Patrick.net

Go to Chick-Fil-A you hypocrites.

By HEY YOU   Follow   Thu, 2 Aug 2012, 12:38am   9,910 views   170 comments
Watch (1)   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike (1)  

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,160382,00.html

« First     « Previous     Viewing Comments 131-170 of 170     Last »     See most liked comments

1. Honest Abe Follow Befriend (41) 91 threads 1,806 comments

   131   2:58pm Fri 3 Aug 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike (2)   http://libertycrier.com/finance/everyone-a-millionaire-social-security-vs-private-retirement/

2. Vicente Follow Befriend (8) 204 threads 4,416 comments Davis, CA

   132   3:26pm Fri 3 Aug 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike (1)   Honest Abe says Imagine you took the money that the government takes from your paycheck to invest into social security and used it instead to privately invest for retirement? Yeah that sort of apples to oranges misdirection works well on SUCKERS, who can't comprehend the difference between a Paygo insurance plan and a Ponzi scheme. Imagine you'd invested it all with Bernie Madoff, you'd be RICH....if you got out early before his fraud was uncovered. Con men are good at appealing to naked greed and avarice and playing that up, and downplaying risks. What does this SPAM have to do with the thread BTW? Nothing that I can see.

3. Honest Abe Follow Befriend (41) 91 threads 1,806 comments

   133   3:36pm Fri 3 Aug 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike (1)   Vincente, wouldn't you like the opportunity to be able to make the decision whether to invest on you own, or participate in a government sponsored retirement plan? [freedom of choice] Or do you prefer to let our "wise" government leaders make all the decisions which affect your life?

4. CL Follow Befriend (12) 140 threads 1,355 comments Emeryville, CA

   134   3:44pm Fri 3 Aug 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (2)   Dislike   CaptainShuddup says Gays if you listen long enough to them, even Abraham Lincoln was Gay. I know, right? Just because he slept with a man in a small bed and later wrote him love letters.

5. Vicente Follow Befriend (8) 204 threads 4,416 comments Davis, CA

   135   3:47pm Fri 3 Aug 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   Honest Abe says Vincente, wouldn't you like the opportunity to be able to make the decision whether to invest on you own Wouldn't you like the freedom to get in on the ground floor of my scheme? We are buying stamps in one country and selling them in another, and taking advantage of exchange rates. People smart enough to see what a GREAT scheme this is, could be bazillionaires! It's very seductive. It's playing on greed not certainty.

6. Honest Abe Follow Befriend (41) 91 threads 1,806 comments

   136   4:12pm Fri 3 Aug 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   V - prove to me your company or idea is worth investing in and I'll consider it. I didn't say I would, I said I'd consider it. Certainty almost always yields a lower return. You know the risk-reward scenario, right. YOU "invest"with SS and after 25 or 30 years your nest egg is ZERO, and you get $300 per week. The other scenario, after 25 or 30 years your nest egg is $3.5M, and a weekly income of $3,500. Seriously, which sounds better to you? I said seriously, no liberal mumbo-jumbo. BTW, average stock market returns for the last 5 years = 2.3%, over the last 10 years 4.5%, the last 20 years 9.4% and the last 25 years 10.5%. Thats not greed, that's just being fiscally prudent...but the government forces you to accept their wonderful, guaranteed zero return investment...yuck.

7. CL Follow Befriend (12) 140 threads 1,355 comments Emeryville, CA

   137   4:17pm Fri 3 Aug 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   Why not do both Abe? This way SS protects you from, say, a housing bubble that brings down the market and your retirement with it. And then the Government doesn't have to help keep old people, widows and orphans from eating cat food.

8. Vicente Follow Befriend (8) 204 threads 4,416 comments Davis, CA

   138   4:18pm Fri 3 Aug 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   Honest Abe says YOU "invest"with SS and after 25 or 30 years your nest egg is ZERO, and you get $300 per week. It's not an investment scheme, it's an insurance plan. Your misunderstandings, whether deliberate or out of ignorance, just cause further mayhem from that point.

9. Honest Abe Follow Befriend (41) 91 threads 1,806 comments

   139   5:17pm Fri 3 Aug 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike   Socialized Insecurity is more of a ponzi scheme than anything, whereby the newer and fewer workers support the older and more numerous retirees. And I do understand whether SS is an insurance plan or not, because its not. Helvering vs. Davis among other things stated Social Security "was NOT a contirbutary insurance program" [emphasis added]. Glad I could clear that up for you, Abe. http://washingtonexaminer.com/duped-by-congressional-lies/article/727066

10. KILLERJANE Follow Befriend (3) 12 threads 600 comments

    140   5:35pm Fri 3 Aug 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike   My Florida insurance provider (who takes a month to write a policy, yes that long) JUST EMAILED ME TO TELL ME HER INTERNET WAS DOWN AND SHE WOULD HAVE TO WAIT TIL TOMORROW TO WRITE IT UP. She emailed me.

11. KILLERJANE Follow Befriend (3) 12 threads 600 comments

    141   5:36pm Fri 3 Aug 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   My internets down, I'll blog you later.

12. Vicente Follow Befriend (8) 204 threads 4,416 comments Davis, CA

    142   6:07pm Fri 3 Aug 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (2)   Dislike   Honest Abe says Socialized Insecurity is..... Obviously you've mistaken this for FreeRepublic.com. Where everyone tries to top each other for hip ways to rename things in derogatory fashion. But I understand. What with your namesake being gay and all, you are traumatized and delirious. Be careful out there y'all. I've heard it starts with sucking on straws.... ?1343334660

13. zzyzzx Follow Befriend (9) 416 threads 4,138 comments Baltimore, MD

    143   8:13pm Fri 3 Aug 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   iwog says I vote we make polygamy okay, incest okay between consenting adults, and lower the age of consent laws to 16 years old or 14 years old, but it's a good start.

14. zzyzzx Follow Befriend (9) 416 threads 4,138 comments Baltimore, MD

    144   8:18pm Fri 3 Aug 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   OK, since you guys can't deliver:

15. Vicente Follow Befriend (8) 204 threads 4,416 comments Davis, CA

    145   10:25pm Fri 3 Aug 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike

16. Buster Follow Befriend (7) 22 threads 325 comments

    146   10:48pm Fri 3 Aug 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (2)   Dislike   CaptainShuddup says She also noted that in Clinton's administration Civil Union recognition was a sure thing, but that wasn't good enough. Because they wanted to fuck with the church and ram their agenda down the religious rights throats, they demanded marital rights. Which a Civil Union by another definition is "Marriage". But it wasn't good enough. You are so full of shit. Are you on Fox News Payroll? The reason why many gays demanded full equality and full marriage rights and the 1,100+ rights that go along with marriage is because we realized that resistance on the right was not about marriage at all. This is evidenced by the fact that Christianists opposed gay people even when they timidly asked for domestic partnerships and civil unions. Hell, they, the christianist right, opposed any legal recognition of gay persons, contracts, job protections, housing protections, etc. Anything to make the life of a gay person just a little more tolerable was fought tooth and nail. Hell, you guys are still fighting against any law that would attempt to decrease the incidence of anti gay bullying for our youth. In TN you can't even say the word gay in schools. It is now illegal. WTF? You would rather see gay teens kill themselves than to offer up any meager protection or support that may be gained via a gay straight student alliance. No, you fight these too. You have blood on your hands. You simply don't give a shit about kids either. This whole fight is all about humiliating and dehumanizing gay people. It has nothing to do with marriage at all. The anti gay marriage issue by the christianist right is simply cover for their animus and bigotry. Your cover is off, you have been exposed for who you really are. You don't give a crap about marriage at all. You only care about putting an entire group of people out to pasture simply so that you may feel a tinge better about yourself, which obviously is not much. Pathetic to say the least.

17. Buster Follow Befriend (7) 22 threads 325 comments

    147   10:58pm Fri 3 Aug 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (2)   Dislike   Here is just another anti gay reality. In spite of trying to get some anti discrimination laws on the books to protect gay people from simply getting fired for who they are, the Employment Non Discrimination Act has failed to pass for over 20+ years. And some of you even think gays have equal rights in this country and that civil unions or domestic partnerships where they are offered cleared all this up? Think again. Like I said, this has nothing to do with marriage. It is all about hate and bigotry.

18. thomaswong.1986 Follow Befriend 15 threads 2,857 comments

    148   12:56am Sat 4 Aug 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   The Original Bankster says Gays demand that the entire world be twisted into a shape that makes them feel better about what they know subconsciously is a derangement. something like this...

19. thomaswong.1986 Follow Befriend 15 threads 2,857 comments

    149   1:00am Sat 4 Aug 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   Buster says Here is just another anti gay reality. Kind of funny since.. in California the law isnt about discrimination as some believe, but rather at will employment. You can quit anytime and they can get fired anytime! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/At-will_employment : "any hiring is presumed to be "at will"; that is, the employer is free to discharge individuals "for good cause, or bad cause, or no cause at all," and the employee is equally free to quit, strike, or otherwise cease work."

20. Buster Follow Befriend (7) 22 threads 325 comments

    150   10:09am Sat 4 Aug 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   thomaswong.1986 says Buster says Here is just another anti gay reality. Kind of funny since.. in California the law isnt about discrimination as some believe, but rather at will employment. You can quit anytime and they can get fired anytime! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/At-will_employment : "any hiring is presumed to be "at will"; that is, the employer is free to discharge individuals "for good cause, or bad cause, or no cause at all," and the employee is equally free to quit, strike, or otherwise cease work." But to fire people for immutable characteristics, (such as race, age, physical ability, etc.) as well as mutable (religious preferences) are protected against firing for simply having these traits or beliefs. Being fired because one is gay should not be allowed just like firing someone because they choose to be Catholic or because they happen to be 55 years old should not be either.

21. thomaswong.1986 Follow Befriend 15 threads 2,857 comments

    151   11:58am Sat 4 Aug 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   Buster says Being fired because one is gay should not be allowed Once again you are misinformed..

22. Buster Follow Befriend (7) 22 threads 325 comments

    152   12:21pm Sat 4 Aug 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   thomaswong.1986 says Buster says Being fired because one is gay should not be allowed Once again you are misinformed.. Typical. I just cited a bunch of court cases that prove that you are misinformed. And a bigot.

23. thomaswong.1986 Follow Befriend 15 threads 2,857 comments

    153   12:38pm Sat 4 Aug 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   I worked with gay people before.. none got fired. they dont walk around with GAY all over them.. they act and perform as would any other person. if anyone went to work and acted like a gay drama queen and caused problems then they should get fired. you cited no court cases.. just a map!

24. Buster Follow Befriend (7) 22 threads 325 comments

    154   12:46pm Sat 4 Aug 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   Like I said, people should not be able to be legally fired for who they are. Just one source: http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/righttomarry.htm The first state marriage law to be invalidated was Virginia's miscegenation law in Loving v Virginia (1967). Mildred Jeter, a black woman, and Richard Loving, a white man, had been found guilty of violating Virginia's ban on interracial marriages and ordered to leave the state. The Court found Virginia's law to violate the Equal Protection Clause because it invidiously classified on the basis of race, but it also indicated the law would violate the Due Process Clause as an undue interference with 'the fundamental freedom" of marriage. In Zablocki v Redhail (1978), the Court struck down a Wisconsin law that required persons under obligations to pay support for the children of previous relationships to obtain permission of a court to marry. The statute required such individuals to prove that they were in compliance with support orders and that marriage would not threaten the financial security of their previous offspring. The Court reasoned that marriage was "a fundamental right" triggering "rigorous scutiny" of Wisconsin's justifications under the Equal Protection Clause. In Turner v Safley (1987), the Court refused to apply strict scutiny to a Missouri prison regulation prohibiting inmates from marrying, absent a compelling reason. Instead, the Court found the regulation failed to meet even a lowered standard of "reasonableness" that it said it would apply in evaluating the constitutionality of prison regulations. The supreme courts of three states (Massachusetts, California, and Connecticut) have, as of 2009, found bans on gay marriage to violate state constitutional provisions. In November 2008, however, California voters narrowly approved a proposition designed to overturn the decision of that state's supreme court. The legality of the voters' action is now an issue in the California courts. Meanwhile, many states have, by legislation or voter initiative, enacted "defense of marriage" laws to keep marriage an institution exclusively for a man and a woman.

25. Peter P Follow Befriend (4) 117 threads 17,655 comments Premium

    155   1:06pm Sat 4 Aug 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   Protected   Buster says Like I said, people should not be able to be legally fired for who they are. Ideally, people ought to to able to fired for any reason at any time. Biased employers will not last very long in an efficient economy. Therefore the government should focus on making the economy efficient instead. On the other hand, I strongly support gay marriage rights. If one wants to defense marriage, he should oppose divorce.

26. Buster Follow Befriend (7) 22 threads 325 comments

    156   1:11pm Sat 4 Aug 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   Peter P says Like I said, people should not be able to be legally fired for who they are. Ideally, people ought to to able to fired for any reason at any time. Because of their colour, their age, marital status, sex, religion, handicap, etc? Most would disagree, even hard core capitalists.

27. Buster Follow Befriend (7) 22 threads 325 comments

    157   1:13pm Sat 4 Aug 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   Peter P says On the other hand, I strongly support gay marriage rights. If one wants to defense marriage, he should oppose divorce. Totally agree.

28. Peter P Follow Befriend (4) 117 threads 17,655 comments Premium

    158   1:18pm Sat 4 Aug 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   Protected   Buster says Peter P says Like I said, people should not be able to be legally fired for who they are. Ideally, people ought to to able to fired for any reason at any time. Because of their colour, their age, marital status, sex, religion, handicap, etc? Most would disagree, even hard core capitalists. Yes. In an ideal world. The best way to remove bigotry is to let its perpetrators fail so hard in the market that they have no more influences. Remember, unwarranted biases are exploitable inefficiencies. But I understand that the ideal world does not exist.

29. Peter P Follow Befriend (4) 117 threads 17,655 comments Premium

    159   1:20pm Sat 4 Aug 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   Protected   Greed is good because it transcends prejudice.

30. CaptainShuddup Follow Befriend (1) 250 threads 4,758 comments

    160   3:04pm Sat 4 Aug 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike (1)   @Buster, Oh Bullcrap, the only Gays discriminated against in this country are the fat ones.

31. Bap33 Follow Befriend (3) 12 threads 3,101 comments

    161   5:20pm Sat 4 Aug 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   was there a Sexual Deviant Nation election for a leader named "Buster"?

32. New Renter Follow Befriend (3) 13 threads 2,227 comments San Jose, CA Premium

    162   6:24pm Sat 4 Aug 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   Protected   ImBetterNU says the lord jesus christ will come donw on the soddomites dont you worry, Buster!! readin is 4 pussies Almost 2000 years and we're still waiting... Jesus? Are you out there? Makes a guy wonder...

33. mell Follow Befriend (5) 57 threads 1,329 comments Premium

    163   6:36pm Sat 4 Aug 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   Protected   Cloud says The next liberal trump card for raw power in the future, after that is making it perfectly legal for a man to pee in a public bathroom with your 11 year old daughter is .... lower the age of consent. The line "The Man Boy Love Association" have been standing in is getting shorter and they are licking their chops. The perversion of society is simply a raw power grab by depraved under achievers: Liberals. If the man needs to pee and just does that, so what? These issues - and ironically a lot of the perverted crimes they are trying to prevent - seem to be prevalent in the US only. I guess I must be a criminal at times, when I need to piss or crap, I use whatever bathroom is available (starting with the men's room first of course). Sorry, I really don't care who else is in the bathroom ;)

34. curious2 Follow Befriend (5) 31 threads 2,265 comments Premium

    164   8:16pm Sat 4 Aug 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (3)   Dislike   Protected   I had never heard of that fast food chain before this episode, so I read further and it turns out there is more to the story, including massive donations to hate groups: http://www.joshuakennon.com/chick-fil-a-anti-gay/ And marriage opponents' theology is dubious too: http://www.sfgate.com/opinion/article/Catholic-Church-wrong-on-gay-nuptials-3761397.php Lastly, Chick-fil-A is another example of lemon socialism. The whole business model depends on selling cheap chicken, which they can buy at artificially low prices because the chickens are fed subsidized corn. The resulting processed food is full of fat and sodium, fattening up the customers even more than the chickens, so the morbidly obese "heavy users" can offload their medical costs onto everyone else via Medicare and Obamneycare. Everybody gets a cut, so to speak: ADM executives get the federal corn subsidies, Tyson and Cathy get the chicken profits, the medical-industrial complex gets the treatment revenue, and everyone gets the bill, while gay people get stabbed with the beaks. People say Cathy can speak his mind as a private citizen, but he's really another example of corporate welfare. Uncle Sam, Inc.: Privatizing profits while socializing losses since around 1910.

35. Dan8267 Follow Befriend (16) 769 threads 7,714 comments Boca Raton, FL Premium

    165   8:21pm Sat 4 Aug 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike   Protected   Buster says Peter P says On the other hand, I strongly support gay marriage rights. If one wants to defense marriage, he should oppose divorce. Totally agree. If you got rid of divorce, no one would get married. It would be too big of a risk.

36. curious2 Follow Befriend (5) 31 threads 2,265 comments Premium

    166   8:29pm Sat 4 Aug 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike   Protected   Dan8267 says If you got rid of divorce, no one would get married. It would be too big of a risk. Whole countries (e.g. Ireland) prohibited divorce for long periods of time. People still got married.

37. Dan8267 Follow Befriend (16) 769 threads 7,714 comments Boca Raton, FL Premium

    167   8:50pm Sat 4 Aug 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike   Protected   curious2 says Dan8267 says If you got rid of divorce, no one would get married. It would be too big of a risk. Whole countries (e.g. Ireland) prohibited divorce for long periods of time. People still got married. It would be too big of a risk in America. We live in a disposable culture.

38. Bap33 Follow Befriend (3) 12 threads 3,101 comments

    168   10:35pm Sat 4 Aug 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike   if there were more brothels, there would be less devorce.

39. Peter P Follow Befriend (4) 117 threads 17,655 comments Premium

    169   10:38pm Sat 4 Aug 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (2)   Dislike   Protected   Bap33 says if there were more brothels, there would be less devorce. I am all for legalizing prostitution.

40. errc Follow Befriend (7) 30 threads 1,220 comments 31 male Premium

    170   6:47am Sun 5 Aug 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   Protected   curious2 says The resulting processed food is full of fat and sodium, fattening up the customers even more than the chickens, so the morbidly obese "heavy users" can offload their medical costs onto everyone else via Medicare and Obamneycare i liked your post, however this is incorrect. Fat and sodium content of the chicken in a chick fila meal, are the last thing that would make a would be consumer overweight. Eating fat doesn't make one fat, and sodium is the boogeyman. The 120g of sugar in the soda pop and the carbs in the bread and the fries are what make people fat.

« First     « Previous comments