Or at least Britain can't live on renewables alone:
"Renewable facilities have to be country-sized because all renewables
are so diffuse."
"To sustain Britain’s lifestyle on its renewables alone would be very
difficult. A renewable-based energy solution will necessarily be large
and intrusive."
See the following:
http://www.inference.phy.cam.ac.uk/withouthotair/c18/page_103.shtml
Watch
Follow
Befriend (48)
273 threads
12,505 comments
47 male
Lafayette, CA
Premium
The United States can live in natural gas entirely and would only need oil for jet fuel and lubrication.
Britain would need nuclear.
Follow
Befriend (4)
117 threads
17,655 comments
Premium
Of course. It is going to be mostly fossil fuel and nuclear.
Follow
Befriend (4)
52 threads
4,416 comments
Corning, NY
Premium
iwog says
For how long though?
Follow
Befriend (3)
13 threads
2,201 comments
San Jose, CA
Premium
iwog says
How long do you figure we could we go entirely on CNG? Are you including deep sea methyl hydrates in your estimate or only proven reserves?
Follow
Befriend (3)
13 threads
2,201 comments
San Jose, CA
Premium
iwog says
I think you mean more nuclear
Follow
Befriend (4)
52 threads
4,416 comments
Corning, NY
Premium
The main problem with renewables: the energy is too "diffuse." Use of renewables means a *huge* amount of area dedicated to energy collection. Remember, rich liberals on Cape Cod couldn't stand the thought of a few offshore wind turbines "spoiling" their view.
We need concentrated, high-density energy. Like we get from fossil sources, nuclear, and hydro*.
*most good hydroelectric sites worldwide are already dammed