Las Vegas Hotels Book Your Best Deal Now (Advertisement)

"Homeland" is a Nazi term. "Domestic" Security would be much better.


By Patrick   Follow   Thu, 8 Jul 2010, 6:38pm   1,365 views   24 comments
Watch (0)   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

Having studied in Austria and Germany for a year each during college, and taken classes in Nazi literature, I was horrified that we got an agency named "Homeland Security" after 9/11.

Homeland is exactly analogous to the German word Heimat, lovingly used by the Nazis over and over. It's brutally simple, and implies simple violent behavior and suppression of critical thought. (Critical thought means looking for mistaks in what people are telling you.)

Homeland is also analogous to the Islamic term for the Islamic world, "Dar al Islam", which also inspires simple violent behavior and suppression of critical thought. I suppose it makes sense that our Homeland Security department was created in response to an Islamic attack.

The correct English term for internal matters is "domestic", but since that word is of French origin, it seems foreign and a bit too well-educated to our domestic Nazis.

Terminology is important, because it carries spin. By making you use Nazi terminology to even talk about a large part of our government, you've been forced to accept fascism in a way.

Of course if most Americans actually are Nazis, I should shut up about all this.

Viewing Comments 1-24 of 24     Last »     See most liked comments

  1. Done!


    Follow
    Befriend (4)
    159 threads
    2,826 comments

    1   7:15pm Thu 8 Jul 2010   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Dictating by the sword is stuff of ancient history.
    I don't think the remaining regime Dictatorships will survive another decade.

    That's not to say history has seen the last of Dictatorships.
    Really though if you think about what is a dictatorship really is, we're not operating as a Democratic country making free will decisions on our own accord?
    Dictatorships is controlling the population, through manufacturing and controlling information.

    We're being controlled by the Media, sometimes when you look at Obama's composure and expressions these days. Right when or after he's lying to the American people or disappointing them once again with excuses or playing the blame shell game, I catch this glimpse of an idealist. That just minutes before was full of excitement, making outlandish claims that he's going to change the world and make poor people rich. Then right in the middle of his dialogue somewhere. A powerful Illuminati member grabs him by his shirt and pulls him in and slaps both sides of his face, tells him to stop going on like a school bitch, listen up! then tells him what he's going to go out there and tell the American people.

    Would you really be surprised at this point?

    I know it would explain a lot for most Democrats that voted for him, but it wouldn't surprise me one damn bit.

  2. rob918


    Follow
    Befriend (3)
    10 threads
    135 comments
    Pasadena, CA

    2   9:39pm Thu 8 Jul 2010   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    I agree with you that the word Homeland is not a good description and I have had this same conversation with friends. That word conjures up visions of Germany's Motherland and Homeland. The other phrase that appeared after 9/11 that I believe is inaccurate is the "War on Terror"........what is that? It sounds like a war on a noun. The US likes using the word war to describe an attack on something. I don't know if it's coincidence, but most of the "Wars" I can think of had dubious results at best........The War on Drugs; War on Poverty; War on Terror.

  3. marcus


    Follow
    Befriend (5)
    168 threads
    5,100 comments

    3   10:23pm Thu 8 Jul 2010   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Here's a thread on the same topic:

    http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x1434508

    One person commented that before Bush/ Cheney we did in fact use the term domestic security. I vaguely remember that.

    It's weird. IT never really hit me consciously, and I think it may be a somewhat innocent mistake ( or not ). Still it is an interesting observation. I don't know to what degree getting people excited about securing their Homeland makes people less likely to question where that takes us, but I think you're right that there is something subtle there.

  4. simchaland


    Follow
    Befriend (6)
    10 threads
    1,234 comments
    Oakland, CA

    4   11:29pm Thu 8 Jul 2010   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    I've always cringed in my very marrow whenever I've heard the terms Homeland and Security used together to describe a governmental department that operates basically the same way that the Gestapo worked for the Nazis. Combine that with Arizona's new law that conjures images of Nazi Polizei demanding to Jews on the street, "Papieren Bitte!" (Papers please") and suddenly my Jewish soul trembles with wretched disgust.

  5. seaside


    Follow
    Befriend (3)
    34 threads
    696 comments
    Alexandria, VA

    5   12:10am Fri 9 Jul 2010   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Homeland is Nazi term. Mainland is Chinese term. First class citizen is what? Imperial Japan? All those terminology are quite eccentic, putting their own in front of others. I don't know most of us are Nazis, but certainly we're not inteligent or deligent enough to think about it. Or is it just me? LOL.

  6. justme


    Follow
    Befriend (2)
    33 threads
    3,461 comments

    6   8:50am Fri 9 Jul 2010   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Patrick, I was thinking exactly the same as you when the Department of Homeland Security was formed.

    I kept waiting for a political cartoon depicting a building with the sign "Department of Vaterland Security". It never came. Nary a joke was cracked.

    Frightening it is how quickly people forget, and how little history they learn.

  7. cheryl.franke


    Follow
    Befriend
    1 comments

    7   12:50pm Fri 9 Jul 2010   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    I agree, I always found it distubing. Even more ignorant was Bush's use of the word, "crusade" to describe the aforementioned War on Terror. I was appalled. And I don't believe it's use was accidental.

  8. simchaland


    Follow
    Befriend (6)
    10 threads
    1,234 comments
    Oakland, CA

    8   12:56pm Fri 9 Jul 2010   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Yes, the word "crusade" was a horrible term to use by any world leader. All that does in the Middle East is conjure up memories of Knights from Europe sacking, raping, and pillaging the Levant. It smacks of the West's Imperialist attitudes toward the Middle East reminding Middle Eastern residents that they are still suffering from the effects of Western Colonialism.

    It also brings it to the level of a religious war or "Holy War." The Muslims say, "Jihad." Historically Christians used the word, "Crusade," to mean the same thing. Bush was just stoking the flames of religious war.

    GWB and his administration that was actually secretly led by Cheney (who just won't die because he is Master of the Dark Side of the Force and has mastered immortality) screwed up international relations to the extent that it brought the West back to the Middle Ages and created even more distrust of our country abroad.

  9. RayAmerica


    Follow
    Befriend (9)
    120 threads
    2,591 comments
    Burbank, CA

    9   5:36pm Fri 9 Jul 2010   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Hitler used the term "New Order" repeatedly, but not as much as Bush 41 using "New World Order." As far as Bush Jr. using the word "crusade," I sincerely doubt he even knew what it meant.

  10. Nomograph


    Follow
    Befriend (1)
    104 threads
    2,851 comments

    10   10:14pm Fri 9 Jul 2010   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    RayAmerica says

    As far as Bush Jr. using the word “crusade,” I sincerely doubt he even knew what it meant.

    And yet you still voted for him. Twice.

  11. kentm


    Follow
    Befriend (1)
    117 threads
    971 comments

    11   11:23am Tue 13 Jul 2010   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    well, if you're talking about terms and not intentions this will be of some use:

    http://www.newspeakdictionary.com/ns-dict.html

    and if you're interested in an examination of the similarities of the changes to the terminologies etc of Nazi Germany and the Bush & now Obama era here's a book for you:

    http://www.amazon.com/End-America-Letter-Warning-Patriot/dp/1933392797

  12. thomas.wong1986


    Follow
    Befriend
    16 threads
    4,426 comments

    12   12:30pm Tue 13 Jul 2010   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Homeland is Nazi term.

    You guys watched too many Hollywood flicks and have been brainwashed...

    Homeland and Motherland are currently used by all nations as is/was Kingdom by their people.
    It is a common term both in European, Asian, and African nations. It is a term of heritage.

    Domestic is clearly wrong since this is a global effort by many nations, from the west and east.
    We are all being terrorized by extreme Islamic groups both domestic and international. So the
    term Crusade fits well. If it fills fear in some who are in the terrorist camp, so be it.

  13. Patrick


    Follow
    Befriend (54)
    5,191 threads
    6,158 comments
    46 male
    Menlo Park, CA

    13   12:56pm Tue 13 Jul 2010   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    I actually don't mind the term crusade, since the implications in English are not what the Muslims perceive them to be. In English, Crusade implies vigorous united action for some cause. Sure, it was specifically Christian to begin with, and bad things were done during crusades in the middle ages, but the idea of unified action for a noble cause is not bad in itself.

    The word "homeland" is something new in America, with no history to give it any context or implications other than Nazi Germany. It just has an evil aura about it.

  14. thomas.wong1986


    Follow
    Befriend
    16 threads
    4,426 comments

    14   2:28pm Tue 13 Jul 2010   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Patrick says

    The word “homeland” is something new in America, with no history to give it any context or implications other than Nazi Germany. It just has an evil aura about it.

    For those immigrants who settled the West, and started the new generations of Americans, Homeland ment their original place of birth and heritage. They may have been Irish, German, Italian, and Chinese. The term "homeland' was etched into their DNA, but may have been lost it over a century with their offspring. You may find some of the old timers use "old country" today in reference to their "Homeland". Talk to an immigrant and you will find a different meaning. In that context, to fight and defend your "homeland", your country and heritage is justifable use.

    Patrick says

    The word “homeland” is something new in America, with no history to give it any context or implications other than Nazi Germany. It just has an evil aura about it.

    In the movie Braveheart, if the writters used the term "Homeland" instead of "Scotland" would that make a difference? As often in history it is a battle cry to unite various factions to a common cause, our land, heritage, god when it becomes in danger.

    You my be thinking of "Fatherland"... but many other nations did as well long before Nazi Germany. Look at the list.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fatherland#Groups_that_refer_to_their_native_country_as_a_.22fatherland.22

  15. kentm


    Follow
    Befriend (1)
    117 threads
    971 comments

    15   2:35pm Tue 13 Jul 2010   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    and its thomas... I was wondering if it was going to be you or RayAmerica who would respond to that first...

    thomas, find me a place in the US terminologies where 'homeland' has been applied in such a way, in a gov dept prior to the recent use. There isn't one. Whatever the term may mean to you personally its not what the discussion and point Patrick was making and its disingenuous of you to start twisting it to support some point you want to make this into.

    I read patrick's post as a comment on the nomenclature only of the dept and its historical precedence (and lack thereof in Norht America). It wasn't taking things into the political realm or the need or whatever for such a thing to exist, so really its not necessary to go there. But then thats what you guys do, you skip around the issues at hand and try to draw parallels and relations where none really exist as a support for your own personal leanings... I get it.

    So regarding the naming of the dept, patrick is correct, such a thing has never existed in the US before and its direct historical precedence is to what depts and etc existend in nazi Gemrnay before and during the war.

    > We are all being terrorized by extreme Islamic groups

    yes, of course its true, we are all threatened by a great and powerful global network of super killers who rise nightly from their villages, where they have little food and water and often little electricity but they have weapons! and they have the arcane knowledge to use them, to run rings around the multi-billion dollar military effort with hundreds of thousands of soliders & support personelle & mercenary contractors, who incidentally are very nice people all of them and who really have nothing but the really really best intentions for all those people - who actually in addition to being super killers in sleeper cells waiting for the chance to strike! are also much like children in many ways and need our help and guidance, to manage their oil etc for example - but rise they do, vampire-like, with one thought and one thought only: to harm us, in our comfortable and kind and happy lives of which they are so jealous...

    Anyway, just go find and read Naomi Campbell's book... she explores the links and realtions pretty thouroghly... and I do get the feeling from your posts that you probably read too much news and too little lit or sociology so it would be a good thing for you to read...

  16. thomas.wong1986


    Follow
    Befriend
    16 threads
    4,426 comments

    16   2:45pm Tue 13 Jul 2010   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    kentm says

    thomas, find me a place in the US terminologies where ‘homeland’ has been applied in such a way, in a gov dept prior to the recent use. There isn’t one. Whatever the term may mean to you personally its not what the discussion and point Patrick was making and its disingenuous of you to start twisting it to support some point you want to make this into.

    If you havent figured it out, you been brained washed with left wing Politically Correct nonsense.

    Funny times we live in:

    Daddy, did you have an Ipod when you were young?
    No! Daddy had vinyl records .. it was big black, round and its edges were so sharp it can cut your finger...

  17. rpanic01


    Follow
    Befriend (1)
    10 threads
    62 comments

    17   3:26pm Tue 13 Jul 2010   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Putting the Czar into title has bothered me. Why can’t they just use director or something, I don’t understand the deal with these titles that would have never even been considered 20 years ago. What’s next dictator of drugs, king of homeland security.

  18. thomas.wong1986


    Follow
    Befriend
    16 threads
    4,426 comments

    18   4:53pm Tue 13 Jul 2010   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    rpanic01 says

    Putting the Czar into title has bothered me. Why can’t they just use director or something,

    They do. Czar is media generated term. Actual titles are your typical director, advisor, counselor.. etc etc.

  19. jljoshlee3


    Follow
    Befriend
    4 threads
    33 comments

    19   9:51pm Wed 14 Jul 2010   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    meh. Obama could have changed it. Its patriotic, not fascist. imo

  20. Patrick


    Follow
    Befriend (54)
    5,191 threads
    6,158 comments
    46 male
    Menlo Park, CA

    20   7:22pm Wed 4 Jan 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    It's time to resurrect this thread, now that permanent imprisonment of US citizens without trial is legal.

    Consitution is suspended during wartime, but now we have eternal wartime, and the 1% are very grateful.

    Next to go: freedom of speech, via instant and non-contestable website shutdowns once the SOPA bill becomes law.

  21. thunderlips11


    Follow
    Befriend (13)
    52 threads
    2,639 comments
    Premium

    21   7:34pm Wed 4 Jan 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike   Protected  

    While we're at it, let's change the Department of Defense back to the Department of War, it's original title.

  22. Patrick


    Follow
    Befriend (54)
    5,191 threads
    6,158 comments
    46 male
    Menlo Park, CA

    22   11:08pm Wed 4 Jan 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    Yes, that would be much more honest.

  23. clambo


    Follow
    Befriend (5)
    1,070 comments
    Santa Cruz, CA

    23   11:25pm Wed 4 Jan 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    How about: no department of homeland security at all? Just beef up the FBI and let them loose.
    The reason domestic is not as good as homeland is that there are more connotations for "domestic" but "homeland" has only one meaning.

  24. Patrick


    Follow
    Befriend (54)
    5,191 threads
    6,158 comments
    46 male
    Menlo Park, CA

    24   9:24am Thu 5 Jan 2012   Share   Quote   Permalink   Like   Dislike  

    I don't see it. What connotations does "domestic" have that "homeland" does not?

    "Homeland" has the very nasty connotations of fascism, and "us vs them".

    But I agree, we already have the FBI for this sort of thing. The creation of "Homeland Security" was just another step towards a police state.

Patrick is moderator of this thread.

Email

Username

Watch comments by email
Home   Tips and Tricks   Questions or suggestions? Mail p@patrick.net  

Page took 179 milliseconds to create.