"Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke said the Fed will use its policy tools to speed economic growth and a recovery in housing, which faces obstacles ranging from too-tight lending rules to racial discrimination."
Bernanke Says Fed Will Do What It Can to Cause Inflation in Housing
By Mark D Follow Thu, 15 Nov 2012, 11:53am 2,368 views 37 comments
Watch (0) Share
Quote
Permalink Like (2) Dislike Viewing Comments 1-37 of 37 Last » See most liked comments
|
Mark D is moderator of this thread. |
Follow
Befriend
10 threads
272 comments
San Jose, CA
Of course, it is never their policy failing or Greenspan being the biggest idiot of the century.
Follow
Befriend (9)
160 threads
1,530 comments
Premium
Huh? This guy is a doofus.
Follow
Befriend (7)
37 threads
1,523 comments
Mountain View, CA
bmwman91's website
Premium
Yeah, lending rules are too tight. I mean really, how can anyone expect Real Americans (TM) to come up with a 3.5% down payment while also doing their job to get properly fucked in the ass via other credit instruments for shit they don't actually need?
Follow
Befriend
3 threads
98 comments
Great idea!
Looks like, we need an "Affirmative Action on Housing".
Why don't we just socialize all housing and distribute the footages based on your family size and rank in the government. We can certainly learn a lot from North Korea. Unfortunately, China gave up the great idea 20 years ago.
Follow
Befriend (1)
15 threads
300 comments
Mark D says
I agree...it's too hard for white folks to get loans. That is racial discrimination.
Follow
Befriend
22 threads
409 comments
So why didn't racial discrimination prevent the housing bubble in the first place? Was it not existent in 2002-2007 and then SUDDENLY reared its ugly head?
Follow
Befriend (7)
37 threads
1,523 comments
Mountain View, CA
bmwman91's website
Premium
Actually, there is racial discrimination in mortgage lending. The government has mandated that poor minorities should be made into debt slaves by making it painfully easy to borrow unwise amounts of money if you are not white. "Equal opportunity lending" my ass. Textbook racism, preying on a group of people like that.
Follow
Befriend
3 threads
98 comments
Bank should use need-based mortgage approval standard. It is racial discrimination to issues loans based on income.
Better idea: the loan should be approved with a quota system, just like the admission standard of many universities.
Follow
Befriend
22 threads
409 comments
BobMSN says
Stop giving them ideas!
Follow
Befriend
19 threads
1,534 comments
Los Angeles, CA
If u deny a loan to them its racism.
If you give them a loan they default and claim predatory lending and racism.
So all lending and non lending is racist.
Follow
Befriend (7)
37 threads
1,523 comments
Mountain View, CA
bmwman91's website
Premium
PockyClipsNow says
THEM?! Racist!
Follow
Befriend (11)
104 threads
454 comments
Premium
wait.. isn't the idea that "everyone should own a home" what got us INTO this mess in the first place.
Follow
Befriend (1)
15 threads
300 comments
bmwman91 says
Are you referring to the fair housing act, the equal credit opportunity act, and the community reinvestment acts? Don't those laws simply prohibit the banks from denying minorities loans that they would otherwise qualify for?
Follow
Befriend (7)
37 threads
1,523 comments
Mountain View, CA
bmwman91's website
Premium
Scagnetti says
Yeah, referring to those. They do a bit more than say, "you can't deny a creditworthy person because they are brown." Banks don't care what color their vassels are. I believe that they set lending quotas, which is an obviously bad idea.
Follow
Befriend (1)
15 threads
300 comments
bmwman91 says
I also agree that quotas are a terrible idea. Although I view the situation differently in regards to minorities being discriminated against.
Think about this....
At the time of inception of these laws, America was undergoing Lyndon B. Johnsons' quest for the "great society". The civil rights act of 1964 was passed, segregation was ended in public schools, affirmative action was coming about, and the above "housing" acts were passed.
All of these laws were intended to uplift the minority community which in some ways, on the surface, they did. Although unfortunately some of the laws went past access for minorities, and into preferential treatment. These laws were not passed to "enslave" minorities but to elevate them. Especially the "housing" acts we are talking about.
If minorities were disproportionately affected by the housing bust, that does not necessarily mean that the banks and the government is racist against minorities.
Follow
Befriend (7)
37 threads
1,523 comments
Mountain View, CA
bmwman91's website
Premium
The road to hell is paved with good intentions. I don't dispute the intentions of the various laws in question, but the results speak for themselves. Lots of welfare programs also came out of the 1960's to appease various groups, and they seem to have led to those groups being fed-and-complacent rather than hungry and angry enough to affect meaningful change. This subject probably belongs in a different sub-forum though.
Anyway, the housing lending rules did, IMO, put minority groups in a bad position where they were encouraged to sign up for things that they did not, and were not given a chance to understand. It obviously was not some ploy by old white bankers to damage minorities deliberately. They were just another easy target, and bankers know as well as anyone that you can make up all sorts of shit in the name of "racial equality." Just plain old apathy and greed. Poor whites were probably targeted just as much, if not more since there are more poor white people in the US than any other group, but nobody makes a fuss about that since they are white. White people taking advantage of white people isn't news; it has been going on since recorded history began.
Follow
Befriend (1)
15 threads
300 comments
agree...+1 for you
Follow
Befriend (28)
169 threads
4,153 comments
Premium
Right on, Ben! There is no reason a 3/2 in Stockton should not be be worth $10 million a year from now and enjoy 50% increases in valuations thereafter for 1000 years.
Follow
Befriend
3 threads
98 comments
bmwman91 says
Yes. Spoiled child tends to be an underperformer when they grow up. That’s why welfare states tend to have more “poor” people.
Follow
Befriend (1)
246 threads
4,658 comments
He also said Blacks and Latinos are discriminated against because the banks wont loan a Lawn maintenance worker, and a School custodian a mortgage. In other News FHA is going under.
It really makes you wonder, does Ben Bernanke even read the News?
Well on second though, perhaps he does.
Follow
Befriend
228 threads
2,748 comments
CaptainShuddup says
What are you, a racist???
Don't they deserve the American dream and should be "given" a $400K mortgage to buy a house??
It's only fair you know.......
Follow
Befriend (13)
102 threads
3,759 comments
PockyClipsNow says
You refuse to lend money to a white guy because he is a deadbeat it is fine.
You refuse to lend money to a black guy because he is a deadbeat and you are a racist.
That's how the new left leaning government does it to pander to minorities just to get votes.
Follow
Befriend
88 threads
457 comments
El Cerrito, CA
Premium
Operation Hope Global Financial Dignity Summit = high housing prices and property taxes and everlasting mortgage dept?
Follow
Befriend
88 threads
457 comments
El Cerrito, CA
Premium
Lets face it. The financial sector, in the guise of 'helping', has degenerated to laundering funny money through government programs and insurance fraud. If they can somehow actually find a fresh crop of debt slaves along the way they pay themselves an extra bonus.
Follow
Befriend (1)
246 threads
4,658 comments
Fun with then and now...
http://www.thepeoplehistory.com/2001.html
Cost of Living 2001
How Much things cost in 2001
Average Cost of new house $136,150.00
Average Median Income $42,350.00
Cost of a gallon of Gas $1.46
http://www.thepeoplehistory.com/2002.html
Cost of Living 2002
How Much things cost in 2002
Average Cost of new house $228,700.00
Average Median Income $42,409.00
Cost of a gallon of Gas $1.61
Follow
Befriend (2)
3 threads
283 comments
Back in more enlightened times, a government official who proposed to deliberately destroy the value of the currency of his own nation would have been tarred and feathered, if not hung for treason.
Speaking as someone who has several years' salary saved in this fiat currency, may those times come back some day.
Follow
Befriend (23)
55 threads
3,761 comments
Scottsdale, AZ
robertoaribas's website
Michinaga says
Actually, countries devalued their currencies directly back in the old days... The US would simply have announced it was devaluing it to encourage exports.
Follow
Befriend
88 threads
457 comments
El Cerrito, CA
Premium
When you're in charge, having all the bennies/carrots/promises to offer is sweet. Those confiscated homes, inflated loans, or brand new fiat currency to pay to a new crop of workers coming up (with clean credit reports!!) really work wonders. Screw those old workers that didn't die on the job or soon after. Serves them right for living past their usefulness.
Follow
Befriend
13 threads
1,478 comments
"including a plan to buy $40 billion a month of mortgage-backed securities, aiming to spur growth and reduce a 7.9 percent unemployment rate."
How does buying MBS create jobs?
Follow
Befriend (31)
34 threads
2,542 comments
San Jose, CA
Premium
Homeboy says
It courages lenders to loosen their lending standards. More lending = higher home prices. Higher home prices = more new construction and remodeling. More new construction and remodeling = more jobs. More lending also = more jobs. higher home prices = more refinance & more disposable income.
This is the Fed's goal. The writing is on the wall. Home prices will continue to head higher for the coming years. Regardless of our hoping & wishing, the market will do what it must.
I wanted to start a thread to talk about this topic. Look around, homebuilders are buying land & lots. Building permits are doubled from last year. There's a freaking waiting list for new homes in the Bay Area. Homebuilders will not go all in now because they got burned before. Not enough new construction means higher home prices. Econ 101.
Follow
Befriend (5)
24 threads
1,300 comments
Premium
Homeboy says
It doesn't create jobs it helps bankers.
Follow
Befriend (5)
24 threads
1,300 comments
Premium
E-man says
higher rent and mortgage = less consumer spending = fewer jobs.
Follow
Befriend (31)
34 threads
2,542 comments
San Jose, CA
Premium
The Professor says
You're right. After all, you're the professor. Professors are always right.
Follow
Befriend (1)
2 threads
324 comments
Sunnyvale, CA
EastCoastBubbleBoy says
No.
We got into this mess because the bankers earned their mortgage origination fees regardless of whether the borrowers paid or defaulted and lost nothing in the later case because they packaged the loans as securities and passed the risk onto someone else. Laxer standards allowed them to write more mortgages for higher profits .
The bond ratings agencies rubber stamping AAA to keep the fees coming helped speed things along.
The National Association of Realtors also benefited from the resulting run-up in prices, sales volume, and commissions. With the largest PAC ranked in terms of contributions to candidates for every election cycle since at least 1998 they had the politicians' ears and were in a position to keep the gravy train running on schedule. The bankers and homebuilders' PACs were also in the top 20.
The Republicans want us to blame the Democrats for this so we're not looking as closely at them when they keep taking the PACs' money (55% of the Realtors' money in 2012) and encourage the same things to happen (like Bush appointee Bernanke with his $40B a month purchase of mortgage backed securities).
Democrats want us to blame the Republicans for this which is also wrong because they're doing the same things (they took 56% of the Realtors' money in 2010 and Obama kept Uncle Ben).
Neither wants us to notice that we have a corporatist government that's acting on behalf of powerful economic interests who usually benefit at our expense - the real-estate industry, the teachers' unions, defense contractors, the prison guards union, farmers, etc.
The average successful senate campaign was running $10M (or about $1.7M/year for the six year term) before the 2012 elections for a job paying about $170K a year which is 1/10th that. The arithmetic works because regardless who wins the people paying for the election get something more valuable after it's over.
It's not Democrat vs. Republican, 99 vs 1% of individuals, or Liberal vs Conservative which is doing this. It's powerful economic interests paying both parties to favor their concerns over ours.
The American people are doomed unless we recognize that and choose neither.
Follow
Befriend
14 threads
2,820 comments
PockyClipsNow says
Andrew Cuomo for President 2016
During Cuomo's tenure as HUD Secretary, he called for an increase in home ownership. He also pushed government-sponsored lenders Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to buy more home loans issued to poor homeowners, in an attempt to end discrimination against minorities. Some believe that this helped lead to the current subprime mortgage crisis.
Follow
Befriend
14 threads
2,820 comments
drew_eckhardt says
Bubba Clinton said.. Looks good to me, its all part of CRA anyway.. and good for my Legacy.
drew_eckhardt says
Ultimately it was the Govt impliedly backing mortgages securities which gave it a AAA rating.
drew_eckhardt says
Yes, I agree and certainly no one in Govt bothered to eliminate the commissions on RE sales as they were eager to do with Wall Street Firms stock transaction fees at the end of the 70s, which led to discount broker boom. The NAR needs to banned from Washington DC.
Follow
Befriend
40 threads
856 comments
Oakland, CA
Nothing like a good housing bubble to get the economy moving again.