Federal agency asks to add big fee to mortgages


By Patrick   Follow   Sat, 1 Dec 2012, 10:26am   331 views   3 comments
In Menlo Park CA 94025   Watch (0)   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

http://www.timesunion.com/local/article/Plan-loads-home-loans-4082483.php

Page 1 of 1 ALBANY — Foreclosures in New York typically take longer than in most states due to the protections and backstops that the courts and Legislature have put in place to try to keep people in their homes. That's the good news.

Viewing Comments 1-3 of 3     Last »     See most liked comments

  1. bmwman91


    Follow
    Befriend (7)
    40 threads
    1,539 comments

    1   1:35pm Sat 1 Dec 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike  

    Lol, the NAr and consumer groups are balking at the possibility of a $2000 cost increase on a $200k house...spread over 30 years. That is $5.56 per month. Seems like a small price to pay to get a government no-skin-in-the-game loan.

  2. CaptainShuddup


    Follow
    Befriend (1)
    806 threads
    10,678 comments

    2   7:41am Sun 2 Dec 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    bmwman91 says

    That is $5.56 per month. Seems like a small price to pay to get a government no-skin-in-the-game loan.

    That $5.56 quickly adds up when the Government comes up with a new fee or a new way to increase existing fees every three months. In the two years since I've bought, there's already over $300 a month in such fees.

    New home owners are the new, pass the tax down to them whipping post. Another reason I'm glad I bought when I did.
    I'm only paying $72 a month. The difference in these fees on my mortgage when I bought, and the fees that are 4X the amount. Is the difference in me never being able to refinance at a a lower rate. Even at 2% I'd probably end paying a few hundred more a month, by the time interest gets down to 2%. By that time these fees might be $500 collectively, as a new fee is devised every 3 months.

  3. scott777


    Follow
    Befriend
    1 threads
    26 comments
    Laguna Beach, CA

    3   8:07am Sun 2 Dec 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike  

    The problem is that people who have little or no equity are basically renters and should be treated as such. If you have less then 25% skin in the game you should be required to maintain the property and not make alterations without permission. And you should be out in lessthan 90 days just like a renter if you cant pay. In a business partnership 51% ownership calls the shots. With housing the real owner has no say. But maybe if the real owners (banks) did have a say the whole illusion of homeownership would be gone and more people would rent. If the risk to the banks and/ or govt was less mortgage insurance could be less.

    Too many people are coming in with 3.5% and depreciate the home and bail and or stop paying and squat. We all have to pay for this.

Premium member Patrick is moderator of this thread.

Email

Username

Watch comments by email
Home   Tips and Tricks   Questions or suggestions? Mail p@patrick.net   Thank you for your kind donations

Page took 271 milliseconds to create.