Watchhttp://www.huffingtonpost.com/ben-hallman/mortgage-interest-deduction_b_2213304.html
As Washington searches for ways to drum up tax revenues in a bid to avert the fiscal cliff, the interest deduction some homeowners claim on their mortgages may be on the chopping block. The possibility that this deduction might go away has prompted the sort of dire warnings that might be reserved for news that the American flag will lose its stars and stripes: The housing market, finally recovering from a long decline, will plunge anew as values fall. People won't buy as many homes. Middle-class families will suffer and despair. But this view, voiced with the most conviction by...
Follow
Befriend
1 threads
208 comments
Arlington, TX
If your married you need to finance ~$200k to benefit vs the standard deduction.
A lot of flyover country does not really benefit.
Follow
Befriend
19 comments
I'm out in Abilene, TX but did live in CA at one point. We had a $600,000 or so mortgage and the interest deduction did matter. Remember we're also at historically low interest rates and when rates go up so will the mortgage interest (some people still take adjustable loans out, and HELOCs are adjustable).
I do think it should be income based and capped. For instance you can only deduct it against W-2 income so the WalMart kids and Buffet won't get to offset their dividend income. If you don't EARN money by working then you can afford to lose the deduction. This could be fazed in over 10 years (10%/year starting in 2014). That'll give them a full year or so to pay off/down the mortgage or adjust their finances. It'll also faze in the impact to the high end real estate market. Those bastard hedge fund managers with their "carried interest" BS tax break wouldn't get to write off their mortgage interest.
I'd argue for full tax deduction for families making W-2 income of $250K or less, with an adjustment upward on the $250K multiplier for high-expense/income counties. Or even double that to $500,000/couple of W-2 income to take full deduction. We never make even close to the $250K when living in CA so a full deduction still covers a SFR in Campbell, CA.
For those fortunate to make W-2 income of $250K/year (or even make it $500K/year) as a couple I think proper budgeting will allow even the affordability of Palo Alto, SF, NYC, etc.
Follow
Befriend
1 threads
208 comments
Arlington, TX
I also think the MID should apply to primary residences only.
Vacation homes should not qualify.
Follow
Befriend
4 threads
64 comments
I think the federal government should get rid of capital gains and make it part of income (like CA does for income tax), and keep the mortgage deduction for primary residences only. Getting rid of the deduction would hit the middle class and upper middle class the hardest, especially in the Northeast and West Coast. The really rich really wouldn't be affected that much.
Follow
Befriend
19 comments
The really rich like Buffet and hedge fund managers making hundreds of millions per year get the low 15% dividends (scheduled to go to 20%) rate. I think that's a better fat cat target than the capital gains tax (isn't that supposed to go to earned income rate if the scheduled law expirations happen??)
Follow
Befriend
4 threads
64 comments
I say both dividends and capital gains should be considered income. Many on this forum say you should put your money into stocks rather than a house, but the stock market is also propped up with sweet tax incentives and is 10x more corrupt and manipulated.
Follow
Befriend (2)
61 threads
1,300 comments
Premium
Erikintx says
Capital gain and dividend goes hand in hand.
If a company does not release dividends, they build up their equity balance which increase the value of the equity.
Dividends is set to go to ordinary and capital gain set to go up 5% before the obamacare extra. The proper policy is to treat dividend and captital gains the same.
Once you leave dividends at 43% and Cap gain at 23%, every Board of director in America will be pressured to build equity and not release dividends.
Follow
Befriend (4)
117 threads
17,655 comments
Premium
You can label poor people "middle class" all day long.
250K is not even upper middle-class.
250K will barely rent you a nice yacht for one week.
The reality distortion field nowadays is simply astonishing.
When people stop aspiring to be successful and want only the fruits right now, we have a big problem.
Follow
Befriend (4)
117 threads
17,655 comments
Premium
I thought mortgage deduction is limited to $1M?
What kind of rich men (other than Warren Buffett) will live in a $1M home?
Regardless of location, a rich man's kitchen alone costs way more than $250K nowadays.
Follow
Befriend (48)
273 threads
12,509 comments
47 male
Lafayette, CA
Premium
The mortgage interest deduction is a middle-class tax cut.
Eliminating it will not affect the 1% at all. They will simply roll all their property into an investment corporation and deduct the interest anyway.
I understand the argument used by those who want to eliminate it, citing lower real estate values as a benefit, however I don't agree with it and I think the aristocracy is going to ultimately set prices regardless of how taxes are handled.
Follow
Befriend (4)
117 threads
17,655 comments
Premium
When the remaining 99% stops wanting to be the top 1%, the society can only go to hell.
Follow
Befriend (4)
117 threads
17,655 comments
Premium
Any tax policy will NEVER affect the rich because they control policies and there will always be some well-designed loop holes.
Progressive taxation only hurts those who try.
Follow
Befriend (48)
273 threads
12,509 comments
47 male
Lafayette, CA
Premium
Peter P says
FDR succeeded and Democrats would succeed if given sufficient support at the polls.
Follow
Befriend
29 threads
1,476 comments
Bellingham, WA
Premium
Peter P says
This is just your ideology defending the indefensible.
The 1% largely do not make their wealth via actual wealth-creation, they make it like iwog, buying up existing wealth and selling access to it.
To argue that we all must be parasites for our system to survive is in indictment of our system, not a defense of it.
Things ARE going to get worse here as we move away from defending the middle class and below from the predations of the wealthy.
Follow
Befriend
29 threads
1,476 comments
Bellingham, WA
Premium
Peter P says
LOL, Sweden, Norway, Germany are not "hurt" by their tax structures.
Now, a flat tax on all incomes would be an interesting experiment. If we did not rebalance the wealth flows with government redistributive spending, the 90% who pay various rents to the 10% would eventually have no means at all and the current price structure would collapse.
That would be an interesting situation to see.
But people who cannot see where this is all going really trouble me, in that they are either being dishonest here (and just bullshitting for fun or profit) . . . or simply fucked in the head.
Follow
Befriend
29 threads
1,476 comments
Bellingham, WA
Premium
iwog says
the fix for that is making interest not deductible for any land purchase.
if I were King interest would be deductible for the actual capital investment (bricks & sticks).
Follow
Befriend
94 threads
438 comments
Kent, WA
John Bailo's website
http://www.mercurynews.com/business/ci_22076881/homeowners-mortgage-interest-deduction-could-be-trimmed