WatchI've had a bunch of people say the newslinks are all over the place now, not specificially about housing, and not necessarily very good...
Edited on 22 Aug 2012:
In response to reader demand, Patrick will again manually pick the newslinks each day
if he can get 100 paying subscribers in the next week. Those paying
subscribers will then be able to view the links here, or by email.
To bring back the hand-picked newslinks, please subscribe with the button on the home page: http://patrick.net
The subscription costs $7 per week, but there is a one-week free trial period,
so you won't be charged anything until a week goes by. If there are 100
subscribers by Monday August 27th at noon, his manually picked newslinks will
get published that evening, and your subscription will start charging you.
If there are not at least 100 subscribers, Patrick will cancel your
subscription and you'll pay nothing.
Follow
Befriend (16)
761 threads
7,688 comments
Boca Raton, FL
Premium
@Patrick
Suggestion: Include the votes for a discussion on the user's discussion page.
That way, we link submitters can easily see which of our discussions/links were useful and interesting to the community and which were not. This will help us better focus our link submissions.
I do think it's a good thing that this site has branched out from just real estate as the bubble is becoming less relevant as time passes. Many places are in post-bubble, particularly the areas least affected by the bubble. It's still relevant to the sun belt though as prices have a ways to fall still. But even those of us who live in the sun belt come to patrick.net for non-housing related news and discussions. At least that's my opinion.
Follow
Befriend (8)
28 threads
1,341 comments
Redwood City, CA
The problem is your forum users are all over the place, while your link readers are here primarily for reading housing links. They come to you for the best hand picked links on housing, to save them time. They aren't interested in contributing, they are here to get information only. In essence you're letting the minority rule the majority, but they seem to have differing views and they're going to run off your largest user base over time.
Follow
Befriend (4)
328 threads
913 comments
Patrick,
pkennedy might be correct. If I start a new discussion I'll try to connect any link to the effect it might have on housing but I reserve the right to make stupid comments on other discussions
Follow
Befriend
1 comments
I tend to agree. I very much enjoy getting the housing links, but as a political agnostic - I am tired of seeing all the left-wing propaganda that is now being sprinkled throughout the links. I was originally drawn to this blog because I felt that the author was more on the independent side.
Follow
Befriend
8 comments
Tustin, CA
Patrick,
I don't want user generated links. I come here because I want someone with intelligence to be parsing the random crap that's out there. I can find random crap by searching the internet myself. If you're getting too busy to support being the engine that weans down the information, I might suggest you look for (and interview) volunteers to help with the process whom you believe to have good taste.
Having random users point out their findings is helpful but I don't want to see it all. If you do assemble a proper team of volunteers, it shouldn't take too long to do a quick search over the 20 or so major news outlets. Any article linked on here from "the economist" I'm going to read. Any article or snarky political cartoon from some loon I've never heard of gets ignored.
If this can't serve as a jump station that offers value, I have no reason to be here. The new formal offers a lot less value than the old. I know it takes time and you may have other priorities, but unfortunately the time you spent was why it was valuable in the first place.
Regards,
Joel Payne
PS Thank you for all you've done over the years.
Follow
Befriend (54)
5,185 threads
6,156 comments
46 male
Menlo Park, CA
Premium
If you'll check the subset of links that are just about real estate you'll see that it's pretty close to what I myself would have chosen, which is not a bad result since this scheme has been running only a few weeks.
http://patrick.net/forum/real-estate/
As far as I can tell, you don't donate or submit links, and you won't even vote on links? You suggest I find volunteers to help, but will you be one of them?
The site could be better than ever if everyone would just vote a little bit.
Hey, actually it's working! Total number of votes on links today are about double what they have been lately, probably because of this thread. Each vote improves the quality of the results!
Follow
Befriend (54)
5,185 threads
6,156 comments
46 male
Menlo Park, CA
Premium
Maybe what's really missing is the ability to subscribe by email to the top ten links by separate forum, so that people could just subscribe to the real estate links under http://patrick.net/forum/real-estate/ for example.
Right now the email subscription has all links together, which I admit is a mish-mash of different topics.
Follow
Befriend
6 threads
55 comments
Fontana, CA
May I suggest a blend of user-submitted links and a few you add yourself? Your editorial judgement made this site much better, but I realize you need to get your life back.
(Can you imagine what would happen to Drudge Report if Matt Drudge turned it over to the site's viewers? Yikes!)
Follow
Befriend (54)
5,185 threads
6,156 comments
46 male
Menlo Park, CA
Premium
I do submit links every day, and I vote on them.
I think the problem is just that relatively few people use the new system, which is understandable since it takes a bit of time to figure out the changes.
The Druge Report would probably be exactly the same, with viewers all finding new ways to hate Obama instead of Matt Drudge doing it. What I don't get is why his site gets so many viewers.
Follow
Befriend (2)
5 threads
8 comments
My suggestion would be to look at an editors / curators circle who can help select links. There are plenty of sites (reddit, hacker news) which allow user-submitted content. However they have to solicit active participation.
My main problem is that I tend to hit PN for a quick perusal of headlines, I generally don't log in, and the recent link quality has been ... decidedly mixed.
Worse is the graphics which frequently link to a forum or discussion with apparently little or no bearing or context on the graphics. I think this may be because the front-page link tends to land on the *current* page of comments, which has almost always drifted significantly from the orginal topic.
It's making things generally less useful.
Follow
Befriend
18 comments
Why would someone donate to a site that is becoming less and less useful? Patrick, I suggest you take control of the main column news links, like you used to do. I come here for your links. I don't come here for political cartoons or anything user-voted. If you think that kind of user voting is a benefit to your site in some way (I'm pretty sure it's not) - move those links to a separate, adjacent column.
Follow
Befriend (16)
761 threads
7,688 comments
Boca Raton, FL
Premium
Patrick says
No, never using mailing lists. Use RSS feeds instead. They empower the user and can be read, filtered, and routed many more ways than email.
RSS feeds make mailing lists obsolete.
Patrick says
One third of Americans are idiots. Why else would there be a tru TV channel?
Follow
Befriend (1)
11 threads
224 comments
San Francisco, CA
joelnpayne says
I agree. But I also know that updating a blog every day with quality content is a big job, esp. if you are not getting paid for your time.
Follow
Befriend
8 comments
Tustin, CA
Patrick says
I think I gave you a spot ten spot but it was a 4-5 years back at least. FWIW I remember that I paid you according to the value I felt I received and was comparing to that of a magazine subscription. I also have commented but only occasionally and only when I felt like I really had something to say.
In terms of your request I put actions to suggestions, unfortunately that doesn't align with MY current priorities. I'm a mechanical engineer, I run an LLC on the side of normal employment, and I'm a father of two. That means life is very very full and I don't have time or desire to put priority on being a volunteer (even though I think it's a good idea). To vote properly requires time and attention paid to what good and what's bad when of course I prefer it all to be good. I find the new system to be inefficient and that's a bummer but it is what it is.
1sfrenter says
That's the rub. Patrick has been being paid for his time. Sure it's a hobby and he's not going to make a living on it, but since this has been up an running since what 2005 or so? I know I referred a friend here who bought a house in 2006 after I recommended she not do so. With a low day of donations at $15 and a good day at $50, Patrick's certainly made several thousand dollars doing this, and it wouldn't surprise me if he'd broken 10k. That's better than the vast majority of bloggers who simply want to have a voice.
Patrick, if you've decided it's not your priority, I can understand and relate to that. Time is precious and life goes so crazy fast (particularly with little girls) :-). You do what you need to do, but naturally I'll be doing the same. You wanted feedback on the system and I've given you that.
I do respect the fact that you've tried several things over the years and you listen to others while still thinking for yourself. If I didn't think you cared I wouldn't have spent 15 minutes of my day jotting you a couple notes.
Regards to you and yours,
Joel
Follow
Befriend
7 threads
187 comments
Pacifica, CA
The only problem I have found with the new system is that the comments seem, sometimes, to be feeding from earlier posts, or somewhere else.
So you click a link for a story, and comments seem to be in the middle of a conversation you didn't see the start of.
Follow
Befriend
6 threads
115 comments
My perspective: I don't have the time to surf, submit, vote. I get the email and read 2-6 stories from it, often not visiting patrick.net itself. I appreciate the pnet forum for the RE/economics talk, but less so the political banter. However, I do enjoy the political links (those containing numbers) and the cartoons (probably because they're quick).
I've contributed some to the forums some and have also submitted a couple links, but I'm generally not going to come here before I get the email. For people using email like me, voting makes no sense because it's the voting result that brings us here. If we're here and voting, email is pointless.
Otherwise, fewer but more high-quality links in the email are better. Timeliness is of moderate value - I like the daily option, but I may go through 10 emails at one time when I get around to reviewing them.
Follow
Befriend
3 comments
Dublin, CA
karsten says
Perhaps add an option to filter out the images from the links/articles or only show them as a link? Or split the images into a separate section from the links? There seem to be lots of joke images which frequently get voted up.
Follow
Befriend (3)
38 threads
801 comments
San Francisco, CA
I've been voting, but the link results have been scaring me away from the site. A picture for the top link/article of the day? I'm also not comfortable viewing some of the pictures at work. This wasn't a problem before, but now they're on the front page.
Follow
Befriend (54)
5,185 threads
6,156 comments
46 male
Menlo Park, CA
Premium
OK, a text-only option is not hard to implement. I will do that.
Follow
Befriend
1 comments
What's the criteria for voting Up or Down? I'm assuming an Up vote means the voter thinks it's a valid housing article, and not necessarily that they agree or not with the subject of the article.
For example, if someone posts an article about bailing out greedy/dumb buyers who took out a huge HELOC and now is losing the house - I don't like the idea of bailing out the buyer, but I like the article in regards to it being an article about housing.
If this site is going to rely on user submissions and user votes, we might as well just make a new subreddit on Reddit. That whole site is based on that kind of model.
Follow
Befriend (54)
5,185 threads
6,156 comments
46 male
Menlo Park, CA
Premium
SoBayDude says
Just whether you think it's worth reading or not.
Doesn't have to be about housing, unless it's in http://patrick.net/forum/real-estate/
Yes, it's sort of like Reddit, but for some reason I find Reddit hard to use.
Follow
Befriend
3 threads
45 comments
Hi Patrick,
I was aware we could submit links, and vote on them, but like JoelNPayne I'm pretty busy too so I haven't been using these features. I just read 1 to 3 links a day that interest me from your list.
The housing bubble is still alive and well in Canada, certainly in Toronto where I live and deflating already in Vancouver (the most overvalued market in the country and possibly the continent). While the story States-side sure provide that cautionary tale people here STILL don't believe it.
I think I'll throw a few links on right now!
TOLurker
Follow
Befriend
3 threads
45 comments
Just tried submitting a link but it threw me into a "start a new discussion" forum box!
TOLurker
Follow
Befriend (1)
71 threads
230 comments
Mountain View, CA
Premium
1)
lets remove the images from the front pages. That will clean up the links a lot.
you can start a new section 'patnet images / cartoons'
2) and are the links 'auto detected' and posted on the front page, even if some body is just writing a post?
Follow
Befriend (54)
5,185 threads
6,156 comments
46 male
Menlo Park, CA
Premium
TOLurker says
Actually, that's the right behavior. Just paste the link into the discussion box, title it, and submit.
Sorry it's not clearer. How should it look?
Follow
Befriend (54)
5,185 threads
6,156 comments
46 male
Menlo Park, CA
Premium
bwdutton says
Request granted!
OK, now in your Profile at the bottom, you can select "View newslinks as text only, no images, both on site and in emails."
Then if you save, you won't see images in the newslinks or the emails by default.
Follow
Befriend
6 threads
115 comments
Patrick,
I realize some of the difficulty in running a site like this day-in, day-out, as you have. However, can I suggest that instead of simply allowing visitors to determine what gets sent out that you do some sort of light 'triage'? Let the voting happen, but still try to curate some of the better links. I'm sure there are some hidden gems in there, but there's a lot of nonsense lately. Have I been sleeping through all the links to LIBOR scandal discussions?
$0.02
Follow
Befriend (54)
5,185 threads
6,156 comments
46 male
Menlo Park, CA
Premium
I do that a bit already, but OK, I will pay more attention to them, deleting obviously bad links and promoting good ones.
Please also help by voting!
I guess pure democracy doesn't get you the highest level of content.
Follow
Befriend
6 threads
115 comments
Hi Patrick,
Pure democracy is generally regarded as not a good thing, however I'm not sure I know how to vote. I tried just so I could say I'm doing my part, but I don't get it.
On the front page on the right column are up/down arrows. The highest rated link already went out in this morning's email. Why is it still there?
The stuff in the left column looks like it might be interesting, but how do I vote for one of those?
And why is a picture of a bank upvoted 6 to 3, and a picture of a movie character upvoted 8 to 5? Because the second is a link to something about Romney and Limbaugh?
I think you need to steer the conversation towards housing and the ancillary topics of banking fraud, economics, regulation, &c. Your byline says "Advertise your house to a relevant audience," but based on the daily emails the site is starting to feel rudderless. You've put a lot of work into building a core but once the trolls start upvoting themselves that's all you'll have left...
Alrighty then, </soapbox>
Follow
Befriend (54)
5,185 threads
6,156 comments
46 male
Menlo Park, CA
Premium
cc0 says
Up arrow means "Worth reading".
Down arrow means "Not worth reading".
I'll add that description to the home page. OK, done.
cc0 says
That was a bug. Someone included the same link twice with slightly different URLs. Deleted. Thanks for telling me!
cc0 says
If you click "Like" at the top of a conversation, it also gets an upvote in the link voting.
cc0 says
That's a mystery to me.
Follow
Befriend
6 threads
115 comments
Patrick says
I'm not quite that dense, but ok.
Patrick says
That is helpful information. Suggest 2 things:
(1) Use the arrows and like/unlike (on stories only, I presume) consistently, so it's clear that 'liking'/'upvoting' and 'dislike'/'downvoting' are the same thing.
(2) Consider framing stories and providing a p@net vote bar. This can be two ways, I think:
(2.a) Traditional: vote bar at top, link content in IFRAME below.
(2.b) With an onClick, open a small window that shows the link summary and p@net voting bar. When navigating away from the page, close the voting window. I'm not sure how you'd do auto-close, but leaving it open is an 'ok' 80% solution, imo.
Follow
Befriend (54)
5,185 threads
6,156 comments
46 male
Menlo Park, CA
Premium
Those are good suggestions.
I tried iframes but it was a nightmare, since many sites strongly object and try to break your iframe, and there are legal issues.
But the toolbar thing seems pretty workable.
Can a toolbar know which page you're on right now and do some database calls based on that? I suppose it can.
Follow
Befriend
6 threads
115 comments
I'll refrain from technicals because I'm no JS/jQuery expert, but to be clearer: When I said "toolbar" I meant the title controls at the top of each story. I suggested IFRAME as a good "80%" solution because it's easy to implement, but without that, imagine this topic:
The idea is simply that when you click link above, this exact same block opens in its own window and you can vote up/down from there.
What I hear from you sounds like something in the browser toolbar. I'm sure you could include bookmarklets that do "vote up" and "vote down" but I'm not sure how a free-floating window could grab "previous focus". You could probably have a window open that snoops each page load and has a "share" link (stumbleupon must do something like this), but all that seems much more complicated than an IFRAME. :)
Also, a "share" link should be able to grab a blurb, and be smart enough to not present the same story from two different sources, as went out with this morning's email...
Follow
Befriend
1 threads
6 comments
Sad to say the experiment to let users vote on the news links is adding alot of noise, and also the topics are no longer focused on housing-related news. For example, I don't need any Obama or Romney news / political cartoons on this site, unless it is housing/economy related. There's plenty of other politics focused sites I can goto to read that drivel.
The news was much better when it was a curated list. If Patrick doesn't have time, maybe he should ask for volunteers who would agree to stick to housing related news and let them curate the news by committee.
Maybe Patrick is trying to turn patrick.net into a reddit.com or something. Right now, I'm finding if I want housing related news, I'm better off going to http://www.reddit.com/r/housing than http://patrick.net, which didn't used to be the case.
Follow
Befriend (54)
5,185 threads
6,156 comments
46 male
Menlo Park, CA
Premium
OK, so many people have said that they want me to again personally select all the links that I'll do it -- if I can make a living at it.
There are about 8,000 subscribers by email. If even 100 of them will pay $7 per week, I'll do the links again. See the notice on the home page.
I'm using the free trial week to give people a chance to vote on what they want without spending anything yet.
Follow
Befriend
5 threads
93 comments
Rockville, MD
Patrick - This is gonna be interesting. I'm quite interested in seeing the outcome. That should tell you if people put their money where their mouth is.
Follow
Befriend (54)
5,185 threads
6,156 comments
46 male
Menlo Park, CA
Premium
Yes, at the very least it's an interesting experiment.
Maybe I should put up a counter on the home page? So far I have seven subscribers.
Follow
Befriend
27 threads
233 comments
Skokie, IL
Why can't you sell advertising for this site?
I know that you mentioned that advertisers don't like advertising against housing prices, but I see all kinds of advertising on the web unrelated to the sites content.
There is all kinds geared to the user, somehow the browser gets user info.
I think if you charge you will lose eyeballs.
Follow
Befriend (54)
5,185 threads
6,156 comments
46 male
Menlo Park, CA
Premium
StillLooking says
At its peak, I got about $1,000/month from Google ads, but that declined to about $100/month over time as real estate advertisers decided not to be on Patrick.net, and as real estate advertising in general crashed.
I do have some ads in a little system I made myself:
http://patrick.net/d.php
It doesn't make much, but I really like it because it's so simple and non-intrusive. If I could find a way to target the most relevant advertisers, that would help.
StillLooking says
True, but if even a few of the eyeballs that remain are paying customers, it works out.
Anyway, the Patrick.net forum traffic continues to grow at a good clip. Not sure why, but eyeballs are being added on the left side of the home page even as I lose them from the right side.
Follow
Befriend (7)
29 threads
1,206 comments
31 male
Premium
Hey patrick, when it says there was 19,241 viewers yesterday, is that unique users or is that how many times the homepage got loaded? Because if its not unique users, its easy to see why the forum generates more page refreshes as two people go back and forth bickering,,,,relative to when it was mainly newslink traffic, I would open pat.net once and then hit the links (in new tabs) and then be done with it,,,,