Seems to me leftists seldom target the mass of the population they're trying to recruit for the "social revolution". Killing people tends to turn them off against joining your revolution.
And that is why they failed.. from Northern and Southern America across Europe and into Asia.
In every nation across many cultures they lost public support and were seen as murders thugs and criminals.
Whereas righties see the general public as heretics, backsliders, brainwashed sheeple, or just plain unrepentant sinners, so have no trouble killing "innocents", whom they don't regard as truly "innocent".
Only a screwed up Lefty would think that.... eventually you will grow up.
Yet 21st century "conservatives" such as yourself are obsessed with the likes of has-beens such as Bill Ayers. Why is that?
obsession ? LOL na ! thats a perfume ! Media's glamorization with Bill Avers is an irony. As is the hypocrisy with Chris Matthews. To call the so called anti-war period and the bombing by the WU as an 'exciting time' and different from KKK bombings in the south. Both are evil both need to be stopped and punished. And while you would give a break to the unrepentant Bill Avers, I like many would not.. neither to WU or the KKK. Both are evil and un-American.
Prosecute them .. send them to prison, and if they walk out of prison unrepentant wishing they did more, do you give them a job in the same building they tried to demolish, a govt they tried to overthrow, allow them to work with people they tried to murder, and give them a pension to retire on. If its Bill Avery, it must be OK, it was after all "an exciting time to be in the anti-war movement.. it was glamorous.. and you were a cultural hero."
You can blame any ideology based on how you cherry pick your data
Um--exactly...or you can just make up lies, put them in a graphic and distribute it on the internet as "proof."
With very little effort I can see several problems with your graphic:
- Only two of the people on the list were perhaps motivated by any strong religious or political ideology: Nidal Hasan, and Wade Michael Page. Regardless of any alleged party registration they both were right-wingers Hasan an extreme Islamist, and Page was an active white supremacist.
-Dorner was not an Obama "supporter", he was a moderate republican (funny the graphic does not mention his party affiliation). A supporter of Jon Huntsman, Dorner did not vote for Obama. It says it right there in his manifesto. Also, Dorner was not motivated by any political ideology.
-Harris and Klebold -- while not motivated by an ideology -- were documented admirers of the nazi movement. You know that right-wing organization that instigated some trouble in Europe a while back.
-The others were not motivated by any political agenda, but by severe mental illness.
The question is why would someone feel the need to fake up a list trying to attribute mass killings to "liberal" Democrat ideology and even go to the extreme of putting clear right-wingers (or even a moderate republican) on that list?
You can blame any ideology based on how you cherry pick your data - for instance, see the attached photo currently circulated on some conservative sites:
Instead of posting some made up stuff, at least they should be making a list of liberal equivalents to Jim David Atkisson, Byron Williams, or Martin Hohenegger. You know people who picked up a gun thinking, "I hate liberals, and I am going to kill one today."
"Conservatives" today seem to be very fond of profiling Muslims because Muslims are indeed more likely to commit a terror act. We should also keep in mind that if today in the US someone is trying to kill someone else because of their political beliefs (or what they think your political beliefs are) it is most likely a conservative trying to kill a liberal. Yet, the conservatives wail and gnash their teeth at the mention that one of there "own" might be responsible. Hell, they even go to such lengths as making up bullshit graphics to try to prove otherwise. Funny how that double-standard works.
Your response is exactly why you and your ilk are morally bankrupt and despicable.
Name all the Right Wing terrorist organizations you know of over the past 30 years that committed bombings and kills. Perhaps Thunderlips might help you. Along with the each incident did you hear of 100s of others associated with that group that were arrested and persecuted for these crimes as was the case with the Left radical groups.
All those Left Wing groups had names, and their members had warrants for their arrest.
So what are the Right Wing Terror groups names.. and how many of their members are being sought out for terrorist act ?
"Conservatives" today seem to be very fond of profiling Muslims because Muslims are indeed more likely to commit a terror act.
what are the odds of a Catholic or Jew setting off a bomb in the USA compared to someone entering the country from Middle East Libya to Pakistan ? For the past 60 plus years the middle east was it hot bed of terrorist organization from Libya to Syria to Iran,
of course we need to profile potential treats... if you try to imped our security, what more are you than a conspirator and saboteur to our national security.
I sure dont see or know of anyone group trying to kill another over political view. If you are aware of any, you need to contact the FBI. I would !
Right Wing terrorist organizations you know of over the past 30 years that committed bombings and kills.
Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines, National Guard, CIA, FBI. These are the biggest terrorists groups. They literally take pride in literally inflicting terror into others. And none of them seem to have any qualms about killing innocents including children. See Move, Waco, Kent State, Iraq, Afghanistan, Vietnam, just to name a few.
Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines, National Guard, CIA, FBI. These are the biggest terrorists groups. They literally take pride in literally inflicting terror into others. And none of them seem to have any qualms about killing innocents including children.