If the Whales had won, there wouldn't even Be a housing crisis--try the book!! (Advertisement)

408 El Salto Dr, Capitola, CA 95010


By Patrick   Follow   Mon, 25 May 2009, 5:51pm   5,817 views   29 comments
In Capitola CA 95010   Watch (0)   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  


Viewing Comments 1-29 of 29     Last »     See most liked comments

  1. Patrick


    Follow
    Befriend (54)
    5,239 threads
    6,173 comments
    46 male
    Menlo Park, CA
    Premium

    1   5:51pm Mon 25 May 2009   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Posted for reader F:

    There's a two bedroom, one bathroom, single garage, 878 sq ft house on a 3,267 sq ft lot around the corner from me in Capitola, CA that is for sale. Asking price is $899,500. No ocean view or anything remarkable for that matter, but "it's on Depot Hill, which traditionally supports these valuations" according to the open house dude when I strolled by the other day to sample the Kool Aid. I said to him "That's $1,000 / sq ft - like Manhattan." His response "Well, I'm not really up on the New York real estate market." Here's the sale history.

    MLS: 80904836
    10/22/2003 $704,000 Grant Deed Resale Matiasevich, Bradford D Martin, Tina V 1995 Trust 167894135
    5/31/2001 $535,000 Grant Deed Resale Gianelli, Joseph W Matiasevich, Bradford D 167894375
    11/17/1997 $330,000 Grant Deed Resale Edward Trust Gianelli, Joseph W 167893061

    If it's true that we're back to 2003 levels, they're asking almost $200k too much. If it's true that we're back to 2001 levels (or will be shortly), they need to drop the price by 40%...

  2. localsavage


    Follow
    Befriend
    6 comments

    2   10:25pm Mon 25 May 2009   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    The worst kind of person is someone who gained wealth by doing nothing and has convinced themself that what they did was worth all of the money and then had the tap shut off. Realtors have been making way too much for too long for doing essentially nothing. Now that the bottom has dropped out they will do anything to including lie to you to bring back their unsustainable life style. As long as they work on a commision they will do whatever they have to to get you into the house at the highest price possible. Essentially, they will do whatever it takes to seperate you from your money. More is yet to come just sit on your hands while the get rich quick crowd buys up these early crisis homes. A couple years from now buy at an even greater bargain.

  3. varelse


    Follow
    Befriend
    6 comments

    3   6:52am Tue 26 May 2009   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    On the surface, it seems overpriced, and it may very well be...

    But that is an awfully nice little neighborhood, and I'd expect it to be among the last to crash. So what I'd wonder more about is other recent sales in Depot Hill and if they support 2003, the asking, or an in-between price. I'ld bet the latter myself.

    I do agree of course that the bargains are only going to get better for the immediate future.

  4. grektokomus


    Follow
    Befriend
    2 comments

    4   9:45am Tue 26 May 2009   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    One thing is for sure, there is no abundance of six-figure salaries in Capitola. So whoever can choose to live in this home will need to have some independent wealth.

  5. damenace


    Follow
    Befriend
    1 threads
    21 comments

    5   12:59pm Tue 26 May 2009   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Patrick,

    That area of Santa Cruz County along with anythign near West Cliff Drive is the pinnacle of fortress areas. Depot Hill is as about as expensive as it gets anywhere in the country. The houses are all old, but in an adorable neighborhood above one of the cutest beach communities on the West Coast.

    Check out the sales...
    1997 - $330k - expensive for a 2 bedroom, but great area so the price seems reasonable. It is also the bottom of the last down-turn in CA.
    2001 -$535k - wow... 200k profit in 4 years! In May of 2001, there were still lots and lots of internet millionaires living off the dot com bubbles teat. How much you wanna bet the new owner cashed in some stock and paid cash?
    2003 -$704k - 2 more years and $100k+!! Housing Bubble on its way to the top. I bet if they sold in 2006 they would have got almost a million for this place.

    We are heading back down still of course so I bet the price this will ultimately be worth is the '97 price, $330k, adjusted for inflation. Probably around $400k... The seller has got to be praying someone that is flush with cash wants to waste $900k on a cute beach home. They are still out there (though I wish they would all go away) and that is why this RE agent thinks they can get it too.

  6. waterbaby


    Follow
    Befriend
    2 threads
    53 comments

    6   2:19pm Tue 26 May 2009   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Speaking for a diff area that ive been following....seeing prices that once sold for 3x the now asking, and knowing that the greater many of them were indeed NEVER worth the high price paid for them, during the 'boom', I am still stunned that anyone would LEND on these places for the boom price.

    Its not even the buyer buying them, imo it was more WhoTF was the seller
    thinking the place was worth that.....Or the bank who lent that much.
    Ive been a GC before...I have some knowledge of land and construction costs. Values.

    Im seeing 350-400k boom prices on RE that is worth 250k.
    IN A GOOD YEAR.

    Now I see why the appraisers were so involved.

  7. tomlin1


    Follow
    Befriend
    2 comments

    7   8:36pm Tue 26 May 2009   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Disclosure: I'm not a RE agent and I think like the fact that they make 4-6% on the sale of an average home is too much.
    Clearly the price is grasping for straws but in reality the agent, in this market would rather price the unit to sell before he starves his family and goes into foreclosure on his own home. There's many a deluded homeowner out there that just doesn't quite get it yet and is telling the RE agent what to list at. It's all part of the slow death process let it happen and wait for the bottom in 2011-12

  8. waterbaby


    Follow
    Befriend
    2 threads
    53 comments

    8   11:14pm Tue 26 May 2009   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    I mentioned the 'third wave' looming to a realtor today, asking why some of the silly prices arent lowered for sales before....the next wave.
    I was told the banks prefer to wait it out til they get their price.

    Ok. You do that.
    ...tho Im not sure who they will sell to as unemployment rises.

  9. zetabeos


    Follow
    Befriend
    117 comments

    9   12:50am Tue 30 Jun 2009   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    330K x 10 years of inflation gets you to 441K.

    One should be careful about buying "next to the waters or ocean view" in Santa Cruz.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ys3_9RG1CIs

    If you saw Santa Cruz storms from 1988-1990 you would think twice about paying $1000/sq ft.

    But excellent surf spots... i did my share back in the day at steamers and at the hook.

  10. zetabeos


    Follow
    Befriend
    117 comments

    10   1:45am Tue 30 Jun 2009   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    This is too funny! Its been true for decades... I guess you cant say the UCSC is a contributing factor to higher prices.

    UCSC named the worst university in the US
    http://www.michnews.com/cgi-bin/artman/exec/view.cgi/403/18049

  11. KurtS


    Follow
    Befriend
    1 threads
    973 comments

    11   12:53pm Tue 3 Nov 2009   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Patrick says

    I said to him “That’s $1,000 / sq ft - like Manhattan.” His response “Well, I’m not really up on the New York real estate market.”

    That pretty much nails it. Yeah, the nabe is OK--but I ask this: how can a house with such tiny BRs be over $1K/sqft? That's some pretty serious Koolaid there, especially since there are nice homes on the MLS at $400-500/sqft.

  12. KurtS


    Follow
    Befriend
    1 threads
    973 comments

    12   8:27am Wed 4 Nov 2009   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    ptiemann says

    Kurt, $1000/ sqft is “ok” for smaller houses because a portion of the price is for the land, right?

    Of course it's OK--if it's worth your while to spend that $. :) In this case, the buyer would spend $900K up-front for a tiny 2BR on a lot size that doesn't have much working room. When I looked around Marin, there were many 2BRs at ~$1K/sqft in Sausalito, Tiburon, etc....but that was 2004 prices, not now. If you can still get that in Santa Cruz/Capitola...I'd say sell!

  13. Tude


    Follow
    Befriend
    15 threads
    356 comments

    13   9:18am Wed 4 Nov 2009   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    CRAZY, in the late 1990s my friend bought their gorgeous ocean front home on a HUGE lot right on the point of Pleasure Point for 800k. Now for that price you get a tiny 2 bedroom cottage on a tiny lot without even a view?

  14. varelse


    Follow
    Befriend
    6 comments

    14   12:11pm Sat 7 Nov 2009   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    zetabeos says

    This is too funny! Its been true for decades… I guess you cant say the UCSC is a contributing factor to higher prices.
    UCSC named the worst university in the US
    http://www.michnews.com/cgi-bin/artman/exec/view.cgi/403/18049

    Horowitz is a hack... Ignore the treehuggers, crossdressers, and lesbian radicals, UCSC is a science mecca... And science and technology is where the money is... I regularly parasitize their most excellent technical libraries...

    That said, the lefty PC NIMBYs do use the campus as a rallying point for a plethora of ridiculous crusades and quests that negatively impact the town's shot at anything but brute force big brick retail in its economic future. But that doesn't change the fact that Horowitz is a hack. I mean if you think Ralph Nader, Glenn Beck, Alan Dershowitz, and/or Tom Tancredo are maximum supergenius prodigies, you'll probably disagree, but um, whatev...

  15. pfdv


    Follow
    Befriend
    3 threads
    18 comments

    15   9:35pm Wed 11 Nov 2009   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Proof that $900k was not reasonable for 878 sq ft 408 El Salto, which is tiny and has no ocean view:

    From Zillow:
    104 1/2 Oakland Ave, Capitola, CA
    Recently Sold: $826,000
    3 Beds
    2.0 Baths
    1,600 sqft
    Sold On: 09/30/2009

    Credible ocean views, third house from the cliff.

  16. Patrick


    Follow
    Befriend (54)
    5,239 threads
    6,173 comments
    46 male
    Menlo Park, CA
    Premium

    16   11:54am Thu 12 Nov 2009   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Wow, I love the red arrows pointing to the duplex units. What program did you use to make those?

  17. pfdv


    Follow
    Befriend
    3 threads
    18 comments

    17   10:39pm Thu 12 Nov 2009   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    In this case proximity to the ocean, partial ocean views, and square footage of the house trump a bigger lot size. And remember, Oakland actually sold for $835 while El Salto didn't sell for $900k.

    And, Oakland is a 3BR/2BA house you could live in, while El Salto is a 2BR/1BA weekend-only cottage. Sure, you could expand on the lot, but how much more are you going to put in over and above the $900k!

    I've been in both and concluded both were overpriced, but I'd buy Oakland before El Salto. And that's assuming the prices were equal!

  18. pfdv


    Follow
    Befriend
    3 threads
    18 comments

    18   9:52pm Fri 13 Nov 2009   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Agreed - both places are worth maybe $500k in my book. But ultimately the value is whatever the market will bear and the market spoke and Oakland sold and El Salto didn't!

  19. pokercat999


    Follow
    Befriend
    1 comments

    19   2:18am Sat 14 Nov 2009   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Central VA 3300 sq feet 3/3, on 4 acres, built in 2005 on Lake Anna, VA. 2nd largest lake in VA with 250mi of shoreline. Deeded use of covered dock with boat lift, $350K hmmm ok it doesn't have water frontage or water view it's a lake access house which means you have to walk or drive a couple of blocks to get to your boat you could of course take your golf cart stored in your 3 car garage. One drawback...HOA fees are over $300 per year, hahahahaha, yeah $30 per month $360 per year, no I'm not missing any zeros! And property taxes are less than $3K per year. They are on their own well and septic so no water or sewer bills.

    No doubt about it Californians are crazy!

  20. ¥


    Follow
    Befriend
    35 threads
    5,700 comments
    Bellingham, WA

    20   9:32pm Fri 8 Jan 2010   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    zetabeos says

    330K x 10 years of inflation gets you to 441K.

    And 441K on a 15yr 4% loan pencils out to a carrying cost of under $1700. With amortization that's $3500 a month for 15 years, after that the monthly expense drops to ~$600/mo. Will rents on Depot Hill be higher than $600/mo in 2025?

  21. seaside


    Follow
    Befriend (3)
    34 threads
    696 comments
    Alexandria, VA

    21   1:16am Sun 10 Jan 2010   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Troy says

    And 441K on a 15yr 4% loan pencils out to a carrying cost of under $1700. With amortization that’s $3500 a month for 15 years, after that the monthly expense drops to ~$600/mo. Will rents on Depot Hill be higher than $600/mo in 2025?

    PG&E would be the same after 15 years? Property tax? no inflation?
    Any chance of major renovation like roofing at all? water/sewer/trash bill will be the same with that of 15 years ago? Not gonna take care of lawn at all? Pipe, door, cabinet and etc will be the same good condition after 15 years? I woud be surprised when it is lower than $600.

  22. pfdv


    Follow
    Befriend
    3 threads
    18 comments

    22   4:00pm Thu 4 Feb 2010   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Now listed (mls #81005046) as REO owned with an asking price of $703k, which is back to the 2003 price. It'll be interesting to see what happens now. If Depot Hill is as immune as the realtors and residents (I'm a resident, but a renting resident) say, then this little "charmer" will be snapped up. If not, let's see how close it gets to the 2001 level. So, if this is sold by the bank, does that sale become a comparable or is it ignored because it wasn't a "real" sale by a "real" owner?

    @ptiemann - if this was a steal at $900k are you going to jump in at $700k?

  23. abcd


    Follow
    Befriend
    4 comments

    23   2:55pm Fri 5 Feb 2010   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Its funny but I couldn't help but notice the comparable commissions another bunch of highly paid guys make - Investment Bankers. The standard commissions of 7% +/- a few hundred bps on IPOs and M&A deals IBs charge are almost the same as the 6% charged by realtors. With the difference being you get a college degree worth $250K, then work for a number of years, drop another $250K (including opportunity cost) for an MBA then work 24hour days as an IBanker whereas all you need is your high school diploma and pass an easy exam to be a realtor. Only in America :-)

    localsavage says

    The worst kind of person is someone who gained wealth by doing nothing and has convinced themself that what they did was worth all of the money and then had the tap shut off. Realtors have been making way too much for too long for doing essentially nothing. Now that the bottom has dropped out they will do anything to including lie to you to bring back their unsustainable life style. As long as they work on a commision they will do whatever they have to to get you into the house at the highest price possible. Essentially, they will do whatever it takes to seperate you from your money. More is yet to come just sit on your hands while the get rich quick crowd buys up these early crisis homes. A couple years from now buy at an even greater bargain.

  24. pfdv


    Follow
    Befriend
    3 threads
    18 comments

    24   7:15am Wed 24 Mar 2010   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    On June 29th, 2009 ptiemann said "in absolute terms - a steal at $900k." Let's see how close he came...

  25. stevennakon


    Follow
    Befriend
    1 threads
    20 comments

    25   3:34am Thu 25 Mar 2010   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    hmmm

  26. pfdv


    Follow
    Befriend
    3 threads
    18 comments

    26   11:13pm Tue 30 Mar 2010   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Back on the market again at $702,900...

    I guess the bank being a "tough negotiator" is realtorspeak for "unwilling to accept lowball offers." Either that or the "more than half a dozen offers" is realtorspeak for "one modest offer on shaky legs..."

  27. E-man


    Follow
    Befriend (31)
    34 threads
    2,612 comments
    San Jose, CA
    Premium

    27   10:03am Sun 18 Apr 2010   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    @ ptiemann,

    Estimated for $730k. Sold for $670k. Off by 8%. NOT BAD. Deal closed in 2 weeks; more than likely a cash purchase. I agree.

  28. E-man


    Follow
    Befriend (31)
    34 threads
    2,612 comments
    San Jose, CA
    Premium

    28   12:35am Tue 20 Apr 2010   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    @ ptiemann,

    Sounds like you know your territory pretty well :-)

    So what did the agent say? I'm interested in what (s)he said to you. I've seen a strategy where the buyer came back to the bank after inspections and ask the bank to drop the price by the $$ amount it required to fix/repair per the inspection reports such as termites and etc. In the last case I know of, the inspection reports came back with $65k worth of fixing. the bank dropped $25k just to close the sales. Yeah I know. She got herself really good inspectors.

  29. pfdv


    Follow
    Befriend
    3 threads
    18 comments

    29   10:03pm Wed 21 Apr 2010   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    OK, so let's recap. My original post (reader F) stood for the proposition that asking $900k for this property was ridiculous. ptiemann disagreed, saying that the "original listing sound(s) reasonable and actually - in absolute terms - a steal at $900k." He (I presume from the "mann") then justified his at-least-$900k valuation for the 2BR/1BA 878 sq ft El Salto house with no ocean view by comparing it to the 3BR/2BA 1,600 sq ft house with ocean view house at 104 Oakland, that actually sold for $825,750. The basis for this comparison eludes me - real house with ocean view vs. tiny weekend cottage with no ocean view. But I digress - the market spoke and El Salto didn't sell for $900k nor at auction for $688k. Ptiemann, ever the expert, then predicts a post-auction sale of $730k, which he misses by $60k after crowing "let's see how close I got!" Wow, only 8%! But he has of course conveniently forgotten about his June, 2009 $900k valuation, which means he is in actual fact off by close to a quarter of a million dollars, or about 35%. As predicted in the first post, El Salto is worth somewhere between the 2001 and 2003 prices, especially adjusting for inflation and considering that El Salto is as neat as a pin and probably had at least $100k dumped into it between 2001 and now. At least $100k! And finally and even more bizarrely, despite his recent and massive overvaluation of El Salto, ptiemann declares himself happy with the final sale price, saying that this sale "make(s) my own properties look more valuable, so I’m ok with the numbers." Wow. Comparable property sells for 35% less than he thought it was worth and it makes his properties look more valuable? Wow.

    Relentless optimism in the face of all evidence to the contrary? He can only be... A REALTOR! You heard it here first folks!

    Sorry to rag on you ptiemann, but sometimes you just have to grow a pair and fess up that you got it wrong.

Premium member Patrick is moderator of this thread.

Email

Username

Watch comments by email
Home   Tips and Tricks   Questions or suggestions? Mail p@patrick.net  

Page took 259 milliseconds to create.