http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304441404577480690440266320.html
IRAs should be simple and easy. You should be allowed to contribute a good deal of savings and withdraw them when you need to, no sooner or later. But the greedy IRS still wants to fuck you and makes things difficult. Meanwhile, you're dependent of social security and that accounts for a quarter of federal spending and is going bankrupt. Good job IRS.
Watch
Follow
Befriend
1 threads
79 comments
New Lenox, IL
I live by the addage "if you don't have anything good to say, don't say it"... so that's my comment......... especially the IRS
Follow
Befriend (9)
410 threads
4,107 comments
Baltimore, MD
Isn't it easy enough not to exceed the contribution limit and make mandatory withdraws?
Follow
Befriend (3)
15 threads
5,606 comments
I agree with zzyzzx--
To what, specifically, do you object? The rules are in there for a reason. Otherwise the 1% would abuse the IRA to avoid paying taxes...
Follow
Befriend (4)
52 threads
4,416 comments
Corning, NY
Premium
Hey, no one ever accused the Federal Government of acting in the interests of regular people.
Follow
Befriend (5)
1,070 comments
Santa Cruz, CA
It's not the "greedy IRS" only. It's the Democrats. See how this is called "low hanging fruit"? Well, so is your 401K and Roth IRA. The Democrats now want to go after anything which has money in it. We're all in the cross hairs.
I still remember when they raised taxes on variable annuities. "The study found that only rich tend to own annuities. They can therefore afford the new tax."
This is how all liberal loser shitheads think, that if you have something they should be able to take some of it since you "can afford it."
I can't afford anything. I am saving up for my private island reachable by helicopter, staffed by bikini models/bodyguards/nurses.
Follow
Befriend (13)
102 threads
3,759 comments
What is wrong with 401k's? Why not 401b's? Or are public sector unions too good all of a sudden?