Are "you" still "you" if you have replaced all your parts?


By tovarichpeter   Follow   Sat, 17 Nov 2012, 9:27am   390 views   7 comments
In South San Francisco CA 94080   Watch (0)   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/technology/2012/11/ray_kurzweil_are_you_still_you_if_your_brain_is_enhanced_with_neural_implants.html

Sent from my iPad

Viewing Comments 1-7 of 7     Last »     See most liked comments

  1. New Renter


    Follow
    Befriend (3)
    35 threads
    6,735 comments
    San Jose, CA

    1   9:20am Mon 3 Dec 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  
  2. Dan8267


    Follow
    Befriend (17)
    1,075 threads
    13,862 comments
    Boca Raton, FL

    2   10:51am Mon 3 Dec 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Whether or not the copy is destructive is irrelevant. You are constantly being altered. Your mind is like a stream. It's a different thing every millisecond, but functionally equivalent.

    The fact is, you at this instant (T = n) are not the same person you are at this instant (T > n). You are mostly the same, but not completely. Every time a neural connection is changed, you are a slightly different person. Such differences are significant over time.

    Rationally, it makes sense to value a perfect copy of yourself as much as the original whether that copy is made destructively or non-destructively.

    Ideally, I'd like to make a purely digital copy of myself and download it to a more reliable piece of hardware. Then that copy can spawn numerous other copies, which act independently for a day. At the end of the day, the copies synch up with each other.

    So, let's say the number of copies N = 100. There would be a hundred of me occupying different hardware platforms. At the beginning of the day, each copy is identical. Each copy experiences its own day, perhaps doing totally different things (one vacations, one works on project X, one works on project Y, one studies, etc.).

    At the end of the day, a network synch is done so that each copy incorporates all the experiences of the others and the copies all become identical again. Each real time day results in N days of life experience. Having multiple copies also ensures a high degree of immortality. If a copy is destroyed at any time in the day, at most one person-day of life is lost. The consciousness continues.

    Now that is the kind of immortality I look forward to. Come to think of it, the Geth from the Mass Effect series is the closest thing to this idea. I always did like the Geth.

  3. curious2


    Follow
    Befriend (4)
    118 threads
    4,508 comments

    3   2:04pm Mon 3 Dec 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Dan8267 says

    Rationally, it makes sense to value a perfect copy of yourself as much as the original whether that copy is made destructively or non-destructively.

    The net values differ. Twins are genetic copies, but neither wants to be killed.

    Also, over time, we accumulate radioactive particles. Very long term survival might require some way to clean out those particles.

  4. lostand confused


    Follow
    Befriend (9)
    557 threads
    3,232 comments

    4   2:39pm Mon 3 Dec 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Are those plastic dolls that pass for celebrities these days still them after all their plastic surgery??

  5. errc


    Follow
    Befriend (5)
    51 threads
    2,588 comments
    32 male

    5   3:06pm Mon 3 Dec 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike  

    This is exactly why I stopped having hand sex while watching gay porn. I didn't want all that wanking to rub off on me

  6. Dan8267


    Follow
    Befriend (17)
    1,075 threads
    13,862 comments
    Boca Raton, FL

    6   4:44pm Mon 3 Dec 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    curious2 says

    The net values differ. Twins are genetic copies, but neither wants to be killed.

    Big difference between something being your genetic copy and something being a copy of your neural network (brain). One is a person, the other is just a chemical code for building a body and body parts.

  7. curious2


    Follow
    Befriend (4)
    118 threads
    4,508 comments

    7   4:55pm Mon 3 Dec 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Dan8267 says

    a copy of your neural network (brain).

    A copy of your neural network would necessarily include your survival instinct. In Darwinian life, self-awareness is merely a strategy to increase survival, with the human cortex being a thin veneer stuck literally on top of the much deeper survival instinct.

tovarichpeter is moderator of this thread.

Email

Username

Watch comments by email
Home   Tips and Tricks   Questions or suggestions? Mail p@patrick.net   Thank you for your kind donations

Page took 97 milliseconds to create.