let's say, hypothetically, liquid net worth of $1.5M. single family house is priced at $500k in the city of santa clara. it's a primary residence. the house would be lived in for 15 years at minimum.
would you pay all cash or use a 30 year fixed mortgage with 20% down?*
why?
* only these 2 options are available, there's no option to rent and no other mortgage options.
Watch
Follow
Befriend (31)
34 threads
2,545 comments
San Jose, CA
Premium
SF ace says
+1.
Paying cash now is financially retarded imho.
Follow
Befriend
35 threads
5,700 comments
Bellingham, WA
yup, ARM is good.
Check out the offering from Union Bank. They've got a pretty flexible ARM product if you've got 20% down.
I don't think we're going to be seeing any interest rises for the foreseeable future. The debt is just growing too big too fast for the Fed to be able to do anything unless, somehow, wage-price spiral starts.
And if a wage-price spiral starts, then buying now will be as golden as buying in 1971, 1981, or 1991, or 2001.
Hmmm.
Follow
Befriend (28)
170 threads
4,181 comments
Premium
Pay cash and visit every bank and mortgage broker within a hundred miles and describe in glowing terms how much loot they didn't make on your need to live indoors - and how you want to see all of them stuffed into supermax prisons and ass raped to bloody pulps by HIV-positive neonazi serial killers for their crimes.
Follow
Befriend (54)
5,185 threads
6,157 comments
46 male
Menlo Park, CA
Premium
APOCALYPSEFUCK is Tony Manero says
+1
Follow
Befriend (2)
14 threads
648 comments
APOCALYPSEFUCK is Tony Manero says
it's really hard to argue against this position.
Follow
Befriend (28)
170 threads
4,181 comments
Premium
I forgot the part about concluding the conversation by taking a monster shit on their faces while singing "America, the Beautiful." For added badness, eat barbeque for a week before setting off on your bank vengeance excursions. The turds, they will burn.
Follow
Befriend (28)
170 threads
4,181 comments
Premium
Hahahahahaha!
You mean the filter prevails!
For beautiful, for spacious skies for, erk!, ergh! amber waves of, erk!, ergh!
Good one for you, bankster!
SMELL THE TRUTH, Bankster!
FEEL the BURN, Bankster!
Follow
Befriend (2)
14 threads
648 comments
APOCALYPSEFUCK is Tony Manero says
i have to invite you to my parties.
Follow
Befriend (3)
48 threads
480 comments
Roslyn, NY
APOCALYPSEFUCK is Tony Manero says
I agree. It's either you should pay CASH or you might as well just go fuck yourself.
Mortgages rates should rise to 25% with a minimum down-payment of 50% along with a 900+ credit score. This effectively will murder the entire market.
Better yet outlaw mortgages.
Follow
Befriend (28)
170 threads
4,181 comments
Premium
Now you're talking!
MCMSinger says
Follow
Befriend
1 threads
208 comments
Arlington, TX
I think you should buy gold and take out a 30 year mortgage if you think hyper-inflation is on the way.
Follow
Befriend (13)
102 threads
3,762 comments
APOCALYPSEFUCK is Tony Manero says
+1 likewise. I'm never in business of giving my money away to the bank in exchange for renting their money
Follow
Befriend
8 threads
62 comments
ptiemann says
wow, take off your purse nancy...go figure you live in SC
Follow
Befriend (1)
28 threads
288 comments
South Pasadena, CA
APOCALYPSEFUCK is Tony Manero says
This is way better than "Shit My Dad Says!"
Follow
Befriend
19 threads
1,534 comments
Los Angeles, CA
CD's in the bank pay 1.5%
You get a mortgage and you pay lets say 5%.
If you pay cash you will 'earn' the difference between these two rates - 3.5% return.
Thats a REALLY good return on 500k ($17,500 gross per year).
Or you could PAY the bank 5% for the mortgage and that would be $25,000 per year. The delta between earning 17.5k and paying 25k per year is $42,500 - a VERY BIG DEAL.
Its a no brainer to pay cash unless you are a master day trading junkie and can earn more than 3.5% per year on your 500k RELIABLY every year on average. (these people are out there).
Dont be conned into 'stock market goes up 10% per year' lol. If you have 1.5m net worth you probably already know thats BS.
However there is a good reason to get a mortgage- insurance against future price declines/earthquake - you can walk away free with non recourse mortgage, for a person with 1.5m net worth this is a big concern as they cannot declare BK
Follow
Befriend
35 threads
5,700 comments
Bellingham, WA
PockyClipsNow says
the flaw in your analysis is assuming interest rates remain dead.
I think there's a very good chance this will be the case for the next 10-20 years, but the problem is I don't know anything and am entirely wrong always.
The Fed WILL raise rates if we get wage inflation.
Hell, the a-holes might even raise rates if we don't get wage inflation.
The former is great for the mortgage, the latter will kill housing no matter what, so a mortgage is good so you can walk away.
Follow
Befriend
11 comments
Boston, MA
E-man, why do you say that "paying cash now is financially retarded"? Why pay interest if you don't have to?
Follow
Befriend (13)
102 threads
3,762 comments
PockyClipsNow says
we have averaged about 4% a year gains. I always found it silly that if you walk into the bank they show you nice graphs making 20% returns on selected portfolios picked after the outcomes, when reality is completely different.
Follow
Befriend
4 threads
16 comments
San Francisco, CA
Since I want an income producing unit, I'll borrow. These rates are so low!
Follow
Befriend (5)
27 threads
2,073 comments
EMan says
I'm not sure what bank posts 20% returns, but they should probably be reported to the SEC if they do. However, it's still quite easy to get more than 4%/year gains if you are truly invested long term. As I've mentioned before, I currently have high quality mutual fund investments that have done far better since 1999, despite the 2 bubbles.
However, you have to make sure the investment is appropriate. You may not want to incorporate that much risk for your down payment money, but if you are reasonably young, it's not inappropriate to do this with your 401(k) funds.
Most people buy high and sell low. That doesn't produce high returns, as you might guess.
Follow
Befriend
31 comments
APOCALYPSEFUCK is Tony Manero says
That seems very tempting, but why do that?
Rates are 4.5% today If you are in the top tax bracket, (35% Fed + 10% CA) thats a 45% deduction. You are getting money at 2.5% effectively.
Put that into a Intermediate CA Muni fund, and you get about 3.2%.
That's 0.7% of tax-free returns. (3.2 - 2.5)
There is of course risk, and there are riskier investments, but at 2.5% fixed rate for 30 years, you might want to consider other options.
Follow
Befriend (31)
34 threads
2,545 comments
San Jose, CA
Premium
Fitzclarence says
See cranker's response above.
There are a lot of blue chip companies currently paying 5% to 6% in dividend annually. Preferred shares are paying 7% to 8%. Some REIT companies are paying as high as 19% dividend. Of course there are risks involved with any types of investment.
You could pay-off that loan in 10 years if you can average 7% to 8% return on your money annually.
Just my opinion of course. :)