Compare Realtors' Commissions and Rankings at LessThan6Percent.com (Advertisement)

Economist Who Advises Mitt Romney--Rich Are Taxed Enough


By bgamall4   Follow   Wed, 24 Oct 2012, 7:54pm   1,002 views   16 comments
In Las Vegas NV 89117   Watch (1)   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

http://news.yahoo.com/economist-advises-mitt-romney-rich-taxed-enough-022030464--abc-news-politics.html Hubbard gave us the tax breaks under Bush that helped blow the housing bubble.

Hubbard. While steering clear of specifics, Hubbard told the audience at the Intelligence Squared Debate that "higher tax rates won't necessarily produce enhancements in revenue." "We can and should achieve fairness and growth without taxing the rich more than they are today," he said.

Viewing Comments 1-16 of 16     Last »     See most liked comments

  1. BananaSlug


    Follow
    Befriend
    7 comments

    1   10:02pm Wed 24 Oct 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike  

    Hubbard seems to have very little understanding of the fundamentals of our economy:

  2. bgamall4


    Follow
    Befriend (14)
    743 threads
    2,566 comments
    63 male
    Las Vegas, NV
    bgamall4's website
    Premium

    2   10:10pm Wed 24 Oct 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Yes Hubbard is a supply side housing bubbler.

  3. BananaSlug


    Follow
    Befriend
    7 comments

    3   12:59am Fri 26 Oct 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    I wonder if Hubbard even believes his own assertions. No valid empirical argument can be made that current progressive tax rates are high enough for the top earners/capital gainers. I love how he references "fairness" as if he has any ownership of that concept.

    The fact that supply side housing bubblers or anyone associated with the 2007 collapse still have any legitimacy in this country indicates that we really are just preparing for another bubble.

  4. Patrick


    Follow
    Befriend (54)
    5,181 threads
    6,153 comments
    46 male
    Menlo Park, CA
    Premium

    4   3:27pm Fri 26 Oct 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike  

    Don't fall for that old canard.

    The poor pay a much higher percent of their income as payroll taxes and sales taxes than the rich do. Income tax is less than half of all gov't revenue.

    Anyway, I say there should be zero income tax on productive work. What should really be taxed is non-productive rent seeking because it is by definition not productive. For example, income derived from mere ownership of land.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rent-seeking

  5. Patrick


    Follow
    Befriend (54)
    5,181 threads
    6,153 comments
    46 male
    Menlo Park, CA
    Premium

    5   4:02pm Fri 26 Oct 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Sales taxes pay for that stuff too.

    But anyway, I'd also ban sales taxes because that's a penalty on commerce just like income tax on real work is a penalty on labor.

    The appropriate object of taxation is income derived from expropriating other people's labor via mere ownership of things not created by anyone's labor, like land, natural resources like oil, wireless spectrum, and excessive claims to "intellectual property".

    A tax on ultra-fast trading also seems appropriate, since it's not productive.

  6. gbenson


    Follow
    Befriend
    16 threads
    376 comments

    6   4:48pm Fri 26 Oct 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Melmakian says

    just starting an options trading class

    There's no way a day trader is going to be deterred by a penny per trade tax. Those computers that buy and sell a stock within 50 milliseconds however... And it might make the stock market less of a casino.

  7. bgamall4


    Follow
    Befriend (14)
    743 threads
    2,566 comments
    63 male
    Las Vegas, NV
    bgamall4's website
    Premium

    7   5:08pm Fri 26 Oct 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Patrick says

    Anyway, I say there should be zero income tax on productive work. What should really be taxed is non-productive rent seeking because it is by definition not productive. For example, income derived from mere ownership of land.

    I would like to see lower payroll taxes and a wealth tax once in awhile to balance the budget. That sounds close to your view Patrick!

  8. bgamall4


    Follow
    Befriend (14)
    743 threads
    2,566 comments
    63 male
    Las Vegas, NV
    bgamall4's website
    Premium

    8   5:11pm Fri 26 Oct 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Patrick says

    A tax on ultra-fast trading also seems appropriate, since it's not productive.

    Patrick, a Tobin tax on trades would be great. The problem is that the politically independent Square Mile of the UK, which has no control on it from Parliament, will never go for it. So the trades will all go there. This should be a world rule, but I am against one world government so what are you going to do? It is a catch 22.

  9. Patrick


    Follow
    Befriend (54)
    5,181 threads
    6,153 comments
    46 male
    Menlo Park, CA
    Premium

    9   5:19pm Fri 26 Oct 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike  

    I don't think we should care much what foreigners do. American law does not have to recognize trades on foreign exchanges.

  10. Patrick


    Follow
    Befriend (54)
    5,181 threads
    6,153 comments
    46 male
    Menlo Park, CA
    Premium

    10   5:22pm Fri 26 Oct 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    bgamall4 says

    I would like to see lower payroll taxes and a wealth tax once in awhile to balance the budget. That sounds close to your view Patrick!

    I'm a fan of Henry George and think we should distinguish between unproductive wealth like landowning and productive wealth like investment in capital goods.

    The first should be taxed, but the second should not, in general.

    Inheritance might be the biggest exception. If you inherit wealth you probably did not produce it, so it seems fair game for taxation too.

  11. bgamall4


    Follow
    Befriend (14)
    743 threads
    2,566 comments
    63 male
    Las Vegas, NV
    bgamall4's website
    Premium

    11   11:58pm Fri 26 Oct 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Patrick says

    I don't think we should care much what foreigners do. American law does not have to recognize trades on foreign exchanges.

    The banks always say they will be uncompetitive and lose business. It is a game they play with congress. Eurozone wanted a Tobin Tax. The UK refused to go along. As Jamie Dimon found out the real trading platforms exist in the Square Mile.

    But I would not be against the tax here.

  12. thunderlips11


    Follow
    Befriend (13)
    49 threads
    2,625 comments
    Premium

    12   2:23pm Sat 27 Oct 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    BananaSlug says

    Hubbard seems to have very little understanding of the fundamentals of our economy:

    Another econalchemist.

  13. BananaSlug


    Follow
    Befriend
    7 comments

    13   11:40pm Sat 27 Oct 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Melmakian says

    Wow...just 'how much' would be the rich's 'fair share' anyway?

    The top 20% income taxpayers already provide 70% of the income tax revenues. So, how much more do you want? 100%?

    Depending on a very narrow tax base for 100% of revenues is monumentally stupid, if you ask me.

    I don't claim to know what "fair" is. I find when intelligent debate between informed individuals falls into the subjective realm very little is satisfactorily resolved. I do find it bitterly amusing that Hubbard thinks America is a "welfare state" for maintaining Social Security and Medicare but not for assuming the debt burden of America's fiscally inept bankers.
    http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-10-24/hubbard-good-chance-obama-puts-u-dot-s-dot-over-fiscal-cliff

    If you accept the assertion that the history of the American socioeconomic system can be extrapolated to the present day, then would you agree that during the eras of most widespread prosperity, tax rates were much higher for the wealthy? "Prosperity" can be a subjective term, but the wealthiest individuals today are doing pretty well.

  14. bob2356


    Follow
    Befriend
    2 threads
    2,495 comments

    14   4:28am Sun 28 Oct 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Melmakian says

    Wow...just 'how much' would be the rich's 'fair share' anyway?

    The top 20% income taxpayers already provide 70% of the income tax revenues. So, how much more do you want? 100%?

    Depending on a very narrow tax base for 100% of revenues is monumentally stupid, if you ask me.

    Nice mix and match. So how much of the income do the top 20% make? About 85% while only paying 70% of the income taxes.

    100% of revenues aren't from income tax. Income taxes are 42% of revenue, Fica is 40% and cuts off at 100k so the top 20% on average pay fica on 1/3 of their income. The most of the other 80% pay on their full income. Romney's 47% that don't pay income tax at all pay FICA. Corporate taxes (oh those poor overtaxed corporations) is 9%. The other 9% is various other taxes.

  15. Honest Abe


    Follow
    Befriend (41)
    91 threads
    1,806 comments

    15   1:42pm Mon 29 Oct 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    To a liberal no amount of taxes are ever enough. To them "profit" is a four letter word.

    BTW, "fair share" is a slogan, as such it has a subjective definition...exactly what liberals want. It can mean anything they want it to mean. It can mean "the current truth, as dictated by us".

  16. gbenson


    Follow
    Befriend
    16 threads
    376 comments

    16   1:49pm Mon 29 Oct 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Abe, do you ever get sick of just being 100% flat out wrong?
    Nobody likes taxes, especially us well to do elitist liberals who are funding a majority of 'red states'.

    If you really see the world like this, I feel sad for you. Your sense of reality is really really messed up.

    If you want to have a debate on whether our tax dollars are used efficiently or if an increase will cripple the economy, lets have that debate. If you are just going to spew stuff that normally comes out another hole, then dude.. Keep it shut!

Premium member bgamall4 is moderator of this thread.

Email

Username

Watch comments by email
Home   Tips and Tricks   Questions or suggestions? Mail p@patrick.net  

Page took 121 milliseconds to create.