WatchNo, "intelligent republicans" is not an oxymoron. THere are intelligent republicans. Or at least there used to be.
Here's the question.
Republicans are promising to repeal and redo "ObamaCare," while preserving pre-exisitng conditions coverage, and all of the other favored aspects of ObamaCare, but killing the mandated coverage of everyone (or penalty (tax if you prefer)for not being covered).
Can you explain how this will be paid for or how it even makes sense ?
If there's no mandate but there is preexisting condition coverage, what's to prevent me from waiting until I'm sick to get insurance ? In other words being covered by a subsidy from your insurance.
I don't think being able to buy insurance accross state lines is any great shakes. I'm sure that could somehow be done on top of ObamaCare as easily as it could as part of a redo.
This is a topsy turvy world when republicans are upset by a good, business friendly, conservative policy, just because it was championed by a democrat.
Follow
Befriend (1)
2 threads
119 comments
San Jose, CA
Bap33 says
I'm not arguing that CA has budget deficits that it has filled with federal loans, by the way loans have to be repaid so that is really not valid point as to CA being on the welfare tit. I am simple pointing out that taking money from one state and giving it to another is "redistribution of wealth". I am not saying this is right or wrong but simply that Republicans are all for "redistribution of wealth" when it is beneficial to them and their constituents.
Follow
Befriend (5)
168 threads
5,074 comments
Auntiegrav says
I agree with the gist of what you're saying, but this is cynical even for me (or maybe I'm just splitting hairs).
Yes, capitalism leads to growth growth growth, sometimes at a cost in terms of quality of life for the masses, or sustainability for that matter.
But it isn't a conspiracy. Things just naturally go in that direction, with capitalism and free markets.
At some point this has to change. I'm for the most part agreeing with you. When people say that "capitalism and free market might not be perfect, but it's the best system we've seen," I sort of agree. But at the same time, it's clear that government is necessary and that a balanced system is best. It's not balanced now. It's skewed towards the benefit of the rich and corporations.
The political battle, which is partly just BS show, and these days mostly about fighting for who gets the most government money, is a tiring joke. They would have the dumb masses believe there are only two choices. Outright communism, with everyone having nearly equal quality of life, versus free market capitalism with small minimal government and regulations, where anyone should be able to work hard and get rich.
When the Citizens United decision occurred, we were already in a state where the pendulum had swung too far to the right, but now it's truly scary. Occupy Wall Street, and possibly other movements will arise. But yes you're initial point I agree with entirely, that is:
Auntiegrav says
True. And maybe I am being overly optimistic when I hope that insurance company administrative costs (including profits they squeeze out), won't be that much more than the bureaucratic costs of a single payer system.
I want to give the PPACA a chance, mostly because it addresses most flaws. If costs don't moderate, then next step hopefully would be standing up to the corporations.
Meanwhile we can hope that campaign finance gets addressed before America as we know it, is totally destroyed. (maybe I am as cynical as you after all).
Follow
Befriend (48)
274 threads
12,534 comments
47 male
Lafayette, CA
Premium
zzyzzx says
I always vote against bond measures because it's not my job to spend the state's money and I couldn't possibly become an expert on every crazy bond issue that gets a petition signed.
Follow
Befriend (3)
8 threads
335 comments
zzyzzx says
Some might find this ironic, but that word does not mean what you think it means. I recommend perusing this article on "irregardless," and eight formerly-pristine words that have become endangered due to the Internet's encroachment upon their natural habitats.
http://www.cracked.com/article_15664_9-words-that-dont-mean-what-you-think.html
Follow
Befriend (5)
7 threads
228 comments
Belgium, WI
Premium
marcus says
It's not so much an evil conspiracy, it's business conspiracy ("it's not personal"). The new hospitals being built are being built in the exurbs, where only people who have enough money for a car can access them easily. My brother tells me they did it on purpose to avoid the obligations to indigents, but I just think it's the cheaper land prices and the paying customers (the same thing, but less cynical and a little less paranoid).
I often hear people say things like "there are no conspiracies". I laugh because where I worked in the gov't, the ONLY way you could actually get your work done (see "doers" above) was to conspire with someone to manipulate the paperwork and "do some tradin' ". If I and my coworkers had followed the rules and not conspired to subvert the system when I was working for the gov't, nothing would have been done. Some of the tradin' gets mighty elaborate and very high up. It doesn't stop unless it crosses certain boundaries or steps on the wrong toes (NSA, DOE, CIA), other than that, it's all fair game to keep the budgets balanced and the authority established in the food chain.
God>>the Invisible Hand >>Banks >>Multinational Corporations>>Puppet Representatives >>Advertising agents>>Distribution (logistics)>>cash register>>Dollars>>drug dealers>>customers/voters
The dollars are counted before the votes, and they are counted every day, not just once every 2 or 4 years.
Follow
Befriend (16)
763 threads
7,702 comments
Boca Raton, FL
Premium
thomas.wong1986 says
It's a pity when humans inflict suffering on each other anywhere in the world. However, just because there is still genocide in Africa does not abolish or even lessen the guilt of the red states for what they have done over the past 300 years.
Trying to distract people from the real issue that red state people are morally inferior is not going to work. Red staters have been on the side of evil in every moral conflict in our country for the past 300 years, even predating independence. As such, red staters have no claim to the moral high ground.
And if red staters want to be viewed as different from their ancestors and they want to redeem the red states, then they have to start by admitting that their ancestors all the way up to the mid-20th century were morally wrong. Next, they have to stop repeating those unethical and immoral decisions like suppressing other human beings.
The red states have yet to even start their redemption process.
Follow
Befriend (16)
763 threads
7,702 comments
Boca Raton, FL
Premium
Bap33 says
That is simply because the media will never admit that religion is inherently evil. Doing so would be highly unpopular.
Follow
Befriend
16 threads
4,426 comments
Dan8267 says
White mans guilt.. oh! i dont think so! You can stop with that kind of BS. Are you going to pin that same crap on whites or any others whose ancestors were not even in the US during those years! I guess your going to have to come up with some other white guilt trip!
Follow
Befriend
16 threads
4,426 comments
Dan8267 says
so said Hitler, Stalin, Mao, and Pol Pot.. so they butchered 50+ millions to make a point destroy their people, culture, and history!
Follow
Befriend
16 threads
4,426 comments
Dan8267 says
Want to start with the Africans who TODAY still have slavery, killing 100,000s, rape, genocide... no no nothing moral wrong there!
Its all white mans fault.. its all Bush fault!!
Follow
Befriend (3)
12 threads
3,097 comments
Dan8267 says
man is inherently evil, and man came up with every religion except God's. I think you are on to something.
Follow
Befriend (3)
12 threads
3,097 comments
evilmonkeyboy says
I am not aware of welfare systems supported by the Repubs where individual workers are taxed and the gov then gives that money to other individual citizens deemed worthy by the gov. If the workers do not surrender the wages demanded by the gov for transfer to other voters/citizens, they will be jailed. I just don't agree with the forced tranfer between voters by the gov. It's a bad idea.
I do not think supporting the war machine is a transfer between individual citizens, like Section 8 housing is, for example.
I am not in favor of giving corps the same status as individuals. Just my personal feelings on that.
Follow
Befriend (48)
274 threads
12,534 comments
47 male
Lafayette, CA
Premium
Bap33 says
Medicare D is exactly that and was passed by Republicans and signed by Bush.
Follow
Befriend (3)
12 threads
3,097 comments
Medicare D .... did it replace something else?
Follow
Befriend (48)
274 threads
12,534 comments
47 male
Lafayette, CA
Premium
Bap33 says
Nope. It was a brand new prescription drug benefit plan that didn't exist before Republicans got there.
It does carry the distinction of being the first federal social spending program without any way to pay for it (other than dragging it out of existing revenues) and is one of the reasons the deficit is so high.
Republicans are worse than Democrats when it comes to fiscal responsibility. Democrats are tax and spend while Republicans are spend and spend.
Follow
Befriend (1)
2 threads
119 comments
San Jose, CA
Bap33 says
I see, so your against the government imposing a "transfer of wealth" from rich to poor, but you don't mind the government "transferring wealth" from CA to Mississippi (state to state).
Just think if Mississippi didn't take so much money out of the pot then the people of CA could pay less in Federal taxes. Sounds pretty conservative to me, see if you can get any red staters to go along with it.
Follow
Befriend (16)
763 threads
7,702 comments
Boca Raton, FL
Premium
thomas.wong1986 says
Yet another bullshit Straw Man argument. No one ever said red state people are guilty because they are white. We say they are guilty because of genocide, slavery, lynching, raping, and assassination. I see that you haven't refuted any of these points.
Furthermore, I'm white, yet I've never committed any of those heinous acts. So your Straw Man argument holds no weight.
I stand by my statement. The people in red states have been on the side of evil in every moral conflict in America for the past 300 years. As such, they have no claim to be wholesome, decent, or morally superior to blue state people. History has proven that claim wrong.
thomas.wong1986 says
Ah, poisoning the well. All of these dictators also said that we should protect children from harm. By your logic, we should therefore let children come to harm.
Seriously Thomas, don't you every get tired of making the same logical faculties over and over again? Do you really want me to repeat every evil thing that religion, particularly Christianity, has done during every single century over the past 2000 years? Cause, you know, I do enjoy doing that.
Follow
Befriend (3)
12 threads
3,097 comments
will I (or you) get to use Medicare D? or just non-working types? I am not aware of any Medicare stuff.
Follow
Befriend (16)
763 threads
7,702 comments
Boca Raton, FL
Premium
iwog says
I think we've proven that republicans spend more than democrats enough times on this site already. Republicans just prefer to spend money on destructive things rather than at least somewhat helpful things.
Follow
Befriend (16)
763 threads
7,702 comments
Boca Raton, FL
Premium
Bap33 says
Incorrect.
For thousands of years philosophers have debated the question "Is man's nature to be good, but he gets corrupted by outside forces, or is man's nature to be selfish, and he only becomes good if guided by noble outside forces?". And for thousands of years, philosophers got this question wrong. I will now tell you the correct answer.
It is man's nature to be good when he expects the behavior to be reciprocated and it is man's nature to be selfish when he expects the behavior not to be reciprocated.
For example, people are generally nice to strangers when meeting them face-to-face on the sidewalk. After all, it pays to be nice. But the same people will often act selfishly when driving on a highway cutting each other off because drivers don't expect to encounter the same other drivers again.
The reciprocity of behavior is what drives selflessness, fairness, and kindness. It's all about cooperation, and cooperation only works if the players meet repeatedly. This is why long-term relationships are inherently healthier and more beneficial than short-term relationships. This is why you get screwed over by realtors and car dealers, but not grocery stores and restaurants.
All of morality is a set of guidelines for facilitating cooperation in a complex and ever-changing environment. Morality is all about cooperation. That is why morality exists.
Follow
Befriend (3)
12 threads
3,097 comments
um, so, um, you just said that people screw each other when they know they have the chance ... and I suggested that man is normally an ass hole (unless taught morals and follow them). So, I think we are close to the same thing.
"Morality is all about cooperation" - not a bad idea. I think morality is also about personal accountablity, responsiblity, and helping those less fortunate without being asked and without expecting a return. Doing the right thing, when noone (but God) will ever know the difference .... that is one of my favorite things.
Follow
Befriend
5 comments
Republicans are promising to repeal and redo "ObamaCare," while preserving pre-exisitng conditions coverage, and all of the other favored aspects of ObamaCare, but killing the mandated coverage of everyone (or penalty (tax if you prefer)for not being covered).
Yeah? Who says? Is this a direct quote from some media/Democrat talking head, or what?
As far as I know, Republicans are promising to repeal Obamacare, and I have yet to hear of any specific proposal to put in its place.
Which is A-OK by me. Healthcare only became a national urgency all of a sudden in 2008. So what changed in 2008? Absolutely zip. Except it was time for the Democrats to pull out some vast monstrous Save The Planet scheme and try to panic everyone into throwing away their liberty and money to support it. Because that's what Democrats do. They're always the party of Big Ideas. Wars to Save Democracy, Wars on Poverty, Wars on war itself.
It's their same old same old. We have a panic about missing kids, and we get kids on milk cartons. Then that mysteriously vanishes, when people figure out not a whole heck of a lot of kids are actually abducted by strangers. We have a panic about school shootings that leads to "assault weapons" bans and hand-wringing about guns in America, and metal detectors at school and what not. And then that drifts away. We have a crisis with girls not being able to play Division I sports. Or gays not being able to marry. Or "equal pay" for women, and the Equal Rights Amendment (remember that? The Republic was going to collapse if that didn't pass.) Or redlining in insurance. Or uninsured motorists. Or apartheid. Global warming (or maybe cooling). Oil spills. Oil addiction. Drug addiction. Legalization of drugs. Education. The homeless. The uninsured.
And on and on and on. There's ALWAYS a Panic Of The Year whipped up by people who want you to send them your vote and your money, so they can hire a bunch of $250,000 a year lawyers and assistants and coffee-fetchers and have meeting after meeting in some nice conference room in Washington, or possibly in Aruba or Paris if it involves international stuff, at which absolutely nothing gets done except more plans and rules are drafted which will -- what a surprise! -- require still more of your tax money and still more of your attention to following another thick book of rules. And after a while, when people realize the "crisis" isn't really happening, it drifts out of sight and out of mind, until the next one is dumped on you, like a fresh steamer from the dog on your newly cut lawn, right from Democratic Party headquarters.
It's all bullshit. All of it. The "health care crisis" is completely manufactured, no less than the global warming that was supposed to destroy the planet any day now, or the food riots that were supposed to be consuming the United States a few year ago, according to the timeline of the 1980s Democrats.
If Obamacare were simply repealed, and we went right back to the status quo as it existed in 2007, after a few years nobody would notice a damn thing. Aside from the eternal grumbling that There Is No Such Thing As A Free Lunch, we were all pretty satisfied with our healthcare and how we bought it in 2007. Nobody felt any huge sense of disaster. There was no marching in the streets. No Nightline coverage of the millions dying of infection because they couldn't afford to have their broken bones set, or the grandmothers denied their chemo and sent home with aspirin and a whiskey bottle. Because there never was any genuine crisis, and there still isn't. It's a manufactured bit of FUD to sell you a bill of goods.
Sure, the cost of medical care rises year after year. Duh. So does the price of a smartphone, in case you hadn't noticed, or the top of the line Mercedes E class, or the best HDTV you can buy, and for the same reason. The best keeps getting better, and if you insist on the best, you'll be paying more and more. (You can very easily keep your health care costs down to 1970s or even 1950s levels, simply by making do with 1970s or 1950s health care outcomes. It's only if you want 2012 outcomes that it's going to cost you 2012 prices.)
But so what? Anybody who has a decent job gets almost all his costs covered as part of the job. (Which means the REAL scandal -- the one the Democrats don't want you thinking about -- is how hard it is to get a decent job under President Obullmaster.)
Sure, healthcare is going to eat up a larger and larger fraction of your budget, compared to other stuff. Again, so what? That's progress. We all spend WAY more of our monthly budget on electronics and communications than we ever did. In 1975 you paid $15 for your monthly phone bill, and that was it. No cell phone, no cable TV, no Internet, no data roaming plan, no WLAN. You bought a phone and a color TV. The phone lasted 20 years, the TV 10. None of this buying of a phone for every person in the household, and replacing them every two years, plus a router, a cable modem, maybe a flatscreen TV for each room of the house, plus a handsfree thingy for the car, not to mention a PC or two, maybe a Kindle and an iPad, just for when it's too much trouble to walk up to the bedroom where the PC lives...
We don't begrudge that. We are a wealthy people, we LIKE the fact that we have money to spend on electronic toys and communications, we feel it's worth it, it improves our lives. Well, so does 21st century healthcare. The statins, the drug stents, the white cell boosters for chemo, the liver and kidney transplants, the hip replacements, the blood pressure meds, the arthroscopic surgery, the MRIs to tell whether it's just a migraine or a brain bleed, the fancy radiotherapy that lets guys with prostate cancer still get a boner. Superior allergy meds, Viagra, birth control pills that take away most periods, arthritis pain meds that don't give you ulcers, patches to help you quit smoking, drugs to control your diabetes so you don't have to stick yourself with needles every day.
These things all let us live years and years longer than our parents, and more importantly in much greater comfort. We are lucky that they are available, and we should be pleased and proud of ourselves that we can afford to devote an increasing percentage of our income to simply improving our health and longevity well past what our genes (and lifestyles) would naturally give us.
Follow
Befriend (5)
168 threads
5,074 comments
The thing that's going to surprise a lot of people this November is how many people are fully capable of comprehending this:
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/29/opinion/the-real-winners.html?source=Patrick.net&_r=1&hp
You might want to check it out Carl.
Follow
Befriend (48)
274 threads
12,534 comments
47 male
Lafayette, CA
Premium
Carl Pham says
It's a direct quote from Mitt Romney, your Republican candidate for president.
ROMNEY: "It’s important for us to repeal and replace Obamacare. What are some of the things that we’ll keep in place? We have to make sure that people who want to keep their current insurance will be able to do so."
ROMNEY: "We also have to assure that we do our very best to help each state in their effort to assure that every American has access affordable health care."
ROMNEY: "Gotta make sure that those people who have pre-existing conditions know that they will be able to be insured."
You want the video? Watch the 6/28/12 Daily Show with Jon Stewart.
Follow
Befriend (9)
414 threads
4,124 comments
Baltimore, MD
iwog says
So, if I understand you correctly, you are FOR socialized medicine when it's implemented by Democrats, but AGAINST it when it's implemented by Republicans?
Follow
Befriend (48)
274 threads
12,534 comments
47 male
Lafayette, CA
Premium
zzyzzx says
I said nothing of the sort. Bap asked for an example of redistribution of wealth by Republicans, and I gave him one.
The really disgusting thing about Medicare D is Republicans totally failed to pay for it. Just like the wars and just like everything else they spend money on.
Republicans spend more than Democrats AND they ignore the sticky issue of paying for any of it. They are BY FAR the most fiscally reckless and irresponsible. It's not even close.
Follow
Befriend
3 threads
189 comments
marcus says
Actually, I don't think that rank-and-file Republicans say they can deliver these w/o a mandate. It's not a priority to them (you can tell where I stand on this). A person shouldn't choose to get sick unless they have enough money to pay for the treatment. If they don't have enough, then then they should ask for private charity. If they can't get it, that is unfortunate but not the goverment's concern.
GOP leadership usually won't explicitly say that these issues are of no concern, but they also won't say that tort reform, high deductible ins plans, etc will enable universal coverage. Because they won't.
The issue goes beyond economics, to a value judgement. Is it OK that some percentage of US citizens should suffer or die due to being unable to afford health care? Some say yes, some say no.
Follow
Befriend (8)
1 threads
792 comments
Danville, CA
Premium
zzyzzx says
I'm on a first name basis with a few people who write for Newsmax and they're saying we already have southern governors who are seriously talking secession. The general consensus seems to be that both parties have betrayed us.
This is getting ugly.
Follow
Befriend (5)
168 threads
5,074 comments
SiO2 says
I agree with you here, except it's not that simple.
Many republicans are extremely capable of programming themselves to believe what they want. They wouldn't even be republicans if they weren't very good at ignoring how against their own interest their votes often are. It happens for a number of reasons.
In one case it might be that they've bought the whole Guns, Gays and God bs. In another it might be a southerner with strong racist upbringing. Often it's just allegiance to a party that they aligned themselves with 30 years ago, because of parents, or whatever reason, and they aren't changing. This happens on the left too.
Many of these people either won't honestly look at the question:
"Is it OK that some percentage of US citizens should suffer or die due to being unable to afford health care?"
Or, they will somehow magically convince themselves that that isn't what it's about. It's about government takeover, death panels, blah, blah, blah,.....(insert propaganda here)...
But you're right, in many other cases, they simply don't believe that we should all pay for health care for everyone.
If asked why we're the only developed country that doesn't have some type of universal health care, what would their answer be ?
I suppose they think it's because we're special.
Follow
Befriend (1)
2 threads
119 comments
San Jose, CA
rootvg says
Yeah but they won't because of this:
http://www.sodahead.com/united-states/what-states-are-leeching-off-the-taxpayer/question-2475027/
I personally wish they would though so America could get back to becoming the greatest country in the world again.
Follow
Befriend (12)
10 threads
3,516 comments
Oakland, CA
leo707's website
Premium
Bap33 says
I bet Romney and Glen Beck are pleased that you have come to know that Mormonism is God's one true religion and all others are abominations. It must have been a difficult first step for you to realize that your brand of Christianity is a corrupt and evil construct of man.
The next step is to have a few lessons before your baptism.
http://mormon.org/missionaries?gclid=CK_liouY_rACFSgbQgodSE_lWA
"My object in going to inquire of the Lord was to know which of all the sects was right, that I might know which to join. No sooner, therefore, did I get possession of myself, so as to be able to speak, than I asked the personages who stood above me in the light, which of all the sects was right — and which I should join. I was answered that I must join none of them, for they were all wrong, and the personage who addressed me said that all their creeds were an abomination in His sight: that those professors were all corrupt . . ."
-Joseph Smith, "History of the Church", Vol. 1, page 5-6
"no man or woman in this dispensation will ever enter into the celestial kingdom of God without the consent of Joseph Smith...every man and woman must have the certificate of Joseph Smith, junior, as a passport to their entrance into the mansion where God and Christ are"
-Brigham Young, "Journal of Discourses", vol. 7, p.289
Follow
Befriend (1)
247 threads
4,704 comments
Carl Pham says
You forgot 1996 when Bill Clinton had to save us from those pesky $35 premiums. He failed but we got $300 premiums for his effort, and a convoluted health privacy act, but for some reason we know exactly how much someone weighed and how much drugs were in their system at the time of death, with more precision than ever.
Medical billing is so complex now, that Medical MD United HC biggest business is their billing practice for smaller doctors.
Thanks Clintons, I can really feel the Vaseline now.
Follow
Befriend (3)
12 threads
3,097 comments
@leo,
Have you forgotten my view of Joe Smith? I think your full force attack aimed at me is based on a misunderstanding. I'm not surprised at your willingness to kick shit my way, but I am surprised that you did so on a baseless, or at the very least misunderstood, point. You are much better at this, than that, normally.
Follow
Befriend (12)
10 threads
3,516 comments
Oakland, CA
leo707's website
Premium
Bap33 says
What, you are not open to change?
Bap33 says
Come now Bap, an "attack"? Yes, this is indeed a misunderstanding. I was merely responding to your comment that all religions were evil except "God's" (whoever that is!). Remembering that Joe Smith once said a very similar thing. I was merely suggesting that perhaps the mormon god is the right one.
An attack no... but yes, knowing what a supporter you are of prominent mormons I thought a good-natured ribbing was in order.
As you well know mormons hold Joe Smith in the same regard/level that they hold Jesus, So...
Right from God's mouth --to--> Joseph Smith's ear --to--> Mormon scripture --to--> Romney and Beck's brains.
The quote can be read on the LDS website right here:
http://www.lds.org/scriptures/pgp/js-h/1.19?lang=eng#18
Follow
Befriend (5)
168 threads
5,074 comments
Is Beck a mormon ? I thought he converted to Catholocim. Who am I thinking of,...Gingrich ?
Follow
Befriend (12)
10 threads
3,516 comments
Oakland, CA
leo707's website
Premium
marcus says
Yes, Glen Beck is a mormon. I am not sure who the Catholic convert is though.
Follow
Befriend (12)
140 threads
1,355 comments
Emeryville, CA
thomas.wong1986 says
James Byrd would disagree, if he were still alive.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Byrd,_Jr.
Follow
Befriend
3 threads
189 comments
leoj707 says
Yes, Newt converted to Catholicism.
Follow
Befriend (3)
12 threads
3,097 comments
Joe Smith simply wrote a plagiarized version of the OT and added in some Cowboys and Indians ... anyone with a clear mind that has read the Bible will see that the very first time they read The BoM. Joe Smith is a fake, just like Mohamad.
God does not need religion. Religion is man's thing.
I did not pick Romney, he is the only choice I have now due to the "system". I wanted Cain, or anyone as conservative as him. Romney is on the same level as Newt in my opinion. Same shit as on the D side, only with an R stamped in it.
Follow
Befriend (1)
2 threads
119 comments
San Jose, CA
Bap33 says
Anyone with a clear mind would not believe a book with talking animals to be true.