CA has super Majority!


By SFace   Follow   Wed, 7 Nov 2012, 9:22am   2,309 views   36 comments
Watch (0)   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (3)   Dislike  

Super majority in Lower house
Super in Upper house
Governor Brown for at least 2 more years.

We'll see what the Dems have planned and what a fillibuster-less control will mean. Unions dream scenerio came true. Taxpayer are probabaly paying more and should be very worried.

In other words, your elected Republicans are irrelevant and have no say in anything. At least gridlock is not an excuse for inactivity anymore.

Viewing Comments 1-36 of 36     Last »     See most liked comments

  1. justme


    Follow
    Befriend (2)
    36 threads
    3,923 comments

    1   10:57am Wed 7 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Nah, the scaredy-cat democrats will find away not to use their power. They will sit around and wring their hands and worry about losing 1% of the vote next time around.

    If it was the Pubes, they would be running rough-shod over the Crats like there was no tomorrow. And probably there would not be ;).

    Democrats, please prove me wrong. Please. Please.

  2. Ceffer


    Follow
    Befriend
    14 threads
    3,284 comments
    Berkeley, CA

    2   11:50am Wed 7 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (2)   Dislike  

    California small and moderate business were on life support. Now time for the public service unions and Dems to kick out the plug.

    CA is now in a tax and regulate economic death spiral that can't be undone, an old hollywood hag with too many face lifts and leathered skin from too much sun.

    Congrats to the parasites, you are finally killing your host. The rich will just barricade themselves or bail like rats.

    Who ever thought that the movie "Escape from LA" was going to be an act of prophecy?

  3. thomaswong.1986


    Follow
    Befriend
    27 threads
    6,131 comments

    3   11:57am Wed 7 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (2)   Dislike  

    Ceffer says

    Who ever thought that the movie "Escape from LA" was going to be an act of prophecy?

    Irony !

  4. zzyzzx


    Follow
    Befriend (10)
    803 threads
    6,885 comments
    Baltimore, MD

    4   11:59am Wed 7 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    I'm puzzled as to why any Republicans would stay in CA.

  5. CaptainShuddup


    Follow
    Befriend (1)
    853 threads
    10,973 comments

    5   12:03pm Wed 7 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    SFace says

    We'll see what the Dems have planned and what a fillibuster-less control will mean.

    Oh I'm sorry you were out of town and must have missed 2009 - 2010 in Washington. Picture that, but it will be Swartz's fault.

  6. Ceffer


    Follow
    Befriend
    14 threads
    3,284 comments
    Berkeley, CA

    6   12:05pm Wed 7 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike  

    The viable business model for California will become third world black market.

    The official apparatus will be increasingly extorting visible soft business targets with identifiable addresses and assets who have tried to play by the rules, attacking them and sucking them dry.

    The shifting black market elements below the tax and regulate radar will have more incentives to thrive. Get ready to change your address, swap out the cell phones, and turn over your part time cash only employees every two months and you might stand a chance.

    Better not stand still for too long, you will wind up in the sights.

  7. tdr


    Follow
    Befriend
    46 comments

    7   1:20pm Wed 7 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (2)   Dislike  

    zzyzzx says

    I'm puzzled as to why any Republicans would stay in CA.

    The weather is great. Other than that waiting for the state collapse is entertaining.

  8. Vicente


    Follow
    Befriend (8)
    262 threads
    5,730 comments
    Davis, CA

    8   1:40pm Wed 7 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    I hadn't been following this at all. Good to hear!

    However Prop 13 is untouchable IMO. Unfortunately.

  9. iwog


    Follow
    Befriend (46)
    375 threads
    19,906 comments
    47 male
    Lafayette, CA
    Premium

    9   1:56pm Wed 7 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   Protected  

    Melmakian says

    My guess is that they will try to 'modify' it so that corporate property owners do not get the grandfather provision, first. That will be the camel's nose in the tent.

    An excellent suggestion. I hope they follow it.

  10. zzyzzx


    Follow
    Befriend (10)
    803 threads
    6,885 comments
    Baltimore, MD

    10   3:47pm Wed 7 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    iwog says

    Melmakian says
    My guess is that they will try to 'modify' it so that corporate property owners do not get the grandfather provision, first. That will be the camel's nose in the tent.

    An excellent suggestion. I hope they follow it.

    So that even more businesses will leave CA? Your neighboring states thank you!

  11. iwog


    Follow
    Befriend (46)
    375 threads
    19,906 comments
    47 male
    Lafayette, CA
    Premium

    11   4:10pm Wed 7 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike   Protected  

    zzyzzx says

    So that even more businesses will leave CA? Your neighboring states thank you!

    Sorry but I don't accept that propaganda just like I didn't accept Rasmussen when you were citing them as gospel.

    This one is easy to explain. Prop. 13 encourages property hoarding. Allowing taxes to increase on corporate real estate holdings will drive prices down. A business abandoning the state means a new business can come in and buy their capital assets as a fraction of the cost.

    This results in competition, a lower cost of doing business, and higher profits.

    What you should be worried about is why everyone on your side lied to you. You were one of the ones who parroted Rasmussen polls repeatedly. You were deceived. You bought into the fraud.

    Now is the time to have introspection about everything, not the time to insist you know what's going to happen with California.

  12. Vicente


    Follow
    Befriend (8)
    262 threads
    5,730 comments
    Davis, CA

    12   4:21pm Wed 7 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    zzyzzx says

    I'm puzzled as to why any Republicans would stay in CA.

    Republicans are not emotionally and mentally small children, they just find it useful to pretend they are sometimes.

  13. iwog


    Follow
    Befriend (46)
    375 threads
    19,906 comments
    47 male
    Lafayette, CA
    Premium

    13   6:43pm Wed 7 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   Protected  

    Melmakian says

    What does your ranting about Rassmussen have anything to do with Prop 13?

    I was making a point that perhaps you should take to heart as well.

    If you were so wrong about the election, if your facts were so screwed up, if your sources were so pathetic as to lead you to think that Romney could take 300+ delegates, maybe some of your other sources are fraudulent as well.

    For example zzyzz's often cited claim that abolishing prop. 13 would cause businesses to vacate California. It's total nonsense, yet you and him believe it as strongly as you both believed Rasmussen was accurate and CNN polling was biased.

    It's very odd to me that you're still swinging AFTER your bat has been shown to be a plastic nerf bat.

  14. Bellingham Bill


    Follow
    Befriend
    75 threads
    3,160 comments
    Bellingham, WA

    14   7:15pm Wed 7 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    iwog says

    that abolishing prop. 13 would cause businesses to vacate California

    this makes no sense. Land can't go anywhere!

    Productive Californian businesses would benefit tremendously with the tax burden shifted off of them onto land-owners, the latter qua land-owners have collectively created exactly zero wealth in this state since its founding.

    Ooops, my Georgist hat is on now : )

    Iwog knows first-hand how fat this sector he moonlights is really is, and also how parasitical on the real wealth-creators in this economy it is.

  15. Bellingham Bill


    Follow
    Befriend
    75 threads
    3,160 comments
    Bellingham, WA

    15   7:16pm Wed 7 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    iwog says

    It's very odd to me that you're still swinging AFTER your bat has been shown to be a plastic nerf bat.

    they're interested in heat -- not light -- here

  16. thomaswong.1986


    Follow
    Befriend
    27 threads
    6,131 comments

    16   7:42pm Wed 7 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Bellingham Bill says

    iwog says

    that abolishing prop. 13 would cause businesses to vacate California

    this makes no sense. Land can't go anywhere!

    Property Tax is a pass through to tenant. If commercial property values skyrocket, so do prop tax... then the catch up billing and additional expenses incurred.

    and because of tight interpretation of Sarbanes Oxley.. for public companies.. they would be unable to accrue that about so a spike in taxes is not incurred in future periods. Ask a controller/CEO/CFO and they will say the same.

    Any business would favor a more predictable business environment. else they say Fuck It.. better to go where the exposure is minimal.

    States like California.. will scream ... BUTS ITS ALL FOR EDUCATION.. and our govt salaries and benefits.

  17. Bap33


    Follow
    Befriend (3)
    17 threads
    3,488 comments

    17   7:44pm Wed 7 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike (1)  

    will the Dems stop the Cal HSR train to nowhere? If not, who's gonna pay for it?
    Just two simple questions.

  18. thomaswong.1986


    Follow
    Befriend
    27 threads
    6,131 comments

    18   7:56pm Wed 7 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    no.. and it will cost 65 Billion .. up to 116 Billion billed to the tax payers.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_High-Speed_Rail

  19. thomaswong.1986


    Follow
    Befriend
    27 threads
    6,131 comments

    19   7:59pm Wed 7 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    SFace says

    You're such a lame controller, any idiot would be able to figure out how to book something this simple.

    not anymore.. cant accrue anything unless services have been billed.

    in prior decades it was possible.. since the base (purchase price) stayed the same..
    and inflation can be estimated its not a issue.

    so now the base (market vale) will fluctuate wildly...

    and given SOX and tight Auditors... for public companies.. Forget it.. Cant do it.

    The auditors will assume your creating a reserve pulling down earnings in year one and inflating earnings in year 2.

  20. thomaswong.1986


    Follow
    Befriend
    27 threads
    6,131 comments

    20   8:43pm Wed 7 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike (1)  

    SFace says

    Where the f__K do you work as your qualifications are embarassing? Is this what you tell your auditor? No, can't, impossible?

    you of all people should realize the risk of using reserve accounts to manipulate earnings between periods.

    Prior to Prop 13, market values used to asses commercial properties swung wildly and it wasnt considered accurate. Up 10-15% in one year and down 10-15% the next.

    with Prop 13, you have predictabe locked in values year over year which allows for reserving the tax bill. No issue.

    Go back to pre-Prop 13, If the market values, used by the assessors office, on a leased building swings wildly, as we have seen it makes it difficult to drive any predictability in your business outlook and compliance. Its a mess !

  21. drew_eckhardt


    Follow
    Befriend (1)
    2 threads
    591 comments
    Sunnyvale, CA

    21   9:12pm Wed 7 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Bap33 says

    will the Dems stop the Cal HSR train to nowhere? If not, who's gonna pay for it?

    The "wealthy" assuming the economic recovery continues.

    If 10.3% - 13.3% aren't high enough state tax rates we'll just have another election and make them higher.

  22. Meccos


    Follow
    Befriend (2)
    8 threads
    639 comments

    22   10:02pm Wed 7 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    I wonder how many more taxes are on the way now...
    We need more money for public safety right??? (aka unions - cops/fire)

  23. Vicente


    Follow
    Befriend (8)
    262 threads
    5,730 comments
    Davis, CA

    23   10:16pm Wed 7 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    thomaswong.1986 says

    Property Tax is a pass through to tenant. If commercial property values skyrocket, so do prop tax... then the catch up billing and additional expenses incurred.

    This is BS argument.

    Original Prop 13 said if taxes kept low, that rents would obviously decrease. Since it's just a "pass through" as you say. "We save money, so do you, ne?"

    However, rents tracked inflation. There was no "savings" to renters. Property holders simply pocketed the difference.

    Since rents are dictated by inelastic REAL ability to pay, the only effect of Prop. 13 repeal should be trimming the profits of fatcat landlords and underpayers like Disney. Boohoo!

  24. Bellingham Bill


    Follow
    Befriend
    75 threads
    3,160 comments
    Bellingham, WA

    24   1:36am Thu 8 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  
  25. zzyzzx


    Follow
    Befriend (10)
    803 threads
    6,885 comments
    Baltimore, MD

    25   7:14am Thu 8 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike  

    iwog says

    This results in competition, a lower cost of doing business, and higher profits.

    Higher taxes doesn't result in a lower cost of doing business!!!

  26. zzyzzx


    Follow
    Befriend (10)
    803 threads
    6,885 comments
    Baltimore, MD

    26   7:16am Thu 8 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Vicente says

    Since rents are dictated by inelastic REAL ability to pay, the only effect of Prop. 13 repeal should be trimming the profits of fatcat landlords

    You mean like:

  27. iwog


    Follow
    Befriend (46)
    375 threads
    19,906 comments
    47 male
    Lafayette, CA
    Premium

    27   8:55am Thu 8 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   Protected  

    zzyzzx says

    Higher taxes doesn't result in a lower cost of doing business!!!

    We're talking about property taxes. By keeping a property tax basis at 1978 +2% per year, you end up with entrenched corporations that have a miniscule cost of doing business compared to start ups that want to enter the state. The cost is SO low in fact that many of these buildings are left empty for years.

    Creating a level playing field and forcing these properties on the market will almost certainly lower the cost of real estate and therefore the cost of doing business in the state. In addition, old companies will no longer be at an advantage and competition will improve everything.

    It's not complicated.

  28. FortWayne


    Follow
    Befriend (12)
    162 threads
    5,360 comments

    28   9:17am Thu 8 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    CaptainShuddup says

    SFace says

    We'll see what the Dems have planned and what a fillibuster-less control will mean.

    Oh I'm sorry you were out of town and must have missed 2009 - 2010 in Washington. Picture that, but it will be Swartz's fault.

    To me this is frightening. They already made laws virtually guaranteeing no Republican opposition. They control how and who gets elected, who gets onto the ballots, and now they can do whatever they wish to give their special interests money out of our pockets.

    These wealthy libs own this state, and they own it because they take our money constantly. So, I'm ready this time, they start taxing and I'll start protesting voting for a massive recall election.

  29. FortWayne


    Follow
    Befriend (12)
    162 threads
    5,360 comments

    29   9:19am Thu 8 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike  

    iwog says

    Creating a level playing field and forcing these properties on the market will almost certainly lower the cost of real estate and therefore the cost of doing business in the state. In addition, old companies will no longer be at an advantage and competition will improve everything.

    What are you a socialist now all of a sudden?

    "Forcing those properties on the market" translates to "throwing hard working people over board because they can't afford to pay the rising costs."

    Spreading misery does not create wealth or improve economy.

  30. Bellingham Bill


    Follow
    Befriend
    75 threads
    3,160 comments
    Bellingham, WA

    30   9:27am Thu 8 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike  

    shorter iwog: real estate is a parasitical sector of the economy

    ; )

  31. Bellingham Bill


    Follow
    Befriend
    75 threads
    3,160 comments
    Bellingham, WA

    31   9:28am Thu 8 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    FortWayne says

    "throwing hard working people over board because they can't afford to pay the rising costs."

    land owners are not hard working at all. Their land value comes from all the work everybody else is doing in their community.

    Their land value literally rises in their sleep.

    http://www.wealthandwant.com/themes/Wealth_from_Land_Appreciation.html

  32. FortWayne


    Follow
    Befriend (12)
    162 threads
    5,360 comments

    32   10:14am Thu 8 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike  

    Bellingham Bill says

    FortWayne says

    "throwing hard working people over board because they can't afford to pay the rising costs."

    land owners are not hard working at all. Their land value comes from all the work everybody else is doing in their community.

    Their land value literally rises in their sleep.

    http://www.wealthandwant.com/themes/Wealth_from_Land_Appreciation.html

    That's wealthy land owners, what about everyone else who will get hit by taxes? Your average hard working families, small businesses, every single homeowner, every single business. What about retirees or simply poor who live on fixed income and cant afford a penny of increased taxes.

    Doubling property taxes for everyone now would put a huge economic burden on everyone in this state.

  33. Vicente


    Follow
    Befriend (8)
    262 threads
    5,730 comments
    Davis, CA

    33   10:27am Thu 8 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike  

    zzyzzx says

    Vicente says

    Since rents are dictated by inelastic REAL ability to pay, the only effect of Prop. 13 repeal should be trimming the profits of fatcat landlords

    You mean like:

    Yes exactly!

  34. Bellingham Bill


    Follow
    Befriend
    75 threads
    3,160 comments
    Bellingham, WA

    34   10:52am Thu 8 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    FortWayne says

    Doubling property taxes for everyone now would put a huge economic burden on everyone in this state.

    yeah, let's not do that, actually. Just the commercial operators sucking money from the actually productive people of the state.

    We could also throw in luxury taxes on premium real estate, stuff that goes for over five million an acre or whatever.

  35. Vicente


    Follow
    Befriend (8)
    262 threads
    5,730 comments
    Davis, CA

    35   10:57am Thu 8 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Bellingham Bill says

    yeah, let's not do that, actually. Just the commercial operators sucking money from the actually productive people of the state.

    Exactly why Prop 13 will NEVER be repealed. Too many entrenched businesses getting too much slop from that trough.

    People talk about businesses fleeing the state over a little tax on their profits. They overlook however industries & RE groups have owned businesses for 20+ years are enjoying HUGE tax advantages due to Prop. 13 versus their younger competitors. Even if the original owners do decide to retire and move to Arizona, it can be structured so sale to new owners never changes the tax basis.

  36. iwog


    Follow
    Befriend (46)
    375 threads
    19,906 comments
    47 male
    Lafayette, CA
    Premium

    36   1:12pm Thu 8 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   Protected  

    Melmakian says

    I didn't believe Rasmussen was 'accurate'. In fact, I didn't rely on Rasmussen per se. You just think that I *must have* in order to keep your fantasy narrative all tight and neat in your Denial Bubble.

    No problem, this is easy to fix. So what did you base your failed election prediction on if not right-wing biased polls?

    Did you get your numbers from somewhere or did you just make them up?

    Serious question. Lets see if you can answer it.

SFace is moderator of this thread.

Email

Username

Watch comments by email
Home   Tips and Tricks   Questions or suggestions? Mail p@patrick.net   Thank you for your kind donations

Page took 155 milliseconds to create.