WatchThink about it:
Who is it that gets power? Nice people, or sociopaths?
The people who get power are generally those who are willing to do almost *anything* to get it, no matter how devious.
I really don't understand this humanistic belief that "good government" is just around the corner. I'd say the belief is no more "rational" than religious belief.
The only thing good about Democracy is that we can have a "bloodless revolution" every two years if necessary. As the old saying goes, "politicians are like diapers...they should be changed often, and for the same reason." We can at least replace the current sociopaths with different sociopaths every election cycle.
Follow
Befriend (13)
61 threads
2,702 comments
Premium
That's why the legislature should be like Jury Duty.
The voters get to pick from 4 randomly selected citizens to be their representative. Or they can vote None of the Above, and a new slate of citizens is randomly picked. The incumbent, if any, runs against 3 randomly chosen citizens.
Refusing "nomination" would be onerous, to make sure that people who don't want it get the job.
We'd be better off taking our chances with the bell curve than allowing sociopaths to self-select. That way we'd get the normal 1% sociopathic legislature instead of 80% (with the remainder being megalomaniacs).
Follow
Befriend (4)
52 threads
4,416 comments
Corning, NY
Premium
thunderlips11 says
Hey, maybe that would work.
How do we make this happen? Facebook?
Follow
Befriend (13)
61 threads
2,702 comments
Premium
freak80 says
Referendum. ;)
Follow
Befriend (3)
23 threads
130 comments
Minneapolis, MN
I heard the idea of electing a president for one 6-year term. The winner gets one shot at making the history books, and we get new ideas every time.
I like the idea, not sure what the down side would be...
Follow
Befriend (1)
1 threads
399 comments
Buffalo, NY
While I generally agree that politicians resemble sociopaths at times, government is the only thing that can stand in the way of the even more potent concentration of sociopaths on Wall Street and in the boardrooms of multinational corporations. Politicians for their numerous faults, are at least elected by popular vote (even the electoral college takes its cue from the popular vote in its winner-take-all, state-by-state system). Bad behavior can be punished by a loss of one's job or even career in politics. Bad behavior is incentivized if it brings short term profits to shareholders in big business circles. Without government, there is no check on the abuses the wealthy and powerful can inflict on the average and the poor. Government is a necesary evil and its size should be dictated by the amount of evil in the greater society, that it must contain. It's the people's job to keep shifting the players until a good outcome is reached. When we abducate that duty, we encourage crony entrenchment.
Follow
Befriend (41)
91 threads
1,806 comments
I think the way to get rid of sociopaths in politics is to: (1) pay them minimum wage, (2) have a 'one term' limit for any elected position, (3) eliminate all retirement plans and benefits.
The sociopaths would then be attracted to other types of work...like union boss, drug trade, community agitator, slimy lawyer, bank robber and the like.
Follow
Befriend (4)
52 threads
4,416 comments
Corning, NY
Premium
futuresmc says
True. I wasn't trying to argue that government should be abolished. I think the best we can hope for is some kind of competition between the sociopaths in government and the sociopaths in Big Business. When they collude (like they are now), all hell breaks loose.
Follow
Befriend (12)
141 threads
1,364 comments
Emeryville, CA
Honest Abe says
That would only accelerate the dominance of multimillionaires in Congress. They are the only ones who can afford to be paid minimum wage for years and still be rich!
Follow
Befriend (41)
91 threads
1,806 comments
CL - OK, lets solve that problem right now by adding a 4th restriction. No one earning more than a combined family income of $250,000 is eligible. Problem solved.
Follow
Befriend (17)
785 threads
7,952 comments
Boca Raton, FL
Premium
Good government is possible, but not with humans running the show. Fully automated government ran by software is the way to go.
Follow
Befriend (9)
182 threads
1,655 comments
Premium
Dan8267 says
I thought that was a movie- The Matrix?
Follow
Befriend
3 threads
34 comments
What about a meritocracy also? Elect only those from the 1% who have some objective accomplishments (e.g. academic achievements)
All back to Plato !
Follow
Befriend (17)
785 threads
7,952 comments
Boca Raton, FL
Premium
lostand confused says
The quality of the software is determine by the quality of the developer. As long as managers keep saying, "Any monkey can code.", the future will continue down the path towards the Matrix or Skynet. Of course, there are alternatives.
Follow
Befriend (2)
33 threads
3,495 comments
jhall says
The concept that one 6-year term will somehow make the presidency "better" seems to be severely lacking in logic and substance.
Then there is the added fallacy that what presidents are lacking is "ideas". Look, every president has lots of "ideas". The problem is that only the BAD-for-the-99% ideas get implemented because our legislature being completely corrupted by the 1%.
The problem is not a lack ideas, it is that all the BAD ideas get implemented instead of the good ones. In fact, all the good ideas are already out there in some form, but many people have no idea (there is that word again) what they are.
Follow
Befriend (2)
33 threads
3,495 comments
thunderlips11 says
I cannot agree with this. Do you not understand that if we replace the legislature with random sheep then all the sociopath wolves (think lobbyists and donors) will simply surround the sheep and threaten to tear them to pieces unless they do as they are told?
I've said it a hundred times: What makes a political system work is fair competition and fair elections, coupled with well-informed voters.
In the US we have none of the above:
Fair competition and fair elections are prevented by our electoral system. Well-informed voters are prevented by the corporate propaganda complex.
Follow
Befriend
10 threads
694 comments
freak80 says
LOL. Loved it.
Maybe we should potty train politicians.
Worked with my dog.
Follow
Befriend (2)
33 threads
3,495 comments
Listen, many of our national politicians, at least on the Democratic side, are thoughtful and intelligent people who are trying unsuccessfully to do the right thing.
It is the structure of our system that prevents them from doing what is right. And voters are not helping by believing that the solution is to throw them out every two years.
Come on, being a good lawmaker requires brains, skill and experience.
Throwing polticians out every two years is EXACTLY what the 1% would want you to do. Don't be stupid.
Follow
Befriend (2)
33 threads
3,495 comments
By the way, how about replacing corporate boards and management/CEOs with randomly selected employees, every two years? [sarcasm alert]
Does that seem like a good idea to anyone? Why or why not? Discuss!
Follow
Befriend (2)
33 threads
3,495 comments
Another idiotic thread killed, with just a little bit of logic. It's all in day's work.
But could I not at least get a few "likes" for doing the job? Huh?
Follow
Befriend (1)
1 threads
399 comments
Buffalo, NY
justme says
If you read my earlier post I said you shift the players UNTIL a good outcome is reached, not just for the sake of shifting the players. You throw out the ones that sell out and you keep the rare few that stand on principle.
Follow
Befriend
10 threads
694 comments
justme says
Replacing the boards and top management of any corporation is entirely up to the shareholders. It's not the business of anyone else.
If they are doing a bad job, it is only a matter of time before they get replaced.
Follow
Befriend (2)
33 threads
3,495 comments
futuresmc,
"shift the players UNTIL a good outcome is reached"
has some moral merit (and I did not read your post before), but does it work in practice?
The whole country can be ruined by the crooks that rule in the interim, and then the damage is already done. Refer to to 1980-2008 as an example, and how Obama, who is at least somewhat trying to fix the problems, just cannot do it in 4 years.
You cannot have a clean reset every two years. What the elected reps did in the meanwhile will matter. And you could easily get a totalitarian state along the way.
The only way to fix politics is to fix the structure of the election system (glad you brought that up as well) and forbid corporate money and associated propaganda..
Follow
Befriend (2)
33 threads
3,495 comments
Raw says
Yeah, right. The shareholder do not stand a chance as long as the board and management in practice has all the power to nominate for the board. Corporate governance just isn't democratic with respect to the shareholders. It is as if Washington candidates would be chosen by congress instead of in a primary election. Imagine how bad that would be.
Follow
Befriend (13)
106 threads
3,860 comments
Good government is impossible when people who make it up are crooks and thieves. And most people are easily tempted when they can steal millions and get away with the crime.
The only good government is small government that can't spend a penny without direct approval from those paying the bill.
Follow
Befriend (5)
32 threads
2,343 comments
Premium
justme says
Actually, that idea has potential too. Suppose 1/3 of the board were replaced with randomly selected employees. They would not be enough by themselves to bankrupt the company (which current CEOs already do, e.g. GM's medical "benefits" plans that bankrupted the company). But, they might be enough to counter the CEO-friendly directors, with the result that CEO salaries might return to normal. Employee directors could say credibly, "I know a dozen people who have more experience with this company and could run it better for half the salary that Ricky Wagoner / Raymond Gilmartin etc. is getting." They might also prevent the company from polluting their neighborhood, and they might reduce the likelihood of the company offshoring all its jobs to China. The shareholders would still control most of the votes, and hence the company, but it would be harder for the steward CEOs to loot the place and rob everyone.
Follow
Befriend
15 threads
3,075 comments
curious2 says
Managers run the company day to day. BOD do strategic planning! Not many have any idea what strategic planning involves.
Follow
Befriend
15 threads
3,075 comments
justme says
Thats how dictators are made! change for the good of all citizens !
Follow
Befriend (5)
32 threads
2,343 comments
Premium
thomaswong.1986 says
You mean "not many directors," right? Employees whose careers, pensions, prospects, and salaries all depend on the company might have a clearer understanding of strategic planning than, for example, the directors of financial companies that failed and needed TARP rescue.
Follow
Befriend
15 threads
3,075 comments
curious2 says
I suggest you look up strategic planning.. what is it ? ..tools, methods used? etc etc..
your way off the mark! no i mean not many employees! clueless!
Follow
Befriend (5)
32 threads
2,343 comments
Premium
thomaswong.1986 says
Skip the name calling. Look at the companies that got TARP bailouts and tell me what their directors' brilliant strategic plans were. Here's a possibility: Ingratiate ourselves to politicians by means of "donations," favorable loan terms, and revolving door jobs to staff, so that when our "business" front blows up they'll bail us out and we can all retire. They excelled brilliantly at that!
Follow
Befriend
15 threads
3,075 comments
curious2 says
Politics! that is all you can offer as a director of an enterprise...
you would lose employees and your business would fail talking like this.
Follow
Befriend (2)
33 threads
3,495 comments
curious2 says
In some countries in Europe it is the law that employees must have representation on the BOD. It appears to work pretty well. However, the representatives are not randomly chosen, they are elected by the other employees.
Follow
Befriend (5)
32 threads
2,343 comments
Premium
thomaswong.1986 says
The TARP companies did fail, which is how they got more money and power than ever before, via TARP. It was, from their POV, a huge success. Strange that one of the biggest news stories of the last fifty years seems to have escaped your attention. Your theory seems to be that boards, as currently constructed, are perfect. But theories must yield to facts.
Follow
Befriend
15 threads
3,075 comments
justme says
And how can a BOD claim to be independent from the company? which today is mandatory ! The same is true in Europe... especially those who trade on the NYSE.
http://corporate.findlaw.com/finance/sec-approves-nyse-and-nasdaq-proposals-relating-to-director.html
BOARD COMPOSITION
NYSE
Majority of independent board members. The NYSE requires that a majority of the board of directors of a listed company be "independent," unless the company is a "controlled company," a limited partnership, is in bankruptcy proceedings or lists only preferred or debt securities. A controlled company is a company in which more than 50 percent of the voting power is held by an individual, group or another company. Although controlled companies, limited partnerships, companies in bankruptcy proceedings and companies listing only preferred or debt securities are not required to have a majority of independent directors, such companies remain subject to the independent audit committee requirements discussed below. Under the NYSE listing standards, foreign private issuers are not required to have a majority of independent directors on their boards of directors. Foreign private issuers are required, however, to disclose any significant ways in which their home-country practices differ from those followed by a domestic company.
Follow
Befriend
15 threads
3,075 comments
curious2 says
what does TARP have anything to do with this, corporate governance!
Follow
Befriend (5)
32 threads
2,343 comments
Premium
thomaswong.1986 says
You quoted the answer to your own question, "majority independent:"
thomaswong.1986 says
Please read before you paste. If 1/3 of the directors are employees, the remaining 2/3 can be independent.
thomaswong.1986 says
It is a widely available example to disprove what appears to be your theory that current American boards are perfect. TARP illustrates that American governance, including corporate governance, has become corrupted by politicians, boards, and executives whose "strategic plans" boil down to crony capitalism, lemon socialism, etc. TARP is only one example among countless others. Putting randomly selected citizens into government, and randomly selected employees onto boards, would bypass the patronage network structure that governs currently.
Follow
Befriend
4 threads
342 comments
Phoenix, AZ
The Original Bankster's website
eventually, perhaps soon, the whole thing will fall apart.
It's simply a matter of time before the financial viability of a nation is completely eroded by it's population. When a nation is financially viable, all sorts of parasites that don't have long term intentions arrive, become citizens, don't participate in the military, and simply collect. We have people like that in the millions today in America. The Left protects them as if they were victims. Eventually, the system falls apart- descends into civil war, foreign campaigns for profit, etc.
this is where America is today. You liberals who think you're about freedom aren't the solution, you're the problem.
Follow
Befriend
56 comments
From the local level to the federal level all politicians are immoral crooks! They only care about increasing the size of their own bank accounts and will do anything necessary to make it happen. The trillions in bail outs was all about self preservation and throwing working class Americans to the wolves! It's really sick when all my friends that make over 6 figures say our economy is doing great. They text me every time there is over an hour wait at a fine dining restaurant to prove it. Meanwhile people on Main Street are giving the option of bologna or 99 cent hot dogs to feed their families! We need a REVOLUTION against the crooks that bailed out the rich at our expense. Not letting the Crooks fail was Satan announcing that he's now completely taken over our country!
Follow
Befriend
56 comments
Able bodied scum on welfare, section 8 and food stamps have a better standard of living then people working 80 hrs per week! I say let's burn all the leeches until they are dead or have been ripped out of their blood sucking roles!
Follow
Befriend (5)
7 threads
228 comments
Belgium, WI
Premium
Dan8267 says
We've already got that. It's called "Excel". The corporations use it to decide how to proceed in their profit-making psychopathy, and government uses it to decide how to respond to the corporations' interests. Churches use it to decide whether to save souls or to save the Building Fund. Consumers use it to decide whether to rent or to buy.