You'd give 600K for that? ..no way. I'd give 4X what someone paid for it in 1995, tops. That assumes a complete rebuild. Note, that the 1995 sale price was 58K, putting my top price for it at 232K. I mean it's Pacifica.
I guess I have been looking at houses around here for too long. The ones priced at 600K seem to be worth 350 or so to me. Maybe I my ruler is off :-)
This one was really nice upstairs. The 500-600K houses just seem too crappy to live in. Small, old, ugly. This one was a little weird downstairs, but much nicer than the cookie cutter raised ranchers. I guess I was thinking that I could stomach the raised rancher price for this one. It wasn't really financial logic that drove my flip assessment of 600K as much as it was dislike of the raised rancher.