Republicans point second gun towards the hostage


By iwog   Follow   Mon, 3 Dec 2012, 6:12pm   3,572 views   74 comments
In Lafayette CA 94549   Watch (0)   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (2)   Dislike (2)  

The hostage being America of course. This time it's the debt ceiling. Obama has proposed taking the debt ceiling out of the hands of congress and allowing the president to unilaterally raise it.

I agree with this since the debt ceiling is simply a big piece of red tape that allows debt to be issued to pay for spending congress has already authorized. Again.....congress has ALREADY spent the money, raising the debt ceiling is ONLY the authorization to make good on bills that congress has already passed. There is no spending power associated with raising the debt ceiling. There is no policy power associated with raising the debt ceiling. There are no issues of fiscal responsibility associated with raising the debt ceiling. It is ONLY THE PROCESS OF PAYING FOR BILLS THAT CONGRESS HAS ALREADY APPROVED.

Of course Republicans in the House have no honor, no morality, and no respect for the country or the government. They intend to hold the debt ceiling hostage along with the fiscal cliff and are demanding unspecified (yes we don't know what Republican demands are yet) concessions in order to pay for bills that most of these same Republicans voted for.

“As I told the president a couple weeks ago, there are a lot of things I’ve wanted in my life, but almost all of them had a price tag attached to them. If we’re going to talk about the debt limit in this, there is going to be some price tag associated with it.”

~ John Boehner

Just the latest in a long list of government terrorist actions and a sign that election losses have made Republicans more desperate and not conciliatory at all. What next? Cut taxes on billionaires or Republicans will burn down the White House?

http://www.nationaljournal.com/blogs/influencealley/2012/12/business-groups-sounding-alarm-on-debt-limit-03

« First     « Previous     Viewing Comments 35-74 of 74     Last »     See most liked comments

  1. iwog


    Follow
    Befriend (46)
    386 threads
    20,327 comments
    47 male
    Lafayette, CA
    Premium

    35   5:26pm Tue 4 Dec 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Melmakian says

    Hey Iwog, what's with the new avatar, dude?

    It looks like you showed up at a Klan meeting at the wrong time and wrong place.

    Fireduck rules.

  2. Seymour


    Follow
    Befriend
    19 comments

    36   7:38pm Tue 4 Dec 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    iwog says

    Obama didn't abandon Simpson-Bowles, in what alternate reality do you suppose Obama is the legislature and is responsible for passing a tax plan?

    I absolutely agree that the legislature is responsible for passing a budget. I also believe that POTUS should be leading his party in delivering that budget. Has our current president been effective at leading his party to pass ANY budget in the Senate?

    iwog says

    Simplified:
    Obama says "I want X and I'm open to compromising on everything else."
    Republicans say "We want X,Y, and Z and will absolutely refuse to compromise on anything the Democrats want."

    Further Simplified:
    Obama says "I want X and I'm not willing to compromise on it"

    The republicans have offered caps on deductions and other revenue generating alternatives, some included in either Simpson-Bowles or, as Roberto notes, acceptable compromises that raise revenue on higher wage earners without changing marginal rates.

    iwog says

    If you don't fucking understand this, you have no business casting a vote in this country. I am not being the least bit unfair here. This is the true nature of the impasse and all the bullshit in the world isn't going to change it.

    As always, Iwog's solution is as simple as Obama's: Agree with me without compromise because my opinion is correct therefore you must be stupid.

  3. Call it Crazy


    Follow
    Befriend
    856 threads
    10,896 comments

    37   7:54pm Tue 4 Dec 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Seymour says

    As always, Iwog's solution is as simple as Obama's: Agree with me without compromise because my opinion is correct therefore you must be stupid.

    Wow, with only 14 comments, you already figured Iwog out!!!

  4. iwog


    Follow
    Befriend (46)
    386 threads
    20,327 comments
    47 male
    Lafayette, CA
    Premium

    38   8:12pm Tue 4 Dec 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Seymour says

    Obama says "I want X and I'm not willing to compromise on it"

    Absolutely correct. Obama refuses to compromise on tax increases just like Republicans pretend to refuse to compromise on spending cuts. That is how you start negotiations towards compromise, by giving each side something they want.

    Unfortunately while Democrats have said repeatedly they will accept spending cuts, Republicans have signed a sworn oath to refuse Democrats tax increases. Furthermore while Democrats have made VERY specific demands on tax increases, no one has any fucking clue what Republicans want. Simpson-Bowles is the wrong answer since it directly contradicts the sworn Grover pledge.

    So I consider any equity argument to be a gross misrepresentation.

    Seymour says

    As always, Iwog's solution is as simple as Obama's: Agree with me without compromise because my opinion is correct therefore you must be stupid.

    Disagree with me all you want, just support it.

  5. Homeboy


    Follow
    Befriend
    39 threads
    3,546 comments

    39   12:29am Wed 5 Dec 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike  

    iwog says

    What the fuck is wrong with you that you can't even quote Obama or provide context? Forgive me if I don't trust your recollection as anything more than fog-shrouded Newscorp memory implants.

    And he paid for a Mars vacation.

  6. kochevnik


    Follow
    Befriend
    2 threads
    35 comments

    40   6:39am Wed 5 Dec 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    The math is pretty simple : the Federal Govt ALONE spends 50% more than it takes in taxes each year. That run rate means the total debt will be well over 20 trillion by the time Hoover2 - whoops, I mean Obama - leaves office. That is far past fixable. And the state budgets in many cases are worse. And putting in a Red colored retard instead of a Blue one in the top post will fix nada.

    Arguing about the 'fical cliff' and who is or was responsible is like children arguing about candy as the house is burning down all around them.

    I come to this blog and see the same crackheads who were pumping up the housing bubble and the tech bubble and all the other bubbles spouting their delusions once again. It is beyond disheartening to see how little people learn from their prior mistakes - but amazingly predictable.

    In a twisted sort of way I have to thank them - they've kept this whole bizarre thing on the rails long enough for my family to save a lot of cash to spend to prepare for the disaster that is barreling down on us all. It is nice to have the extra time, and it is entertaining in an odd way to watch people make the same mistakes over and over again and refuse to understand or acknowledge them - kind of like one of those horror movies where the girl in the skimpy T-short goes searching thru the 'haunted' house crying out for her missing friends - you know exactly what's coming next, but you just can't stop yourself from watching it all unfold.

    If you're a member of the Remnant (as defined by Charles Hugh Smith), if you've read the Fourth Turning and acknowledge the 80 year Crisis cycle ( 1780 Rev War - 1860 Civ War - 1940 WW2 - 2020 The Next Big War ) don't get discouraged, you have a lot of work to do if you want those you love to live.

    For the rest, well maybe I will save some posts from the regulars here on this blog to read to my children as examples of just how insane your regular, 'positive-thinking' American was as his entire nation was right on the verge of total collapse.

    Red-Blue. Now THAT is some funny shit right there.

  7. APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch


    Follow
    Befriend (27)
    408 threads
    11,510 comments

    41   6:49am Wed 5 Dec 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike  

    K,

    I'm ready. The wife is ready. The kids just finished pitchfork combat training. They can eat week-old human carrion and can keep it down. We're ready for horrors that would make Charles Manson's head explode.

    Cannibal anarchy!

    Boo-yah!

  8. marcus


    Follow
    Befriend (5)
    202 threads
    7,467 comments

    42   7:02am Wed 5 Dec 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Seymour says

    my opinion is correct therefore you must be stupid

    Is it possible this is true ?

    In fairness, Iwog usually makes compelling arguments most of which are ignored or at least not responded to. He doesn't say you're stupid, he just usually says something like, "why do you run from the truth (not answering the good questions).

  9. CaptainShuddup


    Follow
    Befriend (1)
    903 threads
    11,605 comments

    43   7:11am Wed 5 Dec 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike (1)  

    marcus says

    He doesn't say you're stupid, he just usually says something like, "why do you run from the truth (not answering the good questions).

    Well sorta, it's more like...
    Re why I think there should be anti Oil speculation laws.
    "So you're willing to go to the rabbit farm and pick up each bunny rabbit by its soft tender ears and pull out a 38 and blow their brains out, aren't you?
    Then that wont be enough for you, you sick fuck you'll then skin those rabbits and copulate with each bloody carcass, wont you?
    Why don't you answer my questions? "

  10. marcus


    Follow
    Befriend (5)
    202 threads
    7,467 comments

    44   7:11am Wed 5 Dec 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    CaptainShuddup says

    Obama's answers to everything Romney said was... "Oh My God! Meee Toooo!"

    hahaha. Wow. Yes. funny stuff.

    This was the most true in the one on foriegn policy where everything Mitt said he wanted to do, Obama said "gosh me too ! Your ideas are so good that I'm going to time travel and implement your ideas in the past."

    As for everything else, everyone has observed Romneys stunning move to the middle in the debates (yes the first one threw Obama, because even he couldn't believe how much of a liar Romney is, and how far he had changed from what he was saying only days earlier).

    "What, me lower tax rates ? What are you talking about?"

    You are funny CAptain. I'll give you that.

  11. thunderlips11


    Follow
    Befriend (13)
    241 threads
    4,955 comments
    Premium

    45   11:55am Wed 5 Dec 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Where was the Debt Ceiling Debate during the Bush Administration when the Republicans controlled both houses and the Presidency?

  12. iwog


    Follow
    Befriend (46)
    386 threads
    20,327 comments
    47 male
    Lafayette, CA
    Premium

    46   1:15pm Wed 5 Dec 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike (1)  

    thunderlips11 says

    Where was the Debt Ceiling Debate during the Bush Administration when the Republicans controlled both houses and the Presidency?

    There has never been a debt ceiling 'debate' before Obama because it takes a special kind of moron to oppose paying for things you have already voted to spend money on.

    This is extortion in its purest form. This is naked slash and burn. No Republican on earth can defend it because it defies explanation.

    1. Boehner votes yes on Medicare D.
    2. Boehner votes yes to authorize war with Iraq.
    3. Boehner votes yes to lowering taxes during a time of war.
    4. Boehner decides he's going to block the United States from paying for his yes votes.

    How in hell can anyone vote for a Republican candidate??? What drives someone to voluntary carve out sections of his or her brain and join the foxbot zombie apocalypse???

  13. iwog


    Follow
    Befriend (46)
    386 threads
    20,327 comments
    47 male
    Lafayette, CA
    Premium

    47   7:03am Thu 6 Dec 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike (1)  

    Melmakian says

    Which YOU have previously expressed not having any problem with. Does the phrase 'Go ahead! Let them kill the hostage' ring a bell, duck?

    Letting the tax cuts expire and automatic spending cuts take place will be annoying but we'll get through it.

    You can't "get through" defaulting on debt payments. Apples and oranges.

    Melmakian says

    Uh, because we don't want to pay for any of that shit, either? DUH!

    So you're in the camp who thinks it's okay to go on a spending spree, then throw away the credit card statements when they show up in the mail.

  14. Entitlemented


    Follow
    Befriend
    20 threads
    564 comments
    Goleta, CA

    48   7:23am Thu 6 Dec 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Why do tax rates expire anyhow? Should not in a Republic with Virtue, should not taxes expire, and tax rates remain constant?

  15. iwog


    Follow
    Befriend (46)
    386 threads
    20,327 comments
    47 male
    Lafayette, CA
    Premium

    49   7:28am Thu 6 Dec 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike (1)  

    Entitlemented says

    Why do tax rates expire anyhow? Should not in a Republic with Virtue, should not taxes expire, and tax rates remain constant?

    This was an invention from the ever toxic Republican party. You're correct that Reagan's tax increases never expired, Clinton's tax increases never expired, etc.

    Our modern clown show decided to include an expiration into the new tax law so they could have something to run on. They wrongly assumed that they would be on the winning side of any future debate over lower taxes, so THEY CREATED the fiscal cliff to fuck with us.

    Obama gave in and extended the deadline by 2 years, but he's not going to do it again. Public opinion has since turned against Republicans and all polls show them taking damage from the fight.

  16. bdrasin


    Follow
    Befriend
    7 threads
    561 comments
    Alameda, CA

    50   7:32am Thu 6 Dec 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Entitlemented says

    Why do tax rates expire anyhow? Should not in a Republic with Virtue, should not taxes expire, and tax rates remain constant?

    Basically its because the Republicans had to put in a sunset provision so they could pass it using reconciliation (i.e. so the Democrats couldn't stop them with a filibuster). See:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunset_provision#Budget_Act_and_the_Byrd_Rule

    Many on the Republican side see this as a feature rather than a bug because it meant that they can play the same irresponsible hostage-taking game every few years.

  17. Seymour


    Follow
    Befriend
    19 comments

    51   6:42pm Thu 6 Dec 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    iwog says

    Unfortunately while Democrats have said repeatedly they will accept spending cuts, Republicans have signed a sworn oath to refuse Democrats tax increases. Furthermore while Democrats have made VERY specific demands on tax increases, no one has any fucking clue what Republicans want. Simpson-Bowles is the wrong answer since it directly contradicts the sworn Grover pledge.

    Simpson-Bowles is the right answer. Compromise is the right answer. You seem to believe that Grover has more power than the president. If so, the polarization will simply continue and we'll drop off the fiscal cliff. Look at the bright side; our credit rating may actually be restored as we defer the next debt ceiling debate.

    marcus says

    Seymour says

    my opinion is correct therefore you must be stupid
    Is it possible this is true ?

    It's likely that my IQ isn't a match for Iwog's brilliance.... and he'll confirm that in every one of his posts on patnet. It's that same smug, pompus attitude of Obama that puts half the country into a defensive stance. Why does he do it? Because when HE attempts to compromise, the other half of the country spits bullets because he won and shouldn't be giving in on THEIR precious principles. POTUS should be the clear, unifying leader of the country and should initiate the compromise. Mr Obama, by Iwog's admission, is simply digging in his heels and stating "My way or we're fallin' off the highway".

    Cheers.

  18. iwog


    Follow
    Befriend (46)
    386 threads
    20,327 comments
    47 male
    Lafayette, CA
    Premium

    52   8:16pm Thu 6 Dec 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike (1)  

    Seymour says

    Simpson-Bowles is the right answer. Compromise is the right answer. You seem to believe that Grover has more power than the president. If so, the polarization will simply continue and we'll drop off the fiscal cliff. Look at the bright side; our credit rating may actually be restored as we defer the next debt ceiling debate.

    Republicans have about as much chance of passing Simpson-Bowles as a toad has of landing the space shuttle. Can I see Democrats going for it? Probably not but at least they would accept it as a starting point for some give and take. Republicans ARE NOT a legitimate political party with a legitimate ideology. They are a total fraud, a cult, and anyone who votes for them is very very confused.

    Republicans are the party that tried to impeach a president for lying about a blow job when 2/3rds of the country was strongly against it. Republicans are the party who attempted to kidnap Elian Gonzales from his father after his mother died. Republicans are the party that tried to issue a congressional subpoena to a brain-dead woman in Florida. Republicans are the party of filibustering their own bills and their own amendments.

    I'm not talking about radicals within the party, I'm talking about the WHOLE FUCKING PARTY!!

    There is no polarization and there is no ideological debate. There is a legitimate government in the Democrats with all their flaws and shortcomings and then there is a hostile toxic political cancer pretending to represent America but in reality slashing and burning our institutions at every opportunity.

  19. iwog


    Follow
    Befriend (46)
    386 threads
    20,327 comments
    47 male
    Lafayette, CA
    Premium

    53   8:17pm Thu 6 Dec 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike (1)  

    Seymour says

    Mr Obama, by Iwog's admission, is simply digging in his heels and stating "My way or we're fallin' off the highway".

    Why are you lying about what I wrote? I defy you to post an actual quote of mine that is even remotely what you paraphrased.

  20. marcus


    Follow
    Befriend (5)
    202 threads
    7,467 comments

    54   8:31pm Thu 6 Dec 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike (1)  

    Seymour says

    Because when HE attempts to compromise, the other half of the country spits bullets because he won and shouldn't be giving in on THEIR precious principles. POTUS should be the clear, unifying leader of the country and should initiate the compromise. Mr Obama, by Iwog's admission, is simply digging in his heels and stating "My way or we're fallin' off the highway".

    I don't really understand what you're saying here.

    But I'll tell you this. In my view, Obama is actually quite conservative (and if you like I'd be happy to list some respected republicans (yes they're RINOs in this crazy wacked out insane right wing world now - but just a few years ago they were respected republicans) that agree with this. Hell, even Geogre Bush senior says (I'm paraphrasing), "Who the fuck is Grover Norquist anyway?"

    Obama is a very centrist pragmatic guy. He's not digging his heels in on some extremist left wing agenda.

    In 2010, at this time he TOTALLY CAVED and extended the Bush tax cuts on everyone. This time he campaigned on the EXTREMELY MODEST
    CENTRIST PROPOSAL, that only the top rates go back up. That is, only on those rates would the Bush tax cuts that republicans said were temporary go back up.

    It's insane that they shouldn't.

    So yeah. OBama is digging in, if that's what you call his center right position when he insists that he won't cave this time to the extremist right wing insane pro-plutocrat agenda.

  21. APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch


    Follow
    Befriend (27)
    408 threads
    11,510 comments

    55   8:34pm Thu 6 Dec 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (2)   Dislike  

    Obama would make Nixon look like St Francis and Ike like a flower child. In fact, he is a fucking war criminal on the same level as W. And he is riding shotgun for Wall Street. If he's progress, Jeffrey Dahmer should have a cooking show.

  22. tatupu70


    Follow
    Befriend (3)
    23 threads
    8,201 comments

    56   4:14am Fri 7 Dec 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Seymour says

    Mr Obama, by Iwog's admission, is simply digging in his heels and stating "My way or we're fallin' off the highway".

    Actually, Mr. Obama is saying the one thing we need is to raise the top tax rate on filers above $250K. Everything else is negotiable. That doesn't really sound like digging in ones heels to me.

  23. tatupu70


    Follow
    Befriend (3)
    23 threads
    8,201 comments

    57   7:17am Fri 7 Dec 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Melmakian says

    Once again, you won't get shit for revenues from the tax increases on the 'rich' relative to the spending that needs to be paid for.

    Once again you entirely miss the point. Raising taxes on the rich is NOT solely to reduce the deficit. It is primarily to reduce the income and wealth disparity. If you fix that disparity, you go a long way towards fixing the economy, and if you fix the economy, you go a long way to fixing the deficit.

  24. CaptainShuddup


    Follow
    Befriend (1)
    903 threads
    11,605 comments

    58   7:20am Fri 7 Dec 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike (1)  

    iwog says

    How in hell can anyone vote for a Republican candidate???

    It's like Jazz Iwog.

    You don't get to get Jazz, until you GET Jazz.

  25. AverageBear


    Follow
    Befriend (2)
    28 threads
    639 comments
    Boston, MA

    59   9:36am Fri 7 Dec 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike (1)  

    iwog says

    The hostage being America of course. This time it's the debt ceiling. Obama has proposed taking the debt ceiling out of the hands of congress and allowing the president to unilaterally raise it.

    ------------------------------------------------
    What you really mean is Obama wants to shred the Constitution. Doesn't Congress decide on budgets? I'll admit I'm woefully not up to speed on the topic of the Constitution, but IIRC, the president can't " take the debt ceiling out of the hands of congress"

    iwog says

    They intend to hold the debt ceiling hostage along with the fiscal cliff and are demanding unspecified (yes we don't know what Republican demands are yet) concessions in order to pay for bills that most of these same Republicans voted for.

    -------------------------------------------------------
    Yes, it's called 'balance of power'.... I thought Obama was a 'uniter' anyway? I thought he'd "work w/ those on the other side of the isle" for a solution", and not telling them 'how it's gonna be'.....This is a trait Clinton had, that Obama sorely lacks.

    BTW, IWOG, if Obama's $1.6 Trillion in tax hikes were the panacea of our economy and the ultimate fix for avoiding the cliff, how come Harry Ried squashed a vote, when it was presented as a separate bill? Hmmmm? You'd think all Democrats would back the president on this. But the cold reality for liberals is that this is far from the truth.....

    http://michellemalkin.com/2012/12/06/jay-carney-democrats-obamas-proposal/

    ...."On Thursday, Jay Carney said he wasn’t sure how many Democrats would support President Obama’s “$1.6 trillion in tax increases, no debt limit and new stimulus spending” plan that is somehow supposed to reduce the deficit — and Harry Reid has taken it upon himself to make sure nobody ever does find out. Mitch McConnell tried to bring the Obama plan to a vote in the Senate either as an amendment or a stand-alone bill and Harry Reid swatted it down so fast you’d think McConnell had proposed a ban on cowboy poetry.

    At a press conference, Jay Carney was asked about Reid’s aversion to allowing a vote on Obama’s proposal:

    Reporters: Why is he afraid to put the President’s plan on the floor. Do you think you have democratic support?

    Carney: We know that, and the filibuster is certainly an issue here, that we don’t have 60 votes in the Senate. So, I would not argue with the idea that the President’s proposal cannot at this time, or has not at this time, garnered Republican support. That’s what this debate is about. ".......

  26. iwog


    Follow
    Befriend (46)
    386 threads
    20,327 comments
    47 male
    Lafayette, CA
    Premium

    60   9:42am Fri 7 Dec 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike (1)  

    AverageBear says

    What you really mean is Obama wants to shred the Constitution. Doesn't Congress decide on budgets?

    The debt ceiling has nothing to do with budgets. The debt ceiling is entirely an executive function. Congress has spent the money, therefore the executive must find ways to pay for it.

    AverageBear says

    Yes, it's called 'balance of power'.

    Hardly. It's called Republicans passing legislation and spending money then deciding they don't like the cost so they rip up the credit card statement. I'm not exaggerating, this is EXACTLY what they are doing.

    AverageBear says

    BTW, IWOG, if Obama's $1.6 Trillion in tax hikes were the panacea of our economy and the ultimate fix for avoiding the cliff, how come Harry Ried squashed a vote, when it was presented as a separate bill? Hmmmm? You'd think all Democrats would back the president on this. But the cold reality for liberals is that this is far from the truth.....

    It's called politics. Harry Reid doesn't want to waste time attempting to vote on an issue that Republicans have already sworn to block at any cost. Why is this complicated????

  27. tatupu70


    Follow
    Befriend (3)
    23 threads
    8,201 comments

    61   9:43am Fri 7 Dec 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    AverageBear says

    What you really mean is Obama wants to shred the Constitution. Doesn't Congress decide on budgets? I'll admit I'm woefully not up to speed on the topic of the Constitution, but IIRC, the president can't " take the debt ceiling out of the hands of congress"

    The Constitution doesn't ever mention a debt ceiling so that argument is pretty ridiculous. Congress still sets the budget whether there is a debt ceiling or not. If they want to reduce spending and shrink the deficit, they should pass a budget that does so. The debt ceiling is completely irrelevant.

  28. Bellingham Bill


    Follow
    Befriend
    77 threads
    3,207 comments
    Bellingham, WA

    62   9:52am Fri 7 Dec 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    AverageBear says

    Doesn't Congress decide on budgets? I'll admit I'm woefully not up to speed on the topic of the Constitution, but IIRC, the president can't " take the debt ceiling out of the hands of congress"

    Congress has the constitutional power to tax monies into the treasury, yes.

    Congress has the constitutional power to direct the executive to spend out of the treasury, yes.

    Congress has the constitutional power to borrow money:

    Article I, Section 8: "To borrow money on the credit of the United States"

    So in our Constitutional system, Congress gets to tell Obama how they want their conflicting directives worked out.

    This is a trait Clinton had, that Obama sorely lacks.

    Complete bullshit. Clinton never had to deal with: “The single most important thing we want to achieve is for President Obama to be a one-term president.”

    http://americablog.com/2010/10/mcconnell-says-top-priority-for-gop-congress-is-to-make-obama-a-one-term-president.html

    Single. Most. Important. Thing.

    It's all bullshit, all the way down. This country is going to tear itself apart on this.

    Good going, Republicans! Thanks for destroying my country, 1995-2005.

    http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/graph/?g=dzq

    blue is annual consumer debt take-on, red is the trade deficit

  29. Bellingham Bill


    Follow
    Befriend
    77 threads
    3,207 comments
    Bellingham, WA

    63   9:55am Fri 7 Dec 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    tatupu70 says

    The debt ceiling is completely irrelevant.

    No, the executive has no authority to borrow money. That's Congress' power.

    The Debt Ceiling is just a formalized, more convenient way of authorizing borrowing (before, each individual issue had to be authorized).

    People don't understand that the seat of power is Boehner's, not Obama's now. This has allowed the Republican snakes in Congress to sabotage everything 2009-now and the electorate not really pick up on what's going down.

  30. Bellingham Bill


    Follow
    Befriend
    77 threads
    3,207 comments
    Bellingham, WA

    64   10:02am Fri 7 Dec 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    iwog says

    Congress has spent the money, therefore the executive must find ways to pay for it.

    no. I don't want the Executive going off into new weeds on this. We need to cut the bullshit here and let the House figure out what it wants to do with this nation.

    AverageBear says

    Yes, it's called 'balance of power'

    The term of constitutional art you're looking for here is actually "checks and balances".

    The current "balance of power" is just an artifact of recent Republican gerrymandering at the state level.

    And given the current Congress has an approval rating somewhere around dogshit on the sidewalk, I don't see much power with Boehner or McConnell now.

  31. Seymour


    Follow
    Befriend
    19 comments

    65   10:25am Fri 7 Dec 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    iwog says

    Seymour says

    Mr Obama, by Iwog's admission, is simply digging in his heels and stating "My way or we're fallin' off the highway".

    Why are you lying about what I wrote? I defy you to post an actual quote of mine that is even remotely what you paraphrased.

    Here's what you wrote. I am not lying but I may be misinterpreting your words. They seem pretty clear to me:

    •On 4 Dec 2012 in Republicans point second gun towards the hostage, iwog said:

    Absolutely correct. Obama refuses to compromise on tax increases just like Republicans pretend to refuse to compromise on spending cuts.

  32. Seymour


    Follow
    Befriend
    19 comments

    66   1:26pm Sat 8 Dec 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    iwog says

    Republicans have about as much chance of passing Simpson-Bowles as a toad has of landing the space shuttle. Can I see Democrats going for it? Probably not but at least they would accept it as a starting point for some give and take.

    The Democrats have had many chances to use Simpson-Bowles as a starting point but refuse to do so. Mr. Obama, who initiated the bipartisan initiative, has ignored the recommendations and instead insists on driving his agenda. Rather than showing leadership and driving to a compromise that would be good for the country, he insists on clinging to his pre-election promise. It's no different than the Republican's tax pledge except he will not be up for re-election.

    You're being disingenuous.

  33. Bellingham Bill


    Follow
    Befriend
    77 threads
    3,207 comments
    Bellingham, WA

    67   1:30pm Sat 8 Dec 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Seymour says

    has ignored the recommendations and instead insists on driving his agenda.

    of course! The Commission failed to reach an agreement, and Simpson (an idiot) and Bowles (another idiot) put their idiot plan forward instead.

    And heaven forfend the Democrats stop driving their "agenda".

    Seymour says

    Rather than showing leadership and driving to a compromise that would be good for the country

    oh, bullshit. "Compromise" with stupidity is still stupidity.

    This nation needs to do what is right. Raise taxes a lot. The Democratic plan is a step in the right direction. The Republican thing -- Ryan Plan, whatever Boehner wants to do, is not.

    This is not to say the Democrats have a solid plan for retrieving the situation. They do not.

  34. iwog


    Follow
    Befriend (46)
    386 threads
    20,327 comments
    47 male
    Lafayette, CA
    Premium

    68   1:34pm Sat 8 Dec 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike (1)  

    Seymour says

    The Democrats have had many chances to use Simpson-Bowles as a starting point but refuse to do so. Mr. Obama, who initiated the bipartisan initiative, has ignored the recommendations and instead insists on driving his agenda. Rather than showing leadership and driving to a compromise that would be good for the country, he insists on clinging to his pre-election promise. It's no different than the Republican's tax pledge except he will not be up for re-election.

    You're being disingenuous.

    Seriously what does it take to convince you Foxbots which side is being unreasonable when a signed sworn oath isn't enough? What the hell is wrong with you?

    It's not the fucking job of Democrats to propose spending cuts. It's the job of Democrats to propose tax increases and spending increases and have the Republicans counter with what they want in return so Democrats can shoot it down or accept it.

    Instead of putting something on the table, Republicans have repeatedly KILLED all negotiation by drawing a line in the sand that effectively states: Balance the budget with 100% spending cuts and 0% tax increases. Democrats have no such line in the sand and in fact have proposed several budget cuts of their own.

  35. iwog


    Follow
    Befriend (46)
    386 threads
    20,327 comments
    47 male
    Lafayette, CA
    Premium

    69   1:37pm Sat 8 Dec 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Seymour says

    Absolutely correct. Obama refuses to compromise on tax increases just like Republicans pretend to refuse to compromise on spending cuts.

    Is not the same as:

    Seymour says

    Mr Obama, by Iwog's admission, is simply digging in his heels and stating "My way or we're fallin' off the highway".

    Obama will accept nothing less than tax increases on the richest Americans. He will ALSO accept spending cuts.

    Republicans will accept nothing less than pretending to want budget cuts. They will ALSO accept not a god damned thing the Democrats want.

    I am not being disingenuous in any way. This is reality. Come join it sometime.

  36. zzyzzx


    Follow
    Befriend (10)
    825 threads
    7,061 comments
    Baltimore, MD

    70   6:54am Mon 10 Dec 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (3)   Dislike (2)  

  37. tatupu70


    Follow
    Befriend (3)
    23 threads
    8,201 comments

    71   12:51pm Mon 10 Dec 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Melmakian says

    You just contradicted your own bullshit. First, you say it is not the job of the Dems to propose budget cuts and now you say that they have done just that.

    That's not a contradiction. It's entirely possible for Dems to do something that's not "their job".

  38. zzyzzx


    Follow
    Befriend (10)
    825 threads
    7,061 comments
    Baltimore, MD

    72   4:55pm Mon 10 Dec 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    thunderlips11 says

    Where was the Debt Ceiling Debate during the Bush Administration when the Republicans controlled both houses and the Presidency?

    It was less of an issue then because Bush didn't spend money like the proverbial drunken sailor, at least when compared to Obama. Emphasis on the comparison part.

  39. iwog


    Follow
    Befriend (46)
    386 threads
    20,327 comments
    47 male
    Lafayette, CA
    Premium

    73   5:16pm Mon 10 Dec 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    zzyzzx says

    It was less of an issue then because Bush didn't spend money like the proverbial drunken sailor, at least when compared to Obama. Emphasis on the comparison part.

    You are dead wrong in every tiny way possible. Your understanding is corrupt and bloody ignorant. Every iota of data is at your fingertips to prove this statement false. I could prove it beyond any shred of doubt and lead you to all the relevant numbers.

    What's the point? You'll continue to believe the lie no matter what. You're in the cult ad you're not leaving. Facts don't matter to you. Reality is simply whatever the internet dictates to you.

    BTW MarketWatch, the source of this graph, comes from the Wall Street Journal which is owned by Newscorp. You have gotten SO radical that you're even telling Fox they are biased to the left now.

    You are utterly lost.

  40. Bellingham Bill


    Follow
    Befriend
    77 threads
    3,207 comments
    Bellingham, WA

    74   5:58pm Mon 10 Dec 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/graph/?g=dGu

    Blue line is federal expenditure.

    Red line is federal expenditure less medicare/medicaid.

    FLAT after the 2009 stimulus.

    NOT FLAT during the Bush spending spree.

« First     « Previous comments    

Premium member iwog is moderator of this thread.

Email

Username

Watch comments by email
Home   Tips and Tricks   Questions or suggestions? Mail p@patrick.net   Thank you for your kind donations

Page took 186 milliseconds to create.