CBS Money Watch Features FREE LEADS and MARKETING TOOLS FOR REAL ESTATE AGENTS (Advertisement)

Mortgage Refinance Applications Highest Since 2009


By Call it Crazy   Follow   Wed, 3 Oct 2012, 7:32am   415 views   7 comments
Watch (0)   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike (3)  

http://www.mbaa.org/NewsandMedia/PressCenter/82246.htm

WASHINGTON, D.C. (October 3, 2012) — Mortgage applications increased 16.6 percent from one week earlier, according to data from the Mortgage Bankers Association’s (MBA) Weekly Mortgage Applications Survey for the week ending September 28, 2012.

“Refinance application volume jumped to the highest level in more than three years last week as each of the five mortgage rates in MBA's survey dropped to new record lows in the survey,” said Mike Fratantoni, MBA’s Vice President of Research and Economics. “Financial markets continue to adjust to QE3, as the ongoing presence of the Federal Reserve as a significant buyer of mortgage-backed securities applies downward pressure on rates. Although there was a slight decline in the HARP share of refinance activity, the level of HARP volume remains steady.”

"The refinance share of mortgage activity increased to 83 percent of total applications from 81 percent the previous week."

*********************
So, 83% of applications were for REFI's, which means that 17% were for PURCHASES....

HARP declines.... are these people having a tough time qualifying??

Also, I wonder how many of these Refi applications end up being "approved"??

How does this bode for the Housing Recovery??

Viewing Comments 1-7 of 7     Last »     See most liked comments

  1. BayArea


    Follow
    Befriend (3)
    49 threads
    368 comments
    Oakland, CA

    1   8:00am Wed 3 Oct 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike (1)  

    Call it Crazy says

    HARP declines.... are these people having a tough time qualifying??

    Don't think so. If you qualify for a normal refi (with the addition of an unlimited LTV clause via HARP), you should have no problems.

    If you don't qualify for normal refi due to a reason outside of exceeding 80% LTV, then you won't qualify for HARP.

  2. SFace


    Follow
    Befriend (2)
    60 threads
    1,297 comments
    Premium

    2   9:00am Wed 3 Oct 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   Protected  

    Call it Crazy says

    So, 83% of applications were for REFI's, which means that 17% were for PURCHASES....

    Pretty much expected ever since the annoucement of QE3 generated another refi cycle. Prettyy much everyone I know is working on their refi's right now.

    Call it Crazy says

    HARP declines.... are these people having a tough time qualifying??

    HARP declines as a % of total. The refi cycle noted above means everything else as a share of percentage went down.

    Call it Crazy says

    Also, I wonder how many of these Refi applications end up being "approved"??

    Most if not all are approved, some may have to take a 125 basis hit. The difference between this refi cycle and prior refi cycle is home appraisals likely went up which means more can likely refi as opposed to last summer. Also, with the appraisals, there are more opportunity to move loan from second to first.

    Call it Crazy says

    How does this bode for the Housing Recovery??

    It's a positive factor. Locking in these rates means more homes will be off the market for sale prospectively. Locking in these rates means, millions just saved on average several thousand $$ annually.

  3. errc


    Follow
    Befriend (7)
    29 threads
    1,203 comments
    31 male
    Premium

    3   9:28am Wed 3 Oct 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   Protected  

    it means that we can see the light at the end of the tunnel, even if that light is a freight train

    The collective we is all the way in survival mode. The long term trend is still deleveraging of private debts. Oil is back down under 90 makes for a nice repreive for us working folk.

    But we know where we've been, and we know where we're at, the question is , where are we going, and lowering interest rates seems more of a gimmick to keep prices where they are at now, not to spur further growth of housing debt (which is the driving force for higher prices)

  4. Call it Crazy


    Follow
    Befriend
    228 threads
    2,748 comments

    4   10:18am Wed 3 Oct 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike (3)  

    errc says

    it means that we can see the light at the end of the tunnel, even if that light is a freight train

    The collective we is all the way in survival mode. The long term trend is still deleveraging of private debts.

    Good point... the part that concerns me is that the bulk of applications are for refi's.... it's nice that these people might save a couple of bucks a month on their mortgage, but it doesn't do much for the overall economy...

    If only 17% are for purchases, then that is really weak and won't help much.

    Think about it, when someone buys a house, a lot of "revenue" gets injected in the local economy. Movers get hired, brokers make commission, attorneys earn fees, surveyors get business, title companies get work, etc....

    Plus, the new home owner usually does a bunch of renovations like painting, carpet, window coverings, appliances, furniture, etc. , so many local companies get some business too...

    If house purchases are down (only 17% applying for new mortgages), the local economy drags down too...

  5. Politicofact


    Follow
    Befriend (3)
    99 threads
    464 comments

    5   10:43am Wed 3 Oct 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (3)   Dislike  

    TROLL

  6. Politicofact


    Follow
    Befriend (3)
    99 threads
    464 comments

    6   10:47am Wed 3 Oct 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (3)   Dislike  

  7. tatupu70


    Follow
    Befriend (3)
    15 threads
    5,606 comments

    7   11:01am Wed 3 Oct 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (2)   Dislike  

    Call it Crazy says

    If only 17% are for purchases, then that is really weak and won't help much.

    Stats obviously aren't your strong point. That 17% number is meaningless in the way you are trying to use it. The number you are looking for is the purchase index, so here you go:

    "The seasonally adjusted Purchase Index increased 4 percent from one week earlier. The unadjusted Purchase Index also increased 4 percent compared with the previous week and was 11 percent higher than the same week one year ago."

    So there you go. It's actually not weaker at all.

Call it Crazy is moderator of this thread.

Email

Username

Watch comments by email
Home   Tips and Tricks   Questions or suggestions? Mail p@patrick.net  

Page took 80 milliseconds to create.