House Prices, Inflation-Adjusted


By ttsmyf   Follow   Wed, 14 Nov 2012, 10:52am   2,379 views   23 comments
Watch (1)   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike (1)  

Click image to enlarge

Viewing Comments 1-23 of 23     Last »     See most liked comments

  1. Patrick


    Follow
    Befriend (55)
    5,664 threads
    6,346 comments
    male
    Menlo Park, CA
    Premium

    1   11:35am Wed 14 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    So what does this mean for predicting prices, if that's even possible?

  2. bmwman91


    Follow
    Befriend (7)
    40 threads
    1,539 comments

    2   11:41am Wed 14 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Print, baby, print. Everyone with the GUTS to borrow the absolute maximum from a bank will be house-wealthy. These are not the droids you are looking for.

  3. maxweber21


    Follow
    Befriend
    2 threads
    31 comments

    3   11:51am Wed 14 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Yep, print, print, print. But can they please send me a bundle?!

    What we need are some "cost of bread" comparisons. Sort of the "adjusted to oz gold" charts. Cause I'd love to see that same chart overlain with the inflation adjusted income. And dream to have it with the inflation adjusted cost of an apple (since a loaf of bread in 1700 was probably whole weat and not the melt-in-your-mouth, low nutrient stuff cheapest on the shelf today).

    Aother thread on stock market adjusting 20% is silly in that it ignores printing. Stock market should continue to go up in fiat dollar amount despite dropping in terms of real value.

    Housing prices will probably stagnate. I think someone mentioned Japan rates dropped for like 15 years. That seems to be the trend here. While insurance, food, water, and suck continue to run up, housing costs will probably stay about the same as the money suppliers try to pump it up with QE credit.

    One remote possibility though is if the QE stock market winds were somehow redirected to housing. Maybe long term gains tax no stocks and not on REIT? Or somesuch thing I can't imagine. That QE money is like an attacking horde driving up stock prices. If it wanders to a new home, that would go up enormously.

  4. ttsmyf


    Follow
    Befriend (3)
    83 threads
    485 comments
    ttsmyf's website
    Premium

    4   11:53am Wed 14 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Patrick says

    So what does this mean for predicting prices, if that's even possible?

    The past is commonly used input for estimating the future. SO, the past should be soundly shown -- that is, inflation-adjusted!
    I do not estimate the future, but I do note the latest past compared with extrapolated, longer-term past. See shortly below the first chart here:
    http://www.showrealhist.com/RD_RJShomes_PSav.html

  5. maxweber21


    Follow
    Befriend
    2 threads
    31 comments

    5   11:55am Wed 14 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    BTW, chart maker is clearly trying to show a trend line. Might be true. But I suspect young people will never have enough money to buy houses at today's prices. So, will need more bailout/stimulus/freebies. Probably going to need some of those next year to keep prices up. Probably will have them too. For every $1T QE to investment banks, give $10B to the people. :-)

  6. Robber Baron Elite Scum


    Follow
    Befriend (2)
    114 threads
    961 comments
    Roslyn, NY

    6   11:58am Wed 14 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Realtards are praying for a "Cash for Dumps" federal government program from Obama.

  7. maxweber21


    Follow
    Befriend
    2 threads
    31 comments

    7   11:59am Wed 14 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Hey ttsmyf, also very possible his chart doesn't show what he thinks but shows inflation is being falsely reported. Don't that would surprise any housewives who shop on a budget. They already know it. He thinks it shows the DOW and housing have a ways to drop. It probably shows his "inflation adjustment" is bogus.

  8. bmwman91


    Follow
    Befriend (7)
    40 threads
    1,539 comments

    8   12:01pm Wed 14 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (2)   Dislike  

    maxweber21 says

    Housing prices will probably stagnate.

    Don't be foolish. Housing ALWAYS goes up. Buy NOW, or be priced out FOREVER.

  9. ttsmyf


    Follow
    Befriend (3)
    83 threads
    485 comments
    ttsmyf's website
    Premium

    9   12:13pm Wed 14 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    maxweber21 says

    Hey ttsmyf, also very possible his chart doesn't show what he thinks but shows inflation is being falsely reported. Don't that would surprise any housewives who shop on a budget. They already know it. He thinks it shows the DOW and housing have a ways to drop. It probably shows his "inflation adjustment" is bogus.

    FOR SAME usage of CPI-U for inflation adjustment, see the four NYT and WSJ links near the bottom of:
    http://www.showrealhist.com/RHandRD.html

  10. gbenson


    Follow
    Befriend
    17 threads
    426 comments

    10   12:51pm Wed 14 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (2)   Dislike  

    How can you call the bit of data from 1920-1940 a floor for today's economy? Prices have not dipped below your 'ceiling' in 60 years... (Maybe you live in the basement?)

    Obviously after 1940 something changed and what you have labeled as a ceiling, I would label as a new floor.

    Whose to say whatever cultivated the new floor in the 1940's isn't reoccuring in some form now, and that American's are now more tolerant of being at the 55-60 level and we mope along at these levels for the next decade.

  11. Bellingham Bill


    Follow
    Befriend
    79 threads
    3,281 comments
    Bellingham, WA

    11   12:55pm Wed 14 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike  

    bmwman91 says

    Everyone with the GUTS to borrow the absolute maximum from a bank will be house-wealthy.

    I can't say this is bad advice necessarily.

    The least painful solution is basically adding a zero to all prices.

    This will wipe out the SSTF, but that's only a $2.6T loss, and the nation's rich didn't want to pay that back anyway.

    Anybody in land now will come through that smelling very, very good.

    This is of course why I don't want them to print, but tax.

    But taxes suuuck, so they're pretty much off the table.

    Cuts? Forgettaboutit.

    We're so fucked.

  12. ttsmyf


    Follow
    Befriend (3)
    83 threads
    485 comments
    ttsmyf's website
    Premium

    12   12:57pm Wed 14 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    LiarWatch says

    Prices are still elevated with nothing but air under them.

    The NYT chart of 2006
    http://www.nytimes.com/imagepages/2006/08/26/weekinreview/27leon_graph2.html
    includes "Two gains in recent decades were followed by
    returns to levels consistent since the late 1950's.".
    As recounted herein
    http://www.showrealhist.com/RD_RJShomes_PSav.html
    I used the quoted NYT observation as basis for the ‘extrapolated history’ level of 54. on my chart:
    http://www.showrealhist.com/RD_RJShomes_PSav.html

  13. ttsmyf


    Follow
    Befriend (3)
    83 threads
    485 comments
    ttsmyf's website
    Premium

    13   1:02pm Wed 14 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    LiarWatch says

    Prices are still elevated with nothing but air under them.

    (This is the same reply as above to LiarWatch.)

    The NYT chart of 2006
    http://www.nytimes.com/imagepages/2006/08/26/weekinreview/27leon_graph2.html
    includes "Two gains in recent decades were followed by
    returns to levels consistent since the late 1950's.".
    As recounted herein
    http://www.showrealhist.com/RD_RJShomes_PSav.html
    I used the quoted NYT observation as basis for the ‘extrapolated history’ level of 54. on my chart:
    http://www.showrealhist.com/RD_RJShomes_PSav.html

  14. ttsmyf


    Follow
    Befriend (3)
    83 threads
    485 comments
    ttsmyf's website
    Premium

    14   1:30pm Wed 14 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Bellingham Bill says

    bmwman91 says

    Everyone with the GUTS to borrow the absolute maximum from a bank will be house-wealthy.

    I can't say this is bad advice necessarily.

    The least painful solution is basically adding a zero to all prices.

    This will wipe out the SSTF, but that's only a $2.6T loss, and the nation's rich didn't want to pay that back anyway.

    Anybody in land now will come through that smelling very, very good.

    This is of course why I don't want them to print, but tax.

    But taxes suuuck, so they're pretty much off the table.

    Cuts? Forgettaboutit.

    We're so fucked.

    I try to keep it simple. Our system is 1-person/1-vote, so it has to be a bad idea (for the common good) to fool the people. To unfool the people, let’s start by identifying the fooling!
    See "The public be suckered" here:
    http://www.showrealhist.com/RD_RJShomes_PSav.html

    See “F... the people.” in “Ongoing extremes” last Letter here:
    http://www.durangotelegraph.com/index.cfm/archives/2008/june-26-2008/soapbox/
    The URL in the Letter is now
    http://www.showrealhist.com/RD_RJShomes_PSav.html

  15. ttsmyf


    Follow
    Befriend (3)
    83 threads
    485 comments
    ttsmyf's website
    Premium

    15   3:32pm Wed 14 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    robertoaribas says

    according to war, the only time home prices were properly priced, was the Great Depression!

    Also, a home from 1940 ain't exactly the same thing as one today...

    1000 square feet

    1 bath room

    No garage

    Small electric service with 2 wire electricity, no ground

    No ac

    Factor the difference of the average home today, to then, factor in
    interest rates and today's prices look very reasonable, in most
    places... California coastal excepted.

    Starting "Also, ...", you greatly misapprehend.
    (1) Read the explanatory text in the NYT chart:
    http://www.nytimes.com/imagepages/2006/08/26/weekinreview/27leon_graph2.html

    (2) Herein:
    http://www.showrealhist.com/RD_RJShomes_PSav.html
    below the three bullet points below the last chart, read the following:
    From page 8 of NYSEArca-2008-92.pdf, downloaded from
    http://www.nyse.com
    ... The Indices measure changes in housing market prices given a constant level of quality. ...
    ... The Indices use the "repeat sales method" of index calculation -- an approach that is widely recognized as the premier methodology for indexing housing prices -- ...
    ... The Indices are designed to measure, as accurately as possible, changes in the total value of all existing single-family housing stock. ...

  16. swebb


    Follow
    Befriend (3)
    31 threads
    670 comments
    Denver, CO

    16   4:29pm Wed 14 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    The thing I take away from the graph is that except for 2001-2009 buying a house was probably a pretty safe bet, assuming you didn't end up selling in the short term or buy something in Detroit. Even if you bought in 1989, you'd be fine if you sold in 99 or later. After you take into account principal paydown, tax advantages and inflation (which helps when you are in debt), that chart doesn't look very scary at all...well, except for the minor detail starting in about 2000.

    It actually appears to be a lot more safe than a lot of things in life.

  17. ttsmyf


    Follow
    Befriend (3)
    83 threads
    485 comments
    ttsmyf's website
    Premium

    17   6:17pm Wed 14 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    swebb says

    The thing I take away from the graph is that except for 2001-2009 buying a house was probably a pretty safe bet, assuming you didn't end up selling in the short term or buy something in Detroit. Even if you bought in 1989, you'd be fine if you sold in 99 or later. After you take into account principal paydown, tax advantages and inflation (which helps when you are in debt), that chart doesn't look very scary at all...well, except for the minor detail starting in about 2000.

    It actually appears to be a lot more safe than a lot of things in life.

    Re. the cited 'exception', it was/is massively punishing -- please see 'Bubbles relative to GDP' near the bottom of
    http://www.showrealhist.com/RD_RJShomes_PSav.html
    The late 1970s and late 1980s bubbles were much smaller nationally, but NOT so much smaller where they were localized -- coast(s). Keeping the real price histories out of sight is SO ENABLING for bubbles!!!

  18. bmwman91


    Follow
    Befriend (7)
    40 threads
    1,539 comments

    18   7:57pm Wed 14 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike (1)  

    E-man says

    How about a combination of tax and print? :)

    You are from another country, so I know you don't understand the principles of America. You see, in America I want it NOW because I deserve it, and I don't want to fucking pay for it. We vote for the guys that promise to continue doing the right thing, kicking the can down the road, rather than committing atrocities like raising taxes. You need a little perspective my friend. I am sure that things might have seemed bad wherever you came from, and for your sake I hope that you never need to know the pain, the terror, the sheer horror that so many of us Real Blooded (TM) Americans have had to live with; the threat of paying more taxes for infrastructure and basic services. Serious human rights violation shit here.

    Now, off to trade-in my old (18 months, ick) Acura SUV lease for the newest model. It is just like the last one, but it has heated CUP HOLDERS! I bet I can qualify for financing, probably. I just won't tell them about my house payments (or NON-payments, living free for 3 years now haHA), or the payments I am making on my new 84" LED TV, or the payments on my wife's new pair of hooters. See, life in America is TOUGH. You have to be man enough to be financially astute while making sure that the above basic needs are covered.

    /AmericaFuckYeah

  19. mell


    Follow
    Befriend (8)
    293 threads
    3,767 comments
    San Francisco, CA

    19   8:25pm Wed 14 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    http://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=213915

    Loved that paragraph about Zillow and zestimates:
    "If you happen to believe Zillow then my house has gone up dramatically (ridiculously so) in value over the last few months. You don't think that's related to Obama's election and the well-known connection between Zillow and the Democrats, do you?

    I have a suggestion -- anyone publishing such a Zestimate should have to do so in the form of writing a "PUT". That is, by doing so they're writing an option that the owner can choose to exercise if they so wish and "PUT" the house on the publisher for the claimed "value"!

    I've long advocated that tax assessors should have to live with this, but we ought to extend it across the board to both appraisers and so-called "web estimates" and similar. In short, put your money where your mouth is or shut up.

    I'll make this clear right here and now -- if you think that the Zestimate reflects the actual value of my home as of the date of this posting you may show up at my door with a cashier's check made for that amount (don't bother trying to play a game here; I know what the amount is and printed a copy of the current Zestimate) and it's all yours. This offer expires in 30 days; I may as well take the (fictitious, in my view) capital gain before rates go up on January 1st."

  20. David Losh


    Follow
    Befriend (2)
    9 threads
    1,546 comments
    Seattle, WA
    David Losh's website

    20   9:51am Thu 15 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    We don't have true inflation without wage increases. What we do have is an increasing amount of personal debt which compensates for that lack of income.

    So, lower house payments don't make the asset value higher.

    At some point there has to be deleveraging. At some point speculation in commodities will be worthless because the consumer can't pay any more.

    If you look at the charts in the link it could predict asset prices will fall to 1980, or 1990 levels.

    http://chartingtheeconomy.com/?cat=27

  21. ttsmyf


    Follow
    Befriend (3)
    83 threads
    485 comments
    ttsmyf's website
    Premium

    21   10:45am Thu 15 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    David Losh says

    We don't have true inflation without wage increases. What we do have is an increasing amount of personal debt which compensates for that lack of income.

    So, lower house payments don't make the asset value higher.

    At some point there has to be deleveraging. At some point speculation in commodities will be worthless because the consumer can't pay any more.

    If you look at the charts in the link it could predict asset prices will fall to 1980, or 1990 levels.

    http://chartingtheeconomy.com/?cat=27

    You do not adjust for inflation. I offer looking at debt/income. See the second chart here:
    http://www.showrealhist.com/RD_RJShomes_PSav.html

  22. David Losh


    Follow
    Befriend (2)
    9 threads
    1,546 comments
    Seattle, WA
    David Losh's website

    22   3:58pm Thu 15 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    ttsmyf says

    I offer looking at debt/income

    Just consider for a moment how much of that Dow activity is tied to bogus asset values, and people promising to pay mortgages.

    It should be clear by now that housing prices won't be propped up much longer. Governments have bigger fish to fry.

    The question is where money will go next. Real Estate is dead as an investment.

  23. bmwman91


    Follow
    Befriend (7)
    40 threads
    1,539 comments

    23   4:04pm Thu 15 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Oh David Losh, how I wish you were right. But, to think that RE market manipulation will end and allow prices to fall...well, please pass me whatever you are smoking, it must be the good stuff ;)

Premium member ttsmyf is moderator of this thread.

Email

Username

Watch comments by email
Home   Tips and Tricks   Questions or suggestions? Mail p@patrick.net   Thank you for your kind donations

Page took 5553 milliseconds to create.