Brazil Travel Buddy. What to do. Where to go. What to see. (Advertisement)

For the Married Guys (And the Guys Who Have Been Married)


By BayArea   Follow   Fri, 28 Dec 2012, 10:55am   20,518 views   590 comments
In Oakland CA 94618   Watch (4)   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (2)   Dislike  

Hi guys,

As the old adage states, "Can't live with them, can't live without them."

For the guys that are married now or have been married, I'm wondering what your experience has been and if you could give a newly engaged man (hypothetical to me since I am not engaged) any piece of advise or wisdom, what would it be?

I love my GF, but for a few minutes I'm going to zoom out and look at things from a more technical, statistical, and less emotional point of view.

To be honest, I am a bit discouraged at just how many people I know who don't seem to be too happy in their marriages. It always seems to be the same story. Things started off great. There was excitement, adventure, strong physical and emotional chemistry. Then 2-3yrs into it, those feels started to fade. Some couples moved on to the next phase of their lives and had some glue, er I mean kids which kept things fresh and exciting.

I saw a plot in the newspaper several years back that showed divorce statistics as a function of time. There is a spike early on in the marriage (first couple of years), then one at 7 years (7-year itch), and one at about year 18-20 (when the glue is all grown up). If you make it past that, you are fairly safe (not necessarily happy, but likelihood of divorce is low). Some of that is influenced by the fact that you don't have the same options at 45 or 50 as you do at 25 or 30. Sucks, but that's the truth.

I recall reading a book by psycologist Scott Peck that studied the term "Love." He argues that 100% of relationships fall out of love, usually pretty early on in the first few years. The feeling of love is not true love then. The conscious decision to love someone once you lose the "in love" feeling is what real love is all about.

Regarding statistics, 50% of couples who get married in this country wind up in divorce (To be fair, some of those aren't 1st marriages so that 50% number isn't quite as bad as it seems - The reason is that 2nd marriages have a higher divorce rate than 1st marriages and 3rd marriages have a higher divorce rate than 2nd marriages). Moving on, if 50% of couples get divorced, then 50% of couples don't get divorced. Surely those 50% that remain together aren't all happy marriages? So then let's say that half of the marriages that stay together are happy. That means that 25% of couples getting married in the first place remain happy, lol. I really don't like the odds here!

But anytime you get into this debate, you have to get into the alternative, being alone into older age. As much as I see my folks fight and bicker, I tend to think it's better than the alternative (at least for the level they fight and bicker).

A while back Patrick argued that the average person remains in their purchased home for no more than 6-7 years. He said, you might think you are different, but statistically you are not. Same thing goes for divorce. Nobody goes into marriage thinking they will get a divorce. But statistically, 1 in 2 people do in the USA.

What do you guys think?

As a side note, I am really curious about the following. What is the divorce rate assuming the following:

Both Members are devout Catholic ?
Both Members are devout Christian ?
Both Members are devout Muslim ?
Both Members are Atheist ?
Members don't share religious beliefs ?

« First     « Previous     Viewing Comments 511-550 of 590     Next »     Last »     See most liked comments

  1. Wiseman


    Follow
    Befriend
    7 comments
    Wiseman's website

    511   7:22am Thu 7 Feb 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike  

    I got lucky. Second wife made up for all the pain of the first. Beautiful old school and brilliant. Did not want kids. For me she is perfect. And she is Canadian.
    First thing you must remember, You will never be her first priority. Her children are (or will be)

    /Users/bob/Desktop/Tiffany.jpg

  2. merlino


    Follow
    Befriend
    5 threads
    8 comments
    Sausalito, CA

    512   9:48am Thu 7 Feb 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    You guys must have been burned real bad!
    I may be an exemption but I have been happily married to an american woman for 15 years and we met when we were 14 years old. We have two young kids and we still have date nights and we try to dress nice and have the butterflies. What else can one asked? Also, with tax season I realized how big interests and taxes deductions can be. Buying a new house has been the best move ever. it costs me 3000$ a month in a house that would cost easily 4500$ to rent. No brainer...

  3. zzyzzx


    Follow
    Befriend (10)
    679 threads
    5,961 comments
    Baltimore, MD

    513   9:57am Thu 7 Feb 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike  

    Peter P says

    If you don't like women in the US just head North. There is much to like aboot ladies in Canada.

    This comment is useless without pics.

  4. zzyzzx


    Follow
    Befriend (10)
    679 threads
    5,961 comments
    Baltimore, MD

    514   10:05am Thu 7 Feb 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Wiseman says

    You will never be her first priority. Her children are (or will be)

    Already pretty high on my long list of reasons not to have kids, but thanks for the reminder!

  5. FortWayne


    Follow
    Befriend (13)
    135 threads
    4,937 comments

    515   10:23am Thu 7 Feb 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike (1)  

    Wiseman says

    I got lucky. Second wife made up for all the pain of the first. Beautiful old school and brilliant. Did not want kids. For me she is perfect. And she is Canadian.

    First thing you must remember, You will never be her first priority. Her children are (or will be)

    You conflate adult priorities w/ childs needs.

    If you let a child be raised by television set don't be surprised if they join a gang, do drugs, or turn homosexual. Children should receive priority and guidance, but you should still make time for your relationship with your wife, just as she should make time for you.

  6. Call it Crazy


    Follow
    Befriend
    615 threads
    7,118 comments

    516   10:26am Thu 7 Feb 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    zzyzzx says

    Wiseman says

    You will never be her first priority. Her children are (or will be)

    Already pretty high on my long list of reasons not to have kids, but thanks for the reminder!

    Hey, one plus with kids is, she can go bitch at THEM instead of bitching at YOU!!

  7. epitaph


    Follow
    Befriend (3)
    12 threads
    324 comments

    517   10:43am Thu 7 Feb 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    FortWayne says

    or turn homosexual.

    Not sure if that was a joke or you are being serious.

  8. iwog


    Follow
    Befriend (48)
    318 threads
    17,033 comments
    47 male
    Lafayette, CA
    Premium

    518   5:27pm Sat 9 Feb 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (2)   Dislike   Protected  

    merlino says

    You guys must have been burned real bad!

    I may be an exemption but I have been happily married to an american woman for 15 years and we met when we were 14 years old. We have two young kids and we still have date nights and we try to dress nice and have the butterflies. What else can one asked? Also, with tax season I realized how big interests and taxes deductions can be. Buying a new house has been the best move ever. it costs me 3000$ a month in a house that would cost easily 4500$ to rent. No brainer...

    Being burned isn't the issue. It's all about playing the odds.

    There are good women in the United States who would certainly make excellent wives, however it's a numbers game. Do you want to marry into a culture where your odds of being happy are 40% or 80%?

  9. New Renter


    Follow
    Befriend (3)
    28 threads
    5,019 comments
    San Jose, CA

    519   8:17pm Sat 9 Feb 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    iwog says

    Mick Russom says

    The greedy stuff you do, like live off the ill gotten rentier income scammed off the working class, is the reason you dont like American woman. The credit card using greedy selfish types.

    The mirror is tough to be married to.

    Naw, not really. I married a gem. It's the men and women who come into my office that give me insight.

    I'll even concede that perhaps 40% of American chicks have potential to be good mates. However those odds suck in my opinion so I'm going to act accordingly.

    As for you, I suggest you let go of some of your hate before it wrecks you.

    As did I. We were together for the better part of a decade before we were married. We went through a lot of good time, bad times, and poor times. I think THAT is the best insurance one can take to making sure you are marrying one of the good ones.

    Not sure about Iwog's statistics, but he does have a good point given >50% of marriages end in divorce now.

    50% percent of first marriages, 67% of second and 74% of third marriages end in divorce, according to Jennifer Baker of the Forest Institute of Professional Psychology in Springfield, Missouri.

    According to enrichment journal on the divorce rate in America:

    The divorce rate in America for first marriage is 41%
    The divorce rate in America for second marriage is 60%
    The divorce rate in America for third marriage is 73%

    http://www.divorcerate.org/

  10. MsBennet


    Follow
    Befriend
    5 threads
    298 comments

    520   8:22pm Sat 9 Feb 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    zzyzzx says

    Wiseman says

    You will never be her first priority. Her children are (or will be)ome

    Already pretty high on my long list of reasons not to have kids, but thanks for the reminder!

    When a boy becomes and man, he leaves childish things behind. After all, it's only for 18 years and you are bringing up and nuturing another human being into this world, so you can put some of your needs aside and not be the center of your universe for that amount of time at least.

  11. Oxygen


    Follow
    Befriend
    15 threads
    213 comments
    Brooklyn, NY

    521   8:31pm Sat 9 Feb 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Wiseman says

    /Users/bob/Desktop/Tiffany.jpg

    lol

  12. New Renter


    Follow
    Befriend (3)
    28 threads
    5,019 comments
    San Jose, CA

    522   8:47pm Sat 9 Feb 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    MsBennet says

    zzyzzx says

    Wiseman says

    You will never be her first priority. Her children are (or will be)ome

    Already pretty high on my long list of reasons not to have kids, but thanks for the reminder!

    When a boy becomes and man, he leaves childish things behind. After all, it's only for 18 years and you are bringing up and nuturing another human being into this world, so you can put some of your needs aside and not be the center of your universe for that amount of time at least.

    I take it you are not familiar with the boomerangs?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boomerang_Generation

  13. iwog


    Follow
    Befriend (48)
    318 threads
    17,033 comments
    47 male
    Lafayette, CA
    Premium

    523   9:22pm Sat 9 Feb 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (4)   Dislike   Protected  

    MsBennet says

    When a boy becomes and man, he leaves childish things behind. After all, it's only for 18 years and you are bringing up and nuturing another human being into this world, so you can put some of your needs aside and not be the center of your universe for that amount of time at least.

    Unless you're a woman. Then you can have an abortion, adopt out, or simply abandon a child at a police or fire station anonymously. Women have unlimited ways of simply walking away from their 18-year responsibility. All legal.

    Men have no rights whatsoever and at the moment of conception they lose their rights to self-determination. American society (and much of the western world) is extremely hostile to men.

  14. New Renter


    Follow
    Befriend (3)
    28 threads
    5,019 comments
    San Jose, CA

    524   9:44pm Sat 9 Feb 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike  

    iwog says

    American society (and much of the western world) is extremely hostile to men.

    With the rest of the world even more hostile to women...

  15. lostand confused


    Follow
    Befriend (9)
    328 threads
    2,452 comments

    525   9:46pm Sat 9 Feb 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    New Renter says

    iwog says



    American society (and much of the western world) is extremely hostile to men.


    With the rest of the world even more hostile to women...

    Two wrongs don't make a right .

  16. lostand confused


    Follow
    Befriend (9)
    328 threads
    2,452 comments

    526   9:48pm Sat 9 Feb 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    MsBennet says

    When a boy becomes and man, he leaves childish things behind. After all, it's
    only for 18 years and you are bringing up and nuturing another human being into
    this world, so you can put some of your needs aside and not be the center of
    your universe for that amount of time at least.

    Same for a woman. When a girl turns 18, she becomes a woman- an equal person who is responsible for herself and her decisions. Not rely on a man to take care of her for life-that is a husband, not a daddy. The laws need to change to reflect the current reality of equality.

  17. iwog


    Follow
    Befriend (48)
    318 threads
    17,033 comments
    47 male
    Lafayette, CA
    Premium

    527   6:04am Sun 10 Feb 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike (1)   Protected  

    New Renter says

    iwog says

    American society (and much of the western world) is extremely hostile to men.

    With the rest of the world even more hostile to women...

    I don't live in the rest of the world however I would argue that in many nations, women enjoy freedom and an equal share of responsibility.

  18. Eliza


    Follow
    Befriend
    187 comments

    528   8:52am Sun 10 Feb 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (2)   Dislike (1)  

    The reality of equality may not exist in the real world. When people marry, their priorities mix. If she, or he, is a lagging spouse, moving to support their spouse's career goals, then their post-divorce options are not equal. If someone stays home with the kids for a few years, perhaps because it makes financial sense within the context of the marriage, that person will most likely make less money for the rest of their life. Women are more likely to sacrifice their career goals for family, but men sometimes do it, too. It would be utterly unfair to ignore those circumstances. If someone prioritizes family and their spouse's career, then they do really need to be compensated for what they gave up.

  19. Reality


    Follow
    Befriend
    10 threads
    3,584 comments

    529   9:36am Sun 10 Feb 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Many females make a career out of roosting the nest by choice. In fact, I had to pay my ex-wife with an extra allowance to incentivise her to keep working outside the family, that's on top of hiring two full-time nannies working in two shifts so she could keep a part time consulting job in her field that paid very well.

    That being said, I don't find it especially objectionable to have the divorce laws somewhat tilted in favor of women: women have much shorter marketable shelf life. When a man and a woman get married in their mid to late 20's, the woman's market value on average is much higher than the man's simply due to her youth and sex appeal (another way of saying how the male population is hard wired). After 10 years of marriage, by the time of their late 30's, the woman's shelf life will have nearly expired as far as finding life time mates is concerned whereas the man is still quite marketable, perhaps even more marketable than 10 years earlier if he has made something of himself.

    Back to the original poster: if you want the marriage to last, spoil her on little things but always let her know who's in charge on important decisions in your lives. Despite all the talks of gender equality, women want men whom they can look up to. It's hard to do when your ages are really close, but try to remember that she will get bored and leave you when you suplicate her too much and let her be in control of you (and yes she will try instinctively without even intentionally doing it). Haven't you noticed how many women want little puppies and kitties? They always want a new one after having had the old one for a few years. Don't become one of her house broken pets. Otherwise, you might be the nicest man in the world, but people only appreciate that which they have lost . . . that applies to woman as well as to man.

    Eliza says

    The reality of equality may not exist in the real world. When people marry, their priorities mix. If she, or he, is a lagging spouse, moving to support their spouse's career goals, then their post-divorce options are not equal. If someone stays home with the kids for a few years, perhaps because it makes financial sense within the context of the marriage, that person will most likely make less money for the rest of their life. Women are more likely to sacrifice their career goals for family, but men sometimes do it, too. It would be utterly unfair to ignore those circumstances. If someone prioritizes family and their spouse's career, then they do really need to be compensated for what they gave up.

  20. MsBennet


    Follow
    Befriend
    5 threads
    298 comments

    530   9:46am Sun 10 Feb 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    iwog says

    MsBennet says

    When a boy becomes and man, he leaves childish things behind. After all, it's only for 18 years and you are bringing up and nuturing another human being into this world, so you can put some of your needs aside and not be the center of your universe for that amount of time at least.

    Unless you're a woman. Then you can have an abortion, adopt out, or simply abandon a child at a police or fire station anonymously. Women have unlimited ways of simply walking away from their 18-year responsibility. All legal.

    Men have no rights whatsoever and at the moment of conception they lose their rights to self-determination. American society (and much of the western world) is extremely hostile to men.

    Of all the divorced women with kids that I know personally, the father gives about 10% of the money and effort (if that) into raising a kid. My sister-in-law's husband chose never to see his kids again and never supported them (then was hurt when he wasn't invited to their wedding doh!) That's just one example, and I know of many, in fact, the majority of divorcees I know.

  21. lostand confused


    Follow
    Befriend (9)
    328 threads
    2,452 comments

    531   9:48am Sun 10 Feb 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Eliza says

    The reality of equality may not exist in the real world. When people marry, their priorities mix. If she, or he, is a lagging spouse, moving to support their spouse's career goals, then their post-divorce options are not equal. If someone stays home with the kids for a few years, perhaps because it makes financial sense within the context of the marriage, that person will most likely make less money for the rest of their life. Women are more likely to sacrifice their career goals for family, but men sometimes do it, too. It would be utterly unfair to ignore those circumstances. If someone prioritizes family and their spouse's career, then they do really need to be compensated for what they gave up.

    That is a choice. I work mostly in IT and have worked in many parts of the country. For some reason, I have had more women bosses than men-very capabale women with kids and families, who have managed to juggle everything and still rise. Yes some were divorced and remarried, others took a lower level job for a while till the kids grew up and then climbed back. If they can do it, then the ones who choose to stay at home are making a choice and should not be rewarded for that. In today's world, you have washing machines, vacuum cleaners, cars, ready made food, clothes, 24/7 electricity and maybe 1 or 2 kids. It is not like back then when you popped 13 kids, had to gather firewood, milk the cows, tend to the harvest, keep enough food stored for the winter , cook and clean and take care of all 13 kids.

    You asked for equality and got it-now act like an equal. Can't have your cake and eat it too. Today's divorce and bizarre child support laws does not encourage women to be independendant. There is great dignity in working for yourself and earning your own money and contributing equally.

  22. iwog


    Follow
    Befriend (48)
    318 threads
    17,033 comments
    47 male
    Lafayette, CA
    Premium

    532   9:50am Sun 10 Feb 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (3)   Dislike   Protected  

    Eliza says

    If someone stays home with the kids for a few years, perhaps because it makes financial sense within the context of the marriage, that person will most likely make less money for the rest of their life. Women are more likely to sacrifice their career goals for family, but men sometimes do it, too. It would be utterly unfair to ignore those circumstances

    I don't have any problem with the state of divorce in the early 1950s. What I find abhorrent and vile are the following. They have no business in a free society and should be exterminated:

    1. Spousal support of any kind for any reason if there are no children.
    2. No fault divorce.
    3. Child support obligations for an unmarried male under all circumstances.
    4. Laws that allow a woman to abandon all responsibility for children while holding men accountable.
    5. Rape convictions where there is no evidence other than the personal testimony of the two involved.

    No doubt 5 needs clarification.

    5. In the United States, a man is presumed to be innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. I hold that no matter how believable the woman is at a rape trial, it is a legal impossibility to EVER prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt if the only evidence is he-said, she-said. The fact that there are men serving time for rape convictions in cases where the "victim" hasn't even taken the stand is a sick atrocity and a horrible indictment of this country. Sex crimes are the modern incarnation of the Salem Witch Trials.

  23. iwog


    Follow
    Befriend (48)
    318 threads
    17,033 comments
    47 male
    Lafayette, CA
    Premium

    533   9:52am Sun 10 Feb 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   Protected  

    MsBennet says

    Of all the divorced women with kids that I know personally, the father gives about 10% of the money and effort (if that) into raising a kid. My sister-in-law's husband chose never to see his kids again and never supported them (then was hurt when he wasn't invited to their wedding doh!) That's just one example, and I know of many, in fact, the majority of divorcees I know.

    That is really not the point. Why does the law give a woman multiple ways to abandon all responsibility towards her children while FORCING men to be responsible for nearly two decades?

    Wasn't slavery abolished?

  24. New Renter


    Follow
    Befriend (3)
    28 threads
    5,019 comments
    San Jose, CA

    534   10:05am Sun 10 Feb 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    iwog says

    I don't live in the rest of the world

    You may not realize it but the rest of the world is coming to you:

    http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,2055445,00.html

    http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/05/29/alleged-honor-killing-suspect-yaser-said-could-be-hiding-in-plain-sight-as-new/

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Shaima_Alawadi

    iwog says

    however I would argue that in many nations, women enjoy freedom and an equal share of responsibility.

    Which probably amounts to 1/1000th of the world population while the "hostile to women" is a FAR larger population.

  25. New Renter


    Follow
    Befriend (3)
    28 threads
    5,019 comments
    San Jose, CA

    535   10:58am Sun 10 Feb 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    iwog says

    MsBennet says

    Of all the divorced women with kids that I know personally, the father gives about 10% of the money and effort (if that) into raising a kid. My sister-in-law's husband chose never to see his kids again and never supported them (then was hurt when he wasn't invited to their wedding doh!) That's just one example, and I know of many, in fact, the majority of divorcees I know.

    That is really not the point. Why does the law give a woman multiple ways to abandon all responsibility towards her children while FORCING men to be responsible for nearly two decades?

    Wasn't slavery abolished?

    Probably because it has been even easier for a man to abandon all responsibility. Granted with cheap, accurate paternity testing it is no longer so easy for men to run away.

    Some men have found their own way of handling things:

    http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/california-dad-cameron-brown-hurled-daughter-4-cliff-avoid-child-support-prosecutor-article-1.426186

    http://www.nola.com/news/index.ssf/2009/01/add_images.html

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2208216/Man-29-killed-ex-girlfriend-26-burned-baby-boy-child-support-payments.html

    http://www.wivb.com/dpp/news/crime/Man-killed-his-ex-over-child-support

    http://www.cbs8.com/story/11457118/man-who-killed-woman-and-baby-to-avoid-child-support-gets-life-term

    These stories do make a strong case for reform. They make a stronger case for women to not have children with psychopaths.

  26. iwog


    Follow
    Befriend (48)
    318 threads
    17,033 comments
    47 male
    Lafayette, CA
    Premium

    536   11:20am Sun 10 Feb 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (2)   Dislike   Protected  

    New Renter says

    Probably because it has been even easier for a man to abandon all responsibility. Granted with cheap, accurate paternity testing it is no longer so easy for men to run away.

    I couldn't disagree more unless you're talking about 50 years ago. Genetic testing has been around since 1985 and prior to that the presumption of parenthood was forced on men who were married regardless of who the actual father was.

    As for your list of criminal acts, I don't think lunatics are relevant.

    Women have ALWAYS had a remedy anyway: Marriage. Men should have zero responsibility towards unwanted children in the exact same way that women do unless there's a marriage contract guaranteeing otherwise.

    New Renter says

    Which probably amounts to 1/1000th of the world population while the "hostile to women" is a FAR larger population.

    I'm sorry I simply don't agree with you. Islamic nations have well known discrimination issues against women however I don't see this in South America, most of Asia, and Eastern Europe.

    Women vote, hold property, make contracts, and are the presumed guardians of young children. The difference is that they are held accountable for their reckless behavior.

  27. New Renter


    Follow
    Befriend (3)
    28 threads
    5,019 comments
    San Jose, CA

    537   12:15pm Sun 10 Feb 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    iwog says

    I'm sorry I simply don't agree with you. Islamic nations have well known discrimination issues against women however I don't see this in South America, most of Asia, and Eastern Europe.

    Around the world at least one woman in every three has been beaten, coerced into sex, or otherwise abused in her lifetime. Every year, violence in the home and the community devastates the lives of millions of women. Gender-based violence kills and disables as many women between the ages of 15 and 44 as cancer, and its toll on women's health surpasses that of traffic accidents and malaria combined.1 Violence against women is rooted in a global culture of discrimination which denies women equal rights with men and which legitimizes the appropriation of women's bodies for individual gratification or political ends.
    http://www.amnestyusa.org/our-work/issues/women-s-rights/violence-against-women/violence-against-women-information

    India, Pakistan and Bangladesh: Bride burning is still widely practiced:
    http://www.examiner.com/article/bride-burning-india-pakistan-and-bangladesh-is-acceptable-murder

    Africa: Rape:
    http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1906000,00.html

    http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Africa/Africa-Monitor/2011/0512/Shocking-Congo-rape-statistics-show-husbands-not-just-soldiers-rebels-perpetuate-the-problem

    China, India, Caucuses: Sex selective infanticide:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex-selective_infanticide

  28. Dr Strangelove


    Follow
    Befriend
    4 comments

    538   12:18pm Sun 10 Feb 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    "First thing you must remember, You will never be her first priority. Her children are (or will be) "

    In response to the above, I would suggest ANY Male considering marriage to take a long, careful look at the woman they're thinking of marrying and ask themselves the following critically important question...

    Does this woman feel having children is part of our relationship together, or is our relationship (to her) part of us having children?

    Just my .02

    DOC

  29. iwog


    Follow
    Befriend (48)
    318 threads
    17,033 comments
    47 male
    Lafayette, CA
    Premium

    539   12:30pm Sun 10 Feb 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike   Protected  

    New Renter says

    Around the world at least one woman in every three has been beaten, coerced into sex, or otherwise abused in her lifetime.

    I reject this statistic. "Coerced into sex" especially. Women do not get to share the same freedoms as men and then pretend they are innocent delicate little flowers who succumb to the wiles of men when they accidentally make a poor choice of sex partners. There are only two categories and zero grey areas: Forcible rape and consensual sex. Anything else is an attempt to divert responsibility of bad decision making to a man.

    As for women who are physically abused, I don't know of many nations on earth that would allow a man convicted of physical violence to escape unpunished. Men having more physical strength than women is an unfortunate reality of biology, not a societal construct to guarantee women are victims.

    New Renter says

    Violence against women is rooted in a global culture of discrimination which denies women equal rights with men and which legitimizes the appropriation of women's bodies for individual gratification or political ends.

    I'm sorry but I cannot accept this either. If the subject is women's rights, then we should be talking about those equal rights that women are not afforded in various countries...........NOT ABUSE! Unless abuse is legal, it is a separate issue with separate solutions.

    As for women's bodies, men will never ever ever ever ever objectify women for individual gratification and political ends as much as women objectify themselves for individual gratification and political ends. Prostitution is a problem because so many women choose it. Revealing clothing is on the wish list of every teenage girl. Even in the Western World, getting a handle on girls sexting nude photos of themselves all over the place is an impossible task. Again we see basic biology being used as some sort of argument that women are being discriminated against. I do not accept it.

    Almost everything on your list is illegal and prosecuted in nations where it is a problem.

  30. MsBennet


    Follow
    Befriend
    5 threads
    298 comments

    540   12:41pm Sun 10 Feb 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    iwog says

    MsBennet says

    Of all the divorced women with kids that I know personally, the father gives about 10% of the money and effort (if that) into raising a kid. My sister-in-law's husband chose never to see his kids again and never supported them (then was hurt when he wasn't invited to their wedding doh!) That's just one example, and I know of many, in fact, the majority of divorcees I know.

    That is really not the point. Why does the law give a woman multiple ways to abandon all responsibility towards her children while FORCING men to be responsible for nearly two decades?

    Wasn't slavery abolished?

    It is the "point" I believe. Men are not forced and cannot be forced in many cases to give 50/50.

  31. iwog


    Follow
    Befriend (48)
    318 threads
    17,033 comments
    47 male
    Lafayette, CA
    Premium

    541   12:46pm Sun 10 Feb 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (2)   Dislike   Protected  

    MsBennet says

    It is the "point" I believe. Men are not forced and cannot be forced in many cases to give 50/50.

    I don't care if it's 50/50 or 99/1. The fact that men are forced to give up one penny of their income for an 18 year period while women are afforded multiple ways to simply walk away and disappear is a sick atrocity and should not be tolerated here by anyone with a shred of morality.

    Day of the pregnancy test:

    Female: I can do anything I want, even after the baby is born. I'm the princess!!
    Male: I'm fucked and have no more control of my life.

    This is not acceptable.

  32. anon595


    Follow
    Befriend
    1 threads
    12 comments
    Menlo Park, CA

    542   12:46pm Sun 10 Feb 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    There are so many disturbed and uninformed comments in this thread that I barely know where to start.

    Here's one: divorce rate for 1st marriages between 2 that are highly educated and marry later in life is fairly low. Something like 20%, though happy to see the real stat.Factor in 2 that came from intact families and it improves even more.

    To me that points to more success with marriages of equals, more mature than the typical couple, and people that have evidence that marriage has ups and downs but usually works when the deck is stacked correctly.

    Marriage with someone from a third world is only successful because the woman had few other options and is making the best of it.

  33. anon595


    Follow
    Befriend
    1 threads
    12 comments
    Menlo Park, CA

    543   12:58pm Sun 10 Feb 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike  

    Denying women are raped and abused at rates far greater than men smacks of fox news reporting during the election.

    Because it is so hard to prove, it is rarely reported or prosecuted, especially in other countries. Haven't you been reading about India this past month?

  34. anon595


    Follow
    Befriend
    1 threads
    12 comments
    Menlo Park, CA

    544   1:02pm Sun 10 Feb 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike  

    And children need to be someone's priority after they are born. They don't raise themselves.

    You want your wife to continue to treat you as her priority? You get what you give.

  35. iwog


    Follow
    Befriend (48)
    318 threads
    17,033 comments
    47 male
    Lafayette, CA
    Premium

    545   1:02pm Sun 10 Feb 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   Protected  

    anon595 says

    Marriage with someone from a third world is only successful because the woman had few other options and is making the best of it.

    This is nonsense. I have a relative who is president of the Eastern European "mail order brides" club in Southern California. Foreign wives who are married to American men are extraordinarily happy. Furthermore they can cook, clean, and take care of the children while these skills are practically banned in the USA.

    anon595 says

    Here's one: divorce rate for 1st marriages between 2 that are highly educated and marry later in life is fairly low. Something like 20%, though happy to see the real stat.Factor in 2 that came from intact families and it improves even more.

    The divorce rate for 1st time marriages is around 40%. The rate for miserable sexless marriages, marriages where one partner dies before divorce, marriages that are lifelong separations, and marriages for the sake of political and professional necessity are unknown.

    Basically the odds suck. While the laws are so abhorrently stacked against men, they should think long and hard before risking their happiness on marriage here.

  36. anon595


    Follow
    Befriend
    1 threads
    12 comments
    Menlo Park, CA

    546   1:05pm Sun 10 Feb 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Denying facts doesnt make them any less true. I'm done arguing with an uneducated troll.

  37. iwog


    Follow
    Befriend (48)
    318 threads
    17,033 comments
    47 male
    Lafayette, CA
    Premium

    547   1:07pm Sun 10 Feb 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (2)   Dislike   Protected  

    anon595 says

    Denying women are raped and abused at rates far greater than men smacks of fox news reporting during the election.

    No one did this.

    anon595 says

    And children need to be someone's priority after they are born. They don't raise themselves.

    There is a waiting list for adoptions and this issue is fake and disingenuous. The problem is NEVER finding suitable parents and support for a new baby.

    What women want is total unhindered freedom to do whatever the fuck they want when they become pregnant with no responsibility or liability whatsoever.

    Well guess what! Women have accomplished it and can simply kill their fetus, abandon their baby, or force men and society to pay her to take care of it regardless of how she behaves.

  38. iwog


    Follow
    Befriend (48)
    318 threads
    17,033 comments
    47 male
    Lafayette, CA
    Premium

    548   1:08pm Sun 10 Feb 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   Protected  

    anon595 says

    Denying facts doesnt make them any less true. I'm done arguing with an uneducated troll.

    You actually didn't argue anything. You made a series of blind assertions then left.

  39. lostand confused


    Follow
    Befriend (9)
    328 threads
    2,452 comments

    549   1:12pm Sun 10 Feb 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    anon595 says

    Marriage with someone from a third world is only successful because the woman
    had few other options and is making the best of it.

    Rubbish. Third world women have to pull their weight. Many are working and taking care of their families. Many times, their men may go off to far off lands to do physical labor, so they can bring back enough money to buy a house or land etc. Women run the show and are quite valued. Here everything is automated and a housewife -especially the upper income ones do nothing and want the moon in a divorce-just because the law allows it. Tiger Woods had to give 100 million dollars for a few years of marraige-how bizarre.

    It is not women who are at fault, but the laws which have gone haywire.

    anon595 says

    Denying facts doesnt make them any less true. I'm done arguing with an
    uneducated troll.

    Typical response from an ideologue who has no answers and so throws a temper tantrum-I am right and that is the only position there is in the world.

  40. marcus


    Follow
    Befriend (5)
    189 threads
    6,659 comments

    550   1:46pm Sun 10 Feb 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    iwog says

    Again we see basic biology being used as some sort of argument that women are being discriminated against. I do not accept it.

    I hesitate to get in to this because of the complexity and subtlety of these issues. I'll say this though. Your bias is interesting.

    The discrimination issue is understandable. Women have recently entered domains that were and sometimes still are dominated by men, some of whom are chauvenistic and or misogynistic (especially relative to true equality in the work place).

    Then that equality is indeed very much complicated by human sexuality.

    And above it all is a sort of inherent "economic" (for a lack of a better term) difference between the sexes. That is that many of us would equate the desire that men have for (attractive) women to be different in nature (if not stronger) than vice versa.

    (I'm going to get argument on that, but you should know what I mean.
    We're talking biology here, combined with what many centuries of social norms have lead us too. Even most straight women who love men, will admit that either women are inherently more beautiful than men, or at least we have promoted that greatly if it isn't true (religion - and norms a way from excessive hedonism, and toward civilized restraint, and reserving sex at least to some extent to marriage). All these cultural trends and others have led to what I call the economics of the situation.)

    If you don't get it. Consider this simple question. Why is it that women even can be prostitutes ? Men can too, but look at the difference. Men and woman are very different, in the mechanics of their sexual urges and also with respect to their appetites and to how desirable they are to the opposite sex.

    I think that what Iwog sees as a problem with American women is just where we are now. Men too have expectations and desires that are pretty out of whack compared to a hundred years ago.

    I don't know. Maybe Iwog has a point, but I think giving up on American women is somewhat absurd. I know of at least a couple cases of guys marrying foriegn women and it not working out.

    The women may be entering in to it with ulterior motives from the start. And they understand the concept of divorce. So some are going to be in it for the citizenship, and thinking, hey, if it doesn't work out, we'll get divorced.

« First     « Previous comments     Next comments »     Last »

BayArea is moderator of this thread.

Email

Username

Watch comments by email
Home   Tips and Tricks   Questions or suggestions? Mail p@patrick.net   Thank you for your kind donations

Page took 204 milliseconds to create.