"But what people recognize is that there's a fear that the United States is in an unstoppable decline. They see the rise of China, the rise of India, the rise of the Soviet Union and our loss militarily going forward." -- Professor Bachmann
Bachmann, like Sgt. Schultz, knows nothing.

Watch
Follow
Befriend (25)
413 threads
6,982 comments
Saint George, UT
elliemae's website
shrekgrinch says
You must stop reading your own posts.
Follow
Befriend (16)
764 threads
7,710 comments
Boca Raton, FL
Premium
bob2356 says
Who knows? She's a nutcase.
In any event, China could win a war against the U.S. without firing a single shot. All China would have to do is dump all of its U.S. treasuries and the run on treasuries would collapse our ability to fight any war. It turns out that smart weapons and stealth bombers cost a lot of money to use. Human cannon fodder is cheap.
Follow
Befriend (16)
764 threads
7,710 comments
Boca Raton, FL
Premium
marcus says
I'd estimate about 50%.
Note to the mathematically literate: Yes, I know that would actually only be true if he used the term "median" rather than "average". But you take the setups you get.
Follow
Befriend (16)
764 threads
7,710 comments
Boca Raton, FL
Premium
Bellingham Bob says
Guantanamo Bay
Follow
Befriend
35 threads
5,700 comments
Bellingham, WA
She's probably right, this nation is probably that stupid to be afraid of the rise of the Soviet Union.
Follow
Befriend
3 threads
2,498 comments
Dan8267 says
So is she proposing we should be militarily (???) going forward against China, Inda, and the Soviet Union. Just out of curiosity didn't the Soviet Union dissolve officially on 26 December 1991 and return to being Russia? Nothing like keeping up with current events Michele.
Follow
Befriend (48)
274 threads
12,571 comments
47 male
Lafayette, CA
Premium
Jay Sekulow......now there's a REAL winner! Makes me want to vote for her even more.
Follow
Befriend (4)
159 threads
2,826 comments
marcus says
It's that attitude that is going to get Sarah Palin elected the next President. People are less comfortable with people that THINK they are smarter, than constituents in other states, and towns, that are a world apart from their socioeconomic demographic.
Follow
Befriend (48)
274 threads
12,571 comments
47 male
Lafayette, CA
Premium
shrekgrinch says
Which actions are those that can be empirically evaluated?
Follow
Befriend (16)
764 threads
7,710 comments
Boca Raton, FL
Premium
marcus says
That's the big problem with hick voters. People should want an intelligent president. The problems the country and the world are facing are hard are require intelligence, if only do be able to properly evaluate the advice of domain experts.
I, for one, would want a president who was more intelligent than me. But, alas, I am unable to convince Steven Hawkings to run.
Follow
Befriend (16)
764 threads
7,710 comments
Boca Raton, FL
Premium
shrekgrinch says
I never considered Gore to be highly intelligent except in comparison to the idiots in Washington. However, he did win the election once you discount all the electoral fraud, and had he served as president, the state of the country would be far better.
But really, I still am bitter that Picard-Riker lost the '92 election.
Follow
Befriend
35 threads
5,700 comments
Bellingham, WA
Dan8267 says
more actually, since ideology can make one stupider than one already is.
Follow
Befriend
35 threads
5,700 comments
Bellingham, WA
iwog says
Green lighting the taking out of OBL. Check.
Signing off on supporting NATO in Libya. Check.
The domestic BS is beyond a lost cause and if the righties on the board were not so intellectually dishonest they would admit it.
Follow
Befriend (48)
274 threads
12,571 comments
47 male
Lafayette, CA
Premium
Bellingham Bob says
Shrek isn't real big on answering questions, especially those questions he begs of himself. Actually answering them would ruin his act.
Follow
Befriend (48)
274 threads
12,571 comments
47 male
Lafayette, CA
Premium
shrekgrinch says
ROFLOL
Shrek: Based upon actual actions that can be empirically evaluated now....
Iwog: What actions?
Shrek: The last 3 years of his wonderful economic policies
That last line is what Shrek considers "empirically evaluated". You can always count on Shrek to say nothing about nothing.
Follow
Befriend (16)
764 threads
7,710 comments
Boca Raton, FL
Premium
shrekgrinch says
Dude, I live in Palm Beach county, the county in Florida that screwed up the 2000 elections. I can absolutely assure you that all the old Jews down here did NOT vote for that anti-semitic Pat Buchanan. You count those votes for Al Gore and that would mean he carried Florida and thus won the election.
In case you doubt that Jews who lived through WWII don't like Buchanan, consider this:
Buchanan wrote that it was impossible for 850,000 Jews to be killed by diesel exhaust fed into the gas chamber at Treblinka. When George Will challenged him about it last week on TV (it is, alas, all too possible), he ducked. Buchanan's long battle with Nazi-hunters is shy of loony but still conspicuous. In 1983 he criticized the U.S. government for expressing regret over its postwar protection of Klaus Barbie. In 1985, he advocated restoring the citizenship of Arthur Rudolph, an ex-Nazi rocket scientist accused of employing slave labor at a V-2 plant. ref
In a 1977 column, Buchanan said that despite Hitler's anti-Semitic and genocidal tendencies, he was "an individual of great courage" ref
No 60-90 year-old Jew living in South Florida voted for Buchanan.
Follow
Befriend (16)
764 threads
7,710 comments
Boca Raton, FL
Premium
And if you have any doubt that a fair counting of the voter's intentions would have left Gore president, read this wonderful mathematical proof that Gore won. It's conclusion:
Evidently, the number of votes that were intended for Gore but that went to Buchanan because of the butterfly ballot is large enough to have
changed the election outcome given any of several reasonable standards that might have been used to count the votes in Florida.
I'd trust mathematics over politicians and newsmen any day. But the great thing about mathematics is that you don't have to trust it. You just have to understand it.
Follow
Befriend (12)
10 threads
3,516 comments
Oakland, CA
leo707's website
Premium
iwog says
Ah Ha... classic shrek.
Is there anything that precocious little scamp wont say to boost his GOP buddies?
Follow
Befriend (16)
764 threads
7,710 comments
Boca Raton, FL
Premium
Just out of curiosity, how did a conversation about Bachmann end up being about Obama?
Follow
Befriend
3 threads
2,498 comments
Because Sherk posted. Shrek can't get through a long sentence without ranting about Obama.