Kids cost a fortune to raise. Besides, they make you less adaptable to changes. They also increase your risk exposure in the unlikely event of a divorce. Kids are harmful to the environment because overpopulation creates all kinds of ills.
Is there even any tangible upside in having children?
* If you care about genetics, we are all 99.9% identical anyway.
* If you want followers, starting a religion is more practical.
* If you want a small and cute companion, get a pet.
* If you want to keep your surname alive, write a fucking novel. (Or better yet, start an immortal corporation.)
Watch
Follow
Befriend (1)
40 comments
Okay please explain this to me:
The wealthier and the educated classes in America have few to no children and the poorer and less educated classes in America lots of children (usually the parents don't even bother to marry).
Doesn't make any sense to me but, I think the wealthy and the educated just are afraid of breeding.
Follow
Befriend
10 threads
694 comments
Peter P says
Sorry, I have kids to feed. I invest in them to ensure their survival so that that can pass on my genes. If you really think kids are not worth investing in, your traits are will soon be extinct.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2008/06/28/having-kids-makes-you-happy.html
Follow
Befriend (25)
413 threads
6,981 comments
Saint George, UT
elliemae's website
Peter P says
Some do grow into monsters, but I'd venture to guess that most grow into productive members of society. I wouldn't trade mine in for anything.
Follow
Befriend
5 threads
121 comments
Everyone posting here was someone's bad investment.
Follow
Befriend (2)
2 threads
465 comments
You get more deductions if you actually pay taxes... if not more money on your ebt card....
Follow
Befriend (4)
117 threads
17,655 comments
Premium
propitup1 says
There are many ways to pass on your trait (extension of your will-to-power). The wealthy and the educated have more options.
If you write a book, you have a legacy. If you have followers, you have a legacy.
Follow
Befriend (4)
117 threads
17,655 comments
Premium
Raw says
As I said, all of us are 99.9% identical genetically.
Wouldn't you rather have a museum to your name?
How is my trait more special than yours? Why would I care if my traits are extinct?
Follow
Befriend (3)
29 threads
490 comments
Denver, CO
Peter P says
That 0.1% sure does make a difference.
Follow
Befriend (4)
117 threads
17,655 comments
Premium
swebb says
Tell that to the OWS folks.
But seriously, my essence is more than my genetics.
Follow
Befriend (2)
33 threads
3,458 comments
swebb says
Yeah, I think so. No chicks seem to be overly impressed that I am 99.9% the same as [pick any famous person you like].
Follow
Befriend (4)
117 threads
17,655 comments
Premium
justme says
Because you are also 99.9% the same as [pick any serial killer you don't like].
Follow
Befriend (2)
33 threads
3,458 comments
Peter P says
But so is [pick any famous person you like]. It's a double standard, I tell ya!
Follow
Befriend (3)
29 threads
490 comments
Denver, CO
Peter P says
But...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noncoding_DNA
"fully 98% of the human genome is noncoding DNA"
Follow
Befriend
6 threads
646 comments
Pleasanton, CA
Children fill you with overweening, swelling narcissistic pride in yourself, as if you have accomplished something, even if you only did what every other mindless rutting animal on earth does. They make you walk around in a sentimental, self centered daze, as everything is justified now because you are a parent, you can become hysterical, exact revenge, attack other people because they don't worship the spawn of your loins etc. etc. They make you highly irrational in a very pleasing, narcotic way, nature's little incentive to keep the rug rats alive.
They can't escape until they are older, automatic captive audience when everybody else has told you to go to hell. If the kids are smart, they will act like they love you.
They give you something to obsess over endlessly so you never get bored, and something to control.
However, it doesn't matter how many kids you have or support, after about five generations out, if your kiddies have kiddies etc. there will be only about 3 percent of you left in any particular individual. You have been essentially erased as an individual by the great waring blender called genetics, sorry, no more you.
What's left of you in genetic bits and pieces may wind up in some weird ethnically mixed backwater of gene pooling.
Guess what, nature fooled you again to do something for it making you think you are doing something for you!
Follow
Befriend (4)
117 threads
17,655 comments
Premium
Ceffer says
Not. Getting. Fooled.
I rather be fooled by randomness.
Follow
Befriend
50 comments
Not everything has to be an 'investment' to make it worthwhile.
In the long term we are all dead and it matters not whether you have offspring or not, and if so, whether they are good or evil, rich or poor. Do whatever you have to do. Life ain't a fsckin investment.
Follow
Befriend
14 threads
158 comments
Brooklyn, NY
government needs your kids' contribution to Social Security
"As Countries Develop, Fertility Rates Usually Drop
In the United States, for instance, the average fertility rate was 3.67 children per woman between the years of 1875 and 1925, dropping to a little above 2 children per woman in the second half of the 20th century. And that’s a good place to be, because 2.1 is the fertility rate sweet spot: It’s the replacement rate, ensuring that a country’s population doesn’t decline over time. (Because two parents each replace themselves, and then some. Get it?)"
Follow
Befriend (1)
2 threads
324 comments
Sunnyvale, CA
Oxygen says
Nope.
They just need to dump the premiums into appreciating or interest bearing assets like treasury securities.
In 2005 I got curious and ran my numbers. Assuming the retirement age did not increase, FICA tax rates didn't go up, and the wage cap did not increase faster than inflation I needed to outlast my statistically expected lifespan by five years to get a 0% inflation adjusted return on my contributions.
Investing my contributions in a portfolio returning 3% after inflation would quadruple my benefit for the same 15 years (or support 4X the people), double my benefit until I died at 100, or allow me to draw 30% more forever with the principle remaining for my heirs (or to support future retirees).
The current Ponzi scheme could also be preserved at lower cost by allowing young working adults to immigrate (no earned income credit for parents, no public schooling, no interval between government benefit eligibility and joining the work force).
Follow
Befriend (6)
5 threads
2,359 comments
Peter P says
Welcome to the Bay Area, Cool and Hip. Welcome to the Values of the Hipsters.
Follow
Befriend
3 threads
367 comments
The only person who should have kids is me because my kid is way better than everyone else's.
Other peoples kids are annoying.
Follow
Befriend (4)
117 threads
17,655 comments
Premium
Moderate Infidel says
I agree. If only you have kids, the world will be less overcrowded.
Follow
Befriend
3 threads
367 comments
Peter P says
I'm only having one though, so goodbye human race.
Follow
Befriend
3 threads
367 comments
If overcrowding is the issue then we should get rid of cars as they outnumber humans and take up more space and resources. Lot's of dogs and cats gotta go too. Except mine of course.
Follow
Befriend (4)
117 threads
17,655 comments
Premium
Moderate Infidel says
No but we should make all roads toll-roads.
Follow
Befriend (5)
55 threads
1,312 comments
Premium
errc says
I agree that it should not be the dominating factor, but it ties in with lifestyle and how you raise your kids. If you are happy without all the consumerism chances are you kids will be to, unless they get baited too much and switch to the dark side ;) Making money just to have more money is kinda pointless to me, but if you can translate that into more free time. early semi-retirement and a happier you through less consumption then it is worth it.
Follow
Befriend (25)
413 threads
6,981 comments
Saint George, UT
elliemae's website
Moderate Infidel says
I love how you think!
Follow
Befriend (9)
414 threads
4,127 comments
Baltimore, MD
Children are a giant sinkhole of time and money.
Follow
Befriend (9)
414 threads
4,127 comments
Baltimore, MD
errc says
You know, back in time when you could use your kids as cheap farm labor or sell them into slavery, kids were a real asset.
Follow
Befriend (9)
414 threads
4,127 comments
Baltimore, MD
Peter P says
No.

Follow
Befriend (9)
414 threads
4,127 comments
Baltimore, MD
Moderate Infidel says
Or make birth control mandatory.
Follow
Befriend (9)
414 threads
4,127 comments
Baltimore, MD
Oxygen says
Or raise the age at which benefits are distributed.
Follow
Befriend
229 threads
2,777 comments
zzyzzx says
What do you mean "back in time"??? I do that now!!!
Follow
Befriend (16)
763 threads
7,706 comments
Boca Raton, FL
Premium
Peter P says
Passing on my genetic code does nothing to help me. Sure, it helps my species, but I don't get anything out of it.
Peter P says
When Apockolypsefuck's cannibal anarchy comes, kids may be a good investment for food.
Follow
Befriend
3 threads
367 comments
Procreating and multiplying is what living organisms do.
Accept your function.
Follow
Befriend (1)
247 threads
4,713 comments
"Kids are horrible investments"
Anyone that would make such a statement, are no doubt the same sort that would put a dollar in a change machine and then say...
"There's just no beating the house with this machine..." after 4 quarters fall out the bottom.
Follow
Befriend (16)
763 threads
7,706 comments
Boca Raton, FL
Premium
Peter P says
It's time to short my shorties.
Follow
Befriend
10 threads
694 comments
Dan8267 says
You guys have a malfunctioning genetic code. There is only one way natural selection deals with a malfunction......recycle bin.
Follow
Befriend (16)
763 threads
7,706 comments
Boca Raton, FL
Premium
Raw says
Just remember, countless species have been driven to extinction due to overpopulation and resource depletion. Natural selection is a very fickle tool.
Follow
Befriend (1)
247 threads
4,713 comments
Kansas sperm donor ordered to pay child support prepares for battle
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/12/31/kansas-sperm-donor-to-same-sex-couple-readies-for-child-support-fight/#ixzz2GenDAkaQ
Follow
Befriend (16)
763 threads
7,706 comments
Boca Raton, FL
Premium
Consent to donate sperm is not the same as consent to finance the upbringing of the kid. The idiots suing him should be made to pay 10 times the asked for "child support" to the man.
Shit like this ultimately harms future users of sperm banks as successful men are much less likely to donate. So instead of getting this guy's sperm,

you get this guy's sperm,

The greedy assholes behind the lawsuit are simply ruining the system they benefited from for all future lesbians. What a bunch of scumbag hypocrites!
Furthermore, men will start insisting on completely and absolute anonymity for their donations which means the child will never know its medical history or be able to connect to his or her biological relatives when he reaches adulthood. Yet another reason to throw out this suit with severe prejudice.