the all-cash head fake


By justme   Follow   Fri, 9 Nov 2012, 5:04pm   1,524 views   9 comments
Watch (1)   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/new-real-estate-fad-the-all-cash-head-fake-2012-11-09?source=Patrick.net

Not all "cash buyers" really are cash buyers...

Viewing Comments 1-9 of 9     Last »     See most liked comments

  1. thomaswong.1986


    Follow
    Befriend
    27 threads
    6,131 comments

    1   5:59pm Fri 9 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    justme says

    Not all "cash buyers" really are cash buyers...

    Its really lame for journalist to state cash vs mortgage.. since majority ( up to 99%) RE contract is closed and settled "in cash" vs seller getting a note. So having a buyer be "all cash" or mortgage is irrelevant matter. How the buyer finances a purchase is a matter between Buyer and Banker.

    Decades ago did I like everyone else buy their home "all cash"..
    yes and I financed it.. without the the interest and knowledge of seller(s).

    .

  2. thomaswong.1986


    Follow
    Befriend
    27 threads
    6,131 comments

    2   4:35pm Sat 10 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    robertoaribas says

    A cash offer with verified funds is a much more sure deal than ANY financed offer.

    along with your bank and investment statements, complete list of other assets and a count of you change in your pockets...

    its no wonder many were fleeced out of their savings.

    it only shows how naive the public has become when buying RE over the past 10-12 years. YOU NEVER tell the other side about your financial well being. That is not for them to know.

    this is why you have a lawyer.. to look out for your interest.

  3. thomaswong.1986


    Follow
    Befriend
    27 threads
    6,131 comments

    3   4:41pm Sat 10 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    robertoaribas says

    In a cash offer, if the buyer fails to buy the home, the seller can cancel and generally keep the earnest money.

    really ? .. is that true in california as well regarding breach of contract laws..... carefully now !

  4. Peter P


    Follow
    Befriend (5)
    126 threads
    19,333 comments
    Premium

    4   6:02pm Sat 10 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   Protected  

    Is delayed-financing considered a purchase-money loan in CA?

  5. thomaswong.1986


    Follow
    Befriend
    27 threads
    6,131 comments

    5   6:05pm Sat 10 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    robertoaribas says

    Typical statement form someone who has no clue... When a buyer with a million dollars in cash makes an offer of $100K on an investment home, nobody thinks they'll pay more just because they have more..

    you are not being very honest here.. of course you dont disclose your financial position. whats the point of negotiating if they already know ...

    the typical buyer pulled every dime out of their savings and then some...

    they were not good negotiations and got taken to the cleaners.

  6. Peter P


    Follow
    Befriend (5)
    126 threads
    19,333 comments
    Premium

    6   6:15pm Sat 10 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   Protected  

    thomaswong.1986 says

    the typical buyer pulled every dime out of their savings and then some...

    The typical buyer is not an all-cash buyer though...

  7. thomaswong.1986


    Follow
    Befriend
    27 threads
    6,131 comments

    7   6:50pm Sat 10 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    robertoaribas says

    Thomas, you have zero clue. You can't write a cash offer without showing proof of funds.

    there is no requirement of such kind in contract laws.. you know that.

    all contract deals are done on good faith...

    there isnt any due diligent requirements here.

    and if there were.. i tell them... "talk to my bank" and "good luck"...

    the common person has lost their common senses

    again buyers ignorance is being used against them...

    every buyer should at minimal get a lawyer... or they will get shafted from day 1.

  8. pkennedy


    Follow
    Befriend (8)
    28 threads
    1,388 comments
    male

    8   8:44pm Sat 10 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (2)   Dislike  

    Roberto hit it dead on. There are many times when an all cash offer is the only way to close a deal. Especially right now! Banks are taking forever and forcing people to jump through hoops to get a loan. Get the property into your name with cash, and then work on getting the money back out.

  9. CDon


    Follow
    Befriend (1)
    533 comments

    9   8:58am Mon 12 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike  

    thomaswong.1986 says

    robertoaribas says



    A cash offer with verified funds is a much more sure deal than ANY financed offer.


    along with your bank and investment statements, complete list of other assets and a count of you change in your pockets...


    its no wonder many were fleeced out of their savings.


    it only shows how naive the public has become when buying RE over the past 10-12 years. YOU NEVER tell the other side about your financial well being. That is not for them to know.


    this is why you have a lawyer.. to look out for your interest.

    Actually, any lawyer with experience in the matter will tell you that proof of funds is an essential component of a cash offer. I do a ton of commercial transactions where (depending upon the type of business, issues with the property, etc.) financing is difficult to get, and cash is king.

    However, I have also found that roughly 75% of the time that someone makes a "cash offer" but doesnt provide proof of funds, its because they dont have the cash.

    When you inquire why no proof of funds, what usually follows is a parade of excues - "I dont have the cash but I will get it soon" or "I dont have the cash but I have this asset which I will sell for cash (and then half the time they dont do that)" or some other excuse which largely ends up being a waste of time and attorneys fees.

    Thus, if I am Buyer's counsel, and my client wants to do cash offer, no proof of funds, I immediately ask why he wants to portray to the other side "there is a 75% chance I am a liar and I really dont have the cash".

    Likewise, if I am Seller's counsel, and his broker brings 3 "all cash" offers and 2 of them do not provide proof of funds, I note there is a very good chance these 2 guys are liars and (unless they can prove funds ASAP) go with the third who has already demonstrated he has the funds and is serious about moving forward.

justme is moderator of this thread.

Email

Username

Watch comments by email
Home   Tips and Tricks   Questions or suggestions? Mail p@patrick.net   Thank you for your kind donations

Page took 49 milliseconds to create.