Post jobs and track applicants with Jobbered, our Applicant Tracking Software (Advertisement)

Is it a good investmeNt property


By ronnieyours   Follow   Fri, 10 Aug 2012, 4:12pm   1,654 views   16 comments
Watch (2)   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

Hi,

How does identify a good investment property.

I have 3 properties that I like and the details are as follows

Condo 1

Asking price: $195K
Renovation needed : $10K
Common charges : $360
Property tax: $3216

Possible rental income: $1400 per month

Condo 2

Asking price: $188K
Renovation needed: $50K
Common charges: $614
Property tax: $4020
Possible rental income : $1800 per month

Condo 3

Asking price: $237K
Renovation needed: $30K
Common charges : $395
Proper tax : $3715
Possible rental income : $1400 per month

Any suggestions how to decide which one would be worth or or if none are worth it

Thanks
Ron

Viewing Comments 1-16 of 16     Last »     See most liked comments

  1. AJ212


    Follow
    Befriend
    3 threads
    2 comments

    1   10:00pm Fri 10 Aug 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Condo 1 is a terrible investment, by adding your monthly cost they are above the rent. I am assuming that what you call common charges are hoa?. You are already losing money every month and that doesn't include repairs, insurance, management agent (if you use one). You need to have positive cash flow. Is this in over priced California?
    Condo 2 and 3 are just as bad.

  2. E-man


    Follow
    Befriend (31)
    34 threads
    2,543 comments
    San Jose, CA
    Premium

    2   10:07pm Fri 10 Aug 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   Protected  

    Where are these condos located?

  3. robertoaribas


    Follow
    Befriend (23)
    55 threads
    3,765 comments
    Scottsdale, AZ
    robertoaribas's website

    3   10:28pm Fri 10 Aug 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    those seem like crappy returns to me.

  4. gbenson


    Follow
    Befriend
    16 threads
    377 comments

    4   10:37pm Fri 10 Aug 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    The formula we use as a general rule of thumb:

    (Rental income for 1 year) - (taxes) - (HOA paid per year)
    _____________________________________________ > 0.10
    Purchase Price + Repairs

    None of yours even come close, but different regions will have different returns. Roberto can probably get at least 0.12 or more where he is. Anything less than 0.08 just isn't worth the effort IMHO though unless you are courageous enough to think the properties will significantly appreciate over time.

  5. KILLERJANE


    Follow
    Befriend (3)
    12 threads
    600 comments

    5   2:41am Sat 11 Aug 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Total rent per year minus - HOA-taxes-insurance divided by purchase price equals 10 percent minimum or more per year. THis is with no mortgage.

  6. ronnieyours


    Follow
    Befriend
    1 threads
    3 comments

    6   5:20am Sat 11 Aug 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Thank you for your response. Condo 2 is a short sale. Do banks give you the advantage if you are putting all cash down. Depending on the Comps and the reno needed I might get it for $130K and with around $40K work needed the total purchase price would be $170K.

    Assuming a 1 month vacancy rate per year the return still comes out to les than 5% a year.

    I thought it would be a good return. This is in CT

  7. gbenson


    Follow
    Befriend
    16 threads
    377 comments

    7   10:13pm Sat 11 Aug 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    ronnieyours says

    Do banks give you the advantage if you are putting all cash down?

    It's more like the opposite. If you try and finance, they just look at you funny and walk away. But most all short sales we have been involved in you usually lowball a bit. Short sales are weird in that its kind of first come first served. Whatever offer gets to the bank first, the bank considers, even if the next guy offered $20k more. Right now, its about the only way to get a good deal.

  8. robertoaribas


    Follow
    Befriend (23)
    55 threads
    3,765 comments
    Scottsdale, AZ
    robertoaribas's website

    8   10:59pm Sat 11 Aug 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    this entire thread shows what an investor shouldn't look like...

  9. RentingForHalfTheCost


    Follow
    Befriend (8)
    38 threads
    1,996 comments
    Pleasanton, CA
    Premium

    9   11:08pm Sat 11 Aug 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   Protected  

    Don't forget to factor in a few more years of depreciation on your pile of aging wood and rusty nails.

  10. omerde


    Follow
    Befriend
    15 comments

    10   6:39am Sun 12 Aug 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    G'Day,

    Going by what a banker told me was an historical fact since the Roman Empire:

    25% of your net pay should go towards your housing. What do you think? You know of anyone taking home in their pocket $5-6k/month to afford these. They would probably have to make a household income of $100k/year. That's how skewed it is so far.

    I remember in Lousiana in 1990, a little-old-lady paid $40,000 for a one year old, four apartment condomium complex. Your's would cost nearly a million dollars. I'd wait a bit.

    Regards,

    Omerde.

  11. ronnieyours


    Follow
    Befriend
    1 threads
    3 comments

    11   6:53am Sun 12 Aug 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    robertoaribas says

    this entire thread shows what an investor shouldn't look like...

    Thank you all, looks like I am missing string here.... I thong 5% returns should be good and considering thy the property will appreciate in value would e an added bonus.

    Also if it's a rental property you can take advantage of tax breaks tat you get with deprecation also.

    I really appreciate all the feedback but am unable to understand hhow can 5% be bad... Unless someone gets great deals it's not possible to make more than that in the NY tri stare area

  12. robertoaribas


    Follow
    Befriend (23)
    55 threads
    3,765 comments
    Scottsdale, AZ
    robertoaribas's website

    12   8:33am Sun 12 Aug 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    throughout most of history, real estate provided much better than 5% return in terms of rent. Up until about 5 years ago, you could get over 5% from safe/risk free investments.

    Real estate is NOT a time and risk free investment. Stocks and bonds don't call you when the toilet upstairs runs over all weekend, don't bounce checks to you, don't have air conditioners that go out, don't have to be evicted at expense...

    today, rates on everything are very low, but if you buy homes at a mere 5% (and did you factor in maintenance and vacancy in that calculation?)
    You will have locked in a lifetime of a low return, when the likelyhood is that in a few years, return rates increase.

    Long term, unless you want to live in these units, I wouldn't view any of them as terribly good, unless they are specially located or something.

    In Phoenix you could get homes for $100K that will rent for $1000, with no HOA, low taxes and insurance...

  13. RentingForHalfTheCost


    Follow
    Befriend (8)
    38 threads
    1,996 comments
    Pleasanton, CA
    Premium

    13   7:55pm Sun 12 Aug 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   Protected  

    robertoaribas says

    In Phoenix you could get homes for $100K that will rent for $1000, with no HOA, low taxes and insurance...

    In SF area you could pay 100K in realtor commission and closing costs and end up with a place that can't be rented out for $1000. ;) Oh, it'll have HOA and high taxes and insurance, and probably be lost in the next quake. What a great place to live though. If sitting in traffic for hour after hour is actually called living.

  14. ronnieyours


    Follow
    Befriend
    1 threads
    3 comments

    14   8:28pm Sun 12 Aug 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    robertoaribas says

    today, rates on everything are very low, but if you buy homes at a mere 5% (and did you factor in maintenance and vacancy in that calculation?)

    The 5% I calculated is with the assumption that my unit will be vacant one month in a year. Also I factored in the HOA & Taxes as well. 5% if the net yield.

    The money that I have is currently fetching less than 0.25% .... this way atleast I can be close to 5% and by the time the rates rise the property would have appreciated and I would sell it for a profit if I wanted to and also when the housing market improves so will the rents

  15. UAVMX


    Follow
    Befriend
    8 threads
    62 comments

    15   12:50am Sat 22 Sep 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    wow, if you couldn't figure out those are bad ideas, you really shouldn't be investing in properties....read some books, do some research first

  16. 37108605


    Follow
    Befriend
    1 threads
    1,055 comments

    16   5:10am Sat 22 Sep 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    AJ212 says

    Condo 1 is a terrible investment, by adding your monthly cost they are above the rent. I am assuming that what you call common charges are hoa?. You are already losing money every month and that doesn't include repairs, insurance, management agent (if you use one). You need to have positive cash flow. Is this in over priced California?

    Condo 2 and 3 are just as bad.

    You know before I got to go over all this outline I immediately thought the same. You couldn't GIVE me a condo I would sell it immediately. That's my take.

ronnieyours is moderator of this thread.

Email

Username

Watch comments by email
Home   Tips and Tricks   Questions or suggestions? Mail p@patrick.net  

Page took 105 milliseconds to create.