« previous   misc   next »

Shiller: Housing market comeback may be an illusion


By HousingBoom   Follow   Fri, 25 Jan 2013, 1:41am PST   5,892 views   104 comments
Watch (2)   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (2)   Dislike  

http://www.nj.com/business/index.ssf/2013/01/shiller_housing_market_comebac.html

The housing market has been declining for something like six years now, it could go on, that’s my worry,” Shiller daid. “The short-term indicators are up now, it definitely looks better, but we saw that in 2009.

« First     « Previous     Comments 65-104 of 104     Last »

Sakman   Mon, 28 Jan 2013, 8:02am PST   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike     Comment 65

robertoaribas says

Yes, the US economy is so bad that housing prices cannot possibly increase... That is why the have been dropping over the past 12 months...

Oh, they've actually been increasing over the past 12 months... That doesn't count! My analysis is perfect, so any increase must be manipulated or fake!

"I don't like reality to get it the way of my theories!" - Every armchair economist when they get plowed by market movements.

thomaswong.1986   Mon, 28 Jan 2013, 8:10am PST   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike (1)     Comment 66

Vicente says

If it were, we'd be at or very close to an actual bottom now. Instead, every effort is extended to prop things up, so we're not there. Yet.

like to Govt sees it.. cant have people get thrown out of their home..
not to mention see local city/county prop tax revenue take a hit..
did you see all this govt interference in RE in prior decades.. No!

of course they want to see prices go up beyond any rationality.

Vicente   Mon, 28 Jan 2013, 8:14am PST   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike     Comment 67

thomaswong.1986 says

did you see all this govt interference in RE in prior decades.. No!

Wrong. It goes back further. "Helping" the real estate market has been around a LOOONG time. At least as long as the home mortgage interest deduction has been around. I would argue further back than that. And it's not unwelcome is the thing, people actively lobby both citizens and real estate types for it. In my own community when a new development was proposed a few years ago, existing homeowners KILLED it dead because that might lower their property values which they wanted propped right where they were.

Raw   Mon, 28 Jan 2013, 8:15am PST   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike     Comment 68

thomaswong.1986 says

Vicente says

If it were, we'd be at or very close to an actual bottom now. Instead, every effort is extended to prop things up, so we're not there. Yet.

like to Govt sees it.. cant have people get thrown out of their home..

not to mention see local city/county prop tax revenue take a hit..

did you see all this govt interference in RE in prior decades.. No!

of course they want to see prices go up beyond any rationality.

Not a fair assessment.
We did not have a crash of this magnitude since the great depression, so there was no need for the government to interfere until now. Real estate was crashing....major banks were collapsing and we were on the verge of a catastrophe. Government interference is what prevented doomsday for us.
The credit goes to Obama and Bernanke. How can we ever thank them.

thomaswong.1986   Mon, 28 Jan 2013, 8:25am PST   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike (1)     Comment 69

tatupu70 says

Not to ruin your good story, but I think it has more to do with the fact that people in other countries work in sweatshops for $1/day.

1 dollar a day or 20 dollars an hour make no difference.. when your talking increasing unit production... 1000s of units a day.. $160-250/day gets "absorbed" into product costing.. they become pennies per unit.

only the journalists and the left use labor as excuse.. and never ask the CEOs about the real issues of modern mfg in the USA.

thomaswong.1986   Mon, 28 Jan 2013, 8:28am PST   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike (1)     Comment 70

TODAY | Aired on December 06, 2012
Exclusive: Brian Williams interviews Apple CEO
In his first television interview since taking over from the late Steve Jobs, Apple CEO Tim Cook has made some profound changes at the company including one economic change that he shared exclusively with NBC’s Brian Williams.

http://video.today.msnbc.msn.com/today/50100299#50100299

>> let's say our constitution was a little different and president obama called you in tomorrow and said get everybody out of china and do whatever you have to do, make these, make everything you make in the united states . what would that do to the price of this device?

>> honestly, it's not so much about price, it's about the skills et cetera . over time , there are skills that are associated with manufacturing that have left the u.s. not necessarily people, but the education to stop producing them.

>> that's sad. how do we get that back?

tatupu70   Mon, 28 Jan 2013, 8:54am PST   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike     Comment 71

thomaswong.1986 says

only the journalists and the left use labor as excuse.. and never ask the
CEOs about the real issues of modern mfg in the USA.

Thomas--you can't be that naive. You know that jobs go to China because of labor cost. Whether you can admit it to yourself or not, you know it to be true.

Why do companies move from California to Texas? It's certainly not beacause of the "skills" difference. Or from the union states to non-union states? Again--certainly not because of skills.

CEOs may be politically correct in public, but you ask any CEO of a manufacturing company and labor costs are a HUGE focus.

thomaswong.1986   Mon, 28 Jan 2013, 9:23am PST   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike (1)     Comment 72

SFace says

nominated

I have no idea it takes 10 man-hours a day to manufacture 1000 units. Bubble gum maybe

absorption .. In January 2012, Apple reported its best quarterly earnings ever, with 53% of its revenue coming from the sale of 37 million iPhones.

it doesnt have to be iphones.. you can pick t-shirts...frankly many consumers already bought 30 millions pieces of underwear during the same quarter. The concept is the same.

Its everything else besides direct materials and direct labor in the realm of overhead costs that get hit the most. OH is certainly cheaper in Texas compared to CA.

Bap33   Tue, 29 Jan 2013, 1:08am PST   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike (1)     Comment 73

tatupu70 says

Thomas--you can't be that naive. You know that jobs go to China because of labor
cost. Whether you can admit it to yourself or not, you know it to be true.

I submit there is more than the regulations of wages to be avoided when manufacturing jobs move to China. The EPA regs, the OSHA regs, Gov-State-and local taxes, plus the permitting of so many aspects of a plant and its componants .. as well as the same entities cost increases tied to each point of a product - tranportation of raw materials, manufactuing, transportation of completed materials, marketing, wholesaling, distributing, retailing - I think those things play a large portion of the reason a job (such as manufactuing) goes to china, along with the labor cost. Right?

tatupu70   Tue, 29 Jan 2013, 1:28am PST   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike     Comment 74

Bap33 says

I submit there is more than the regulations of wages to be avoided when
manufacturing jobs move to China. The EPA regs, the OSHA regs, Gov-State-and
local taxes, plus the permitting of so many aspects of a plant and its
componants .. as well as the same entities cost increases tied to each point of
a product - tranportation of raw materials, manufactuing, transportation of
completed materials, marketing, wholesaling, distributing, retailing - I think
those things play a large portion of the reason a job (such as manufactuing)
goes to china, along with the labor cost. Right?

Yes and no. There is some cost to meeting EPA and OSHA regulations, permits, etc., but those costs are FAR less than the difference in labor costs.

Quick and dirty calculation for you. Assume $25/hr difference in wage & benefit costs across 150 people in the plant at any time? Reasonable? That's $3,750 per hour. Or $90,000 per day. Does that put things in perspective?

The other stuff you mention--transportation of finished good is much more expensive when you manufacture in China, transportation of raw materials is hard to say--depends on what your raw materials are, marketing, wholesaling, distributing, retailing--not sure what you mean. Why would any of those be cheaper when you manufacture in China??

dublin hillz   Tue, 29 Jan 2013, 3:46am PST   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike     Comment 75

Perhaps the housing bears can explain the following development - how come in many parts of bay area, the rent zestimate for single family homes is about $1,000 more than estimated mortgage payment for same property (this is for single family homes). Please no asinine conspiracy theories questioning the accuracy of zillow as there are some folks I know who decided to rent single family homes and their rent is extremely close to the zestimate. In other words, what is the driving force for why current rents are so much higher than mortgage payments if as you claim renting is so much better because the market is "rigged."? Thanks!

gbenson   Tue, 29 Jan 2013, 4:25am PST   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (2)   Dislike     Comment 76

SFace says

A US company makes a sample, say a Disney Princess Doll

I don't disagree with your example figures, however there are some things that we as American's (or buyers at Disney) fail to consider.

- Your China manufacturer may use toxic materials and subject consumers to health issues (major liability concerns) and employ child labor (bad press). So now you have to spend another $1/doll testing, enforcement, and maintain PR.

- Each dollar that leaves the US is not reinvested in your consumer base. If you pay a US worker the $6 more in labor, they can go buy dolls for their kids.

The last point really irks me that more people don't think about the ramifications of what this means to the US. You make a product that you want to sell to the American people, but in an effort to make it cheap, you take away their jobs so they can't afford to buy your product. It's a downward spiral with a smaller and smaller consumer base that leads to (Apocalypsefuck usually shows up at this point in the story)

Vicente   Tue, 29 Jan 2013, 4:26am PST   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike     Comment 77

tatupu70 says

CEOs may be politically correct in public, but you ask any CEO of a manufacturing company and labor costs are a HUGE focus.

This is why all that "job creator" business is complete bullshit.

Jobs are an undesired cost for a CEO. If they could replace everyone with robots they would do so. Except themselves of course, they are indispensible!

David Losh   Tue, 29 Jan 2013, 4:54am PST   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike     Comment 78

dublin hillz says

the driving force for why current rents are so much higher than mortgage payments

Because the renter doesn't carry the debt load, the land lord does. Many people, myself included, would love to dump the property I pay a mortgage on, and rent.

It's a demand side of the equation. Also over time the rents will come down, that mortgage payment will remain the same.

ELC   Tue, 29 Jan 2013, 8:14am PST   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike     Comment 79

Vicente says

If they could replace everyone with robots they would do so.

I used to have cold callers as well as auto dialing machines. It's a total waste of time and money employing cold callers. The machines outperformed the humans every time for a fraction of the cost and no personal problems to deal with.

ELC   Tue, 29 Jan 2013, 8:27am PST   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike     Comment 80

gbenson says

The last point really irks me that more people don't think about the ramifications of what this means to the US. You make a product that you want to sell to the American people, but in an effort to make it cheap, you take away their jobs so they can't afford to buy your product. It's a downward spiral with a smaller and smaller consumer base that leads to (Apocalypsefuck usually shows up at this point in the story)

There was a time when it benefitted America to sit back and allow certain countries to stay in poverty. Now it's biting us back. Call it Globalization, karma, invevitability... whatever. It can't be reversed. Americans have to put down their beer and porn and get serious about success. It's kinda hard to compete with a chinaman when you've got your dick in one hand and your remote in the other flipping back and forth between the porn channel and Fox News and your biggest worry in life is that your little gun might get taken away.

ELC   Tue, 29 Jan 2013, 2:36pm PST   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike     Comment 81

robertoaribas says

Not to mention, all of the lead toddlers will get by sucking on these dolls.

There's supposed to be stickers on them that say, "Made In China Wash Throughly." But Disney removes the stickers. However, every once in a while they forget to remove the sticker.

Mick Russom   Tue, 29 Jan 2013, 4:38pm PST   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike     Comment 82

robertoaribas says

My analysis is perfect, so any increase must be manipulated or fake

Any trend that benefits me (and none of the people renting from me) is TRUTH, and propaganda must be crafted to support this trent, not matter what! I will use my position, credentials and a housing crash blog to sell it.

Mick Russom   Tue, 29 Jan 2013, 4:41pm PST   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike     Comment 83

tatupu70 says

Looking at the US as a whole, consumers are not broke.

Really. The average net worth in 2010 including home equity was 77,000.

Without plastic the nation would be halted.

Mick Russom   Tue, 29 Jan 2013, 4:41pm PST   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike     Comment 84

robertoaribas says

Not to mention, all of the lead toddlers will get by sucking on these dolls.

Or paint chips from the nasty hovels you rent to the working wage slaves so you can keep earning unearned income.

thomaswong.1986   Tue, 29 Jan 2013, 5:00pm PST   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike (1)     Comment 85

tatupu70 says

That's $3,750 per hour. Or $90,000 per day. Does that put things in perspective?

$90,000 x 90 days (quarter) $8.1M direct labor costs spread that across 37M units ( produced and sold) comes down to .21 /unit of direct labor costs.

Clearly even Tim Cooks comments illustrate this...Its not price/costs...

thomaswong.1986   Tue, 29 Jan 2013, 5:08pm PST   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike (1)     Comment 86

SFace says

US manufacturer with their high labor cost can only go as low as $15 per unit ($6 material and $9 labor), save on shipping.

China manufacturer can quote $9 ($6 material and $3 labor ) plus another $2 for container ship. Total is $11.

$9 labor per hour.. how many do you make per hour... how about you make 10 units per hour and therefore direct labor shrinks to .90 per unit. With automation as is the case for many industries may well be even lower down to .09 /unit... how different is that from .03 /unit.. Your assuming a great deal of inefficiencies in capacity using 1 unit produced per hour... How do you make 22M or 47M units of an item per quarter as in the case of Apple below. This is why journalist fail to provide a fair picture.. it certainly doesnt escape the many Finance professions working in Business/Industry.

Apple Reports Record Results
47.8 Million iPhones Sold; 22.9 Million iPads Sold
CUPERTINO, California—January 23, 2013

tatupu70   Tue, 29 Jan 2013, 8:20pm PST   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike     Comment 87

thomaswong.1986 says

$90,000 x 90 days (quarter) $8.1M direct labor costs spread that across 37M
units ( produced and sold) comes down to .21 /unit of direct labor costs.


Clearly even Tim Cooks comments illustrate this...Its not price/costs...

OK--if the total cost is .50/unit, then I'd say .21/unit savings is pretty damn signicant. Wouldn't you?

The cost savings/unit is somewhat important, but what good managers look at is the total cost savings. How much extra will be added to the bottom line by moving to China.

ELC   Tue, 29 Jan 2013, 9:07pm PST   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike     Comment 88

SFace says

I doubt anyone goes to Disneyland CA Adventures, come out from a ride say radiator springs racer, go to the gift shop and say, gee that Lightning McQueen RC is made from China. That's a deal breaker.

As far as I know, even 1 yo. toddlers don't eat their toys. You know, they recognize it is not food. A slap in the mouth would discourage behavior.

I'm sure those warning labels telling you to wash before using are there for a reason. Removing the label should be illegal. At the very least it's dishonest. It was brought to my attention by a stranger who was very upset because she had kids.

ELC   Tue, 29 Jan 2013, 9:16pm PST   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike     Comment 89

robertoaribas says

you aren't getting lead based paint out by washing the thing.

It's probably for chemical residue from the manufacturing process. I was researching stainless steel pet bowls and some had unacceptable levels of radiation when coming from China. I wonder if all this is really a concern or just propaganda to get people to overpay for American products?

tatupu70   Tue, 29 Jan 2013, 9:20pm PST   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike     Comment 90

ELC says

There's supposed to be stickers on them that say, "Made In China Wash
Throughly." But Disney removes the stickers. However, every once in a while they
forget to remove the sticker

So, your theory is that the Chinese plant puts the sticker on even though Disney doesn't want them to--then Disney pays their employees to remove the stickers?? Really?

If Disney is paying the Chinese factory to make the toys, you don't think they could tell them NOT to put the stickers on the toys in the first place?

ja   Tue, 29 Jan 2013, 11:18pm PST   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike     Comment 91

gbenson says

The last point really irks me that more people don't think about the ramifications of what this means to the US. You make a product that you want to sell to the American people, but in an effort to make it cheap, you take away their jobs so they can't afford to buy your product. It's a downward spiral with a smaller and smaller consumer base that leads to (Apocalypsefuck usually shows up at this point in the story)

What about the opportunity cost? You cannot do anything better with the $4 you save? (e.g. invest in nanotechnology instead of making dolls).

It's ironic how easy is hearing that Adam's Smith theories are incomplete, but at the same time people forget its most basic principles. It's like justifying on Einstein that the Earth doesn't move around the Sun

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparative_advantage

Goran_K   Tue, 29 Jan 2013, 11:58pm PST   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike     Comment 92

I was in Los Angeles for a client meeting. By some dumb luck, my belt buckle was loose, and starting to fall off of the belt. These pants being a bit loose, I needed to go buy a belt.

I went to a store by this plaza on Hoover street. It was a small asian version of a thrift store. I asked the lady for where the belts were and she pointed me to a small section on a rack. There were 3 belts. One of them had comic heroes on it. The second one was a girl's belt. The last one was a thin, no frills black belt. I thought, well it's better than not having one and having my pants drop to the floor during our meeting.

I bought the belt, it was $2.25. As I was walking out of the store, I started to smell something. It didn't smell pleasant, kind of like a really strong chemical smell. I looked around, nothing around me but students, and some homeless. I figured out it was coming from the belt itself. I pulled it to my nose, and I nearly fainted. I literally got dizzy, and had to gather myself for a minute. I thought to myself, this can't be legal to sell? What was this belt treated with?

There was a small piece of white paper stuck to the back of the belt, in 12 point font, probably Times New Roman, it said "Made in China."

David Losh   Wed, 30 Jan 2013, 12:42am PST   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike     Comment 93

I drove for a woman who was here from China and worked for a bicycle company. It's a huge company.

She needed an American driver, and companion for a meeting she had in Canada with her company representatives. It was a favor.

It was the most interesting couple of days by the way these people did business. I bought them coffee at a Starbucks, and they were squimish. They only wanted to buy things in the International District, from Chinese businesses. We both had a lot of questions for each other.

What I learned is that the United States has a defect quotiant for products from China. It used to be only 25% defects that were allowed, but the United States lowered it to 10%. There must be a fine system in place, I don't really know.

What I do know is that in other business meetings I've attended with Chinese, and American representatives is that the defect rate is a driving concern for American business. No business wants to be associated with bad product.

ELC   Wed, 30 Jan 2013, 7:29am PST   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike     Comment 94

tatupu70 says

If Disney is paying the Chinese factory to make the toys, you don't think they could tell them NOT to put the stickers on the toys in the first place?

Look, all I know is occationally there'll be a sticker left on.

thomaswong.1986   Wed, 30 Jan 2013, 7:43am PST   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike (2)     Comment 95

SFace says

Nominated.

If you are implying the difference in building an Iphone in China is an increment of .21 in costs, you're totally clueless.

ask any Cost Accountant or Financial Analyst in a Manufacturing company...

see Apple's CEO above.. costs are not the concern... as Tim Cook has stated.

thomaswong.1986   Wed, 30 Jan 2013, 7:47am PST   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike (2)     Comment 96

SFace says

Evan Mexico, with a fraction of US wages and free trade with North America and proximity is not even close to competitive with China.

funny comments from an anonymous source... lets compare to facts..

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/10/20/steve-jobs-biography-obama_n_1022786.html

"You're headed for a one-term presidency," he told Obama at the start of their meeting, insisting that the administration needed to be more business-friendly. As an example, Jobs described the ease with which companies can build factories in China compared to the United States, where "regulations and unnecessary costs" make it difficult for them."

tatupu70   Wed, 30 Jan 2013, 7:48am PST   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike     Comment 97

thomaswong.1986 says

  • ask any Cost Accountant or Financial Analyst in a Manufacturing company...

    see Apple's CEO above.. costs are not the concern... as Tim Cook has stated.

  • I don't need to ask--I know costs are always a concern. To imply otherwise is pure nonsense.

    For you to say costs are not the concern is one of the most ridiculous statements I've seen from you Thomas. It's all about costs. Everything boils down to costs.

    thomaswong.1986   Wed, 30 Jan 2013, 7:59am PST   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike (2)     Comment 98

    If costs are a concern.. there is an answer to that as well.. like our tech equipment which has been hacked by the Chinese military and intelligence agencies in order to spy and control various personal and industrial systems across many nations.

    Frankly .. a US manufacturer could offer safe higher priced goods vs Chinese made lower costs goods that have security flaws and have been compromised.

    Any customer in any continent would feel safer by purchasing a higher costing "Made in the USA" for those reasons. Im very sure the push back to the USA is also centered around "National Security" not only for USA but many other nations around the globe.

    ----------------------------------------------------------

    China tech company brags: We hack U.S. telecoms
    www.wnd.com/.../china-tech-company-admits-hacking-u-s-tel...
    Jun 14, 2012 – WASHINGTON – A major Chinese telecommunications company has been boasting how it was able to hack into U.S. and international .

    China-Based Hacking of 760 Companies Shows Cyber Cold War ...
    www.bloomberg.com/.../china-based-hacking-of-760-compan...
    Dec 14, 2011 – China has made industrial espionage an integral part of its .... semiconductors and clean energy, like solar power, the PwC report said

    Backdoor Found In China-Made US Military Chip? - Slashdot
    it.slashdot.org/.../backdoor-found-in-china-made-us-military-c...
    May 28, 2012 – If it turns out the Chinese stealth stomps the F35 and can be made for less than ..... aspires to being serious competition to China in semiconductor manufacturing. ..... There are stories about hacking, and now about hardware ...

    Digital Spies: The Alarming Rise of Electronic Espionage - Popular ...
    www.popularmechanics.com › ... › DIY Tech › Cyber Security
    Jan 24, 2012 – Foreign agents are stealing stealth technology, hacking heads of state ... And while many of these attacks are traced to China, electronic ... They made off with sensitive semiconductor, satellite, space, and aircraft technologies.

    Chinese intelligence operations in the United States - Wikipedia, the ...
    en.wikipedia.org/.../Chinese_intelligence_operations_in_the_U...
    The Chinese operate in ways that take advantage of U.S. laws to avoid prosecution. ... These items may include computers, semiconductors, software, telecommunications devices, and .... During this time, Smith made classified documents available to Leung, who was .... More journalists have their email accounts hacked, ...

    thomaswong.1986   Wed, 30 Jan 2013, 8:02am PST   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike (1)     Comment 99

    tatupu70 says

    For you to say costs are not the concern is one of the most ridiculous statements I've seen from you Thomas. It's all about costs. Everything boils down to costs.

    your examples of costs are faulty.. when applied to mass scale operations.. $20 of hourly labor gets absorbed and applied to product costing across large number of units...

    under your example... every unit labor burden is the 1 hourly rate.. regardless of home many 1000s of units produced within that hour.. Clearly... YOU ARE WRONG!

    thomaswong.1986   Wed, 30 Jan 2013, 8:21am PST   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike (1)     Comment 100


    Dislike (1)  

    your fucking welcome.. LOL!

    tatupu70   Wed, 30 Jan 2013, 8:24am PST   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike     Comment 101

    thomaswong.1986 says

    your examples of costs are faulty.. when applied to mass scale operations.. $20 of hourly labor gets absorbed and applied to product costing across large number of units...

    under your example... every unit labor burden is the 1 hourly rate.. regardless of home many 1000s of units produced.. Clearly... YOU ARE WRONG!

    I am most definitely not wrong. I really can't believe you are even an acccountant. You lack a basic understanding of cost accounting.

    My example showed you the difference in total labor cost. The difference in unit labor cost is not really important--companies don't pay their employees per unit, they pay them per hour. If you want to calculate the total labor savings, you look at total labor cost in the US vs. total labor cost in China. Not unit labor costs.

    David Losh   Wed, 30 Jan 2013, 8:39am PST   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike     Comment 102

    SFace says

    Evan Mexico, with a fraction of US wages and free trade with North America and proximity is not even close to competitive with China.

    OK, I posted an incomplete comment this morning because I was late.

    The point in China is to employ as many people as possible. When we think of a factory here in the United States we talk in city blocks, in China they talk in acres.

    China has thousands of people employed in factories, and if they don't have enough people to meet demand they ship people in.

    The reason the defect rate was allowed to go down for China is the promises of quality control. China did an admirable job in a short amount of time to respond to the new standards.

    Where it would take the United States ten years to comply with higher standards of manufacturing, and an Act of Congress, the Chinese simply went into factories and made the changes.

    You don't get that in South America, or Mexico, there would be cries of unfair trade practices; in China they just did it.

    As far as the cost of labor, it is rising, fast, and even with the rises in labor costs the Chinese are happy to have the work.

    When I say Chinese, I mean that the government is there to do all they can to keep businesses hiring.

    When you meet with Chinese business people you meet with a government representative at the same time. I used to think it was so the Chinese could control the business sector, but the facts, to me, have shown that when you tell a Chinese business owner they need to do something, it gets done.

    What a concept that the government of China is interested, and responsive to the needs of business.

    David Losh   Wed, 30 Jan 2013, 11:04am PST   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike     Comment 103

    robertoaribas says

    I've never been to a more moronically run or less efficient country ever.

    For a shipping company? and your girlfreind didn't tell you you need to pay taxes, and black money to boot?

    Come on, grow a pair. It's the cost of doing business.

    However, if you are a big employer, I mean a million person employer, the government listens.

    David Losh   Wed, 30 Jan 2013, 9:08pm PST   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike     Comment 104

    robertoaribas says

    i just went along for the ride.

    It's the cost of doing business the same as there is a cost of doing business anywhere.

    The people who complain about the red tape are the one's not involved in the Chinese culture.

    I don't do business in Asia, but my bbrother has for thirty years, he has the same complaints you do, and I know he's not making much money.

    If your girl freind's boss wanted to wire the money instead he could, and pay the bribes to get the taxes paid. It was cheaper to give your girl freind the car, and a day off. What did her time with the car cost again, I mean as long as we are talking about the cost of labor in China?

    If I wanted to compare that the the good old USofA, I can easily, because I have to go pay a frigging payment to our City government in person tomorrow for taxes I have already paid for last year, but the frigging system the City of Seattle has is so backward they can't keep any records straight. So I'm going to go down in a couple of hours, in person, to pay $384.60 that the City claims I owe, on an account I know is closed. They called me today to threaten me. So, I have one day to get it paid or I pay fees, and penalties, and maybe go into collections.

    See, I go and pay, then while doing my taxes I add up my payments, and hey! I'm right they are wrong, but hey! I'm going to owe them money any way, so we will work it out later the same as we have for twenty years or more.

    It's the frigging cost of doing business.

    Did you really say total, and utter bullshit?

    Don't get me started on small business, because it is tough all over.

    « First     « Previous comments    

    HousingBoom is moderator of this thread.

    Email

    Username

    Watch comments by email

    home   top   questions or suggestions? write p@patrick.net