Patrick.net

A Wonderful Site for Liberals

By RayAmerica   Follow   Fri, 30 Apr 2010, 9:36am   12,345 views   367 comments
Watch (0)   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

Finally, there is a site where BIG Government, tax & spend liberals can literally put their money where their mouth is. What a wonderful idea. Why wait for tax increases when you can send in your donation to the Government?

https://www.pay.gov/paygov/forms/formInstance.html?nc=1271991815942&agencyFormId=23779454&source=patrick.net

« First     « Previous     Viewing Comments 8-47 of 367     Next »     Last »     See most liked comments

1. elliemae Follow Befriend (25) 413 threads 6,978 comments Saint George, UT elliemae's website

   8   11:00am Fri 30 Apr 2010   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike (1)   rayray started this thread as a way to say "conservatos good, libs bad." Not a new topic, nor is his link to a new site. Someone pissed in his cheerios today, probably a liberal.

2. RayAmerica Follow Befriend (9) 120 threads 2,591 comments Burbank, CA

   9   11:18am Fri 30 Apr 2010   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   To ellie "I never insult anyone" mae: Don't thank me for this being an old site, thank Patrick. He's the one that posted on his site today. LOL ! PS: To the rest of you lefties out there that are either "Jewish" or "Gentile", etc. (thanks to ellie, ethicity is important) I suggest you give until it hurts.

3. RayAmerica Follow Befriend (9) 120 threads 2,591 comments Burbank, CA

   10   11:21am Fri 30 Apr 2010   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike (1)   elliemae says Yes, as a liberal jewish social worker, my goal is to not only ruin my children’s future, but to ruin my grandchildren’s future. Even more reason to GIVE UNTIL IT HURTS. Save the future generations, the whales, snale darters and Mother Earth. GIVE !

4. Katy Perry Follow Befriend 8 threads 530 comments Murrieta, CA

   11   11:23am Fri 30 Apr 2010   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   this is a troubling time to be a closed minded conservative. we all need to be less polorized. it really isn't us vs them. we have more in common than one might think. and in the end the goals are the same. happiness. hate and angry words never do much. just say'n.

5. RayAmerica Follow Befriend (9) 120 threads 2,591 comments Burbank, CA

   12   11:28am Fri 30 Apr 2010   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike (1)   Official Liberal Give Meter: $0.00 and counting.... Come on people, support the cause. Big Brother needs you. GIVE!

6. iwog Follow Befriend (48) 273 threads 12,494 comments 47 male Lafayette, CA Premium

   13   11:48am Fri 30 Apr 2010   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   Protected   RayAmerica says Official Liberal Give Meter: $0.00 and counting…. Come on people, support the cause. Big Brother needs you. GIVE! I already explained why giving money doesn't make any sense. Why are you continuing to spam this nonsense?

7. ¥ Follow Befriend 35 threads 5,700 comments Bellingham, WA

   14   11:51am Fri 30 Apr 2010   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike (1)   In European terms I am a conservative, but as long as the Republican party trims its sails to the RayAmericas running around I'm forced to coalition with the idiot Dems. I actually voted for Tom Campbell in 2000 over Feinstein, and I don't regret that vote today. FICA payers actually have over $2T banked up (and owed by the wealthy of this country), said balance which is really starting to be drawn down this year and will be exhausted in the 2025-2035 timeframe. Even more reason to GIVE UNTIL IT HURTS. Save the future generations, the whales, snale darters and Mother Earth. GIVE ! And disarm myself against predatory capital?

8. elliemae Follow Befriend (25) 413 threads 6,978 comments Saint George, UT elliemae's website

   15   12:11pm Fri 30 Apr 2010   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   RayAmerica says To ellie “I never insult anyone” mae: Don’t thank me for this being an old site, thank Patrick. He’s the one that posted on his site today. LOL ! PS: To the rest of you lefties out there that are either “Jewish” or “Gentile”, etc. (thanks to ellie, ethicity is important) I suggest you give until it hurts. You're very welcome. I do appreciate that you're one of my biggest fans, rayray. It makes me feel all warm & squishy inside.

9. RayAmerica Follow Befriend (9) 120 threads 2,591 comments Burbank, CA

   16   12:29pm Fri 30 Apr 2010   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike (1)   Troy says I’m forced to coalition with the idiot Dems. I'm really shocked .... SHOCKED ... and dismayed that you would call Democrats "idiots." That is no way to treat Little elliemae and her ilk.

10. iwog Follow Befriend (48) 273 threads 12,494 comments 47 male Lafayette, CA Premium

    17   12:42pm Fri 30 Apr 2010   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   Protected   That's funny, I also voted for Tom Campbell over Diane Feinstein. That women is evil. I like Barbara Boxer tho. She may be a bit bubble brained sometimes, but she's a lot more sincere and generally she's running against lunatics.

11. elliemae Follow Befriend (25) 413 threads 6,978 comments Saint George, UT elliemae's website

    18   12:44pm Fri 30 Apr 2010   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   RayAmerica says That is no way to treat Little elliemae and her ilk. I don't gots ilk. I gots horses & goats, silly.

12. ZippyDDoodah Follow Befriend 3 threads 241 comments

    19   6:44pm Fri 30 Apr 2010   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike (1)   The biggest spender in American history was Ronald Reagan, in fact it isn’t even close Two problems with that claim iwog - 1. it's patently false since Obama/Pelosi's deficits exceed Reagans in size and in percentage of GDP. 2. Congress was controlled by Democrats when Reagan was President, and Congress controls spending. Any deficit spending at that time needs to be, at a minimum, co-shared by Democrats who were in charge of spending at that time.. that is, unless you're a partisan hack who wants to dishonestly deflect spending decisions made by your "side". After Dems decimated our national defense under Carter, Reagan had to spend $$ to rebuild in order to win the cold war, which he did! Liberals let him do so only if Reagan agreed to their massive spending on social programs. Under heavy fire from liberals who objected to his arms strategy, Democrats agreed to military spending in exchange for their social spending programs.. and the resulting deficits which resulted from this spending.

13. Nomograph Follow Befriend (1) 104 threads 2,851 comments

    20   9:43pm Fri 30 Apr 2010   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike (1)   RayAmerica says you lefties Ray, you are amazingly one dimensional.

14. elliemae Follow Befriend (25) 413 threads 6,978 comments Saint George, UT elliemae's website

    21   10:05pm Fri 30 Apr 2010   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   Nomograph says RayAmerica says you lefties Ray, you are amazingly one dimensional. ...anyway, I prefer to be called "southie"

15. ¥ Follow Befriend 35 threads 5,700 comments Bellingham, WA

    22   10:12pm Fri 30 Apr 2010   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   ZippyDDoodah says 1. it’s patently false since Obama/Pelosi’s deficits exceed Reagans in size and in percentage of GDP. It's like W and his FY09 budget never existed.

16. ¥ Follow Befriend 35 threads 5,700 comments Bellingham, WA

    23   10:15pm Fri 30 Apr 2010   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike (1)   ZippyDDoodah says After Dems decimated our national defense under Carter, Reagan had to spend $$ to rebuild in order to win the cold war your history is faulty. For one, the Cold War was won more by Levi's, Apple Computer, the crazy industriousness if not inventiveness of the Japanese, and rock music than defense hardware, and at any rate the hardware we did have in the 80s was initiated and/or developed under Carter's admin not Reagan's, for obvious reasons if you understood military procurement. Eg. the M-1 Abrams went from prototype in 1976 to production in 1980, curiously coincident with the Carter administration you so wrongfully impugn.

17. ¥ Follow Befriend 35 threads 5,700 comments Bellingham, WA

    24   10:19pm Fri 30 Apr 2010   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike (1)   ZippyDDoodah says and the resulting deficits which resulted from this spending. O'Neill said he tried to warn Vice President Dick Cheney that growing budget deficits-expected to top $500 billion this fiscal year alone-posed a threat to the economy. Cheney cut him off. "You know, Paul, Reagan proved deficits don't matter," he said, according to excerpts. Cheney continued: "We won the midterms (congressional elections). This is our due." -- from Paul O'Neill's expose of the late and unlamented administration, a sorry excuse for a government that is so quickly disappearing down the memory hole. I will grant you though that the Republicans deserve just as much credit as Clinton for putting the nation on a solid fiscal course in the 90s (well, except for their total opposition to the tax rise in 1993, which they so-incorrectly claimed was going to destroy the universe). It was painful holding the 90s (non-black budget) defense establishment to under $300B/yr, but we did it, together.

18. iwog Follow Befriend (48) 273 threads 12,494 comments 47 male Lafayette, CA Premium

    25   11:27pm Fri 30 Apr 2010   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike (1)   Protected   ZippyDDoodah says The biggest spender in American history was Ronald Reagan, in fact it isn’t even close Two problems with that claim iwog - 1. it’s patently false since Obama/Pelosi’s deficits exceed Reagans in size and in percentage of GDP. 2. Congress was controlled by Democrats when Reagan was President, and Congress controls spending. Any deficit spending at that time needs to be, at a minimum, co-shared by Democrats who were in charge of spending at that time.. that is, unless you’re a partisan hack who wants to dishonestly deflect spending decisions made by your “side”. After Dems decimated our national defense under Carter, Reagan had to spend $$ to rebuild in order to win the cold war, which he did! Liberals let him do so only if Reagan agreed to their massive spending on social programs. Under heavy fire from liberals who objected to his arms strategy, Democrats agreed to military spending in exchange for their social spending programs.. and the resulting deficits which resulted from this spending. I'm sorry, but you're wrong. Congress WAS NOT controlled by the Democrats, in fact the Republicans held the Senate for 6 years. Furthermore the main thing I remember about the 1980s is that Democrats were rubber stamping everything Reagan wanted. I'm particularly sick of this particular lie because like the lies regarding Reagan, it seems to have infected everyone......Democrats and Republicans alike. You're also wrong on % of GDP. It is not fair to blame Obama for deficits left to him by Geroge Bush. Bush's last deficit exceeded $1.25 trillion. Obama's first budget deficit, which as not actually been recorded yet, (fiscal year 2009-2010 ending in October) Is projected to be over a trillion dollars. HOWEVER the HUGE majority of that spending was on the books during the Bush administration. Furthermore Obama also inherited Bush's numerous tax cuts INCLUDING the elimination of estate tax for 2010. We are now and still living under tax laws, spending laws, and government programs created by REPUBLICANS! Contrast this to Reagan, who took an insignificant budget deficit left to him by Carter and BLEW IT THE HELL UP beyond any possible historical experience up to that time. Reagan is an unmatched figure in world history. NO ONE can possibly hold a candle to the red ink that poured out of Washington during those years. Huge tax cuts, massive spending increases, and hundreds of billions of dollars for a FAILED MX missile system. That's Reagan's legacy. Reagan more than any other historical figure INVENTED deficit spending.

19. ¥ Follow Befriend 35 threads 5,700 comments Bellingham, WA

    26   12:14am Sat 1 May 2010   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   National debt held by the public was $550B in 1977 and $800B in 1981, an actual decrease in real terms. In 1989 the national debt held by the public was $2.2T, which was a clean doubling of the debt in real terms. Clinton (and the Republicans running Congress 1994-2000) inherited a $3.25B debt in 1993 and left us with it at $3.32B in 2001. Nicely done! (I don't count intra-governmental debt since it, in isolation, isn't a bad debt to have on the books -- retirees have to put their savings somewhere, and a forced investment program in T-bonds is a win-win when run responsibly) Bush took this $3.32B from FY01 and ran it up to $7.5T at the end of FY09, "only" a 75% increase in real terms, so he was no Reagan in the end. In the first six months of this FY the national debt has increased $800B, quite an impressive rate of increase given the free money the government is getting with interest rates from our creditors. If this nominal rate of increase remains constant the national debt will be $20T when Obama is elected for his third term in 2013 (the 2012 election will be delayed due to unfortunate disturbances in the Hope & Change reeducation centers).

20. Honest Abe Follow Befriend (41) 91 threads 1,806 comments

    27   6:42am Sat 1 May 2010   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike   Nevertheless liberals still deny the individuals full ownership of himself, denies his right to control his person and property and declares that a very great deal of his time effort and assets are at the disposable property of the state, to be redistributed to others at the discretion of government officials. On this premise, the liberal mind assumes the right to tax and regulate the citizenry but denies those activities are theft, coercion and domination. Similar actions apply to the liberal agenda's intrusions into the world of contractual agreements and social relationships. The entire liberal enterprise is rationalized as beneficial, while the people who have lost sight and vision of individual liberty and individual responsibility, are duped into voting for manipulators masking as statesman with noble purposes. In short, the government invites the citizen to vote for the candidate who promises what a parent promises a CHILD. It invites his to assume the DEPENDENT ROLE of the CHILD, to surrender his personal sovereignty to the state, ignore his obligation to take full responsibility for his material and social welfare, and to empower government hacks to be his MOMMY. THIS IS A PERSCRIPTION FOR PATHOLOGICAL DEPENDENCY for weak minded, narrow minded, short sighted, controlling, do-gooders. Its commonly referred to today as the "Nanny State", "cradle-to-grave welfare", or "the road to serfdom". Todays book: "From Dawn to Decadence" by Jacques Barzun

21. tatupu70 Follow Befriend (3) 15 threads 5,616 comments

    28   6:55am Sat 1 May 2010   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   Abe-- So what you are saying is-- don't let the facts get in the way of my good story... "Nevertheless....."

22. RayAmerica Follow Befriend (9) 120 threads 2,591 comments Burbank, CA

    29   7:55am Sat 1 May 2010   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   We need to get back to the original intent of this thread. The challenge for all those that love BIG GOVERNMENT, TAXES, etc. is to participate in this fund raising drive of which I am an enthusiastic supporter. I'm thrilled to give liberals an opportunity to prove they are not hypocrites by making it easy for them to donate towards the cause. Why wait for Big Brother to raise taxes? Take charge and raise taxes on yourself. Again, GIVE UNTIL IT HURTS !

23. theoakman Follow Befriend 2 threads 645 comments

    30   8:45am Sat 1 May 2010   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   iwog says Why is that a wonderful site for liberals? Liberals support higher taxes to accomplish specific goals. Voluntary donations can never accomplish those specific goals, so it’s pointless to throw money. Liberals are ethical and believe in paying for what they spend. Neocons are unethical because they scream for tax cuts while at the same time supporting trillion dollar unnecessary wars. I may not agree with all government spending, but I do know which side is acting like responsible adults and which side consists of spoiled children. Most of my liberal friends what us to become Sweden and they think every citizen should be paying 50% of their income in taxes. Meanwhile, they all cheat on their taxes. I wouldn't make a sweeping generalization like "Liberals are ethical". Most of the ones I know want all these services but when it comes time to pay the piper, they don't want to do it.

24. iwog Follow Befriend (48) 273 threads 12,494 comments 47 male Lafayette, CA Premium

    31   9:34am Sat 1 May 2010   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike   Protected   I'm sure there are plenty of unethical liberals too, however the only place you are going to find a willingness to increase taxes to pay for what government spends is on the left. People on the right almost universally favor drastic tax cuts AND spending increases for the military. While some conservatives favor spending cuts in federal government, I'd say 95% or more have no clue what type of cuts would be necessary to balance the current budget. Once Social Security, Medicare, the military, debt servicing, cost for veterans, the federal court system, and unemployment insurance are all funded, there's almost nothing left to cut. Furthermore even if a "conservative" does favor large cuts in non-discretionary programs, it is IMPOSSIBLE for a Republican to win on such a platform. Cuts to medicare and social security? Dead. Cuts to unemployment insurance benefits? Dead. Cuts in military? Dead Default on debt servicing? Good luck with that. Cutting retirement benefits for veterans? Dead. Eliminating ALL pork barrel spending wouldn't do a damn thing. Thus the bottom line is that voting for a Republican candidate can ONLY result in tax cuts without fiscal responsibility and skyrocketing debt. It's not just me saying that, it's the graph of every Republican administration from Reagan onward.

25. elliemae Follow Befriend (25) 413 threads 6,978 comments Saint George, UT elliemae's website

    32   10:08am Sat 1 May 2010   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   RayAmerica says We need to get back to the original intent of this thread. If the original intent of this thread was to point out that liberals have a place to donate, you failed. The link isn't specific to liberals, conservatives, etc. And why do you keep yelling at us? ;RayAmerica says GIVE UNTIL IT HURTS ! Honest Abe says THIS IS A PERSCRIPTION FOR PATHOLOGICAL DEPENDENCY Your "perscriptions" seem to be working, btw. Do ya'll really believe that if you perceive no one is listening, all you have to do is repeat yourself loudly? Sure doesn't seem to be working.

26. RayAmerica Follow Befriend (9) 120 threads 2,591 comments Burbank, CA

    33   10:21am Sat 1 May 2010   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   elliemae says If the original intent of this thread was to point out that liberals have a place to donate, you failed. I take that to mean you aren't going to donate. How sad. So much for putting your money where your mouth is. LOL

27. elliemae Follow Befriend (25) 413 threads 6,978 comments Saint George, UT elliemae's website

    34   10:36am Sat 1 May 2010   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   RayAmerica says I take that to mean you aren’t going to donate Take it however you would like (you don't need my permission, but it's nice that you asked). RayAmerica says So much for putting your money where your mouth is. How much did you donate?

28. Nomograph Follow Befriend (1) 104 threads 2,851 comments

    35   11:14am Sat 1 May 2010   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   Honest Abe says Nevertheless liberals still deny the individuals full ownership of himself, denies his right to control his person and property and declares that a very great deal of his time effort and assets are at the disposable property of the state, to be redistributed to others at the discretion of government officials. Actually, you do that all by yourself. You were born into the wealthiest nation the world has ever known; you had access to primary education, college, and graduate/professional schools; you enjoy more economic opportunity than 99.999% of the world population throughout history; and you may travel the world openly as a free man. You throw this all away in exchange for AM talk radio propaganda and a victim mentality. It's both a shame and an embarrassment.

29. elliemae Follow Befriend (25) 413 threads 6,978 comments Saint George, UT elliemae's website

    36   11:40am Sat 1 May 2010   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   Nomograph says You throw this all away in exchange for AM talk radio propaganda and a victim mentality. It’s both a shame and an embarrassment. ...and constantly attacks little ol' me. If I weren't a mature woman, I'd be hurt over his constant attacks upon me and what he perceives to be my beliefs. Instead, it's merely comical that he's unable to see how each attack endeavors to make him look boorish.

30. elliemae Follow Befriend (25) 413 threads 6,978 comments Saint George, UT elliemae's website

    37   11:40am Sat 1 May 2010   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike (1)   Did I use too many big words?

31. bob2356 Follow Befriend 2 threads 2,497 comments

    38   12:53pm Sat 1 May 2010   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   theoakman says iwog says Why is that a wonderful site for liberals? Liberals support higher taxes to accomplish specific goals. Voluntary donations can never accomplish those specific goals, so it’s pointless to throw money. Liberals are ethical and believe in paying for what they spend. Neocons are unethical because they scream for tax cuts while at the same time supporting trillion dollar unnecessary wars. I may not agree with all government spending, but I do know which side is acting like responsible adults and which side consists of spoiled children. Most of my liberal friends what us to become Sweden and they think every citizen should be paying 50% of their income in taxes. Meanwhile, they all cheat on their taxes. I wouldn’t make a sweeping generalization like “Liberals are ethical”. Most of the ones I know want all these services but when it comes time to pay the piper, they don’t want to do it. As a patriotic true American you must as a matter of ethical purity turn all your friends in for cheating on their taxes. Plus you will get a reward from the IRS. How do you know about this anyway? I've never had anyone in my entire life tell me they were cheating on their taxes. You must have some pretty unique friends, at least the ones who are liberals. Is it only the liberals that cheat on their taxes or is it only the liberals that tell you about it? After all everyone knows conservatives, especially politicians, never get involved in financial scandals or even, heaven forbid, sexual scandals. That type of activity is strictly reserved for immoral liberals.

32. elliemae Follow Befriend (25) 413 threads 6,978 comments Saint George, UT elliemae's website

    39   1:29pm Sat 1 May 2010   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   bob2356 says As a patriotic true American you must as a matter of ethical purity turn all your friends in for cheating on their taxes. Dear Bob2356: My name is jethro (name changed to protect the guilty) and I - gasp - lied on my taxes. Maybe not lied - more like omitted the truth. An entry on my form was incorrect - which substantially changes my liability and therefore renders my tax return incorrect. I don't know what to do - as a patriotic 'merican should I turn myself in? If I do, will I receive a reward? I realize that the amount of the fraud, including penalties, interest & fees/fines etc, must be at least two million dollars - but I'm confident that the malfeasance involved will be egrigious enough to warrant a full investigation. Line 19 on Schedule A was underreported by $600; ellie (I mean jethro) recently found the receipt but the taxes were already filed. This changes her (I mean his) tax liability by about $10 (less, not more). Elliemae was well aware that he/she was underreporting this amount (and the pup whose photo appears on the site was complicit), yet due to her/his lack of ability to maintain an adequate filling system the correct amount wasn't applied when considering her/his share of taxes used to support lazy, shiftless, welfare-abusing liberals. My question is this, Bob2356: I intend to wear a light-colored sundress when I become a turncoat - must I wait until after Memorial Day to wear the white shoes that match it or should I go with a conservative dark non-matching color of sensible shoes? Jethrelliemaero

33. deanrite Follow Befriend 7 threads 91 comments

    40   10:02am Sun 2 May 2010   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike (2)   Sorry to point this out, but the dems are tax and spend; however, the republicans are borrow and spend. http://www.lafn.org/gvdc/Natl_Debt_Chart.html just want to point out cuts in defence spending aren't dead. You could cut defence by two-thirds and we wouldn't be any less secure. It's all in the way we fight wars. Obliterate the enemy and walk away- forget about trying to get everybody to believe we're the good guys. They're just lucky we don't go after the spoils of war. Do that a few times and they'll stop fuckin' with us. Save our money and political will for a truly dangerous enemy like China.

34. elliemae Follow Befriend (25) 413 threads 6,978 comments Saint George, UT elliemae's website

    41   10:06am Sun 2 May 2010   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   Isn't it easier to blame all of our problems on the other guy? Only, in this case, the other guy is a friend, a neighbor, or some cute lil' pup on a real estate forum on the interweb?

35. iwog Follow Befriend (48) 273 threads 12,494 comments 47 male Lafayette, CA Premium

    42   10:58am Sun 2 May 2010   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like (1)   Dislike   Protected   deanrite says Sorry to point this out, but the dems are tax and spend; however, the republicans are borrow and spend. http://www.lafn.org/gvdc/Natl_Debt_Chart.html just want to point out cuts in defence spending aren’t dead. You could cut defence by two-thirds and we wouldn’t be any less secure. It’s all in the way we fight wars. Obliterate the enemy and walk away- forget about trying to get everybody to believe we’re the good guys. They’re just lucky we don’t go after the spoils of war. Do that a few times and they’ll stop fuckin’ with us. Save our money and political will for a truly dangerous enemy like China. Tax and spend will always be more ethical than borrow and spend. Right now I think we need a good dose of print and spend.

36. RayAmerica Follow Befriend (9) 120 threads 2,591 comments Burbank, CA

    43   12:11pm Sun 2 May 2010   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   iwog says Right now I think we need a good dose of print and spend. Weimar Republic here we come!

37. iwog Follow Befriend (48) 273 threads 12,494 comments 47 male Lafayette, CA Premium

    44   12:14pm Sun 2 May 2010   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike (1)   Protected   RayAmerica says iwog says Right now I think we need a good dose of print and spend. Weimar Republic here we come! You would allow the Chinese to buy up every last American asset instead of devaluing the dollar. You're this nation's worst enemy.

38. tatupu70 Follow Befriend (3) 15 threads 5,616 comments

    45   12:17pm Sun 2 May 2010   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   RayAmerica says Weimar Republic here we come! Yes, because there is no in-between. You're either the US or the Weimar Republic.. How has a weak currency worked for China for the last 10 years? Doesn't seem like some a bad thing to me...

39. RayAmerica Follow Befriend (9) 120 threads 2,591 comments Burbank, CA

    46   12:34pm Sun 2 May 2010   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike (1)   China is the next bubble waiting to bust.

40. RayAmerica Follow Befriend (9) 120 threads 2,591 comments Burbank, CA

    47   12:35pm Sun 2 May 2010   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   iwog says You’re this nation’s worst enemy. Coming from you, I can't think of a higher compliment. Thank you very, very much.

« First     « Previous comments     Next comments »     Last »