In a recent statement, the California Association of Realtors objected to the Nov. 5 REO bulk sale transaction between Fannie Mae, the FHFA and Colony Capital. The Santa Monica real estate investment company won an auction by the federal government to purchase 970 foreclosed homes in California, Arizona and Nevada from Fannie Mae for $176 million. "Fannie Mae and FHFA's decision to move forward with the REO bulk sale in California amounts to another gift to Wall Street at the expense of taxpayers," said the state group president, LeFrancis Arnold. "The deal, which calls for the sale of more than...
Realtors object to bulk foreclosure sales which do not pay Realtors commissions
By Patrick Follow Mon, 12 Nov 2012, 8:02pm 595 views 8 comments
In Menlo Park CA 94025
Watch (0) Share
Quote
Permalink Like Dislike Viewing Comments 1-8 of 8 Last » See most liked comments
|
Patrick is moderator of this thread. |
Follow
Befriend (31)
34 threads
2,552 comments
San Jose, CA
Premium
Not sure why the realtors object to it. They will get their commission when the big boys unload these homes several years down the road.
Follow
Befriend
64 threads
486 comments
Simi Valley, CA
they want their commissions now and later.
Follow
Befriend (8)
28 threads
1,342 comments
Redwood City, CA
Probably a bunch of realtors that had invested time in here. 900 homes isn't a lot, considering it's over 3 states, and average price offered is nearly 185K, add in commissions, 3-4 extra months holding cost to unload these, and possibly back taxes, hoa dues, or other fees, and these places are probably worth $225K-250K, right in the niche rental market area for many places.
Follow
Befriend (4)
25 threads
1,522 comments
Laguna Beach, CA
Premium
Melmakian says
There are some that say we've already established the first steps.
Follow
Befriend
28 threads
1,489 comments
San Jose, CA
Premium
Melmakian says
Communism is already here - in form of NAR, Federal Govt & the Federal Reserve.
Follow
Befriend (9)
416 threads
4,138 comments
Baltimore, MD
Realtors object to bulk foreclosure sales which do not pay Realtors commissions
I am absolutely shocked, I say!!!
Follow
Befriend (23)
55 threads
3,813 comments
Scottsdale, AZ
robertoaribas's website
dunnross says
In the 1960's you could go to jail for owning gold. Interest rates on bank accounts were set by the government, Wage and price controls were common, and accepted.
We are so far away from moving communist or socialist in this country, but people who don't know what they are talking about love to banter these words around.
Follow
Befriend (1)
2 threads
324 comments
Sunnyvale, CA
dunnross says
You've got your "isms" mixed up.
This is corporatism not communism.
To quote wikipedia:
In America we have powerful economic groups paying to elect our leaders and legislators (often through PACs) which then enact favorable laws, rules, and policies on their behalf.
For instance, the National Association of Realtors' PAC contributed more to candidates in the 2012, 2008, 2004, and 2000 election cycles than any other (45% Democrat, 54% Republican for 2012 - this is a bipartisan problem). They also contributed more in all the off-year elections since 1998.
Then comes the quid pro quo where extensions of the federal government act on their behalf. The fed (with governors appointed by the president and confirmed by the senate) buys $40B/month worth of mortgage backed securities. The government sponsored enterprises (with charters set by congress) buy or insure the vast majority of mortgages which allows lower rates, higher purchase prices, and bigger commissions.
That's about as far as you can get from classless and moneyless with common ownership of wealth producing assets.
In a communist country there would be no NAR. The people would collectively own all the homes and the government would decide who gets into each one. People aspiring to do better would be party members and get the best housing.
In an America headed towards communism, Fannie Mae would have held onto those properties and let people live there for free or perhaps rented them out. With populists in power it would have sold them to citizens at good prices or given them to individuals. Instead it sold them to a corporation which will benefit economically at the expense of private citizens who eventually buy those houses at a profit-providing premium.