Bernanke Says Fed Will Do What It Can to Cause Inflation in Housing


By Mark D   Follow   Thu, 15 Nov 2012, 11:53am   2,574 views   32 comments
Watch (0)   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (2)   Dislike  

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-11-15/bernanke-says-fed-will-do-what-it-can-to-support-housing.html

"Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke said the Fed will use its policy tools to speed economic growth and a recovery in housing, which faces obstacles ranging from too-tight lending rules to racial discrimination."

Viewing Comments 1-32 of 32     Last »     See most liked comments

  1. Nobody


    Follow
    Befriend
    10 threads
    286 comments
    San Jose, CA

    1   11:56am Thu 15 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (2)   Dislike  

    Of course, it is never their policy failing or Greenspan being the biggest idiot of the century.

  2. lostand confused


    Follow
    Befriend (9)
    546 threads
    3,206 comments

    2   12:48pm Thu 15 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Huh? This guy is a doofus.

  3. bmwman91


    Follow
    Befriend (7)
    40 threads
    1,539 comments

    3   12:54pm Thu 15 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (6)   Dislike  

    Yeah, lending rules are too tight. I mean really, how can anyone expect Real Americans (TM) to come up with a 3.5% down payment while also doing their job to get properly fucked in the ass via other credit instruments for shit they don't actually need?

  4. BobMSN


    Follow
    Befriend
    6 threads
    107 comments

    4   1:09pm Thu 15 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike  

    Great idea!

    Looks like, we need an "Affirmative Action on Housing".

    Why don't we just socialize all housing and distribute the footages based on your family size and rank in the government. We can certainly learn a lot from North Korea. Unfortunately, China gave up the great idea 20 years ago.

  5. Scagnetti


    Follow
    Befriend (1)
    15 threads
    300 comments

    5   2:41pm Thu 15 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Mark D says

    "Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke said the Fed will use its policy tools to speed economic growth and a recovery in housing, which faces obstacles ranging from too-tight lending rules to racial discrimination."

    I agree...it's too hard for white folks to get loans. That is racial discrimination.

  6. bmwman91


    Follow
    Befriend (7)
    40 threads
    1,539 comments

    6   3:31pm Thu 15 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (4)   Dislike  

    Actually, there is racial discrimination in mortgage lending. The government has mandated that poor minorities should be made into debt slaves by making it painfully easy to borrow unwise amounts of money if you are not white. "Equal opportunity lending" my ass. Textbook racism, preying on a group of people like that.

  7. BobMSN


    Follow
    Befriend
    6 threads
    107 comments

    7   3:43pm Thu 15 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike  

    Bank should use need-based mortgage approval standard. It is racial discrimination to issues loans based on income.

    Better idea: the loan should be approved with a quota system, just like the admission standard of many universities.

  8. PockyClipsNow


    Follow
    Befriend
    19 threads
    1,582 comments
    Los Angeles, CA

    8   6:54pm Thu 15 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (6)   Dislike  

    If u deny a loan to them its racism.
    If you give them a loan they default and claim predatory lending and racism.

    So all lending and non lending is racist.

  9. bmwman91


    Follow
    Befriend (7)
    40 threads
    1,539 comments

    9   6:58pm Thu 15 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    PockyClipsNow says

    If u deny a loan to them its racism.

    If you give them a loan they default and claim predatory lending and racism.

    So all lending and non lending is racist.

    THEM?! Racist!

  10. EastCoastBubbleBoy


    Follow
    Befriend (13)
    111 threads
    513 comments

    10   7:09pm Thu 15 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (3)   Dislike  

    wait.. isn't the idea that "everyone should own a home" what got us INTO this mess in the first place.

  11. Scagnetti


    Follow
    Befriend (1)
    15 threads
    300 comments

    11   8:38pm Thu 15 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    bmwman91 says

    The government has mandated that poor minorities should be made into debt slaves by making it painfully easy to borrow unwise amounts of money if you are not white.

    Are you referring to the fair housing act, the equal credit opportunity act, and the community reinvestment acts? Don't those laws simply prohibit the banks from denying minorities loans that they would otherwise qualify for?

  12. bmwman91


    Follow
    Befriend (7)
    40 threads
    1,539 comments

    12   8:49pm Thu 15 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Scagnetti says

    Are you referring to the fair housing act, the equal credit opportunity act, and the community reinvestment acts? Don't those laws simply prohibit the banks from denying minorities loans that they would otherwise qualify for?

    Yeah, referring to those. They do a bit more than say, "you can't deny a creditworthy person because they are brown." Banks don't care what color their vassels are. I believe that they set lending quotas, which is an obviously bad idea.

  13. Scagnetti


    Follow
    Befriend (1)
    15 threads
    300 comments

    13   9:20pm Thu 15 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    bmwman91 says

    Scagnetti says

    Are you referring to the fair housing act, the equal credit opportunity act, and the community reinvestment acts? Don't those laws simply prohibit the banks from denying minorities loans that they would otherwise qualify for?

    Yeah, referring to those. They do a bit more than say, "you can't deny a creditworthy person because they are brown." Banks don't care what color their vassels are. I believe that they set lending quotas, which is an obviously bad idea.

    I also agree that quotas are a terrible idea. Although I view the situation differently in regards to minorities being discriminated against.

    Think about this....

    At the time of inception of these laws, America was undergoing Lyndon B. Johnsons' quest for the "great society". The civil rights act of 1964 was passed, segregation was ended in public schools, affirmative action was coming about, and the above "housing" acts were passed.

    All of these laws were intended to uplift the minority community which in some ways, on the surface, they did. Although unfortunately some of the laws went past access for minorities, and into preferential treatment. These laws were not passed to "enslave" minorities but to elevate them. Especially the "housing" acts we are talking about.

    If minorities were disproportionately affected by the housing bust, that does not necessarily mean that the banks and the government is racist against minorities.

  14. bmwman91


    Follow
    Befriend (7)
    40 threads
    1,539 comments

    14   9:56pm Thu 15 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (2)   Dislike  

    The road to hell is paved with good intentions. I don't dispute the intentions of the various laws in question, but the results speak for themselves. Lots of welfare programs also came out of the 1960's to appease various groups, and they seem to have led to those groups being fed-and-complacent rather than hungry and angry enough to affect meaningful change. This subject probably belongs in a different sub-forum though.

    Anyway, the housing lending rules did, IMO, put minority groups in a bad position where they were encouraged to sign up for things that they did not, and were not given a chance to understand. It obviously was not some ploy by old white bankers to damage minorities deliberately. They were just another easy target, and bankers know as well as anyone that you can make up all sorts of shit in the name of "racial equality." Just plain old apathy and greed. Poor whites were probably targeted just as much, if not more since there are more poor white people in the US than any other group, but nobody makes a fuss about that since they are white. White people taking advantage of white people isn't news; it has been going on since recorded history began.

  15. Scagnetti


    Follow
    Befriend (1)
    15 threads
    300 comments

    15   10:12pm Thu 15 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    agree...+1 for you

  16. APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch


    Follow
    Befriend (27)
    431 threads
    12,685 comments

    16   4:33am Fri 16 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (4)   Dislike  

    Right on, Ben! There is no reason a 3/2 in Stockton should not be be worth $10 million a year from now and enjoy 50% increases in valuations thereafter for 1000 years.

  17. BobMSN


    Follow
    Befriend
    6 threads
    107 comments

    17   6:53am Fri 16 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    bmwman91 says

    The road to hell is paved with good intentions.

    Yes. Spoiled child tends to be an underperformer when they grow up. That’s why welfare states tend to have more “poor” people.

  18. CaptainShuddup


    Follow
    Befriend (1)
    1,005 threads
    12,493 comments

    18   8:16am Fri 16 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    He also said Blacks and Latinos are discriminated against because the banks wont loan a Lawn maintenance worker, and a School custodian a mortgage. In other News FHA is going under.

    It really makes you wonder, does Ben Bernanke even read the News?
    Well on second though, perhaps he does.

  19. Call it Crazy


    Follow
    Befriend
    929 threads
    11,832 comments

    19   8:26am Fri 16 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike  

    CaptainShuddup says

    He also said Blacks and Latinos are discriminated against because the banks wont loan a Lawn maintenance worker, and a School custodian a mortgage. In other News FHA is going under.

    What are you, a racist???

    Don't they deserve the American dream and should be "given" a $400K mortgage to buy a house??

    It's only fair you know.......

  20. FortWayne


    Follow
    Befriend (12)
    171 threads
    5,583 comments

    20   8:28am Fri 16 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (3)   Dislike  

    PockyClipsNow says

    If u deny a loan to them its racism.

    If you give them a loan they default and claim predatory lending and racism.

    So all lending and non lending is racist.

    You refuse to lend money to a white guy because he is a deadbeat it is fine.
    You refuse to lend money to a black guy because he is a deadbeat and you are a racist.

    That's how the new left leaning government does it to pander to minorities just to get votes.

  21. taxee


    Follow
    Befriend
    88 threads
    466 comments
    El Cerrito, CA

    21   11:02am Fri 16 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Operation Hope Global Financial Dignity Summit = high housing prices and property taxes and everlasting mortgage dept?

  22. taxee


    Follow
    Befriend
    88 threads
    466 comments
    El Cerrito, CA

    22   11:13am Fri 16 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Lets face it. The financial sector, in the guise of 'helping', has degenerated to laundering funny money through government programs and insurance fraud. If they can somehow actually find a fresh crop of debt slaves along the way they pay themselves an extra bonus.

  23. CaptainShuddup


    Follow
    Befriend (1)
    1,005 threads
    12,493 comments

    23   11:19am Fri 16 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Fun with then and now...

    http://www.thepeoplehistory.com/2001.html
    Cost of Living 2001
    How Much things cost in 2001
    Average Cost of new house $136,150.00
    Average Median Income $42,350.00
    Cost of a gallon of Gas $1.46

    http://www.thepeoplehistory.com/2002.html
    Cost of Living 2002
    How Much things cost in 2002
    Average Cost of new house $228,700.00
    Average Median Income $42,409.00
    Cost of a gallon of Gas $1.61

  24. Michinaga


    Follow
    Befriend (2)
    3 threads
    283 comments

    24   11:28am Fri 16 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike  

    Back in more enlightened times, a government official who proposed to deliberately destroy the value of the currency of his own nation would have been tarred and feathered, if not hung for treason.

    Speaking as someone who has several years' salary saved in this fiat currency, may those times come back some day.

  25. taxee


    Follow
    Befriend
    88 threads
    466 comments
    El Cerrito, CA

    25   6:57pm Fri 16 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    When you're in charge, having all the bennies/carrots/promises to offer is sweet. Those confiscated homes, inflated loans, or brand new fiat currency to pay to a new crop of workers coming up (with clean credit reports!!) really work wonders. Screw those old workers that didn't die on the job or soon after. Serves them right for living past their usefulness.

  26. Homeboy


    Follow
    Befriend
    39 threads
    3,546 comments

    26   7:11pm Fri 16 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike  

    "including a plan to buy $40 billion a month of mortgage-backed securities, aiming to spur growth and reduce a 7.9 percent unemployment rate."

    How does buying MBS create jobs?

  27. The Professor


    Follow
    Befriend (5)
    54 threads
    2,443 comments
    Premium

    27   7:28pm Fri 16 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   Protected  

    Homeboy says

    How does buying MBS create jobs?

    It doesn't create jobs it helps bankers.

  28. The Professor


    Follow
    Befriend (5)
    54 threads
    2,443 comments
    Premium

    28   7:31pm Fri 16 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (2)   Dislike   Protected  

    E-man says

    It courages lenders to loosen their lending standards. More lending = higher home prices. Higher home prices =

    higher rent and mortgage = less consumer spending = fewer jobs.

  29. drew_eckhardt


    Follow
    Befriend (1)
    2 threads
    594 comments
    Sunnyvale, CA

    29   10:07pm Fri 16 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (2)   Dislike  

    EastCoastBubbleBoy says

    wait.. isn't the idea that "everyone should own a home" what got us INTO this mess in the first place.

    No.

    We got into this mess because the bankers earned their mortgage origination fees regardless of whether the borrowers paid or defaulted and lost nothing in the later case because they packaged the loans as securities and passed the risk onto someone else. Laxer standards allowed them to write more mortgages for higher profits .

    The bond ratings agencies rubber stamping AAA to keep the fees coming helped speed things along.

    The National Association of Realtors also benefited from the resulting run-up in prices, sales volume, and commissions. With the largest PAC ranked in terms of contributions to candidates for every election cycle since at least 1998 they had the politicians' ears and were in a position to keep the gravy train running on schedule. The bankers and homebuilders' PACs were also in the top 20.

    The Republicans want us to blame the Democrats for this so we're not looking as closely at them when they keep taking the PACs' money (55% of the Realtors' money in 2012) and encourage the same things to happen (like Bush appointee Bernanke with his $40B a month purchase of mortgage backed securities).

    Democrats want us to blame the Republicans for this which is also wrong because they're doing the same things (they took 56% of the Realtors' money in 2010 and Obama kept Uncle Ben).

    Neither wants us to notice that we have a corporatist government that's acting on behalf of powerful economic interests who usually benefit at our expense - the real-estate industry, the teachers' unions, defense contractors, the prison guards union, farmers, etc.

    The average successful senate campaign was running $10M (or about $1.7M/year for the six year term) before the 2012 elections for a job paying about $170K a year which is 1/10th that. The arithmetic works because regardless who wins the people paying for the election get something more valuable after it's over.

    It's not Democrat vs. Republican, 99 vs 1% of individuals, or Liberal vs Conservative which is doing this. It's powerful economic interests paying both parties to favor their concerns over ours.

    The American people are doomed unless we recognize that and choose neither.

  30. thomaswong.1986


    Follow
    Befriend
    27 threads
    6,131 comments

    30   6:10am Sat 17 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike  

    PockyClipsNow says

    If u deny a loan to them its racism.
    If you give them a loan they default and claim predatory lending and racism.

    So all lending and non lending is racist.

    Andrew Cuomo for President 2016

    During Cuomo's tenure as HUD Secretary, he called for an increase in home ownership. He also pushed government-sponsored lenders Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to buy more home loans issued to poor homeowners, in an attempt to end discrimination against minorities. Some believe that this helped lead to the current subprime mortgage crisis.

  31. thomaswong.1986


    Follow
    Befriend
    27 threads
    6,131 comments

    31   6:19am Sat 17 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike  

    drew_eckhardt says

    We got into this mess because the bankers earned their mortgage origination fees regardless of whether the borrowers paid or defaulted and lost nothing in the later case because they packaged the loans as securities and passed the risk onto someone else.

    Bubba Clinton said.. Looks good to me, its all part of CRA anyway.. and good for my Legacy.

    drew_eckhardt says

    The bond ratings agencies rubber stamping AAA to keep the fees coming helped speed things along.

    Ultimately it was the Govt impliedly backing mortgages securities which gave it a AAA rating.

    drew_eckhardt says

    The National Association of Realtors also benefited from the resulting run-up in prices, sales volume, and commissions.

    Yes, I agree and certainly no one in Govt bothered to eliminate the commissions on RE sales as they were eager to do with Wall Street Firms stock transaction fees at the end of the 70s, which led to discount broker boom. The NAR needs to banned from Washington DC.

  32. toothfairy


    Follow
    Befriend
    43 threads
    912 comments

    32   4:30pm Sat 17 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Nothing like a good housing bubble to get the economy moving again.

Mark D is moderator of this thread.

Email

Username

Watch comments by email
Home   Tips and Tricks   Questions or suggestions? Mail p@patrick.net   Thank you for your kind donations

Page took 240 milliseconds to create.