« previous   next »

Evictions are driving long-time renters out of their homes


By FunTime   Follow   Wed, 6 Feb 2013, 6:32am PST   619 views   9 comments
Watch (1)   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

http://www.sfbg.com/2013/02/05/out-place?source=Patrick.net\\&utm_campaign=Guardian%20Intelligence%2002/06/13&utm_medium=email&utm_source=patrick.net

In his State of the City address last week, Mayor Ed Lee cheerfully characterized San Francisco as "the new gravitational center of Silicon Valley." He touted tech-sector job creation. "We have truly become the innovation capital of the world," Lee said, "home to 1,800 tech companies with more than 42,000 employees and growing every day." From a purely economic standpoint, San Francisco is on a steady climb. But not all residents share the mayor's rosy outlook. Shortly after Lee's speech, renowned local author Rebecca Solnit published her own view of San Francisco's condition in the London Review of Books. Zeroing...

Comments 1-9 of 9     Last »

curious2   Wed, 6 Feb 2013, 6:47am PST   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike     Comment 1

Lucretia had the best comment: "Since we build around 250 new units per year in SF...We're in this terrible situation. It's not that difficult to comprehend."

9 million people live in the SF Bay area. If 20% of those people want to live in SF, and there are only enough housing units for 10%, the price increases until only the 10% who can afford the most are able to live here.

Economics isn't rocket science. If you limit supply with zoning & planning restrictions, then any increase in demand will drive higher prices. The predictable result is boom & bust cycles. If you allow people to build enough to meet demand, which in SF would mean allowing at least another 100k units, then the price/income ratio will return to normal levels, i.e.2x-5x. Instead we see myriad programs to divide & misrule voters while politicians' patronage networks get fat off developers' "donations" and reserved "below market" units that go to somebody's nephew.

Quigley   Wed, 6 Feb 2013, 6:55am PST   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike     Comment 2

Meanwhile the old time residents who pay the least taxes scream NOT IN MY BACKYARD when new development is proposed.
It's business as usual: government by the rich, of the rich, and for the rich. Everyone else gets screwed.

Nobody   Wed, 6 Feb 2013, 6:58am PST   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike     Comment 3

Pay us more money or GET THE F*** OUT. We created jobs for you. You ungrateful SONS of Female Dogs.

From the 1%.

Nobody   Wed, 6 Feb 2013, 7:05am PST   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike     Comment 4

curious2 says

Economics isn't rocket science.

Wa? I thought most economists couldn't tell the last impending economic disaster everyone in this website except Iwog saw. If economy is simpler than rocket science, the economists like Green Span should have seen it coming miles away.

Oh, and about supply and demand? Could you pleeeeeeze tell us something we don't already know? It gets too boring here.

curious2   Wed, 6 Feb 2013, 7:05am PST   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (4)   Dislike     Comment 5

I can understand people wanting to contain sprawl and keep Atherton bucolic, but downtown SF? The City is going to require that old buildings on the verge of collapse must be retrofitted at a cost over $10k/unit, with of course the obligatory debt financing from the banking sector which is credited for its lobbying:

http://sfpublicpress.org/news/2013-02/mandatory-earthquake-retrofit-proposal-advances-quickly-in-san-francisco-city-hall

This is like retrofitting airbags into a Yugo. Old dangerous apartment buildings that are already fully depreciated and could collapse any day should be replaced with new and stronger buildings that can safely house 10x more people. We are borrowing & spending billion$ to replace the eastern span of the SF Bay Bridge with a new and (hopefully) safer design, and we are going to borrow & spend million$ not to replace rickety old apartment buildings downtown.

The excess demand priced out of SF artificially increases prices throughout the Bay Area. Federal policies like QE and ZIRP inflate prices nationwide, but SF Bay's special excess results from the difficulty of building even in urban centers. It's the same in NYC: if the current zoning & planning restrictions had existed 200 years ago, Manhattan would still be mostly farmland and there wouldn't be any such thing as NYC as we know it. There were communities in China where girls' feet were bound in tiny shoes to keep them small and pretty. NYC and SF have become like that. Some people think it's nice to look at, but it's really cruel, and yet the victims scream the loudest that it must continue, like African women demanding genital mutilation.

The biggest myth in economics is the assumption that people are rational actors. People are the weirdest, most irrational creatures on this planet.

FunTime   Wed, 6 Feb 2013, 7:27am PST   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike     Comment 6

Population of San Francisco is posted at about 800,000(793,697?)
I hope San Francisco finds some kind of balance between "change is difficult" and "everyone here is the same."

thomaswong.1986   Wed, 6 Feb 2013, 7:31am PST   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike (1)     Comment 7

FunTime says

Lee said, "home to 1,800 tech companies with more than 42,000 employees and growing every day." From a purely economic standpoint, San Francisco is on a steady climb.

Old Ed has been hitting some herbal medicine lately. They elected a demented idiot in SF.

P N Dr Lo R   Fri, 8 Feb 2013, 7:54am PST   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike     Comment 8

thomaswong.1986 says

Old Ed has been hitting some herbal medicine lately. They elected a demented idiot in SF.

"Every nation (and city) gets the government it deserves". Often attributed to Alexis de Tocqueville, it was actually written by Joseph de Maistre in 1811, but probably still applicable today.

Quigley   Fri, 8 Feb 2013, 8:17am PST   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike     Comment 9

P N Dr Lo R says

thomaswong.1986 says

Old Ed has been hitting some herbal medicine lately. They elected a demented idiot in SF.

"Every nation (and city) gets the government it deserves". Often attributed to Alexis de Tocqueville, it was actually written by Joseph de Maistre in 1811, but probably still applicable today.

Ain't that the truth! Which makes me sad for America that we have such a dysfunctional government that spends 1.4 trillion/year more than it takes in, provides sub par services at every turn, and has no plan for a turn around. Congress has lower popularity than prostate exams: presumably because at least some guys get a thrill from foreign objects shoved up their ass.
Homeland security is preparing for a protracted war against the civilian population, perhaps due to the above ranking and fears about what it could mean should it slip below monkey poo levels.
We are still sending our young people to be maimed on the battlefields of Afghanistan, a nation that can give us nothing but heroin to poison the rest of our young people, and of course, more enemies to shoot at.
The list goes on. Either we aren't in control, or worse, and Toqueville's words apply to us.

FunTime is moderator of this thread.

Email

Username

Watch comments by email

home   top   share   link sharer   users   register   best of   about   questions or suggestions? write p@patrick.net