shot at it.
Follow
Befriend (5)
10 threads
2,329 comments
iwog says
Until then pretend,extend and ignore. :)
Follow
Befriend (48)
274 threads
12,577 comments
47 male
Lafayette, CA
Premium
bubblesitter says
Do what now?
The market is exploding now and has pretty much chased me out of buying new properties. The only thing holding back a full scale bull market blowout is low appraisals.
Do you think the following graph is fake, based on nothing, and simply NAR propaganda?
Follow
Befriend
449 comments
Boulder Creek, CA
Sold $ is still below 2010.
It'll be lower again next year.
Follow
Befriend (48)
274 threads
12,577 comments
47 male
Lafayette, CA
Premium
CrazyMan says
Barely, but again I'll remind you that the listing price is the leading indicator. You're not going to see the sold prices heading lower until months after the asking prices head lower.
Follow
Befriend (5)
10 threads
2,329 comments
iwog says
Now try giving some examples out of the redfin data - properties sold at your 2009 phantom bottom and sold back in 2012 at the price more then 2009 sold price, will you? I need to see that trend on recorded sale data.
Follow
Befriend (48)
274 threads
12,577 comments
47 male
Lafayette, CA
Premium
bubblesitter says
Why? Redfin is a measure of $ per sq. ft., not same property sales. Besides why would you even question it? It matches all of the reports in the media, the latest report from CS, and the reports from people posting on this board who are actually buying homes.
Maybe it would be more productive for you to post something.......anything......contradicting the current market as anything other than red hot?
Follow
Befriend (5)
10 threads
2,329 comments
iwog says
That is the response I was expecting. Keep quacking.
Follow
Befriend
3 threads
73 comments
Hi bubblesitter,
I give it a shot though you'll be typically dismissive. Look at this place. New development in the Mission back in 2009. Sold for 499k. Sold for 639k a few months ago. I was pretty shocked but the Mission real estate is crazy right now.
That's one example.
http://www.redfin.com/CA/San-Francisco/601-Alabama-St-94110/unit-306/home/18906059
Follow
Befriend
3 threads
73 comments
Heck, here's another
770k in 2009, 880k in 2012
http://www.redfin.com/CA/San-Francisco/2501-Harrison-St-94110/unit-8/home/1913444
Follow
Befriend
19 threads
1,534 comments
Los Angeles, CA
all this run up is due to super duper low int rates.
since rates can go to zero - there is a A LOT OF ROOM for house prices to go up up up up.
I know you would think that with double digit default rates on mortgages that a 3% mortgage is a disaster for the bank since one bad loan makes the whole pool a loss BUT remember they are just printing up money from thin air for years now. Fed Reserve is buying what 60% of the US bonds with printed from air money. That money is covering the losses.
Not sure how this game ends but it might take 50 years.
Follow
Befriend (3)
13 threads
2,227 comments
San Jose, CA
Premium
PockyClipsNow says
How can interest rates go to zero? Will the government then be paying banks via negative interest for the banks to then give home buyers free loans?
Follow
Befriend (5)
10 threads
2,329 comments
New renter says
Sure. All the burden can be on taxpayers.
Follow
Befriend
1 threads
55 comments
It's not the interest rate. It's affordability, which is determined by total household income (or whoever is paying the mortgage). And you must inflation adjust all variables.
You can make a case for any outcome (house prices up or down) if you only pick one variable.
Example: inflation -3%, total household income +5%, interest rates +2%. Then you can say, Golly Gee! See, aw told you, houses prices go up when interest rates go up!!! Hardy harrr.
Reverse example: inflation -3%, household incomes -15% (layoffs, depression, etc), interest rates at -3% = house prices go down!
A more realistic example: inflation +7%, household incomes +5%, interest rates +3%: house prices go up. Obviously they'll go up because affordability goes up.
On the other hand, this what a lot of people believe today: inflation +%6, household incomes +1%, interest rates +2% = houses prices go down.