Watchwrite on que, we see that foreclosure filings are once again rising in the bay area, right here on patrick news...
So lets see:
1. continued price declines ala case shiller.
2. Foreclosure filings climbing.
3. Interest rates climbing
4. Fannie and Freddie reorganization overdue, and simply put, any change that helps them lose less money means less lending available for marginal buyers, less demand and another kick to an ailing demand side of the market.
Shortly the usual suspects will be along to explain that these facts don't matter, but lets save them the trouble:
War is Peace, Slavery is Freedom, Ignorance is strength.. (they are very strong!!!)
Follow
Befriend (6)
10 threads
1,234 comments
Oakland, CA
Troy, how dare you inject foreign data into this thread? You can't possibly know what is really going on here. See, the Bay Area is the most special place ever. And the "fortress," aka the True Bay Area™, is the most specialest place ever anywhere on Earth. Prices never really go down here. Everyone wants to live here. If you claim you don't, you are just in denial. That means that demand is always highest here and prices go up forever. They aren't making any more land. Silicon Valley is the world's most innovative area in the world and never ever has any decline in economic activity so everyone there makes over $100,000 per year minimum guaranteed. Therefore the fortress is especially immune to any macro-economic forces. If you don't buy now you'll be priced out forever. Listen to the duck. He'll tell you all you need to know.
Follow
Befriend
35 threads
5,700 comments
Bellingham, WA
well, the fortress is in fact different, partially if not largely thanks to the stupendous successes of goog and aapl.
Truth be told, I'd rather live in Los Altos than Bellingham, but damn if that place is not a fortress.
Follow
Befriend (48)
272 threads
12,450 comments
47 male
Lafayette, CA
Premium
Troy says
The market, the charts, and indeed the entire thread pertain to the Bay Area in Northern California.
Follow
Befriend (48)
272 threads
12,450 comments
47 male
Lafayette, CA
Premium
simchaland says
No one is making that assertion, we just happen to be talking about Bay Area real estate right now. Bellingham WA real estate is a tangent.
Follow
Befriend (6)
10 threads
1,234 comments
Oakland, CA
Duck, that's a great hatchet job of editing my post which is only somewhat tongue in cheek. Really take a look at that last graph that you posted and look past the peak. What do you see? Draw a line from the peak to the end of the graph averaging data points after the peak and you get (clutch the pearls and gasp) a decline? Say it ain't so, Ducky.
Follow
Befriend
28 threads
1,489 comments
San Jose, CA
Premium
iwog says
Oooh! I like it when the duck gets all technical. Let's see: chart-reading -> chart-patterns -> Head & Shoulders pattern -> Head peak at 280 -> Neckline at 140 -> Bottom = 140 - (280 - 140) = 0. That's right, a 12 year H&S pattern with a target price of 0 (give or take 5-10%) in the year of 2018. That's technical analysis for you - Mr. Ducky.
Follow
Befriend
41 threads
703 comments
Monterey, CA
Nice commentary Dunross - very creative :)
Follow
Befriend
28 threads
1,489 comments
San Jose, CA
Premium
Yes, in fact the results of this graph's technical analysis point to data which confirms all other predictions, including those based on fundamental and historical analysis:
Low Tier Target Price = 0 (Low Tier houses & land is pretty much worthless in a Depression - even in the Bay Area - see Detroit)
Middle Tier Target Price = 40
High Tier Target Price = 70
Follow
Befriend
41 threads
703 comments
Monterey, CA
dunnross says
Nice work - I believe more colors, especially neons would really help get your point across to those who don't understand the "head and shoulders" action we have going on.
Follow
Befriend
28 threads
1,489 comments
San Jose, CA
Premium
The H&S action hasn't quite yet been confirmed, because the index didn't break below the neckline. However, we are pretty close to it, and if it does break down, prices are going down to their respective target levels. That's an 80% drop from the peak for the middle tear, which equates to prices going back to the 1975 levels (in nominal terms).
Follow
Befriend (48)
272 threads
12,450 comments
47 male
Lafayette, CA
Premium
Technical analysis. ROFLOL
"I realized that technical analysis didn't work when I turned the chart upside down and didn't get a different answer." - Warren Buffett
Follow
Befriend (3)
15 threads
5,606 comments
iwog says
Agreed. If you have to use technical analysis to make your point, then you are officially reaching....
Follow
Befriend (2)
14 threads
647 comments
TA gets a bad wrap. but it's pretty useful if, and that's a big if, you know what to look for when trading stocks(don't know how well it applies to a housing index).
claiming that list prices are increasing, so that must mean sale prices will increase is a form of technical analysis (ie chart reading).
Follow
Befriend (6)
10 threads
1,234 comments
Oakland, CA
Syphilis says
Is it on the same level as when I analyze someone's birth chart?
Follow
Befriend (48)
272 threads
12,450 comments
47 male
Lafayette, CA
Premium
So can we agree that the real estate chart and expert technical analysis predicts a crash in the price of real estate?
Enough wishy washy telephone-psychic type answers. What's going to happen?
Follow
Befriend
28 threads
1,489 comments
San Jose, CA
Premium
iwog says
When you turn the H&S pattern upside down, you get an inverse H&S pattern, which is one of the most bullish patterns known to a technician.
Follow
Befriend
7 comments
What does fortress area mean?
Follow
Befriend
16 threads
4,426 comments
nrc2112 says
It means "Shangri-La" a mythical place, permanently happy land, isolated from the outside world. It started around the year 2000.
LOL! Seriously, Not sure what the big deal is. Plenty of people who lived in the Bay Area over the past several decades never considered some of these towns, or cities as the fortress.
Follow
Befriend
35 threads
5,700 comments
Bellingham, WA
^ basically an area where the only way homeowners leave is in a hearse.
Everybody wants in, nobody wants out.
Follow
Befriend
16 threads
4,426 comments
Troy says
A black hole, where gravity pull is so intense not even light can escape.
Follow
Befriend (6)
5 threads
2,359 comments
A few times a year I look up my zipcode on foreclosure.com to form an opinion for myself about value in my neighborhoods and ones nearby. I was surprised to see among the names of "defendants" someone who used to be my boss (an engineering manager), in a neighborhood where homes are all on oversized lots and are said to be worth over 1 M.
Follow
Befriend (6)
5 threads
2,359 comments
thomas.wong1986 says
It's not the past anymore. In former decades, tech field employment in the region was dominated by defense which required citizenship, so mainly staffed by Americans with the Common Sense about what is a reasonable portion of the income to spend on housing. And besides, even for the growing consumer sector, employment was mainly of Americans because in former decades the H-1 exploitation and student visa gaming the system were not so prevalent.
It's not the past anymore.
Defense employment is not dominant, it's negligible.
In the Silicon Valley area, most of the tech employment is for recent immigrants who bring their own sense of what is reasonable portion of income to pay for housing. Even today's irrational Fortress prices are bargains; Fortress neighborhoods are like the Wide Open Prairie. I expect my ex-bosses' residence, if he hasn't straightened things out, will be gobbled up by an immigrant tech worker.
Because of these wealthy foreigners, the Bay Area and particularly Fortress communities in the Bay Area, is special; and it IS different this time.
Follow
Befriend (6)
5 threads
2,359 comments
Troy says
Not everybody. Just everybody among wealthy foreigners. To them, they are everybody who matters. They are creating a new reality here. It is a different place than it was back in Thomas' day, and it is a different time. It is different this time.
Follow
Befriend
16 threads
4,426 comments
sybrib says
That was certainly true back in the 50-60-70s. By mid 70s and into the 80s (long before even the 90s) it was entirely non-defense industries. Expanding industries in Chip, Semi Equip Mfg, Software, Networking, Mainframe, storage, and etc etc. As they say, Game Changer by 81-85. Certainly higher demand, higher incomes, etc etc. But prices never doubled-tripled in a few years. Yes this is much different from back than.
No! immigrants didnt have an impact. I know that the Indians and Chinese today make a big deal out of their presence in the valley. But that is just egos gone wild. They are clueless.
We certainly had plenty of 3-4rd generational asian and non-asian natives in defense and non-defense for decades past, but that too was not a factor.
sybrib says
OK! let them overspend and watch the prices fall anyway.
Follow
Befriend (6)
5 threads
2,359 comments
thomas.wong1986 says
Thomas, I agree with what you wrote. As our economy transitioned from defense-dominated to consumer products dominated tech employment, in a big way by the late '70s- early '80's, many of those workers in the new industries were former defense workers, Americans with American Common Sense about what is a reasonable portion of the household budget for housing. I was one of those defense workers who made the transition myself, in the late 1980's.
3rd and 4th (even 2nd-) generation Asian Americans are Americans, not Asians. They are not immigrants, they are Americans. I grew up with many of them, shared housing as roommates with some of them, one of them is my partner now, each of my kids has a different one of them as a godparent; and I saw most of them leave along with most of the other "locals" over the decades to places where they expected a higher quality of life outside of the Cool and Hip Bay Area. At my last HS reunion, those emigrants outnumbered those of us who are still here.
When our economy was in that transition you and I referred to, we still did not have such large numbers of foreign students gaming the system to stay in the US by getting a tech job in the Bay Area, nor did we have the H-1 exploitation. What we had was, as you pointed out, a population of Americans, including Asian-looking Americans, who mainly shared the same Common Sense about housing cost.
That was then, this is now. It *IS* different now.
Follow
Befriend
4 threads
261 comments
Fremont, CA
Case Schiller looks like a down trend to me.
Follow
Befriend (1)
2 threads
119 comments
San Jose, CA
Fortress or no fortress the housing in the bay area is way to expensive compared to rent. Why buy when you can rent the same place way cheaper. The price to rent ratio in the BA is far to high so unless rent goes way up there is no reason to buy in the bay.
Follow
Befriend (9)
6 threads
194 comments
Dublin, CA
Cvoc13's website
iwog says
trending upward? I think you need glasses and a Compass, North, South, East, West, the last part of the lines look to me to have rolled over, and IWOG you of all people can't possibly be in the camp (still) that prices are going up, my good man, these prices are headed much lower, and to see it any other way is simply wishful thinking or delusional. WHat is your pleasure? I would at this point go with Delusional
Follow
Befriend
16 threads
4,426 comments
evilmonkeyboy says
It seems no sense hiring in the BA either !! Bugger! Wish it wasnt happening..
but there you have it.....OMAHA!
http://careers.yahoo.com/jsearchresults.php?pagenumber=2&prev=1&next=&crumb=SiUsZARjZhT&sortfield=PostingDate&sortorder=desc&sort=&concept=&action=&submit_x=&totalrec=33&resume=&key=&reqid=&jcat=&city=NE-Omaha&proximity=&datecreated=Date+Posted&submit_x=Prev+15
Follow
Befriend (6)
5 threads
2,359 comments
evilmonkeyboy says
Evil Boy, you sound like another American with a different point of view than the people from very crowded cities in other countries, and they are the ones who are buying. In their point of view, Fortress communities along the West Coast are bargains.
Follow
Befriend
16 threads
4,426 comments
Former Sun CEO Worries About Region's Prospects .
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704422204576130520662465078.html?mod=googlenews_wsj#articleTabs%3Darticle
Mr. McNealy: It's not a terribly job-filled recovery. Productivity gains continue to push the need to hire out. A lot of the jobs today are around two areas: government-sponsored green initiatives and the social-networking space.
I'm skeptical that the green jobs are [going to drive the recovery]. So far, the track record's been terrible. That's going to be a challenge for the people here who stuck their neck out to go green.
Then there's social networking, which is a pretty interesting phenomenon. There's a lot of energy there, but that's not a terribly labor-intensive kind of activity. I don't think social networking is the jobs driver.
I see a migration from the early days of the Valley. We aren't doing manufacturing; we aren't doing design; we aren't doing computers. It's all moving to Asia and other places where there are lots of technical engineers who are willing to work at a more reasonable salary because they don't have to spend $3.5 million on a home and pay half of it to taxes.
I think every new transition has created less job opportunity as technology has become very leveraged. I don't think our education system, our regulations, our government policies have kept pace with the changes that technology is driving.
WSJ: LinkedIn has filed for an initial public offering, and Facebook is expected to go public in the next couple of years. Aren't these positive signs?
Mr. McNealy: It's certainly going to make some venture capitalists successful. But I'm not sure that's going to change the rank and file's feelings of the recovery at all here, with all that's wrong with doing real business in California.
Follow
Befriend (6)
5 threads
2,359 comments
Thomas, I read the article too. He validated his worries with his observation about the players in his adult hockey league not spending as much on their hobby as in the past.
But I doubt that the wealthy immigrants in our region are represented in the Night Hockey demographic.
Follow
Befriend (1)
2 threads
119 comments
San Jose, CA
sybrib says
It really doesnt matter what your point of view is. I rent in san jose and I am considering buying rentals out of state because I can make money on them. On the other hand if I bought a house in the bay the interest on the house would be more the rent.... A property is only worth what you can rent it for.... so why buy the cow when you can have the milk for free?
Follow
Befriend (6)
5 threads
2,359 comments
evilmonkeyboy says
Point of view matters a lot. Just ask the Californians who voted the way they did (Yea/Nea) on Proposition 8.
Follow
Befriend (28)
149 threads
1,398 comments
>so why buy the cow when you can have the milk for free?
Lol! At least for a lot less...
Hmmm...What are we looking at? Still rents at 0.5 of a mortgage payment (with 20% down) in that area.
BTW I would think the "fortress effect" would keep a higher (ave. home price / ave. income) than in the rest of the US, but not necessary such a high gross rent multiplier...but what do I know?
Follow
Befriend (6)
5 threads
2,359 comments
American in Japan says
It depends. You wanna exploit renters in blue color neighborhoods like where I live which sounds like the kinda place where iwog is doing that, well it could be a wash. For Fortress neighborhoods, insanely overpriced.
Follow
Befriend (28)
149 threads
1,398 comments
@sybrib
Lol!
Thanks...
Follow
Befriend (48)
272 threads
12,450 comments
47 male
Lafayette, CA
Premium
Cvoc13 says
I don't think prices are going very far in either direction, but I think 2009 will remain the bottom and I also think that 2011 is going to be a better year than most people think. Real Estate is going to anticipate inflation and adjust accordingly.
Anyway Case-Shiller is obviously showing a slump that has lasted less than two quarters and looks very similar to the one in early 2010.
Follow
Befriend
448 comments
Campbell, CA
What inflation? You must mean wage inflation right? Wage inflation isn't happening with 20% unemployment.
I think you're right with the bottom-end. Mid-high? LOL, it's obviously going down much further.
It will continue to decrease until its found an economy that can support it and/or wage inflation meets it half-way. Oh, that's right, back to wage inflation. Not happening.
Follow
Befriend (48)
272 threads
12,450 comments
47 male
Lafayette, CA
Premium
Do you see any extended plateaus on this graph? I don't. What I see is peak unemployment rate occurring right at the end of each recession, or more recently 18-24 months after the end of a recession. After the peak, the rate falls VERY QUICKLY back to more reasonable levels. (wage inflation)
Now some of you really do think "this time is different" and I get that although I don't agree with it. Wages will correct. The GDP has recovered, business activity has recovered, and hiring will also recover as confidence returns.
The one thing that doesn't recover is the one thing that's seldom mentioned. Wealth disparity will remain at very high levels and will be a problem for decades until it is finally addressed. I expect a more exaggerated boom and bust cycle combined with a declining standard of living for the bottom 90%.