Mortgage interest deduction benefits realtors and rich, not middle class


By tovarichpeter   Follow   Thu, 29 Nov 2012, 3:46pm   1,269 views   15 comments
In South San Francisco CA 94080   Watch (2)   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (3)   Dislike  

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ben-hallman/mortgage-interest-deduction_b_2213304.html

As Washington searches for ways to drum up tax revenues in a bid to avert the fiscal cliff, the interest deduction some homeowners claim on their mortgages may be on the chopping block. The possibility that this deduction might go away has prompted the sort of dire warnings that might be reserved for news that the American flag will lose its stars and stripes: The housing market, finally recovering from a long decline, will plunge anew as values fall. People won't buy as many homes. Middle-class families will suffer and despair. But this view, voiced with the most conviction by...

Viewing Comments 1-15 of 15     Last »     See most liked comments

  1. C Boy


    Follow
    Befriend
    4 threads
    240 comments
    New York, NY

    1   6:04am Fri 30 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    If your married you need to finance ~$200k to benefit vs the standard deduction.

    A lot of flyover country does not really benefit.

  2. Erikintx


    Follow
    Befriend
    19 comments

    2   9:22am Fri 30 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    I'm out in Abilene, TX but did live in CA at one point. We had a $600,000 or so mortgage and the interest deduction did matter. Remember we're also at historically low interest rates and when rates go up so will the mortgage interest (some people still take adjustable loans out, and HELOCs are adjustable).

    I do think it should be income based and capped. For instance you can only deduct it against W-2 income so the WalMart kids and Buffet won't get to offset their dividend income. If you don't EARN money by working then you can afford to lose the deduction. This could be fazed in over 10 years (10%/year starting in 2014). That'll give them a full year or so to pay off/down the mortgage or adjust their finances. It'll also faze in the impact to the high end real estate market. Those bastard hedge fund managers with their "carried interest" BS tax break wouldn't get to write off their mortgage interest.

    I'd argue for full tax deduction for families making W-2 income of $250K or less, with an adjustment upward on the $250K multiplier for high-expense/income counties. Or even double that to $500,000/couple of W-2 income to take full deduction. We never make even close to the $250K when living in CA so a full deduction still covers a SFR in Campbell, CA.

    For those fortunate to make W-2 income of $250K/year (or even make it $500K/year) as a couple I think proper budgeting will allow even the affordability of Palo Alto, SF, NYC, etc.

  3. C Boy


    Follow
    Befriend
    4 threads
    240 comments
    New York, NY

    3   9:48am Fri 30 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    I also think the MID should apply to primary residences only.

    Vacation homes should not qualify.

  4. wave9x


    Follow
    Befriend
    12 threads
    156 comments

    4   10:08am Fri 30 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    I think the federal government should get rid of capital gains and make it part of income (like CA does for income tax), and keep the mortgage deduction for primary residences only. Getting rid of the deduction would hit the middle class and upper middle class the hardest, especially in the Northeast and West Coast. The really rich really wouldn't be affected that much.

  5. Erikintx


    Follow
    Befriend
    19 comments

    5   10:15am Fri 30 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    The really rich like Buffet and hedge fund managers making hundreds of millions per year get the low 15% dividends (scheduled to go to 20%) rate. I think that's a better fat cat target than the capital gains tax (isn't that supposed to go to earned income rate if the scheduled law expirations happen??)

  6. wave9x


    Follow
    Befriend
    12 threads
    156 comments

    6   10:55am Fri 30 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    I say both dividends and capital gains should be considered income. Many on this forum say you should put your money into stocks rather than a house, but the stock market is also propped up with sweet tax incentives and is 10x more corrupt and manipulated.

  7. Peter P


    Follow
    Befriend (4)
    117 threads
    18,187 comments

    7   4:10pm Fri 30 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    You can label poor people "middle class" all day long.

    250K is not even upper middle-class.

    250K will barely rent you a nice yacht for one week.

    The reality distortion field nowadays is simply astonishing.

    When people stop aspiring to be successful and want only the fruits right now, we have a big problem.

  8. Peter P


    Follow
    Befriend (4)
    117 threads
    18,187 comments

    8   4:12pm Fri 30 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    I thought mortgage deduction is limited to $1M?

    What kind of rich men (other than Warren Buffett) will live in a $1M home?

    Regardless of location, a rich man's kitchen alone costs way more than $250K nowadays.

  9. iwog


    Follow
    Befriend (46)
    366 threads
    19,383 comments
    47 male
    Lafayette, CA
    Premium

    9   4:19pm Fri 30 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (3)   Dislike   Protected  

    The mortgage interest deduction is a middle-class tax cut.

    Eliminating it will not affect the 1% at all. They will simply roll all their property into an investment corporation and deduct the interest anyway.

    I understand the argument used by those who want to eliminate it, citing lower real estate values as a benefit, however I don't agree with it and I think the aristocracy is going to ultimately set prices regardless of how taxes are handled.

  10. Peter P


    Follow
    Befriend (4)
    117 threads
    18,187 comments

    10   4:22pm Fri 30 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike  

    When the remaining 99% stops wanting to be the top 1%, the society can only go to hell.

  11. Peter P


    Follow
    Befriend (4)
    117 threads
    18,187 comments

    11   4:25pm Fri 30 Nov 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Any tax policy will NEVER affect the rich because they control policies and there will always be some well-designed loop holes.

    Progressive taxation only hurts those who try.

  12. iwog


    Follow
    Befriend (46)
    366 threads
    19,383 comments
    47 male
    Lafayette, CA
    Premium

    12   11:22am Sat 1 Dec 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   Protected  

    Peter P says

    Any tax policy will NEVER affect the rich because they control policies and there will always be some well-designed loop holes.

    Progressive taxation only hurts those who try.

    FDR succeeded and Democrats would succeed if given sufficient support at the polls.

  13. Bellingham Bill


    Follow
    Befriend
    71 threads
    3,090 comments
    Bellingham, WA

    13   11:35am Sat 1 Dec 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Peter P says

    When the remaining 99% stops wanting to be the top 1%, the society can only go to hell.

    This is just your ideology defending the indefensible.

    The 1% largely do not make their wealth via actual wealth-creation, they make it like iwog, buying up existing wealth and selling access to it.

    To argue that we all must be parasites for our system to survive is in indictment of our system, not a defense of it.

    Things ARE going to get worse here as we move away from defending the middle class and below from the predations of the wealthy.

  14. Bellingham Bill


    Follow
    Befriend
    71 threads
    3,090 comments
    Bellingham, WA

    14   11:41am Sat 1 Dec 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Peter P says

    Progressive taxation only hurts those who try.

    LOL, Sweden, Norway, Germany are not "hurt" by their tax structures.

    Now, a flat tax on all incomes would be an interesting experiment. If we did not rebalance the wealth flows with government redistributive spending, the 90% who pay various rents to the 10% would eventually have no means at all and the current price structure would collapse.

    That would be an interesting situation to see.

    But people who cannot see where this is all going really trouble me, in that they are either being dishonest here (and just bullshitting for fun or profit) . . . or simply fucked in the head.

  15. Bellingham Bill


    Follow
    Befriend
    71 threads
    3,090 comments
    Bellingham, WA

    15   11:44am Sat 1 Dec 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    iwog says

    They will simply roll all their property into an investment corporation and deduct the interest anyway.

    the fix for that is making interest not deductible for any land purchase.

    if I were King interest would be deductible for the actual capital investment (bricks & sticks).

tovarichpeter is moderator of this thread.

Email

Username

Watch comments by email
Home   Tips and Tricks   Questions or suggestions? Mail p@patrick.net   Thank you for your kind donations

Page took 75 milliseconds to create.