What Does Obama's Reelection Mean for the Housing Market?


By Patrick   Follow   Wed, 7 Nov 2012, 8:50pm   1,726 views   18 comments
In Menlo Park CA 94025   Watch (0)   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

http://www.sacbee.com/2012/11/07/4968211/what-does-obamas-reelection-mean.html

The nation's unemployment rate is still hovering around 8%, and we've seen that the housing market is directly tied to the jobs market. - The U.S.. dollar grew weaker on Tuesday night, as word of Obama's reelection spread. Right now, economic experts say that's a sign that the uncertainty has been lifted, and world markets are selling more of their stocks. In the long run, though, no one knows for sure how a weak U.S.. dollar is going to affect the world markets -- and, in turn, how the world markets are going to affect our economy here at home....

Viewing Comments 1-18 of 18     Last »     See most liked comments

  1. Automan Empire


    Follow
    Befriend
    7 threads
    562 comments
    Los Angeles, CA

    1   9:19pm Wed 7 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike (1)  

    This is going to greatly increase housing inventory.

    It totally stands to reason. Just think of all the Republicans you've heard swear that they were moving out of America if Obama was reelected?

  2. thomaswong.1986


    Follow
    Befriend
    27 threads
    6,131 comments

    2   9:39pm Wed 7 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (2)   Dislike  

    what was true in 2009 is still true today.. govt intervention in the housing market.

    with no end in sight... govt sponsored hype and policies to inflate home prices.

    Frankly, only two people publicly stated that home prices needed to find their
    natural market bottom unimpeded by govt. That was Hank Paulson and
    later Mitt Romney.

  3. Meccos


    Follow
    Befriend (2)
    8 threads
    639 comments

    3   10:00pm Wed 7 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (3)   Dislike  

    thomaswong.1986 says

    what was true in 2009 is still true today.. govt intervention in the housing market.

    with no end in sight... govt sponsored hype and policies to inflate home prices.

    Frankly, only two people publicly stated that home prices needed to find their

    natural market bottom unimpeded by govt. That was Hank Paulson and

    later Mitt Romney.

    So did Ron Paul

  4. thomaswong.1986


    Follow
    Befriend
    27 threads
    6,131 comments

    4   11:21pm Wed 7 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (2)   Dislike  

    Meccos says

    So did Ron Paul

    +1 makes 3... thanks

  5. uomo_senza_nome


    Follow
    Befriend (13)
    787 threads
    1,542 comments

    5   11:39pm Wed 7 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  
  6. bmwman91


    Follow
    Befriend (7)
    40 threads
    1,539 comments

    6   11:53pm Wed 7 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Just out of curiosity, if there were to be widespread debt-forgiveness measures, could they lead to higher inventories? If people were above water, they could sell, and I have to imagine that there are a lot of people that might want to do just that if they could afford it. Wishful thinking, I know, but how about it?

  7. curious2


    Follow
    Befriend (4)
    115 threads
    4,345 comments

    7   12:04am Thu 8 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike  

    thomaswong.1986 says

    people publicly stated that home prices needed to find their
    natural market bottom unimpeded by govt. That was Hank Paulson and
    later Mitt Romney [and Ron Paul]

    Unfortunately, Republicans failed to nominate Ron Paul, and there was no correlation between what multiple-choice Romnesia said and did. So, at least six more years of Fed ZIRP and QE∞. Probable result: house prices remain propped up relative to consumer prices, until stagflation causes consumer prices to increase and normalize the ratio. Alas wages might not keep pace, so living standards may decline. But hey, you'll have mandatory medical insurance! Unfortunately, the mandatory diversion of resources into medical will come at the expense of all other sectors, prolonging the need to prop up house prices. Look on the bright side: at least the hospital administrator who overcharges you will be able to afford a house, and so will the insurance executive who denies your claim! Pity that you might not be able to afford a house after all that, but hey, you have insurance!

  8. thomaswong.1986


    Follow
    Befriend
    27 threads
    6,131 comments

    8   12:50am Thu 8 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    curious2 says

    Look on the bright side: at least the hospital administrator who overcharges you will be able to afford a house, and so will the insurance executive who denies your claim! Pity that you might not be able to afford a house after all that, but hey, you have insurance!

    I already have a house..nice one! but your argument goes nowhere.. Its another attempt to ignore any idea of a housing bubble or that prices had a historical pattern.

  9. curious2


    Follow
    Befriend (4)
    115 threads
    4,345 comments

    9   1:11am Thu 8 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike  

    thomaswong.1986 says

    your argument goes nowhere.. Its [sic] another attempt to ignore any idea of a housing bubble or that prices had a historical pattern.

    What?!? Your comment is truly bizarre. When have I ever denied that there was a housing bubble? I've pointed to Case Shiller data many times. Even in my post above, I said prices are still propped up now. You seem to be boxing with shadows and straw men rather than reading what people have actually written.

  10. PockyClipsNow


    Follow
    Befriend
    19 threads
    1,582 comments
    Los Angeles, CA

    10   9:59am Thu 8 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike  

    Obama makes house prices rise. Even more loan mods and principal reductions will keep inventory off the mls permanently. Underwater squatting for four more years everywhere!

  11. michaelsch


    Follow
    Befriend
    21 threads
    586 comments
    South Pasadena, CA

    11   11:02am Thu 8 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike  

    SFace says

    Housing Policy: He will continue the same kind of policy to support housing, like HAMP and Fannie/Freddie

    Mortgage interest rates: He and Bernanke will continue easy money policies. sign of econonomic weakness and we will see QE4.

    Yes and No.

    You are generally right, they will try to reinflate. However, I believe that recent attempt of pooring money into the economy were not 100% genuine. They where at least partially driven by the reelection concerns. This part is gone now. Thanks God, Romney disaster has been successfully averted.

    For the last four years Obama had to be concerned about his reelection, which made him more populist than he would be. That's the problem with any first term President.

    All this means is that the monetary inflation should slow down in the next couple of years, which means cheaper stocks etc.

  12. BobMSN


    Follow
    Befriend
    6 threads
    107 comments

    12   12:23pm Thu 8 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Obama tried every means to keep the housing price in float by destroying the true housing market.

    He's now re-elected. Anyone thinks he will keep doing that?

  13. zzyzzx


    Follow
    Befriend (10)
    804 threads
    6,901 comments
    Baltimore, MD

    13   12:31pm Thu 8 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    SFace says

    Obama made it clear he wants to tax those earning more than 250K a year, but those below are safe.

    Did he even say that once during his re-election campaign????

  14. michaelsch


    Follow
    Befriend
    21 threads
    586 comments
    South Pasadena, CA

    14   12:55pm Thu 8 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    BobMSN says

    Obama tried every means to keep the housing price in float by destroying the true housing market.

    He's now re-elected. Anyone thinks he will keep doing that?

    Yes, but much less agressively, since it was partially done for the populist reasons, which are gone now.

  15. michaelsch


    Follow
    Befriend
    21 threads
    586 comments
    South Pasadena, CA

    15   12:56pm Thu 8 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (2)   Dislike  

    LiarWatch says

    PockyClipsNow says

    Obama makes house prices rise.

    Considering prices have resumed their decline tells me Obama isn't very good at making them rise.

    Which is very good.

  16. Goran_K


    Follow
    Befriend (4)
    31 threads
    2,192 comments
    Laguna Beach, CA

    16   12:59pm Thu 8 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Both candidates avoided much talk about the housing market (arguably one of the biggest drags on the economy currently). Very peculiar.

  17. Strategic Renter


    Follow
    Befriend
    45 threads
    149 comments
    Las Vegas, NV

    17   1:06pm Thu 8 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Housing is only 2% of the economy. Whatever happens its effect is minimal. Especially as any rise will simply mean buyers are still underwater

  18. michaelsch


    Follow
    Befriend
    21 threads
    586 comments
    South Pasadena, CA

    18   1:10pm Thu 8 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike  

    zzyzzx says

    SFace says

    Obama made it clear he wants to tax those earning more than 250K a year, but those below are safe.

    Did he even say that once during his re-election campaign????

    Do not fool yourselves. Taxes must rise. For everyone. There is simply no way out of our current deficits w/o raisng taxes. The only way to delay it is a huge monetory inflation followed by the price and income inflation.

    If we go that way we'll simply fall into the >$250K income without getting real income increase and we'll pay high taxes. Look at the AMT, for a good example of how such things work.

    BTW, only a fool would think it would be anyhow better with Romney. In the past there could be some differences between Reps and Dems. Dems wanted to tax and spend, Reps wanted to cut. The only diffrence today is: Dems print and spend, Reps spend and print. They also spend slightly differently: Reps spend on wars and print, Dems print promising to spend on climate change.

Premium member Patrick is moderator of this thread.

Email

Username

Watch comments by email
Home   Tips and Tricks   Questions or suggestions? Mail p@patrick.net   Thank you for your kind donations

Page took 112 milliseconds to create.