Obamas shameless exploitation of children


By zzyzzx   Follow   Thu, 17 Jan 2013, 9:57am   2,607 views   84 comments
In Baltimore MD 21230   Watch (1)   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (4)   Dislike (5)  

http://www.infowars.com/other-tyrants-who-have-used-children-as-props/

Obama’s shameless exploitation of children as set pieces is hardly new or original. In fact, tyrants and dictators have used kids as props down through the ages.

Here are a few more recent examples:

The Soviet Union’s Joseph Stalin

China’s Mao Zedong

Germany’s Adolf Hitler

Cuba’s Fidel Castro

North Korea’s Kim Il-sung

Venezuela’s Hugo Chávez

Obama Exploiting the Children for Executive Action on Gun Control

« First     « Previous     Viewing Comments 45-84 of 84     Last »     See most liked comments

  1. FortWayne


    Follow
    Befriend (12)
    159 threads
    5,326 comments

    45   9:21am Fri 18 Jan 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (3)   Dislike (3)  

    Obama has been pushing all kinds of legislative party efforts that have been robbing us taxpayers blind and stealing our dollars. He sent millions to his crony criminal friends.

    And constantly wants more, and yet somehow low information voters are always ok with it. Because it is "their guy" stealing from them, not the other guy from that other bad party stealing from them.

    When did we as a nation decide to condone theft as long as it is within a certain party? Why is it not all right to stop both from criminal activity?

  2. mell


    Follow
    Befriend (7)
    267 threads
    3,381 comments
    San Francisco, CA

    46   9:36am Fri 18 Jan 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (5)   Dislike  

    FortWayne says

    Obama has been pushing all kinds of legislative party efforts that have been robbing us taxpayers blind and stealing our dollars. He sent millions to his crony criminal friends.

    And constantly wants more, and yet somehow low information voters are always ok with it. Because it is "their guy" stealing from them, not the other guy from that other bad party stealing from them.

    When did we as a nation decide to condone theft as long as it is within a certain party? Why is it not all right to stop both from criminal activity?

    So true. Since he took office my taxes (being upper middle class roughly) have nothing gone but up. That money went straight to the bankstas pockets, people who clearly committed massive fraud such as his buddy Corzine are roaming free! It seems this nation has been constantly stupified over the past decade. Robbing the middle-class, (preemptive) warfare without congressional approval, and limiting civil liberties and personal freedom and gradually abolishing the rule of law and undermining the constitution was criminal/wrong when Bush was in office and it is criminal/wrong now with Obummer. Stop babbling about the greatness of your fuehrer and blindly repeating your party's manifesto and start thinking for yourself already.

  3. dublin hillz


    Follow
    Befriend
    50 threads
    1,711 comments
    Dublin, CA

    47   9:44am Fri 18 Jan 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike (2)  

    mell says

    Since he took office my taxes (being upper middle class roughly) have nothing
    gone but up

    The only taxes that "have gone up" is the resumption of 6.2% for social security and the 4.2% break was only for 2 years to "stimulate the economy." If your income taxes were restored to clinton rates that means that you are making single 400Gs, married 450Gs in which case you are definitely not "upper middle class."

  4. edvard2


    Follow
    Befriend
    53 threads
    3,807 comments

    48   9:46am Fri 18 Jan 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike (2)  

    Interesting how my comments keep getting deleted. I hope others realize this as well because that shows that clearly opposing opinions are edited out. So don't complain about "freedoms" and other over-the-top patriotic jargain when a double standard is being set. This is a non story. Hence why there is no real debate here. It was simply a non story that the right wing media decided to make a story out of to please their listeners. That's it.FortWayne says

    Obama has been pushing all kinds of legislative party efforts that have been robbing us taxpayers blind and stealing our dollars. He sent millions to his crony criminal friends.

    Taxes in the US have been lower than they have in over 60 years. Look it up and then perhaps consider attaching those comments to previous administrations from the past 60 years who did more taxing.

  5. CaptainShuddup


    Follow
    Befriend (1)
    806 threads
    10,677 comments

    49   10:08am Fri 18 Jan 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (7)   Dislike (4)  

    The point is Obama hasn't listened to his constituents since he came in office. Not even when he went on his Town hall roadshow tour. Anytime he ran into someone like Joe the Plumber, he bailed quicker than a Judge in crack house raid. Now he has stopped doing town halls, and he hasn't taken any effective press corp interviews in over 3 years.
    For him to bring out those children in a ruse to chastise everyone else. Like "Oh look here Kids get it" everyone else is Stupid.

  6. finehoe


    Follow
    Befriend
    21 threads
    481 comments
    Washington, DC

    50   10:10am Fri 18 Jan 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike (1)  

    Joe the Plumber? Seriously?

  7. mell


    Follow
    Befriend (7)
    267 threads
    3,381 comments
    San Francisco, CA

    51   10:12am Fri 18 Jan 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (2)   Dislike  

    dublin hillz says

    mell says

    Since he took office my taxes (being upper middle class roughly) have nothing

    gone but up

    The only taxes that "have gone up" is the resumption of 6.2% for social security and the 4.2% break was only for 2 years to "stimulate the economy." If your income taxes were restored to clinton rates that means that you are making single 400Gs, married 450Gs in which case you are definitely not "upper middle class."

    It's not 450Gs (believe me I know what middle-class is) and 2 points here: First you can call it a temporary tax break but it was for the middle class, so it is a tax increase on the middle-class no matter how you look at it. Technically all tax increases and decreases are "temporarily". Secondly you forgot the capital gains increase and the medicare surtax. The income tax bracket jump and the 50% increase in SS contributions leave 40 cents on every dollar of the raise. Anybody who calls that fair gets my erect middle-finger.

  8. zzyzzx


    Follow
    Befriend (10)
    791 threads
    6,761 comments
    Baltimore, MD

    52   10:18am Fri 18 Jan 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike (1)  

    dublin hillz says

    The only taxes that "have gone up" is the resumption of 6.2% for social security and the 4.2% break was only for 2 years to "stimulate the economy." If your income taxes were restored to clinton rates that means that you are making single 400Gs, married 450Gs in which case you are definitely not "upper middle class."

    My state taxes have gone up.

  9. mell


    Follow
    Befriend (7)
    267 threads
    3,381 comments
    San Francisco, CA

    53   10:18am Fri 18 Jan 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike  

    edvard2 says

    Interesting how my comments keep getting deleted. I hope others realize this as well because that shows that clearly opposing opinions are edited out. So don't complain about "freedoms" and other over-the-top patriotic jargain when a double standard is being set. This is a non story. Hence why there is no real debate here. It was simply a non story that the right wing media decided to make a story out of to please their listeners. That's it.FortWayne says

    Obama has been pushing all kinds of legislative party efforts that have been robbing us taxpayers blind and stealing our dollars. He sent millions to his crony criminal friends.

    Taxes in the US have been lower than they have in over 60 years. Look it up and then perhaps consider attaching those comments to previous administrations from the past 60 years who did more taxing.

    Nice try. You can cherry pick the top income tax brackets and perhaps corporate tax rates but that doesn't tell you about the total tax burden of the middle class. We are not talking about the top earners here. Neither about the 47%. We are talking about the middle-class which has been shrinking at the expense of the other two.

  10. mell


    Follow
    Befriend (7)
    267 threads
    3,381 comments
    San Francisco, CA

    54   10:20am Fri 18 Jan 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike  

    zzyzzx says

    dublin hillz says

    The only taxes that "have gone up" is the resumption of 6.2% for social security and the 4.2% break was only for 2 years to "stimulate the economy." If your income taxes were restored to clinton rates that means that you are making single 400Gs, married 450Gs in which case you are definitely not "upper middle class."

    My state taxes have gone up.

    And that's another problem, esp. in CA. OK, someone could say, then why don't you move - just not that easy if you have a good job or a family. Total tax burden keeps in increasing, even municipalities keep adding on. I would rather see fees for actual usage of services than those broad taxes on everybody.

  11. edvard2


    Follow
    Befriend
    53 threads
    3,807 comments

    55   10:21am Fri 18 Jan 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike (1)  

    I setup my own thread so if those who want to read the responses I've made that are being deleted from this thread, you can read it on mine. That is all.

  12. Call it Crazy


    Follow
    Befriend
    774 threads
    9,697 comments

    56   10:22am Fri 18 Jan 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (2)   Dislike (1)  

    edvard2 says

    Interesting how my comments keep getting deleted. I hope others realize this as well because that shows that clearly opposing opinions are edited out.

    I see a bunch of posts you made above...

    Maybe you should take yourself off of ignore, then you could see your own posts....

  13. dublin hillz


    Follow
    Befriend
    50 threads
    1,711 comments
    Dublin, CA

    57   10:22am Fri 18 Jan 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike (1)  

    mell says

    zzyzzx says



    dublin hillz says



    The only taxes that "have gone up" is the resumption of 6.2% for social security and the 4.2% break was only for 2 years to "stimulate the economy." If your income taxes were restored to clinton rates that means that you are making single 400Gs, married 450Gs in which case you are definitely not "upper middle class."


    My state taxes have gone up.


    And that's another problem, esp. in CA. OK, someone could say, then why don't you move - just not that easy if you have a good job or a family. Total tax burden keeps in increasing, even municipalities keep adding on. I would rather see fees for actual usage of services than those broad taxes on everybody.

    Increases in state and local taxes is a separate issue and in my opinion should not be associated with the federal government and the president.

  14. CaptainShuddup


    Follow
    Befriend (1)
    806 threads
    10,677 comments

    58   10:25am Fri 18 Jan 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike (2)  

    finehoe says

    Joe the Plumber? Seriously?

    Yes seriously! HE sent Obama scurrying into his Hole where he hasn't come out into the light of day since.

  15. edvard2


    Follow
    Befriend
    53 threads
    3,807 comments

    59   10:33am Fri 18 Jan 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    They were not showing just a few minutes ago. I am not making that up.

  16. zzyzzx


    Follow
    Befriend (10)
    791 threads
    6,761 comments
    Baltimore, MD

    60   10:40am Fri 18 Jan 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (2)   Dislike (1)  

    mell says

    And that's another problem, esp. in CA. OK, someone could say, then why don't you move - just not that easy if you have a good job or a family. Total tax burden keeps in increasing, even municipalities keep adding on. I would rather see fees for actual usage of services than those broad taxes on everybody.

    Along the same lines, I'd like to see parents pay their fair share of taxes. You know, like a per kid fee and extra taxes.

  17. lostand confused


    Follow
    Befriend (9)
    454 threads
    2,915 comments

    61   10:43am Fri 18 Jan 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (2)   Dislike  

    Call it Crazy says

    iwog says



    ROFLOL..........Wow, Obama the tyrant, Obama the dictator........is pushing legislation.


    Umm, I am no fan of Obama. But he got Bin Laden. He handled Libya with minimal money and loss of American lives. Can you imagine how Bushie the shrub and the republicans would have handled it. I never saw him under a banner saying ,"Mission Accomplished." republicans have no right to say anything about national security -given their dismal record. 9/11 happens under your watch-wouldn't you want to end it? Remember both McCain and Romeny were against going into pakistan to get bin Laden.

    He has been plenty tough with our enemies-with the drone strikes . Now I don't like him for a variety of reasons, but when the right start their nonsensical spiel, you lose people .

  18. FortWayne


    Follow
    Befriend (12)
    159 threads
    5,326 comments

    62   11:38am Fri 18 Jan 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (2)   Dislike (3)  

    lostand confused says

    Umm, I am no fan of Obama. But he got Bin Laden.

    He didn't get Bin Laden, he was simply in the office when military and intelligence finally got it figured out and done.

    We have a Hoover Dam, not FDR Dam, remember that one? Because it was a project started by President Hoover, even though it finally completed during FDR tenure.

    Just thinks to think about L&C.

  19. lostand confused


    Follow
    Befriend (9)
    454 threads
    2,915 comments

    63   12:03pm Fri 18 Jan 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike (1)  

    FortWayne says

    lostand confused says



    Umm, I am no fan of Obama. But he got Bin Laden.


    He didn't get Bin Laden, he was simply in the office when military and intelligence finally got it figured out and done.


    We have a Hoover Dam, not FDR Dam, remember that one? Because it was a project started by President Hoover, even though it finally completed during FDR tenure.


    Just thinks to think about L&C.

    It was his decision to let the military to go into Pakistan. Both McCain and Romney were against the idea. If he didn't authorize it, Bin laden would still be out there releasing audio tapes taunting us- while marrying new wives and building up his stash of porn. That one I never got-why do you need porn when you have so many wives?????

  20. leo707


    Follow
    Befriend (12)
    11 threads
    4,088 comments
    Oakland, CA
    leo707's website

    64   12:57pm Fri 18 Jan 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike (1)  

    FortWayne says

    lostand confused says

    Umm, I am no fan of Obama. But he got Bin Laden.

    He didn't get Bin Laden, he was simply in the office when military and intelligence finally got it figured out and done.

    We have a Hoover Dam, not FDR Dam, remember that one? Because it was a project started by President Hoover, even though it finally completed during FDR tenure.

    Just thinks to think about L&C.

    Yes, that would be a more interesting and applicable point if Obama's predecessor was actually trying to kill Ben Laden, but he wasn't.

  21. Call it Crazy


    Follow
    Befriend
    774 threads
    9,697 comments

    65   1:03pm Fri 18 Jan 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike (1)  

    leo707 says

    Yes, that would be a more interesting and applicable point if Obama's predecessor was actually trying to kill Ben Laden, but he wasn't.

    It's tough to kill a guy who was already dead...

    Report: Bin Laden Already Dead
    Published December 26, 2001

    Usama bin Laden has died a peaceful death due to an untreated lung complication, the Pakistan Observer reported, citing a Taliban leader who allegedly attended the funeral of the Al Qaeda leader.

    Bin Laden, according to the source, was suffering from a serious lung complication and succumbed to the disease in mid-December, in the vicinity of the Tora Bora mountains. The source claimed that bin Laden was laid to rest honorably in his last abode and his grave was made as per his Wahabi belief.

    About 30 close associates of bin Laden in Al Qaeda, including his most trusted and personal bodyguards, his family members and some "Taliban friends," attended the funeral rites. A volley of bullets was also fired to pay final tribute to the "great leader."

    http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,41576,00.html

  22. FortWayne


    Follow
    Befriend (12)
    159 threads
    5,326 comments

    66   1:04pm Fri 18 Jan 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike (1)  

    Bush was not wrong when he said: "Terrorism is bigger than one person". Scope of the mission wasn't to get one guy.

    Not saying Bush was a great leader, he wasn't. But Obama isn't a breath of fresh air either.

  23. leo707


    Follow
    Befriend (12)
    11 threads
    4,088 comments
    Oakland, CA
    leo707's website

    67   1:18pm Fri 18 Jan 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike (1)  

    FortWayne says

    Bush was not wrong when he said: "Terrorism is bigger than one person". Scope of the mission wasn't to get one guy.

    Sure, but Bush was wrong when he said, "I truly am not that concerned about [Bin Laden]."

    Yes, the scope of the "Mission Accomplished" was more than getting one guy, but some guys are more important to get than others. Maybe this is just me but the planner and mastermind behind 9/11--who is clearly wanting to repeat his "success"--would be on the top of my "concerned about" list.

  24. FortWayne


    Follow
    Befriend (12)
    159 threads
    5,326 comments

    68   1:23pm Fri 18 Jan 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (3)   Dislike (1)  

    I don't know if he was wrong or simply pretending. They all seem to lie for internal political or military reasons. I remember Reagan used to say that we don't negotiate with terrorists, but his administration did.

    Our government doesn't think we are smart enough population to be trusted with truth.

  25. edvard2


    Follow
    Befriend
    53 threads
    3,807 comments

    69   1:25pm Fri 18 Jan 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike (1)  

    FortWayne says

    Our government doesn't think we are smart enough population to be trusted with truth.

    Using proper grammar might be a good start towards fixing that situation assuming one believes in such silly things.

  26. lostand confused


    Follow
    Befriend (9)
    454 threads
    2,915 comments

    70   2:14pm Fri 18 Jan 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (3)   Dislike  

    leo707 says

    Maybe this is just me but the planner and mastermind behind 9/11--who is clearly
    wanting to repeat his "success"--would be on the top of my "concerned about"
    list.

    Yup. Somebody attacks us and takes down iconic buildings in our financial nerve center , attacks the Pentagon itself and kills thousands of innocent souls-right in our soil and in the most densely populated cities.

    This same guy walks the earth freely, insulting us and releasing video and audio tapes, marrying new wives and living a stone throws away from the military base of our "allies" in a giant palatial mansion with his entire family.

    Just him being alive and us focussing on Sadaam and Iraq at the expense of Bin laden was just dumb. How is that supposed to stop terrorism? Why would the terrorists be afraid of us? Oh we go bomb America and kill Americans and bomb the Pentagon and their Govt goes and attacks the wrong country and lets the perpetrators walk free? That is supposed to scare them? Maybe the next time, terrorists might attack us again , hoping we might go and invade Iran too-take out their enemies for them by attacking us. That is the message you are sending them.

  27. Dan8267


    Follow
    Befriend (17)
    1,025 threads
    12,537 comments
    Boca Raton, FL

    71   3:57pm Fri 18 Jan 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (2)   Dislike (3)  

    zzyzzx says

    Obamas shameless exploitation of children


    OK, not a child, but I like the picture.


    He did have a thing for chimps.

    And this is exactly why Republicans are hypocrites. They make Obama out to be evil for doing the exact same thing they do, but they are careful not to list the really evil things that Obama and Republicans have in common.

    Getting a photo-op with kids is not evil. Using drones to kill children in Afghanistan is evil. And Republicans are every bit as guilty of both as Obama is.

  28. Dan8267


    Follow
    Befriend (17)
    1,025 threads
    12,537 comments
    Boca Raton, FL

    72   4:02pm Fri 18 Jan 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike (1)  

    zzyzzx says

    Obama’s shameless exploitation of children as set pieces is hardly new or original.

    Yep, every president including both Bushes and Reagan did it. Hell, Nixon even did it with a dog.

  29. Thedaytoday


    Follow
    Befriend
    46 threads
    530 comments

    73   4:20pm Fri 18 Jan 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike (1)  

    ahh Faux News at it again

  30. zzyzzx


    Follow
    Befriend (10)
    791 threads
    6,761 comments
    Baltimore, MD

    74   4:42pm Fri 18 Jan 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike (1)  

    Exactly what legislation was Bush promoting when any of those pictures were taken?
    I didn't think so!

  31. leo707


    Follow
    Befriend (12)
    11 threads
    4,088 comments
    Oakland, CA
    leo707's website

    75   4:46pm Fri 18 Jan 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike (1)  

    zzyzzx says

    Exactly what legislation was Bush promoting when any of those pictures were taken?

    zzyzzx says

    I didn't think so!

    Oh, but I do!

  32. leo707


    Follow
    Befriend (12)
    11 threads
    4,088 comments
    Oakland, CA
    leo707's website

    76   4:52pm Fri 18 Jan 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike (1)  

    In case you missed it here is another pic of Bush promoting "No Child Left Behind." In this one there are some other familiar faces trying to inch in on Bush's kiddie pic.

    Here is another pic of Bush promoting his "Promoting Strong Families, Safe Children" legislation.

    Did you honestly think that Bush never took a picture with a kid to promote legislation?

  33. Dan8267


    Follow
    Befriend (17)
    1,025 threads
    12,537 comments
    Boca Raton, FL

    77   6:19pm Fri 18 Jan 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike (2)  

    leo707 says

    Did you honestly think that Bush never took a picture with a kid to promote legislation?

    Don't burst his bubble. He has no immune defense against the truth. Lack of exposure due to spending all his time with Fox News.

  34. zzyzzx


    Follow
    Befriend (10)
    791 threads
    6,761 comments
    Baltimore, MD

    78   6:32pm Fri 18 Jan 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (2)   Dislike (1)  

    I don't doubt that you can find pics of just about any politician and kids. It's Obama's use of them for something as controversial as gun control. There weren't huge numbers of people or really hardly anyone complaining about no child left behind at the time it was enacted. Bush didn't wait for some event and then use kids as an excuse for legislation like Obama is.

  35. thomaswong.1986


    Follow
    Befriend
    27 threads
    6,131 comments

    79   7:41pm Fri 18 Jan 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike (2)  

    Dan8267 says

    zzyzzx says

    Obama’s shameless exploitation of children as set pieces is hardly new or original.

    Yep, every president including both Bushes and Reagan did it. Hell, Nixon even did it with a dog.

    the picture of Reagan was back in 1982...welcoming visitors to the white house.

    Ronald Reagan, 1982

    President Ronald Reagan reads a Christmas story to children of White House staffers on Dec. 12, 1982.

    Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/christmas-white-house-gallery-1.1215704?pmSlide=5#ixzz2IOAzDX5m

  36. thomaswong.1986


    Follow
    Befriend
    27 threads
    6,131 comments

    80   7:48pm Fri 18 Jan 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike (2)  

    leo707 says

    Here is another pic of Bush promoting his "Promoting Strong Families, Safe Children" legislation.

    The unions declined to participate in the signing of the legislation so.. the kids were included.

  37. thomaswong.1986


    Follow
    Befriend
    27 threads
    6,131 comments

    81   7:52pm Fri 18 Jan 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (2)   Dislike (1)  

    leo707 says

    Oh, but I do!

    promoting eduction is a direct impact on children's lifes... so what if you include

    children in the signing.. no biggie... its all acceptable for Bush to do what he did...

    this is far different than the very very long standing goal of liberals to disarm

    the American public... so where was the shopkeeper who fought back the robber or the

    woman who protected herself from a rapist/killer...they were not represented..

    more over where was the many others who stopped the mobs... and who will stop the mobs next time.

  38. APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch


    Follow
    Befriend (27)
    378 threads
    10,372 comments

    82   7:55pm Fri 18 Jan 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (2)   Dislike (1)  

    It's generally well known that Obama ate all those kids after the press conference.

  39. thomaswong.1986


    Follow
    Befriend
    27 threads
    6,131 comments

    83   8:00pm Fri 18 Jan 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (2)   Dislike (1)  

    lostand confused says

    Just him being alive and us focussing on Sadaam and Iraq at the expense of Bin laden was just dumb. How is that supposed to stop terrorism? Why would the terrorists be afraid of us? Oh we go bomb America and kill Americans and bomb the Pentagon and their Govt goes and attacks the wrong country and lets the perpetrators walk free? That is supposed to scare them? Maybe the next time, terrorists might attack us again , hoping we might go and invade Iran too-take out their enemies for them by attacking us. That is the message you are sending them.

    actually ... scared the living fuck out of Qaddafi.. to the point of giving up his Nuclear program and disbanding all the major terrorist camps he was supporting for decades.

    Like Iraq.. both were seeking to attain nuclear arms since the 70s..

    "In March 2003, days before the invasion of Iraq, Gaddafi's personal envoys contacted U.S. President George W. Bush, Russian President Vladimir Putin, and British Prime Minister Tony Blair about Libya's willingness to dismantle its nuclear program. Subsequently, at Gaddafi's direction, Libyan officials provided British, Russian, and U.S. diplomats with documentation and additional details on Libya's chemical, biological, nuclear, and ballistic missile activities. Libya reportedly allowed Russian, U.S., and British officials to visit 10 previously secret sites and dozens of Libyan laboratories and military factories to search for evidence of nuclear fuel cycle-related activities, and for chemical and missile programs"

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libya_and_weapons_of_mass_destruction

  40. thomaswong.1986


    Follow
    Befriend
    27 threads
    6,131 comments

    84   8:06pm Fri 18 Jan 2013   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (2)   Dislike (1)  

    Dan8267 says

    And this is exactly why Republicans are hypocrites. They make Obama out to be evil for doing the exact same thing they do, but they are careful not to list the really evil things that Obama and Republicans have in common.

    are you enjoying the shit you spew.. is it tasty as you say it is ?

« First     « Previous comments    

zzyzzx is moderator of this thread.

Email

Username

Watch comments by email
Home   Tips and Tricks   Questions or suggestions? Mail p@patrick.net   Thank you for your kind donations

Page took 163 milliseconds to create.